Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front Struc Civil Eng    0, Vol. Issue () : 332-340    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-013-0206-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Evaluation of potential failure of rock slope at the left abutment of Jinsha River Bridge by model test and numerical method
Zhiming ZHAO1(), Xihua WANG2
1. Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China; 2. School of Resources and Environment, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
 Download: PDF(667 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Jinsha River Bridge is located on Tiger Leaping Gorge town, China. The left bank slope composes of moderately thick layer of slate overlain by schistose basalt, and where rocks are controlled by two sets of joint planes. To evaluate the stability of the rock slope under bridge foundation, model test and calculation model based on the geological parameters and the slope stability was simulated and analyzed using Universal Distinct Element Code (UDEC) and Finite Element Mehod (FEM). According to model test, failure mainly initiated at the toe with shear movement along the joint planes, eventually resulting in the sliding along the slope surface and formation of tension crack at the crest of the model. This result coincide with the UDEC model, which shows that slope surface will produce loosening damage and slipping expected along the joint planes under different loading conditions. Moreover, the result of FEM analysis indicates that the rock mass under the main pier has potential shear failure region. So, the bridge foundation should be strengthened to prevent the slope failure under external forces.

Keywords slope stability      strength properties      model test      numerical analysis     
Corresponding Author(s): ZHAO Zhiming,Email:zmzhao@swjtu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 September 2013
 Cite this article:   
Zhiming ZHAO,Xihua WANG. Evaluation of potential failure of rock slope at the left abutment of Jinsha River Bridge by model test and numerical method[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 0, (): 332-340.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-013-0206-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y0/V/I/332
Fig.1  Location map of the proposed bridge site
Fig.2  Panorama view of the left bank slope outcrop at the bridge site
analytical parametersstructure surface
joint 1joint 2schistose
altitudeN84E/47EN45E/84EN18W/61NE
Schmidt hammer rebound value15.720.224
basic friction angle28°28°32°
JRC2-44-62-4
JCS/MPa11.0411.2911.49
τ/MPa (σn = 5MPa)1.711.752.00
JCS~JRCσn = 5 MPa?/(°)28.3828.5332.43
C/MPa0.0900.1220.099
Tab.1  shear strength properties of structural planes calculated based on Barton model.
mechanical parametersstructure plane
joint 1joint 2schistose
maxmum normal stress/MPa12.912.212.8
critical shear strength?′/(°)28.828.832.2
c′/MPa3.791.863.34
shear strength?/(°)28.826.632.2
c/MPa3.391.313.07
Tab.2  Shear strength parameters of the structural planes based on direct shear test
Fig.3  Shear strength-normal stress diagrams of (a) schistose plane, (b) Joint No. 1 and (c) joint No. 2
Fig.4  General sketch showing the dimensions and properties of the designated model
Fig.5  Figures (a) and (b) are the model of the left bank slope (before testing) under gravity and bridge loading respectively, where (c) and (d) are the characteristic failure of the left bank slope under gravity and bridge loading (after testing) respectively
model material propertiesrock types
basaltslate
barite: gypsum ratio (gravity)37 ∶ 6325.5 ∶ 74.5
unit weight γ/(kN·m-3)2726
cohesion/kPa20.04.0
friction angle ?/(°)3535
Tab.3  Model material properties for rock-like model.
Fig.6  Characteristic failure of slope under (a) gravity; (b) bridge loading and (c) Static and seismic loading
Fig.7  Ansys calculation model and the boundary condition
Fig.8  Results of finite element analysis of the slope at the site area. (a) Before applying stress; (b) under bridge foundation; (c) under seismic force
1 Goodman R E, Taylor R L, Brekke T L. A model for the mechanics of jointed rock. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division , 1968, 94(3): 637–659
2 Manfredini G, Martinetti S, Ribacchi R. Inadequacy of limiting equilibrium methods for rock slopes design. In: Proceedings of the 16th Symposium on Rock Mechanics. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, American Society of Civil Engineers , 1975, 35–43
3 Hoek E, Bray J W. Rock Slope Engineering. 3rd ed. London: Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, 1981, 358
4 Hoek E. Lectures Notes: Practical Rock Engineering. 2007 Edition, http://www.rocscience.com/hoek/corner/4
5 Brady B H G, Brown E T. Rock mechanics for Underground Mining. 2nd ed. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher , 1993, 626
6 Barton N. Rock Slope Performance as Revealed by A physical Joint Model. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Congress of the International Society for Rock Mechanics , Washington D C: National Academy of Sciences, 1974, Vol IIB: 765–773
7 Einstein H H, Hirschfeld R C. Model studies on mechanics of jointed rock. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division , 1973, 90: 229–248
8 Barla G, Brunetto M B, Gerbaudo G, Zaninetti A. Physical and mathmetical modelling of a jointed rock mass for the study of block topling. In: Proceedings of the ISRM Regional Conference on Fractured and Jointed Rock Masses . Rotterdam: A A Balkema, 1995, 647–653
9 Ladanyi B, Archambault G. Direct and Indirect Determination of Shear Strength of Rock Mass. In Preprint No. 80-25, A.I.M.E. Annual Meeting . Littleton: Society of Mining Engineers of A.I.M.E, Las Vegas, Nevada, February24-28, 1980
10 Leichnitz W. Mechanical properties of rock joints. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts , 1985, 22(5): 313–321
doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(85)92063-7
11 Amadei B, Wibowo J, Sture S, Price R H. Applicability of existing models to predict the behavior of replicas of natural fractures of welded tuff under different boundary conditions. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering , 1998, 16(2): 79–128
doi: 10.1023/A:1008886106337
12 Cundall P A, Hart R D. Numerical modeling of discontinua. Engineering Computations , 1992, 9(2): 101–113
doi: 10.1108/eb023851
13 Stead D, Eberhardt E, Coggan J S. Developments in the characterization of complex rock slope deformation and failure using numerical modelling techniques. Journal of Engineering Geology , 2006, 83(1-3): 217–235
doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.033
14 Lemos J V, Hart R D, Cundall P. A generalized distinct element program for modelling jointed rock mass. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fundamentals of Rock Joints . Bjorkliden, Sweden, 1985, 335–343
15 Ghaboussi J, Wilson E L, Isenberg J. Finite element for rock joints and interfaces. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division , 1973, 99: 833–848
16 Bfer G. An isoparametric joint/interface element for finite element analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , 1985, 21(4): 585–600
doi: 10.1002/nme.1620210402
17 Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. UDEC-Universal Distinct Element Code, Version 4. Itasca: Minneapolis, 2004
18 Ortigao J A R, Alberto S F J. Hand Book of Slope Stabilization. Germany , 2004, 478
19 Patton F D. Multiple modes of shear failure in rock. In: Proceedings of the 1st Congress of International Society of Rock Mechanics . Lisbon, Portugal, 1966, 509–13
20 Barton N, Choubey V. The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mechanics , 1977, 10(1-2): 1–54
doi: 10.1007/BF01261801
21 Saeb S, Amadei B. Modelling rock joints under shear and normal loading. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences , 1992, 29(3): 267–278
doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(92)93660-C
22 Barton N, Bandis S C. Review of Predictive capability of JRC-JCS model in engineering practice. In: Barton N, Stephensson O, eds. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rock Joints . Loen, Norway, Rotterdam, Balkema, 1990603–610
23 Deere D U, Miller R P. Engineering classification and index properties of rock. Technical Report No. AFNL-TR-65-116 . Albuquerque, NM: Air Force Weapons Laboratory , 1966
24 GB/50330-2002. Technical code for building slope engineering (in Chinese)
25 Wittke W. Rock Mechanics: Theory and Applications with Case Histories. Berlin: Springer, Berlin, 1990
26 Zhao Z, Wu G, Ali E, Wang X, Kou C. Rock slope stability evaluation in static and seismic conditions: Left bank of Jinsha River Bridge along Li-Xiang railway, China. Journal of Modern Transportation , 2012
27 Pande G N, Beer G, Williams J R. Numerical Methods in Rock Mechanics. New York: Wiley, 1990, 327
[1] Xudong SHAO, Xuan SUN, Deqiang ZOU, Junhui CAO, Chuanqi YANG. Research on an innovative structure of an open-ribbed steel–ultra-high performance concrete composite bridge deck[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(5): 716-730.
[2] Weifeng QIAN, Ming HUANG, Bingnan WANG, Chaoshui XU, Yanfeng HU. Experimental study of face passive failure features of a shallow shield tunnel in coastal backfill sand[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(2): 252-271.
[3] Meng HUANG, Mingli HUANG, Ze YANG, Yuan SONG, Zhien ZHANG. Large-scale model test study on the water pressure resistance of construction joints of karst tunnel linings[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(8): 1249-1263.
[4] Jie HE, Hehua ZHU, Xiangyang WEI, Rui JIN, Yaji JIAO, Mei YIN. Numerical and experimental analyses of methane leakage in shield tunnel[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(7): 1011-1020.
[5] Shimin WANG, Xiaoyu PENG, Hang ZHOU, Xuhu HE, Anqi ZHOU, Bing CHEN. Deformation control criterion of shield tunnel under lateral relaxation of soft soil[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 780-795.
[6] Jiujiang WU, Lingjuan WANG, Qiangong CHENG. Numerical modeling of current-induced scour around multi-wall foundation using large-eddy simulation[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(4): 546-565.
[7] Shili MA, Liquan XIE, Tsung-Chow SU. Model testing of tripod caisson foundations in silty clay subjected to eccentric lateral loads[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(3): 467-476.
[8] Shaojun ZHU, Zhangjianing CHENG, Chaozhong ZHANG, Xiaonong GUO. Numerical analysis of aluminum alloy reticulated shells with gusset joints under fire conditions[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(3): 448-466.
[9] Shuang ZHAO, Kuihua WANG, Yuan TU, Weiqiu CHEN, Juntao WU. Numerical analysis of bearing behaviors of single batter piles under horizontal loads in various directions[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 224-237.
[10] Shuang SHU, Bin GE, Yongxin WU, Fei ZHANG. Reliability analysis of excavated slopes in undrained clay[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(11): 1760-1775.
[11] Xiaoqing ZHAO, Jinchang WANG, Panpan GUO, Xiaonan GONG, Yongle DUAN. Displacement and force analyses of piles in the pile-caisson composite structure under eccentric inclined loading considering different stratum features[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(10): 1517-1534.
[12] Yangpan FU, Mansheng LIN, You ZHANG, Gongfa CHEN, Yongjian LIU. Slope stability analysis based on big data and convolutional neural network[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 882-895.
[13] Shiguo XIAO, Shaohong LI. LSSVM-based approach for refining soil failure criteria and calculating safety factor of slopes[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 871-881.
[14] Guangyu DAI, Fei ZHANG, Yuke WANG. Stability analysis of layered slopes in unsaturated soils[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(3): 378-387.
[15] Shan LIN, Hong ZHENG, Chao HAN, Bei HAN, Wei LI. Evaluation and prediction of slope stability using machine learning approaches[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 821-833.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed