Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2020, Vol. 9 Issue (4) : 774-804    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2020.07.006
Research Article
Subjective experience and visual attention to a historic building: A real-world eyetracking study
Luis Alfonso de la Fuente Suaárez()
Architecture School, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, San Nicolá s de los Garza (Monterrey), 66455, Mexico
 Download: PDF(9858 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The objective of this exploratory study is to discover the relations between visual attention to an architectural work and the subjective experiences produced during its observation. A subjective experience with a building is the specific manner in which an architectural element or the building as a whole are presented to a person. The qualities of the element as how they are perceived and the inner world of the observer are both considered in this subjective experience. The aims of this study are to describe the experience that a building generates in people, pinpoint what has attracted the participant’s attention during each view of the building in an itinerary; and understand which aspects of this selected case study have made it an object of attention. An eye-tracking study was carried out using a portable eye tracker. This tool allowed the participants to walk freely around the exterior of a historic train station in the city of Monterrey, Mexico. Two groups of participants, with routes starting from opposite sides of the building, contemplated it while using the eye tracker. Eye tracking allowed for the identification of the architectural elements that were objects of attention, the lengths of observation, and the points of view from which the elements were observed. Other data collection techniques, such as the think-aloud protocol and a special type of survey, were used to deeply understand the experiences that accompanied the visual exploration of the historic building. Results suggest that the participants observed the different architectural elements for a time that was neither influenced by the route used to explore the building nor the point where that route was initiated. The architectural elements identified as examples of high-quality architecture and perceived as aesthetically pleasing by the participants during the itinerary were observed for longer times.

Keywords Eye tracking      Architecture      Attention      Subjective experience      Data visualization     
Corresponding Author(s): Luis Alfonso de la Fuente Suaárez   
Issue Date: 25 December 2020
 Cite this article:   
Luis Alfonso de la Fuente Suaárez. Subjective experience and visual attention to a historic building: A real-world eyetracking study[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 774-804.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2020.07.006
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2020/V9/I4/774
[1] Ana Torres, Juan Serra, Jorge Llopis, Anna Delcampo. Color preference cool versus warm in nursing homes depends on the expected activity for interior spaces[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 739-750.
[2] Ran Xu, Haishan Xia, Mei Tian. Wayfinding design in transportation architecture e are saliency models or designer visual attention a good predictor of passenger visual attention?[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 726-738.
[3] Xiaoxin Zhao. Game of capitals: Production of influential online architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 670-680.
[4] Sanyam Bahga, Gaurav Raheja. Complexities of practicing architectural regionalism in India: An interview study[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 568-578.
[5] Cong Sun, Charlie Q.L. Xue. Shennan Road and the modernization of Shenzhen architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 437-449.
[6] Agnieszka Faustyna Szuta, Jakub Szczepański. Striking elements – A lifebelt or a fad? Searching for an effective way of adapting abandoned churches[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 277-286.
[7] Vinicius Mizobuti, Luiz C.M. Vieira Junior. Bioinspired architectural design based on structural topology optimization[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 264-276.
[8] Tulay Karakas, Dilek Yildiz. Exploring the influence of the built environment on human experience through a neuroscience approach: A systematic review[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 236-247.
[9] Maurice Mitchell, Amara Roca Iglesias. Urban agriculture in Kathmandu as a catalyst for the civic inclusion of migrants and the making of a greener city[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 169-190.
[10] Andréa de Paiva, Richard Jedon. Short- and long-term effects of architecture on the brain: Toward theoretical formalization[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 564-571.
[11] Anh Tuan Nguyen, Nguyen Song Ha Truong, David Rockwood, Anh Dung Tran Le. Studies on sustainable features of vernacular architecture in different regions across the world: A comprehensive synthesis and evaluation[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 535-548.
[12] Roy Kozlovsky. Forking path: De-scripting interchange architecture at the Ayalon Crosstown Expressway[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(3): 332-347.
[13] Fangqing Lyu. Architecture as spatial storytelling: Mediating human knowledge of the world, humans and architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(3): 275-283.
[14] Camille de Gaulmyn, Karine Dupre. Teaching sustainable design in architecture education: Critical review of Easy Approach for Sustainable and Environmental Design (EASED)[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(2): 238-260.
[15] Yingbo Xiao, Yan Wan, Charlie Q.L. Xue. Performing arts buildings in Taiyuan: Cultural history buildings in a second-tier Chinese city[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(2): 215-228.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed