Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (6) : 1390-1399    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0775-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Effect of different high viscosity modifiers on rheological properties of high viscosity asphalt
Peipei KONG1, Gang XU1, Xianhua CHEN1,2(), Xiangdong SHI1, Jie ZHOU1
1. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
2. National Demonstration Center for Experimental Road and Traffic Engineering Education, Nanjing 211189, China
 Download: PDF(26068 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

High viscosity asphalt (HVA) has been a great success as a drainage pavement material. However, the larger porosity of drainage asphalt mixtures weakens the cohesion and adhesion and leads to premature rutting, water damage, spalling and cracking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rheological properties of HVA prepared using different high viscosity modifiers through conventional tests, Brookfield viscosity tests, dynamic shear rheometer tests and bending beam rheometer tests. The conventional performance results demonstrated SBS + rubber asphalt (SRA-1/2) exhibited excellent elastic recovery and low-temperature flexibility. The 60°C dynamic viscosity results indicated TPS + rubber asphalt (TRA) had the excellent adhesion. The rotational viscosity results and rheological results indicated that SRA-2 not only exhibited excellent temperature stability and workability, as well as excellent resistance to deformation and rutting resistance, but also exhibited excellent low-temperature cracking resistance and relaxation performance. Based on rheological results, the PG classification of HVA was 16% rubber + asphalt for PG76-22, 20% rubber + asphalt for PG88-22, TRA and SRA-1/2 for PG88-28. From comprehensive evaluation of the viscosity, temperature stability and sensitivity, as well as high/low temperature performance of HVA, SRA-2 was found to be more suited to the requirements of drainage asphalt pavement materials.

Keywords high viscosity asphalt      rheological properties      rubber      modifier      viscosity     
Corresponding Author(s): Xianhua CHEN   
Just Accepted Date: 29 October 2021   Online First Date: 01 December 2021    Issue Date: 21 January 2022
 Cite this article:   
Peipei KONG,Gang XU,Xianhua CHEN, et al. Effect of different high viscosity modifiers on rheological properties of high viscosity asphalt[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1390-1399.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-021-0775-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2021/V15/I6/1390
rubber asphalt type asphalt crumb rubber powder (wt%) SBS (wt%) TPS (wt%)
SBS + crumb rubber asphalt (SRA-1) 70# asphalt 20 4.0 0
SBS + crumb rubber asphalt (SRA-2) 20 4.5 0
TPS + crumb rubber asphalt (TRA) 20 0 8
crumb rubber modified asphalt (RMA-1) 16 0 0
crumb rubber modified asphalt (RMA-2) 20 0 0
Tab.1  Proportion of high viscosity modifier in high viscosity asphalt
Fig.1  Dynamic Shear Rheometer instruments and test samples.
Fig.2  CANNON bending beam rheometer.
Fig.3  Diagram of the research methods.
Fig.4  60°C dynamic viscosity of high viscosity asphalt.
rubber asphalt type softening point (°C) 25°C penetration (0.1 mm) 5°C ductility (cm) 25°C elastic recovery (%)
SRA-1 87 71.5 42.9 96. 0
SRA-2 89.5 63.9 49.6 94
TRA 88.2 55 41.3 95.5
RMA-1 60.4 55 12.8 78.5
RMA-2 71.4 43 16.1 86.5
reference specification ASTM D3461 ASTM D5 ASTM D113 ASTM D6084
Tab.2  Physical properties of high viscosity asphalt
Fig.5  Rotational viscosity of high viscosity asphalt at different temperature.
rubber asphalt type k
135°C?155°C 155°C?175°C 175°C?185°C 185°C?195°C
SRA-1 0.0275 0.0179 0.0141 0.0164
SRA-2 0.0219 0.0178 0.0164 0.0154
TRA 0.0224 0.0206 0.0157 0.0151
RMA-1 0.0243 0.0176 0.0093 0.0095
RMA-2 0.0286 0.0191 0.0214 0.0091
Tab.3  Calculation results of the k of the viscosity-temperature curve in each temperature interval
Fig.6  The k of the viscosity-temperature curve in each temperature interval.
rubber asphalt type slope viscous flow activation energy (J/mol) R2
SRA-1 8063.4 67039.0 0.9878
SRA-2 8288.5 68910.6 0.9990
TRA 8631.0 71758.1 0.9984
RMA-1 7574.2 62971.9 0.9802
RMA-2 8780.3 72999.4 0.9891
Tab.4  Calculation results of viscous flow activation energy of high viscosity asphalt
Fig.7  Arrhenius fitting curves of high viscosity asphalt.
Fig.8  (a) G* and (b) δ of high viscosity asphalt at different temperature.
Fig.9  G*/sinδ of (a) unaged and (b) short-term aged high viscosity asphalt at different temperature.
rubber asphalt type |A|
unaged short-time aged
SRA-1 0.0335 0.0305
SRA-2 0.0320 0.0299
TRA 0.0304 0.0309
RMA-1 0.0394 0.0395
RMA-2 0.0325 0.0312
Tab.5  The |A| of unaged and short-term aged high viscosity asphalt
Fig.10  The semi-logarithmic fitting results of (a) unaged, (b) short-term aged high viscosity asphalt, and (c) the |A| of unaged and short-term aged high viscosity asphalt.
Fig.11  BBR test results of high viscosity asphalt. (a) logS; (b) m.
1 J Chen, T Tang, Y Zhang. Laboratory characterization of directional dependence of permeability for porous asphalt mixtures. Materials and Structures, 2017, 50( 5): 215–
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1081-z
2 M S M Ghavami, M S Hosseini, P D Zavattieri, J E Haddock. Flexible pavement drainage system effectiveness. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 218 : 99– 107
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.088
3 J B Król, R Khan, A C Collop. The study of the effect of internal structure on permeability of porous asphalt. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2018, 19( 4): 935– 951
https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1283355
4 A E Alvarez, A E Martin, C Estakhri. A review of mix design and evaluation research for permeable friction course mixtures. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25( 3): 1159– 1166
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.038
5 A Gupta, J Rodriguez-Hernandez, D Castro-Fresno. Incorporation of additives and fibers in porous asphalt mixtures: A review. Materials (Basel), 2019, 12( 19): 3156–
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12193156
6 R Jing, A Varveri, X Liu, A Scarpas, S Erkens. Laboratory and field aging effect on bitumen chemistry and rheology in porous asphalt mixture. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019, 2673( 3): 365– 374
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119833362
7 Q Liu, D Cao. Research on material composition and performance of porous asphalt pavement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2009, 21( 4): 135– 140
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:4(135
8 X Ma, Q Li, Y C Cui, A Q Ni. Performance of porous asphalt mixture with various additives. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2018, 19( 4): 355– 361
https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1175560
9 B Xu, M Li, S Liu, J Fang, R Ding, D Cao. Performance analysis of different type preventive maintenance materials for porous asphalt based on high viscosity modified asphalt. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 191: 320– 329
10 L Cong, T Wang, L Tan, J Yuan, J Shi. Laboratory evaluation on performance of porous polyurethane mixtures and OGFC. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 169 : 436– 442
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.145
11 K R Hansen, R B McGennis, B Prowell, A Stonex. Current and future uses of non-bituminous components of bituminous paving mixtures. Transportation in the New Millennium, 2000
12 C H Ho, J Shan, F Wang, Y Chen, A Almonnieay. Performance of fiber-reinforced polymer-modified asphalt: Two-year review in northern Arizona. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016, 2575( 1): 138– 149
https://doi.org/10.3141/2575-15
13 Q Lu, J T Harvey. Laboratory evaluation of open-graded asphalt mixes with small aggregates and various binders and additives. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011, 2209( 1): 61– 69
https://doi.org/10.3141/2209-08
14 Y Chen, Y Tan, K Chen. Effect of TPS modifier on the properties of high-viscosity asphalt. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012, 44( 06): 82– 85
15 M L Afonso, M Dinis-Almeida, C S Fael. Study of the porous asphalt performance with cellulosic fibres. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 135 : 104– 111
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.222
16 W Li, Y Mai, Y Lu, H Li, Y Hong. Development of high viscosity asphalt modifier HVM-700. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2010, 37( 9): 1– 2
17 Z Li. Preparation and research of high-viscosity modified asphalt. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2019
18 J Tanzadeh, R Shahrezagamasaei. Laboratory assessment of hybrid fiber and nano-silica on reinforced porous asphalt mixtures. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 144 : 260– 270
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.184
19 R Imaninasab, B Bakhshi, B Shirini. Rutting performance of rubberized porous asphalt using Finite Element Method (FEM). Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 106 : 382– 391
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.134
20 F Zhang, C Hu, W Zhuang. The research for low-temperature rheological properties and structural characteristics of high-viscosity modified asphalt. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2018, 131( 2): 1025– 1034
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6569-9
21 A A A Molenaar, E T Hagos, M F C van de Ven. Effects of aging on the mechanical characteristics of bituminous binders in PAC. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2010, 22( 8): 779– 787
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000021
22 T Yourong, H Zhang, D Cao, L Xia, R Du, Z Shi, R Dong, X Wang. Study on cohesion and adhesion of high-viscosity modified asphalt. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2019, 8( 4): 394– 402
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2019.04.001
23 L Zhong, Y Zhang, T Wang, Y Ji, P Norris, W P Pan. Optimized methods for preparing activated carbon from rock asphalt using orthogonal experimental design. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2019, 136( 5): 1989– 1999
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7855-x
24 L Li, H Geng, Y Sun. Simplified viscosity evaluating method of high viscosity asphalt binders. Materials and Structures, 2015, 48( 7): 2147– 2156
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0299-2
25 R O Rasmussen, R L Lytton, G K Chang. Method to predict temperature susceptibility of an asphalt binder. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2002, 14( 3): 246– 252
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(246
26 S Zhao. Study on application of new TPS in drainage asphalt pavement. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2017
27 M R Mohd Hasan, Z You, X Yang, P A Heiden. Quantification of physicochemical properties, activation energy, and temperature susceptibility of foamed asphalt binders. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 153 : 557– 568
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.123
28 L Zhang, Q Liu, S Wu, Y Rao, Y Sun, J Xie, P Pan. Investigation of the flow and self-healing properties of UV aged asphalt binders. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 174 : 401– 409
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.109
29 D Mirzaiyan, M Ameri, A Amini, M Sabouri, A Norouzi. Evaluation of the performance and temperature susceptibility of gilsonite- and SBS-modified asphalt binders. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 207 : 679– 692
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.145
30 ASTM. D6373–21a. Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2021
31 D Zhang, Z Chen, H Zhang, C Wei. Rheological and anti-aging performance of SBS modified asphalt binders with different multi-dimensional nanomaterials. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 188 : 409– 416
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.136
32 Z Dong. Research on the composite applications between stabilized asphalt rubber and technology of hot recycling in plant. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2018
[1] Teng WANG, Dajun YUAN, Dalong JIN, Xinggao LI. Experimental study on slurry-induced fracturing during shield tunneling[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 333-345.
[2] Fucheng GUO, Jiupeng ZHANG, Jianzhong PEI, Weisi MA, Zhuang HU, Yongsheng GUAN. Evaluation of the compatibility between rubber and asphalt based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 435-445.
[3] Dongliang HU, Jianzhong PEI, Rui LI, Jiupeng ZHANG, Yanshun JIA, Zepeng FAN. Using thermodynamic parameters to study self-healing and interface properties of crumb rubber modified asphalt based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 109-122.
[4] Aydin SHISHEGARAN, Mohammad Reza GHASEMI, Hesam VARAEE. Performance of a novel bent-up bars system not interacting with concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 1301-1315.
[5] Parham SHOAEI, Houtan Tahmasebi ORIMI. A combined control strategy using tuned liquid dampers to reduce displacement demands of base-isolated structures: a probabilistic approach[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 890-903.
[6] Sowmini GOPINATHAN, K B ANAND. Properties of cement grout modified with ultra-fine slag[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 58-66.
[7] A. SILVA,Y. JIANG,L. MACEDO,J. M. CASTRO,R. MONTEIRO,N. SILVESTRE. Seismic performance of composite moment-resisting frames achieved with sustainable CFST members[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 312-332.
[8] M. BENAICHA,X. ROGUIEZ,O. JALBAUD,Y. BURTSCHELL,A. Hafidi ALAOUI. New approach to determine the plastic viscosity of self-compacting concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(2): 198-208.
[9] Bashar S. MOHAMMED,N. J. AZMI. Strength reduction factors for structural rubbercrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2014, 8(3): 270-281.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed