Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Law in China

ISSN 1673-3428

ISSN 1673-3541(Online)

CN 11-5742/D

Postal Subscription Code 80-981

Front. Law China    2020, Vol. 15 Issue (4) : 452-480    https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-009-020-0026-0
ARTICLE
The Legal Infrastructure for Creativity in China: A Perspective of Venture Capital
ZHANG Lin1(), AN Jingjing2()
1. Ph.D. in commercial law, Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Professor, School of Law, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China; Distinguished Professor, School of Law and Economics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China.
2. Ph.D. candidate in international law, School of Law, Korea University, Seoul, Korea; Lecturer, School of Law, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China.
 Download: PDF(399 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A new concept of “legal infrastructure” has recently been emerging and becoming increasingly popular in China. The concept offers a novel analytical framework to explore China’s existing legal organism for creativity. For this academic mission, the perspective of venture capital is developed by this article in that it has been already been convincingly demonstrated by extant studies that venture capital is an indispensable catalyst for the output level of a country’s creativity. The findings of this article are that the current legal infrastructure in China impedes the life cycle of venture capital, to some degree, and in turn impairs the capability of creativity in China’s economy.

Keywords legal infrastructure      creativity      venture capital (VC)      China     
Issue Date: 13 January 2021
 Cite this article:   
ZHANG Lin,AN Jingjing. The Legal Infrastructure for Creativity in China: A Perspective of Venture Capital[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(4): 452-480.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.3868/s050-009-020-0026-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2020/V15/I4/452
[1] NA Heya. Between Tradition and Modernity: The Re-trial System of the Beiyang Period in the Early Republic of China (1912-1928)[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(1): 59-83.
[2] HAI Dan. Institutional Reform and Social Changes in Northeast China During the Late Qing: A Case Study of Appeal Trials[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(1): 38-58.
[3] LU Haina. Adding a Gender Perspective to China’s Belt and Road Initiative as an International Human Rights Obligation[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(4): 445-477.
[4] HOU Peng. Using Shields as Weapons: Third-Party Funding Assisting China-Related Arbitration under Belt and Road Investment[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(2): 274-303.
[5] Yuko Nishitani. Coordination of Legal Systems by the Recognition of Foreign Judgments — Rethinking Reciprocity in Sino-Japanese Relationships[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(2): 193-230.
[6] ZHANG Wenxian. Forty Themes on the Innovation and Development of Chinese Legal Research in the Reform and Opening Up Era[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(1): 2-38.
[7] ZHANG Wenliang. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN NON-MONETARY JUDGMENTS IN CHINA[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(2): 218-240.
[8] Yasuhiro OKUDA. UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF RECIPROCITY REQUIREMENT FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN JAPAN[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(2): 159-170.
[9] Bruno da Silva. EVOLUTION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT: MORE THAN HALF OF CENTURY OF UNCERTAINTY AND WHAT HISTORY CAN TELL US[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(4): 501-523.
[10] Philip Ebow Bondzi-Simpson, Felix Awuah. A REVIEW OF THE CHINA–GHANA BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATY, 1989[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(3): 372-383.
[11] JIANG Dong. DOES CHINA NEED AN ANTI-FOREIGN BRIBERY STATUTE? SOME LESSONS FROM THE FCPA OF US[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(3): 355-371.
[12] JIN Meirong. ANTI-MONOPOLY PERSPECTIVES OF CHINESE PUBLIC AIR TRANSPORT MARKET[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 138-156.
[13] FU Xin. DOING FIELDWORK ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN CHINA[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 114-137.
[14] Razeen Sappideen. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS: THE CASE OF STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 90-113.
[15] ZHANG Lei, Arthur P. J. Mol, YANG Shuai. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE IN CHINA: IN THE ERA OF INFORMATIZATION AND BIG DATA[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 57-75.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed