Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2014, Vol. 3 Issue (4) : 452-467    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.06.006
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Healthy campus by open space design: Approaches and guidelines
Stephen Siu Yu Lau1,2,Zhonghua Gou3,*,Yajing Liu2
1. Department of Architecture, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2. Department of Architecture, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
3. Faculty of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Room 3001, Red Centre West Wing, UNSW Built Environment, Kensington Campus, Sydney, Australia
 Download: PDF(7600 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This paper examines the architectural and landscape design strategies and intentions for green, open spaces facilities targeting stress alleviation for learning environments such as those of university campuses in a compact urban setting. Literature reviews provide three prevailing perspectives for physical design pedagogical operatives: healing gardens where greenery and plants produce restorative effects; flexible spaces that accommodate functional needs of different activities; and green buildings that incorporate open space as a catalyst for integrated eco-system. Corresponding design approaches (landscape design, spatial design and green design) are scrutinized by case study. A comparison of two university campuses with different urban contexts is conducted to identify challenges and opportunities for applying these design approaches. For a compact campus, high-dense surroundings may limit the size of an open space and may handicap circulation and accessibility; on the other side, a small open space may provide its users more intimate contact with natural restorative elements and also a more controllable microclimate for physical comfort. A healthy campus should encompass diverse open spaces to satisfy different purposes. Finally, a framework that integrates the three approaches is combined to produce a sustainable design rubric.

Keywords Healthy campus      Open space      Healing gardens      Architecture      Green building     
Corresponding Author(s): Zhonghua Gou   
Issue Date: 08 January 2015
 Cite this article:   
Stephen Siu Yu Lau,Zhonghua Gou,Yajing Liu. Healthy campus by open space design: Approaches and guidelines[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2014, 3(4): 452-467.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2014.06.006
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2014/V3/I4/452
[1] Luis Alfonso de la Fuente Suaárez. Subjective experience and visual attention to a historic building: A real-world eyetracking study[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 774-804.
[2] Ana Torres, Juan Serra, Jorge Llopis, Anna Delcampo. Color preference cool versus warm in nursing homes depends on the expected activity for interior spaces[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 739-750.
[3] Ran Xu, Haishan Xia, Mei Tian. Wayfinding design in transportation architecture e are saliency models or designer visual attention a good predictor of passenger visual attention?[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 726-738.
[4] Xiaoxin Zhao. Game of capitals: Production of influential online architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 670-680.
[5] Sanyam Bahga, Gaurav Raheja. Complexities of practicing architectural regionalism in India: An interview study[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 568-578.
[6] Cong Sun, Charlie Q.L. Xue. Shennan Road and the modernization of Shenzhen architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 437-449.
[7] Agnieszka Faustyna Szuta, Jakub Szczepański. Striking elements – A lifebelt or a fad? Searching for an effective way of adapting abandoned churches[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 277-286.
[8] Vinicius Mizobuti, Luiz C.M. Vieira Junior. Bioinspired architectural design based on structural topology optimization[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 264-276.
[9] Tulay Karakas, Dilek Yildiz. Exploring the influence of the built environment on human experience through a neuroscience approach: A systematic review[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 236-247.
[10] Maurice Mitchell, Amara Roca Iglesias. Urban agriculture in Kathmandu as a catalyst for the civic inclusion of migrants and the making of a greener city[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 169-190.
[11] Andréa de Paiva, Richard Jedon. Short- and long-term effects of architecture on the brain: Toward theoretical formalization[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 564-571.
[12] Anh Tuan Nguyen, Nguyen Song Ha Truong, David Rockwood, Anh Dung Tran Le. Studies on sustainable features of vernacular architecture in different regions across the world: A comprehensive synthesis and evaluation[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 535-548.
[13] Duy Thinh Do, Yuning Cheng, Amir Shojai, Ye Chen. Public park behaviour in Da Nang: An investigation into how open space is used[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 454-470.
[14] Roy Kozlovsky. Forking path: De-scripting interchange architecture at the Ayalon Crosstown Expressway[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(3): 332-347.
[15] Fangqing Lyu. Architecture as spatial storytelling: Mediating human knowledge of the world, humans and architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(3): 275-283.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed