Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front Arch Civil Eng Chin    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (3) : 394-404    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0116-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Seismic analysis of a super high-rise steel structure with horizontal strengthened storeys
Yuanqing WANG1(), Hui ZHOU1, Yongjiu SHI1, Yi HUANG1, Gang SHI1, Siqing WEN2
1. Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Safety and Durability of China Education Ministry, Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. Wuhan Architectural Design Institute, Wuhan 430014, China
 Download: PDF(660 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Horizontal strengthened storeys are widely used in super high-rise steel structures to improve the lateral structural rigidity. This use has great effects on the seismic properties of the entire structure. The seismic properties of the Wuhan International Securities Building (a 68-storey super high-rise steel structure with three horizontal strengthened storeys) were evaluated in this study. Two approaches, i.e., mode-superposition response spectrum analysis and time-history analysis, were employed to calculate the seismic response of the structure. The response spectrum analysis indicated that transition parts near the three strengthened storeys were weak zones of the structure because of the abrupt change in rigidity. In the response spectrum analysis approach, the Square Root of Sum of Square (SRSS) method was recommended when the vertical seismic effects could be ignored. However, the complete quadratic combination (CQC) method was superior to SRSS method when the vertical seismic effects should be considered. With the aid of time-history analysis, the seismic responses of the structure were obtained. The whiplash effect that spectrum analysis cannot reveal was observed through time-history analysis. This study provides references for the seismic design of super high-rise steel structures with horizontal strengthened storeys.

Keywords seismic analysis      steel structure      super high-rise      horizontal strengthened storey      response spectrum analysis      time-history analysis     
Corresponding Author(s): WANG Yuanqing,Email:wang-yq@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 September 2011
 Cite this article:   
Yuanqing WANG,Yongjiu SHI,Yi HUANG, et al. Seismic analysis of a super high-rise steel structure with horizontal strengthened storeys[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2011, 5(3): 394-404.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-011-0116-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2011/V5/I3/394
No.project namematerialstructure systemstorey/ heightnumber & location of HSStypes of HSSreduction in storey driftreduction in internal force
1Tianjin International Trade Centersteelbraced-frame64/256 m3 (23, 34, 53)trussNANA
2Guangdong International HotelRCtube-in-tube63/200 m3 (23, 42, 61)trussNANA
3Hong Kong Exchange SquareRCframe-tube51/183 m2 (20-21, 31-38)beamNAboth inner and outer tube 5%
4Qiaoguang Square BuildingRCtube-in-tube52/177 m4 (6, 19, 35, 44)beamtop storey 18% inner storey 16%NA
5Shenzhen Commercial CenterRCframe-tube52/167 m2 (27, 49)beamtop storey 30%outer frame 42% inner tube 58%
6Shanghai Jinjiang Hotelsteelframe-tube44/154 m2 (23, 44)trusstop storey 13%max. force of column 20%
Tab.1  High-rise buildings with horizontal strengthened storeys in China
Fig.1  Plane (a) and elevation (b) view of the Wuhan International Securities Building
storeybox column Z-1box column Z-2box column Z-3beambrace
1~9B1500 × 1500 concreteshear wall thick 900shear wall thick 800concrete beam-
10~29B1200 × 1200 × (46~30)B600 × 1200 × (42~38)B350 × 700 × (44~32)H600 × 280 × 12 × 20H300 × 300 × 14 × 22
30~37B 1100 × 1100 × 30B600 × 1000 × (36~32)B350 × 700 × (38~22)H600 × 350 × 12 × 22H300 × 300 × 14 × 22
38~47B900 × 900 × (28~22)B600 × (800~600) × (38~22)B350 × 600 × (22~20)H600 × 350 × 12 × 22H300 × 300 × 14 × 22
48~52B800 × 800 × 22B600 × 600 × 20B350 × 500 × 18H600 × 350 × 12 × 22H300 × 300 × 12 × 20
53~57B700 × 700 × 22B500 × 500 × 18B350 × 500 × 18H600 × 350 × 12 × 22H300 × 300 × 12 × 20
58~68B600 × 600 × 20B500 × 500 × 16B350 × 400 × 16H600 × 350 × 14 × 22H300 × 300 × 12 × 20
Tab.2  Section sizes of typical columns and beams for Wuhan International Securities Building
modeperiod/smodeperiod/smodeperiod/s
18.0767110.8484210.5991
27.4911120.7861220.5832
33.7515130.7462230.5614
41.7477140.7443240.5451
51.5831150.7297250.5129
61.0918160.6962260.4942
71.0484170.6453270.4830
80.9955180.6381280.4792
90.9736190.6276290.4716
100.8994200.6218300.4654
Tab.3  Natural vibration periods of the first 30 modes
Fig.2  Storey drift under a unidirectional earthquake (response spectrum analysis). (a) direction; (b) direction
Fig.3  Storey lateral displacement envelops under four seismic loadings (time-history analysis)
Fig.4  Magnification factor curves for storey lateral acceleration (time-history analysis)
earthquake excitationsbase shearing force/kNbase shearing force coefficient
X directionY directionX directionY direction
unidirectional18247205720.780.88
bidirectional27959311111.191.33
three-directional30619339071.311.45
Tab.4  Base shearing forces under seismic loadings
Fig.5  Internal forces for typical columns. (a) Column Z-1; (b) column Z-2; (c) column Z-3
Fig.6  Deformations of each vibration mode. (a) The 1st mode in the plane; (b) the 2nd mode in the - plane; (c) the 3rd mode in the plane; (d) the 4th mode in the plane; (e) the 5th mode in the plane; (f) the 16th mode in the plane
Fig.7  Modal participation factor for each vibration mode. (a) direction; (b) direction; (c) direction
Fig.8  Cumulative effective mass fractions of the first 40 modes in different earthquake directions
earthquake excitationX directionY directionZ directionbidirectionthree-direction
cumulative mass fraction0.91750.91480.98260.91960.9648
number of modes7516716
Tab.5  Number of vibration modes required for achieving a 90% cumulative effective mass fraction
Fig.9  Displacements calculated with different numbers of summation modes. (a) direction; (b) direction
number of vibration modes includedbase shearing force/Kn
X directionY direction
102880429753
203290034112
303590435481
Tab.6  Base shearing forces in a three-directional earthquake
Fig.10  Coupling coefficient between vibration modes 1, 10, 20, 30 and other vibrable modes
modal summation methodbase shearing force/kNtop floor displacement/mm
X directionY directionX directionY direction
SRSS3069730262241.53251.52
CQC2931530473240.77252.31
Tab.7  Results of the response spectrum analysis under a bidirectional earthquake
modal summation methodbase shearing force/kNtop floor displacement/mm
X directionY directionZ directionX directionY directionZ direction
SRSS37424100766712.282.5781.39
CQC20 modes37404109772932.182.4177.62
30 modes37574134774252.202.4277.60
Tab.8  Results of the response spectrum analysis under a vertical earthquake
1 Yi F M, Gao X W, Zhang W Y, Wang W, Xiao W, Yang W B. A study on the application of outrigger to super-tall steel structures. Building Science , 2001, 17(1): 15–20 (in Chinese)
2 Coull A, Lau W H O. Analysis of multioutrigger-braced structures. Journal of Structural Engineering , 1989, 115(7): 1811-1815
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:7(1811)
3 Wu J R, Li Q S. Structural performance of multi-outrigger-braced tall buildings. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings , 2003, 12(2): 155-176
doi: 10.1002/tal.219
4 Smith B S, Salim I. Parameter study of outrigger-braced tall building structures. Journal of the Structural Division , 1981, 107(10): 2001-2014
5 Huang Y, Wang Y Q, Chen H, Wen S Q. A study on the effect of horizontal strengthened story to super high-rise steel braced frame. Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu University , 2005, 27(3): 49–56 (in Chinese)
6 ANSYS User Manual.ANSYS, Inc., 2001
7 GB 50011-2010. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, 2010 (in Chinese)
8 GB 50009-2001.Load Code for the Design of Building Structures. Beijing: Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China, 2002 (in Chinese)
9 Chen H, Wang Y Q, Shi Y J, Wen S Q. Random vibration analysis of Wuhan International Securities Mansion subjected to wind loading. In: Proceeding of 2004 Colloquium Institute of Structural Stability and Fatigue China Steel Construction Society (ISSF, CSCS), Taiyuan , 2004, 153-162 (in Chinese)
10 Clough R W, Penzien J. Dynamics of Structures, 3rd Edition.Berkeley: Computers & Structures, Inc., 1995: 234-235
11 Wang X C, Shao M. The Basic Principle and Digital Method of Finite Element. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1997: 443-482 (in Chinese)
12 Fang E H, Qian J R, Ye L P. Tall Building Structural Design. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2003, 57-71 (in Chinese)
13 JGJ 99-98.Technical specification for steel structure of tall buildings. Beijing: Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China, 1998 (in Chinese)
14 Guo J W. Seismic Design of Buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2002, 50-59 (in Chinese)
15 Shi T H, Wei C J. Decision of reasonable mode number in mode-superposition method. Building Science , 2002, 18(2): 29-31 (in Chinese)
[1] Suman HAZARI, Sima GHOSH, Richi Prasad SHARMA. New pseudo-dynamic analysis of two-layered cohesive-friction soil slope and its numerical validation[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1492-1508.
[2] Il-Sang AHN, Lijuan CHENG. Seismic analysis of semi-gravity RC cantilever retaining wall with TDA backfill[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(4): 455-469.
[3] Roberto T. LEON,Yu GAO. Resiliency of steel and composite structures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 239-253.
[4] Sufang WANG, Yiyi CHEN, . Initial stiffness and moment resistance of reinforced joint with end-plate connection[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2009, 3(4): 345-351.
[5] CHEN Yue, HU Kai. Optimal design of steel portal frames based on genetic algorithms[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2008, 2(4): 318-322.
[6] GUO Zhengxing, SHI Kairong, LUO Bin, TIAN Qiliang, WU Julong, BI Shuiyong. Lifting installation and prestressed cable construction of suspendome roof for Wuhan Gymnasium[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2008, 2(1): 87-92.
[7] SHEN Zuyan, WU Aihui. Seismic analysis of steel structures considering damage cumulation[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2007, 1(1): 1-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed