Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front. Mech. Eng.    2014, Vol. 9 Issue (2) : 120-129    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-014-0300-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Error analysis and optimization of a 3-degree of freedom translational Parallel Kinematic Machine
S. SHANKAR GANESH(),A. B. KOTESWARA RAO
Department of Mechanical Engineering, G.V.P. College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam 530048, India
 Download: PDF(686 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In this paper, error modeling and analysis of a typical 3-degree of freedom translational Parallel Kinematic Machine is presented. This mechanism provides translational motion along the Cartesian X-, Y- and Z- axes. It consists of three limbs each having an arm and forearm with prismatic-revolute-revolute-revolute joints. The moving or tool platform maintains same orientation in the entire workspace due to its joint arrangement. From inverse kinematics, the joint angles for a given position of tool platform necessary for the error modeling and analysis are obtained. Error modeling is done based on the differentiation of the inverse kinematic equations. Variation of pose errors along X, Y and Z directions for a set of dimensions of the parallel kinematic machine is presented. A non-dimensional performance index, namely, global error transformation index is used to study the influence of dimensions and its corresponding global maximum pose error is reported. An attempt is made to find the optimal dimensions of the Parallel Kinematic Machine using Genetic Algorithms in MATLAB. The methodology presented and the results obtained are useful for predicting the performance capability of the Parallel Kinematic Machine under study.

Keywords translational Parallel Kinematic Machine      error modeling      global error transformation index     
Corresponding Author(s): S. SHANKAR GANESH   
Issue Date: 22 May 2014
 Cite this article:   
S. SHANKAR GANESH,A. B. KOTESWARA RAO. Error analysis and optimization of a 3-degree of freedom translational Parallel Kinematic Machine[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2014, 9(2): 120-129.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-014-0300-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2014/V9/I2/120
Fig.1  Kinematic sketch of 3-DOF PKM
Fig.2  Schematic diagrams of (a) first limb, (b) second limb, and (c) third limb
Design variablesSymbol
Length of the arm of the first limbL11
Length of the forearm of the first limbL21
Length of the arm of the second limbL12
Length of the forearm of the second limbL22
Length of the arm of the third limbL13
Length of the forearm of the third limbL23
Distance of the Z-slider from the originD1
Offset of the Z-slider from the X-axisD2
Starting point of the X-sliderXI
Starting point of the Y-sliderYI
Starting point of the Z-sliderZI
Tab.1  Variables considered for optimization
δL11/mδL21/mδL12/mδL22/mδL13/mδL23/mδθ11/radδθ12/radδθ13/rad
0.00050.00050.00050.00050.00050.00050.00350.00350.0035
Tab.2  Errors considered in links and joints
Fig.3  Variation of pose errors along X-direction in the central horizontal plane. (a) When the dimensional and joint errors do not exist; (b), (c), and (d) when the dimensional and joint errors exist and Y-slider at various positions, namely, start point, mid-point, and end point, respectively
Fig.4  Variation of pose errors along Y-direction in the central horizontal plane. (a) When the dimensional and joint errors do not exist; (b), (c), and (d) when the dimensional and joint errors exist and X-slider at various positions, namely, start point, mid-point, and end point, respectively
L1 /mL2 /mD1 /mD2 /mXI /mYI /mZI /mGETIGMPE/m
0.6900.6841.1940.250.2150.403-0.7060.5780.0056
0.6990.6711.0740.0020.2950.377-0.7120.5720.0061
0.6820.6601.1900.0100.2030.363-0.6840.6590.0048
0.6820.6611.1990.0100.2030.354-0.6880.6610.0048
0.7000.7001.1310.0320.2090.469-0.7150.6320.0052
0.6920.6921.1990.0000.2020.255-0.7500.6430.0052
0.7000.6921.1250.0000.2000.469-0.6980.6400.0052
0.6810.5571.1900.2570.2590.271-0.6820.5370.0073
Tab.3  Optimal solutions and the corresponding design variables
L11L21L12L22L13L23XIYIZIGETI
0.6820.6610.6820.6610.6820.6610.2030.354-0.6880.661
Tab.4  Best solution and the corresponding design variables
Reciprocal of condition number of ETMMaximum pose error /m
Minimum: 0.48720.0039
Maximum: 0.86520.0015
Tab.5  Reciprocal of condition number of ETM and its corresponding maximum pose error
Fig.5  Variation of reciprocal of the condition number of the error transmission matrix in the (a) top plane (b) central plane and (c) bottom plane of the workspace for the PKM
1 StewartD. A platform with six degrees of freedom. In: Proc Auto Inst. Mech. Engg, London, 1965, 180(5): 371–386
2 Koteswara RaoA B, Dimensional design of hexaslides for optimal workspace and dexterity. IEEE Transactions on Robotics-IEEE-TRO, 2005, 21(3): 444–449
doi: 10.1109/TRO.2004.842353
3 MerletJ P. Parallel Robots. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000
4 ClavelR. Delta: a fast robot with parallel geometry. 18th International Symposium on Industrial Robots. Sydney, Australia, 1988: 91–100
5 PierrotF, ReynaudC, FournierA. DELTA: a simple and efficient parallel robot. Robotica, 1990, 8(02): 105–109
doi: 10.1017/S0263574700007669
6 HaungT, WhitehouseD J, WangJ. The local dexterity, optimal architecture and design criteria of parallel machine tools. Annals of the CIRP, 1998, 1988(47): 347–351
7 TsaiL W. Kinematics of a three-DOF platform manipulator with three extensible limbs. In: Lenarcic J, Parenti-Castelli V, eds. Advances in Robot Kinematics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, 401–410
8 LiY, XuQ, LiY M, XuQ S. Kinematic analysis and design of a new 3-DOF Translational Parallel Manipulator. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006, 128(4): 729–738
doi: 10.1115/1.2198254
9 KimH S, TsaiL W. Design optimization of a Cartesian parallel manipulator. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2003, 125(1): 43–51
doi: 10.1115/1.1543977
10 NiaritsiryT F, Study of the Sources of Inaccuracy of a 3-DOF Flexure Hinge-Based Parallel Manipulator. Proceedings of IEEE International conference on Robotics and Automation New Orieans, LA. April 2004
11 WangJ, MasoryO. on the accuracy of a Stewart platform – Part 1: The effect of manufacturing tolerances. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1993, 114–120
12 MasoryO, WangJ. On the accuracy of a Stewart platform – Part 2: Kinematic calibration and compensation. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1993, 725–731
13 PatelA J, EhmannK F. Volumetric error analysis of a Stewart platform-based machine tool. CIRP Annals, 1997, 46(1): 287–290
doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60827-0
14 ZhuangH Q, LiuL X. Self-calibration of a class of Parallel Manipulators. Proceedings IEEE International conference on Robotics and Automation, 1996, 0-7803-2988-4
15 RyuJ, ChaJ. Volumetric error analysis and architecture optimization for accuracy of Hexaslide type parallel manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2003, 38(1): 227–240
doi: 10.1016/S0094-114X(02)00126-X
16 XUQ S, LiY M. Error analysis and optimal design of a class of translational parallel kinematic machine using particle swarm optimization. Robotica, 2003, 27(1): 227–240
17 ZhaoJ W, Error analysis of a serial-parallel type machine tool. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2002, 19: 174–179
18 VernerM, XiF, MechefskeC. Optimal calibration of Parallel Kinematic Machines. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2005, 127(1): 62–69
doi: 10.1115/1.1828461
19 TianH, Error modeling, sensitivity analysis and assembly process of a class of 3-DOF Parallel Kinematic Machines with parallelogram struts. Science in China (series E), 2002, 45(5): 467–476
20 CaroS, WengerP, BennisF, ChablatD. Sensitivity analysis of the orthoglide. A 3-DOF translational parallel kinematic machine. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006, 128(2): 392–402
doi: 10.1115/1.2166852
21 YuA, BonevI A, Zsombor-MurrayP. Geometric method for the accuracy analysis of a class of 3-DOF Planar Parallel Robots. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2008, 43(3): 364–375
doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.03.002
22 NicolasB, Comparision of 3-RPR Planar Parallel Manipulators with regard to their kinetostatic performance and sensitivity to geometric uncertainities. Mechanica, 2011, 46(1): 75–88
doi: 10.1007/s11012-010-9390-0
23 DaxingZeng, Performance analysis and optimal design of a 3-DOF 3-PRUR parallel mechanism. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2008, 130: 042307 (1–11)
24 OscarAltuzarraOptimal dimensioning for parallel manipulators: workspace, dexterity, and energy. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2011, 133: 041007 (1–5)
25 LiuX J, WangJ, 0. Jinsong Wang. A new methodology for optimal kinematic design of parallel Mechanisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2007, 42(9): 1210–1224
doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.08.002
26 BiZ M, LangS Y T, ZhangD, OrbanP E, VernerM. Integrated design toolbox for tripod-based parallel kinematic machines. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2007, 129(8): 799–806
doi: 10.1115/1.2735340
[1] Min WANG, Jianzhong HU, Tao ZAN. Kinematic error separation on five-axis NC machine tool based on telescoping double ball bar[J]. Front Mech Eng Chin, 2010, 5(4): 431-437.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed