Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Optoelectronics

ISSN 2095-2759

ISSN 2095-2767(Online)

CN 10-1029/TN

Postal Subscription Code 80-976

Front. Optoelectron.    2016, Vol. 9 Issue (4) : 627-632    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-016-0647-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Hyperspectral image unmixing algorithm based on endmember-constrained nonnegative matrix factorization
Yan ZHAO1,2(),Zhen ZHOU1,Donghui WANG3,Yicheng HUANG4,Minghua YU4
1. School of Measurement and Communication, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China
2. School of Electrical and Control Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150022, China
3. College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
4. Qiqihar Vehicle Group, Qiqihar 161000, China
 Download: PDF(268 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The objective function of classical nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) is non-convexity, which affects the obtaining of optimal solutions. In this paper, we proposed a NMF algorithm, and this algorithm was based on the constraint of endmember spectral correlation minimization and endmember spectral difference maximization. The size of endmember spectral overall-correlation was measured by the correlation function, and correlation function was defined as the sum of the absolute values of every two correlation coefficient between the spectra. In the difference constraint of the endmember spectra, the mutation of matrix trace was slowed down by introducing the natural logarithm function. Combining the image decomposition error with the influences of endmember spectra, in the objective function the projection gradient was used to achieve NMF. The effectiveness of algorithm was verified by the simulated hyperspectral images and real hyperspectral images.

Keywords hyperspectral image      unmixing      nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF)      correlation      logarithm function     
Corresponding Author(s): Yan ZHAO   
Just Accepted Date: 02 November 2016   Online First Date: 21 November 2016    Issue Date: 29 November 2016
 Cite this article:   
Yan ZHAO,Zhen ZHOU,Donghui WANG, et al. Hyperspectral image unmixing algorithm based on endmember-constrained nonnegative matrix factorization[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2016, 9(4): 627-632.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foe/EN/10.1007/s12200-016-0647-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foe/EN/Y2016/V9/I4/627
Fig.1  Algorithm performance comparisons in different noise intensities. (a) S A D ; (b) R M S E
Fig.2  Algorithm performance comparisons for different pixel numbers. (a) S A D ; (b) R M S E
Fig.3  The 172th band image of Cuprite region
Fig.4  Unmixing results in Cuprite region obtained in EC-NMF algorithm. (a) Alunite; (b) buddingtonite; (c) chalcedony; (d) jarosite; (e) kaolinite#1; (f) kaolinite#2; (g) kaolinite#3; (h) montmorillonite; (i) muscovite; (j) nontronite; (k) sphene
endmember EC-NMF CSNMF SCNMF MVCNMF
alunite 0.0731 0.1053 0.0836 0.0772
buddingtonite 0.0966 0.0842 0.1197 0.1493
chalcedony 0.1425 0.1622 0.2921 0.1641
jarosite 0.1990 0.2013
kaolinite#1 0.2297 0.2342 0.3717 0.2562
kaolinite#2 0.3285 0.3310 0.3595
kaolinite#3 0.1337 0.1507 0.2546
montmorillonite 0.1273 0.0935 0.1353
muscovite 0.0819 0.1365 0.0874 0.0945
nontronite 0.0875 0.0881
sphene 0.0868 0.0954 0.3173 0.3528
Tab.1  SAD comparisons for different algorithms in Cuprite region
1 Thouvenin P A, Dobigeon N, Tourneret J Y. Hyperspectral unmixing with spectral variability using a perturbed linear mixing model. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2016, 64(2): 525–538
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2015.2486746
2 Heylen R, Scheunders P. A multilinear mixing model for nonlinear spectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(1): 240–251
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2453915
3 Zheng C Y, Li H, Wang Q, Chen C L P. Reweighted sparse regression for hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(1):479–488
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2459763
4 Altmann Y, Pereyra M, Bioucas-Dias J. Collaborative sparse regression using spatially correlated supports—application to hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2015, 24(12): 5800–5811
5 Guillamet D, Vitrià J, Schiele B. Introducing a weighted non-negative matrix factorization for image classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2003, 24(14): 2447–2454
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8655(03)00089-8
6 Pauca V P, Piper J, Plemmons R J. Nonnegative matrix factorization for spectral data analysis. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 2006, 416(1): 29–47
7 Miao L, Qi H. Endmember extraction from highly mixed data using minimum volume constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2007, 45(3): 765–777
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.888466
8 Hoyer P O. Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2004, 5(1): 1457–1469
9 Lu X, Wu H, Yuan Y. Double constrained NMF for hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(5): 2746–2758
10 Luo W F, Zhong L, Zhang B, Gao L R. Independent component analysis for spectral unmixing in hyperspectral remote sensing image. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2010, 30(6): 1628–1633 (in Chinese)
pmid: 20707164
11 Wu B, Zhao Y, Zhou X. Unmixing mixture pixels of hyperspectral imagery using endmember constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. Computer Engineering, 2008, 34(22): 229–231
12 Chang C, Du Q. Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2004, 42(3): 608–619
13 Heinz D C, Chang C. Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2001, 39(3): 529–545
https://doi.org/10.1109/36.911111
14 Gillis N, Glineur F. Using underapproximations for sparse nonnegative matrix factorization. Pattern Recognition, 2010, 43(4): 1676–1687
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2009.11.013
15 Clark R N, Swayze G A. Evolution in imaging spectroscopy analysis and sensor signal-to-noise: an examination of how far we have come. In: Proceedings of The 6th Annual JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, 1996
[1] Jun ZENG, Rong LIN, Xianlong LIU, Chengliang ZHAO, Yangjian CAI. Review on partially coherent vortex beams[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2019, 12(3): 229-248.
[2] Chenwenji WANG,Peili LI,Yuying GAN,Di CAO,Xiaozheng QIAO,Chen HE. Cross-correlation frequency-resolved optical gating scheme based on a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide for an optical arbitrary waveform measurement[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2017, 10(1): 70-79.
[3] Ning LI,Honglei ZHAN,Kun ZHAO,Zhenwei ZHANG,Chenyu LI,Cunlin ZHANG. Characterizing PM2.5 in Beijing and Shanxi Province using terahertz radiation[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2016, 9(4): 544-548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed