Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2023, Vol. 12 Issue (4) : 575-586    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.02.003
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Lighting, colour and geometry: Which has the greatest influence on students’ cognitive processes?
María Luisa Nolé Fajardo1(), Juan Luis Higuera-Trujillo1,2, Carmen Llinares1
1. Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano (HUMAN-tech), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia 46022, Spain
2. School of Architecture, Art and Design, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
 Download: PDF(1550 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Many studies have analysed the effects that design elements, such as lighting and colour, have on students’ cognitive functions. These analyses, while providing useful information, do not allow researchers to compare the effects of multiple design elements. The objective of the present study is to analyse the relative influence of lighting, colour and geometry on attention and memory, the main cognitive functions that underlie learning, and on preference. In a controlled, virtual reality (VR)-based experiment, 200 university students (100 male/100 female) performed attention, memory and preference tests in classrooms with different configurations of lighting (colour temperature and illuminance), colour (saturation and hue) and geometry (height and width). The results identified significant gender-based differences, which demonstrates the need to segment, by gender, samples in this type of study. Lighting had the greatest influence, significantly affecting males’ memories, females’ attention and the preferences of both genders. Colour was also an influential element, significantly affecting females’ attention, while geometry was the least influential. Finally, it should be highlighted that attention was the metric most sensitive to design variations. These results may be of interest to architects, interior designers and engineers who wish to create classrooms that satisfy students’ psychological needs.

Keywords Classroom design      Memory      Attention      Preference      Virtual classroom     
Corresponding Author(s): María Luisa Nolé Fajardo   
Issue Date: 27 July 2023
 Cite this article:   
María Luisa Nolé Fajardo,Juan Luis Higuera-Trujillo,Carmen Llinares. Lighting, colour and geometry: Which has the greatest influence on students’ cognitive processes?[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2023, 12(4): 575-586.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2023.02.003
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2023/V12/I4/575
[1] Wenzhang Zhou, Siyuan Song, Kan Feng. The sustainability cycle of historic houses and cultural memory: Controversy between historic preservation and heritage conservation[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(6): 1030-1046.
[2] Mar Llorens-Gámez, Juan Luis Higuera-Trujillo, Carla Sentieri Omarrementeria, Carmen Llinares. The impact of the design of learning spaces on attention and memory from a neuroarchitectural approach: A systematic review[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(3): 542-560.
[3] Juan Serra, Banu Manav, Yacine Gouaich. Assessing architectural color preference after Le Corbusier’s 1931 Salubra keyboards: A cross cultural analysis[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(3): 502-515.
[4] Maryam Fakhari, Rima Fayaz, Somayeh Asadi. Lighting preferences in office spaces concerning the indoor thermal the indoor thermal[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(3): 639-651.
[5] Xin Jin, Jianguo Wang. Assessing Linear Urban Landscape from dynamic visual perception based on urban morphology[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(1): 202-219.
[6] Ran Xu, Haishan Xia, Mei Tian. Wayfinding design in transportation architecture e are saliency models or designer visual attention a good predictor of passenger visual attention?[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 726-738.
[7] Ana Torres, Juan Serra, Jorge Llopis, Anna Delcampo. Color preference cool versus warm in nursing homes depends on the expected activity for interior spaces[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 739-750.
[8] Luis Alfonso de la Fuente Suaárez. Subjective experience and visual attention to a historic building: A real-world eyetracking study[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 774-804.
[9] Tatiana Sergeevna Reshetnikova. Reconstruction of the remembrance: Palace of Culture in Slantsy[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 572-590.
[10] Katarína Šafárová, Martin Pírko, Vojtěch Juřík, Tomáš Pavlica, Ondřej Németh. Differences between young architects’ and non-architects’ aesthetic evaluation of buildings[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(2): 229-237.
[11] Francesco Isidori. A structural project: Redevelopment of the historic center of Wuhu[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(2): 100-118.
[12] Ismailn Mostafa Refat. Sound preferences of the dense urban environment: Soundscape of Cairo[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2014, 3(1): 55-68.
[13] Jiboye Adesoji David. Significance of house-type as a determinant of residential quality in Osogbo, Southwest Nigeria[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2014, 3(1): 20-27.
[14] Hesamaddin Sotoudeh, Wan Mohd Zakri Wan Abdullah. Evaluation of fitness of design in urban historical context: From the perspectives of residents[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2013, 2(1): 85-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed