Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front Mech Eng    0, Vol. Issue () : 13-22    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-011-0201-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A low cost wearable optical-based goniometer for human joint monitoring
Chee Kian LIM(), Zhiqiang LUO, I-Ming CHEN, Song Huat YEO
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
 Download: PDF(576 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Widely used in the fields of physical and occupational therapy, goniometers are indispensible when it comes to angular measurement of the human joint. In both fields, there is a need to measure the range of motion associated with various joints and muscle groups. For example, a goniometer may be used to help determine the current status of the range of motion in bend the arm at the elbow, bending the knee, or bending at the waist. The device can help to establish the range of motion at the beginning of the treatment series, and also allow the therapist to monitor progress during subsequent sessions. Most commonly found are the mechanical goniometers which are inexpensive but bulky. As the parts are mechanically linked, accuracy and resolution are largely limited. On the other hand, electronic and optical fiber-based goniometers promise better performance over its mechanical counterpart but due to higher cost and setup requirements does not make it an attractive proposition as well. In this paper, we present a reliable and non-intrusive design of an optical-based goniometer for human joint measurement. This device will allow continuous and long-term monitoring of human joint motion in everyday setting. The proposed device was benchmarked against mechanical goniometer and optical based motion capture system to validate its performance. From the empirical results, it has been proven that this design can be use as a robust and effective wearable joint monitoring device.

Keywords optical      goniometer      human-joint measurement     
Corresponding Author(s): LIM Chee Kian,Email:limck@pmail.ntu.edu.sg   
Issue Date: 05 March 2011
 Cite this article:   
Chee Kian LIM,Zhiqiang LUO,I-Ming CHEN, et al. A low cost wearable optical-based goniometer for human joint monitoring[J]. Front Mech Eng, 0, (): 13-22.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-011-0201-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y0/V/I/13
Fig.1  Optical mice illuminate an area of the work surface with an LED, to reveal a microscopic pattern of highlights and shadows (Courtesy of Avago)
Fig.2  Optical mouse sensor component ADNS-3530 (Courtesy of Avago)
Fig.3  Supination and Pronation of the Elbow
Fig.4  Proposed sensing system setup for human elbow joint measurement
Fig.5  Optical-based goniometer prototype
Fig.6  Optical sensor design
Fig.7  Arduino Diecimila and interface board
Joint iθαda
0θ190°00
1θ2-90°00
2θ390°00
3θ4d3a3
4θ590°d4a4
5θ6-90°00
6θ7-90°00
Tab.1  D-H parameters
Fig.8  Denavit-Hartenberg coordinate system for human arm
Fig.9  Graphical user interface of proposed system
Fig.10  Setup for PowerCube test
Fig.11  Arrangement of strip and sensor on PowerCube
Fig.12  Strip distance traveled on PowerCube
Angle settingRun1Run2Run3Run4AvgAngle compute
0000000.00
547464748475.23
10929395969410.45
15136137143142139.515.51
20181182189190185.520.63
2522923023623723325.91
30276270284287279.2531.06
35326328333338331.2536.84
40374375381385378.7542.12
4542242042643242547.26
50471467471477471.552.44
5551751451351251457.16
60560557554566559.2562.19
65602597596608600.7566.81
7064263763464764071.17
75684678675688681.2575.76
80725718716723720.580.13
85765757757764760.7584.60
9080579780180580289.19
Tab.2  Linearity test of optical sensor
Fig.13  Mayo Elbow Brace/Optical Goniometer/OptiTrack experimental setup
Mayo elbow brace (MO)Optical goniometer (OG)Difference (MO-OG)OptiTrack (OT)difference (MO-OT)Difference (OG-OT)
00.000.000.000.000
1512.382.6215.820.823.44
3031.821.8232.232.230.41
4547.192.1947.282.280.09
6062.122.1262.432.430.31
7576.991.9973.591.413.4
9090.290.2987.032.973.26
7575.880.8872.352.653.53
6062.442.4458.531.473.91
4546.801.8044.580.422.22
3031.821.8228.061.943.76
1516.751.7514.140.862.61
02.612.610.620.621.99
Tab.3  Tabulated experimental results
Fig.14  Comparison of measured angles between the three systems
1 Luinge H J, Veltink P H. Inclination measurement of human movement using a 3-D accelerometer with autocalibration. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering , 2004, 12(1): 112–121
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.822759 pmid:15068194
2 Veltink P H, Bussmann H B J, de Vries W, Martens W L J, Van Lummel R C. Detection of static and dynamic activities using uniaxial accelerometers. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering , 1996, 4(4): 375–385
doi: 10.1109/86.547939 pmid:8973963
3 Steele B G, Belza B, Cain K, Warms C, Coppersmith J, Howard J. Bodies in motion: monitoring daily activity and exercise with motion sensors in people with chronic pulmonary disease. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development , 2003, 40(5s): 45–58
doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2003.10.0045 pmid:15074453
4 Norkin C C, White D J. Measurement of joint motion a guide to goniometery. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company , 1995.
5 Reese N B, Bandy W D. Joint range of motion and muscle length testing. Saunders , 2002.
6 Electrogoniometer. http://www.biometricsltd.com/gonio.htm
7 Optical fiber based goniometer. http://www.adinstruments.com/products/hardware/research/product/MLTS700
8 Gibbs P T, Asada H H. Wearable conductive fiber sensors for multi-axis human joint angle measurements. Journal of Neuro-engineering and Rehabilitation , 2005, 2(1): 7
9 Legnani G, Zappa B, Casolo F, Adamini R, Magnani P L. A model of an electro-goniometer and its calibration for biomechanical applications. Medical Engineering & Physics , 2000, 22(10): 711–722
doi: 10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00009-1 pmid:11334757
10 Donno M, Palange E, Di Nicola F, Bucci G, Ciancetta F. A new flexible optical fiber goniometer for dynamic angular, measurements: application to human joint movement monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , 2008, 57(8): 1614–1620
doi: 10.1109/TIM.2008.925336
11 Shiratsu A, Coury H J C G. Reliability and accuracy of different sensors of a flexible electrogoniometer. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) , 2003, 18(7): 682–684
doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00110-4 pmid:12880717
12 Ng T W, Ang K T. The optical mouse for vibratory motion sensing. Sensors and Actuators. A, Physical , 2004, 116(2): 205–208
doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2004.04.009
13 Palacin J, Valganon I, Pernia R. The optical mouse for indoor mobile robot odometry measurement. Sensors and Actuators. A, Physical , 2006, 126(1): 141–147
doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2005.09.015
14 Minoni U, Signorini A. Low-cost optical motion sensors: An experimental characterization. Sensors and Actuators. A, Physical , 2006, 128(2): 402–408
doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2006.01.034
15 Tresanchez M, Palleja T, Teixido M, Palacin J. Using the image acquisition capabilities of the optical mouse sensor to build an absolute rotary encoder. Sensors and Actuators. A, Physical , 2010, 157(1): 161–167
doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2009.11.002
16 Morrey B F. 2nd ed.The Elbow and Its Disorders.Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 2000, 43–60
17 Fuss F K. The ulnar collateral ligament of the human elbow joint. Anatomy, function and biomechanics. Journal of Anatomy , 1991, 175: 203–212
pmid:2050566
18 Zatsiorsky V M, ed. Kinetics of Human Motion. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics , 2002, 298–301
[1] Dongxu WU, Fengzhou FANG. Development of surface reconstruction algorithms for optical interferometric measurement[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(1): 1-31.
[2] Hui LI, Likai LI, Neil J. NAPLES, Jeffrey W. ROBLEE, Allen Y. YI. Micro-optical fabrication by ultraprecision diamond machining and precision molding[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2017, 12(2): 181-192.
[3] Tianfeng ZHOU,Xiaohua LIU,Zhiqiang LIANG,Yang LIU,Jiaqing XIE,Xibin WANG. Recent advancements in optical microstructure fabrication through glass molding process[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2017, 12(1): 46-65.
[4] Liangchi ZHANG,Weidong LIU. Precision glass molding: Toward an optimal fabrication of optical lenses[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2017, 12(1): 3-17.
[5] Zhiqiang LUO, Chee Kian LIM, I-Ming CHEN, Song Huat YEO. A virtual reality system for arm and hand rehabilitation[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2011, 6(1): 23-32.
[6] Albert ALBERS, Duotai PAN, Leif MARXEN, Claudia BECKE, . Application and evaluation of optical distance measurements in geometrical quality testing of microgears[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2010, 5(3): 261-269.
[7] Guan LU, Dakai LIANG, . Smart optical-fiber structure monitoring based on granular computing[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2009, 4(4): 462-465.
[8] LI Xianghua, LIU Xiaohui, YUAN Shenfang. Inner strain determination of three-dimensional braided preforms with co-braided optical fiber sensors[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2008, 3(4): 416-420.
[9] CHEN Zhixiang, SONG Yonglun, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Wanchun, JIANG Li, XIA Xuxin. Laser vision sensing based on adaptive welding for aluminum alloy[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2007, 2(2): 218-223.
[10] LIU Guixiong, LI Xiani. A novel decoupling approach to an integrated optical-fiber proximity sensor for robots[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2007, 2(2): 164-167.
[11] ZHANG Deng-wei, SHU Xiao-wu, MU Xu-dong, LIU Cheng. Digitalization optical open loop test system for fiber optic gyroscope[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2006, 1(4): 434-438.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed