Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front Mech Eng Chin    2010, Vol. 5 Issue (4) : 431-437    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-010-0110-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Kinematic error separation on five-axis NC machine tool based on telescoping double ball bar
Min WANG(), Jianzhong HU, Tao ZAN
School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100024, China
 Download: PDF(227 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The theory and algorithm of the homogeneous transformation matrix (HTM) method are applied in establishing the kinematic error model of five-axis machining tool with two-axis turntable. Based on this model, a new method for the kinematic error separation in five-axis numerical control (NC) machining tool is proposed. In this study, three types of simultaneous three-axis control motions are designed for each rotary axis to identify the deviations. In the measurement, two translational axes and one rotary axis are simultaneously controlled to keep a constant distance between the tool and the worktable. Telescoping double ball bar is used to measure the relative distance between the spindle and the worktable in the motion of NC machining tool. Finally, the value measured by telescoping double ball bar is substituted into the model to obtain kinematic error of NC machining tool. Comparison has confirmed that the proposed method is high precision and can be applied to effectively and conveniently measure the five-axis machining tool.

Keywords error modeling      error separation      telescoping double ball bar      five-axis numerical control (NC) machining tool     
Corresponding Author(s): WANG Min,Email:wangm@bjut.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 December 2010
 Cite this article:   
Tao ZAN,Jianzhong HU,Min WANG. Kinematic error separation on five-axis NC machine tool based on telescoping double ball bar[J]. Front Mech Eng Chin, 2010, 5(4): 431-437.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-010-0110-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2010/V5/I4/431
Fig.1  Configuration of employed five-axis NC machine tool
Fig.2  axis rotates with radial direction of ball bar
Fig.3  axis rotates with axial direction of ball bar
Fig.4  axis rotates with tangential direction of ball bar
Fig.5  axis rotates with axial direction of ball bar
Fig.6  axis rotates with tangential direction of ball bar
Fig.7  axis rotates with radial direction of ball bar
rotary axisposes of ball bar0°90°180°270°
A axisradial directionLAR1LAR2
axial directionLAA1LAA2
tangential directionLAT1LAT2
C axisradial directionLCR1LCR2LCR3LCR4
axial directionLCA1LCA2LCA3LCA4
tangential directionLCT1LCT2LCT3LCT4
Tab.1  Actual lengths of ball bar which need to be read at special locations and poses
errorsgiven valuesidentified values
αAY/(°)0.00430000.0042977
βAY/(°)-0.0067000-0.0066987
γAY/(°)0.00380000.0038013
βCA/(°)-0.0092000-0.0092017
δxAY/mm0.00640000.0063991
δyAY/mm-0.0054000-0.0053973
δzAY/mm-0.0084000-0.0084044
δyCA/mm0.00760000.0075965
Tab.2  Identified results of kinematical errors
Errorsgiven valuesidentified values
αAY/(°)0.0043000-0.0005271
βAY/(°)-0.0067000-0.0140667
γAY/(°)0.00380000.0035667
βCA/(°)-0.00920000.0029910
δxAY/mm0.0064000-0.0104455
δyAY/mm-0.0054000-0.0053971
δzAY/mm-0.0084000-0.0084206
δyCA/mm0.0076000-0.0053971
Tab.3  Identified results of kinematical errors using the former method
1 Bohez E L J. Five-axis milling machine tool kinematic chain design and analysis. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture , 2002, 42(4): 505-520
doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00134-1
2 Kakino Y, Ihara Y, Kamei A, Ise T. Study on the motion accuracy of NC machine tools (1st report): the measurement and evaluation of motion errors by double ball bar test. Journal of the Japan Society of Precision Engineering , 1986, 52(7): 1193-1198 (in Japanese)
3 Lai J M, Liao J S, Chieng W H. Modeling and analysis of nonlinear guideway for double-ball bar (DBB) measurement and diagnosis. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture , 1997, 37(5): 687-707
doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(96)00006-5
4 Takeda Y, Shen G, Funabashi H. A DBB-based kinematic calibration method for in-parallel actuated mechanisms using a Fourier series. Journal of Mechanical Design , 2004, 126(5): 856-865
doi: 10.1115/1.1767822
5 Florussen G H J, Delbressine F L M, Schellekens P H J. Assessing thermally induced errors of machine tools by 3D length measurements. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology , 2003, 52(1): 333-336
doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60595-2
6 Inasaki I, Kishinami K, Sakamoto S. Shaper Generation Theory of Machine Tools - Its Basis and Applications. Tokyo: Yokendo, 1997, 95-103 (in Japanese)
7 ISO 230–1. Test Code for Machine Tools (Part 1): Geometric Accuracy of Machines Operating under No-load or Finishing Conditions. 1996,1-62
8 Tsutsumi M, Saito A. Identification and compensation of systematic deviations particular to 5-axis machining centers. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture , 2003, 43(8): 771-780
doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00053-1
[1] Dede ZHAI, Shanyong CHEN, Ziqiang YIN, Shengyi LI. Review of self-referenced measurement algorithms: Bridging lateral shearing interferometry and multi-probe error separation[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2017, 12(2): 143-157.
[2] S. SHANKAR GANESH,A. B. KOTESWARA RAO. Error analysis and optimization of a 3-degree of freedom translational Parallel Kinematic Machine[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2014, 9(2): 120-129.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed