Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (5) : 600-614    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0821-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Effect of cavity defect on the triaxial mechanical properties of high-performance concrete
Yanbin ZHANG, Zhe WANG(), Mingyu FENG
School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing100044, China
 Download: PDF(8705 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The stress concentration of pipe structure or cavity defect has a great effect on the mechanical properties of the high-performance concrete (HPC) members in deep underground locations. However, the behaviour of HPC with cavities under triaxial compression is not understood, especially when pressurized liquid flows into the fractures from the cavity. This study aims to investigate the effect of the cavity and the confining pressure on the failure mechanisms, strengths, and deformation properties of HPC with a new experimental scheme. In this experiment, the pressurized liquid can only contact the surface of the sample in the cavity, while the other surfaces are isolated from the pressurized liquid. To further explore the effect of the cavity, the same experiments are also conducted on sealed and unsealed intact samples without a cavity. The failure modes and stress-strain curves of all types of the samples are presented. Under various confining pressures, all the samples with a cavity suffer shear failure, and there are always secondary tensile fractures initiating from the cavity sidewall. Additionally, it can be determined from the failure modes and the stress-strain curves that the shear fractures result from the sidewall failure. Based on the different effects of the cavity on the lateral deformations in different directions, the initiation of the sidewall fracture is well predicted. The experimental results show that both the increase of the confining pressure and the decrease of the cavity size are conducive to the initiation of sidewall fracture. Moreover, the cavity weakens the strength of the sample, and this study gives a modified Power-law criterion in which the cavity size is added as an impact factor to predict the strength of the sample.

Keywords high-performance concrete      cavity      conventional triaxial compression      pressurized liquid      modified power-law criterion     
Corresponding Author(s): Zhe WANG   
About author:

Tongcan Cui and Yizhe Hou contributed equally to this work.

Just Accepted Date: 15 April 2022   Online First Date: 30 June 2022    Issue Date: 30 August 2022
 Cite this article:   
Yanbin ZHANG,Zhe WANG,Mingyu FENG. Effect of cavity defect on the triaxial mechanical properties of high-performance concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 600-614.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-022-0821-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2022/V16/I5/600
cement material quartz powder quartz sand admixture
cement silica fume water water reducer defoamer
1 0.18 0.27 1 0.2 0.018 0.001
Tab.1  Mix proportions of the samples
Fig.1  The assembly of the sample and the force diagram: (a) force diagram of the sample; (b) assembly of the sample. Note: l1 = 175 mm, l2 = 70.7 mm, l3 = 41 mm; q is the axial load; p is the confining pressure; the cavity axis is parallel to l3.
dh (mm) sample sealing condition
0 SPI all the surfaces fully sealed
0 UPI all the surfaces not sealed
2 SPH2 the pressurized liquid could flow into the cavity, while the other surfaces of the sample were sealed
5 SPH5
7 SPH7
10 SPH10
Tab.2  Types of the sample
Fig.2  Failure patterns of SPI, UPI and SPH.
Fig.3  Failure pattern of the intact sample under uniaxial compression.
Fig.4  Schematic diagram of the failure mechanism for SPI.
Fig.5  Schematic diagram of the failure mechanism for UPI. Note: The red arrows indicate the pressure of the liquid.
Fig.6  Schematic diagram of the failure mechanism for SPH.
Fig.7  qε1 curves and ε2ε1 curves for SPI and SPH. (a) p = 5 MPa; (b) p = 10 MPa; (c) p = 20 MPa; (d) p = 40 MPa; (e) p = 70 MPa. Note: Curves of the same color refer to the same sample and the vertical dashed line corresponds to the peak stress.
Fig.8  qε1 curves and ε2ε1 curves of UPI. Note: Curves of the same color refer to the same sample and the vertical dashed lines correspond to the axial peak stress.
p (MPa) axial peak stress (MPa)
SPI UPI SPH2 SPH5 SPH7 SPH10
0 140.1 140.1
0 146.3 146.3
0 139.8 139.8
5 177.3 163.3 175.847 179.3116 175.9208 156.8198
5 183.5 159.1 184.1258 181.9131 167.5052 162.3003
5 169.8 155.9
10 212.1 191 211.9001 208.3154 201.6341 186.669
10 216.2 189.2 223.3365 210.718 192.5688 193.1564
10 214.1
20 251.4 230.1 254.8578 236.8297 230.2449 210.3614
20 247 225.3 252.3076 245.208 238.378 210.3417
20 252.7 225.8
40 319.5 247.3 322.6123 292.1734 288.4725 265.5269
40 326.3 249.1 316.6082 292.0641 294.1774 264.7601
40 235.4
70 392 295.1 386.0612 361.7528 346.8041 329.3212
70 369.3 296.2 379.6329 350.6812 348.8799 327.4678
70 391.2 318.4
Tab.3  The axial peak stress of SPI, UPI, and SPH
Fig.9  The axial peak stresses and the corresponding axial strains. (a) σ1udh; (b) ε1udh. Note: The horizontal dashed lines correspond to the peak axial stress of UPI. σ1u is the axial peak stress; ε1u is the axial strain at peak stress.
Fig.10  qε1 curves, εvε1 curves, ε2ε1 curves and ε3ε1 curves of SPH and SPI. (a) p = 5 MPa; (b) p = 10 MPa; (c) p = 20 MPa; (d) p = 40 MPa; (e) p = 70 MPa. Note: Curves of the same color refer to the same sample; the vertical dashed lines correspond to the peak points of the εvε1 curves; the points where the ε2ε1 and ε3ε1 curves diverge are marked with black dots; εv is the volumetric strain of the sample.
Fig.11  The crack initiation stress and the crack damage threshold. (a)σcidh; (b)σcddh.
1 M M Kassim, S A Ahmad. Strength evaluation of concrete columns with cross-sectional holes. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2018, 23( 4): 04018027
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000391
2 M F Tahir, F Shabbir, A Ahmad, N Ejaz. Experimental and numerical investigation of transverse circular holes on load-carrying capacity of RC columns. Civil Engineering (Shiraz), 2021, 45( 2): 683– 696
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00372-2
3 M E Lotfy. Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete columns with holes. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 2013, 3( 3): 655– 668
4 H Haeri, A Khaloo, M F Marji. Fracture analyses of different pre-holed concrete specimens under compression. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2015, 31( 6): 855– 870
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-015-0436-3
5 K S Son, K Pilakoutas, K Neocleous. Behaviour of concrete columns with drilled holes. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2006, 58( 7): 411– 419
https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2006.58.7.411
6 A Fantilli, H Mihashi, P Vallini, B Chiaia. The ductile behavior of high-performance concrete in compression. Archives of Civil Engineering, 2010, 56( 1): 3– 18
https://doi.org/10.2478/v.10169-010-0001-1
7 E M Williams, S S Graham, S A Akers, P A Reed, T S Rushing. Constitutive property behavior of an ultra-high-performance concrete with and without steel fibers. Computers and Concrete, 2010, 7( 2): 191– 202
https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2010.7.2.191
8 G Vankirk, W Heard, A Frank, M Hammons, J Roth. Residual structural capacity of a high-performance concrete. Dynamic Behavior of Materials, 2019, 1 : 233– 236
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95089-1_42
9 R Sovják, F Vogel, B Beckmann. Triaxial compressive strength of ultra-high-performance concrete. Acta Polytechnica, 2013, 53( 6): 901– 905
https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2013.53.0901
10 A Noori, M Shekarchi, M Moradian, M Moosavi. Behavior of steel fiber-reinforced cementitious mortar and high-performance concrete in triaxial loading. ACI Materials Journal, 2015, 112( 1): 95– 103
https://doi.org/10.14359/51686837
11 Z R Yu X Qin M Z An. Experimental research on the conventional triaxial compressive properties of reactive powder concrete. China Railway Science, 2012, 33(2): 38− 42 (in Chinese)
12 L C Wu Z Wang D Liu H H Zhu Y Lu L Lin. Effect of Confining pressure and steel fiber volume content on mechanical property of reactive powder concrete. Journal of Building Materials, 2018, 21(2): 208− 215 (in Chinese)
13 Y B Zhang, Z Wang. Effect of pressurized oil on the mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2020, 18( 12): 743– 752
https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.18.743
14 J Ren, X Ge. Computerized tomography examination of damage tests on rocks under triaxial compression. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2004, 37( 1): 83– 93
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-003-0007-y
15 B Haimson, I Song. Laboratory study of borehole breakouts in Cordova Cream: A case of shear failure mechanism. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1993, 30( 7): 1047– 1056
https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)90070-T
16 M Lee, B Haimson. Laboratory study of borehole breakouts in Lac du Bonnet granite: A case of extensile failure mechanism. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1993, 30( 7): 1039– 1045
https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)90069-P
17 D S Cheon, S Jeon, C Park, C Ryu. An experimental study on the brittle failure under true triaxial conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2006, 21( 3−4): 448– 449
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.087
18 D S Cheon, S Jeon, C Park, W K Song, E S Park. Characterization of brittle failure using physical model experiments under polyaxial stress conditions. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48( 1): 152– 160
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.10.001
19 B Haimson. Micromechanisms of borehole instability leading to breakouts in rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44( 2): 157– 173
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.06.002
20 T B Li, X F Wang, L B Meng. A physical simulation test for the rockburst in tunnels. Journal of Mountain Science, 2011, 8( 2): 278– 285
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-011-2116-5
21 M C He, H M Xia, X N Jia, W L Gong, F Zhao, K Y Liang. Studies on classification, criteria and control of rockbursts. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 4( 2): 97– 114
https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1235.2012.00097
22 A Kusui, E Villaescusa, T Funatsu. Mechanical behaviour of scaled-down unsupported tunnel walls in hard rock under high stress. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 60 : 30– 40
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.07.012
23 E Hoek. Rock Fracture under Static Stress Conditions. CSIR Report MEG 383. 1965
24 H Wu, G Y Zhao, W Z Liang. Investigation of cracking behavior and mechanism of sandstone specimens with a hole under compression. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2019, 163 : 105084
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105084
25 H H Einstein, G B Baecher, R C Hirschfeld. The effect of size on the strength of brittle rock. International Society of Rock Mechanics, 1970, 7– 13
26 B J Carter, E Z Lajtai, A Petukhov. Primary and remote fracture around underground cavities. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1991, 15( 1): 21– 40
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610150103
27 B J Carter. Size and stress gradients effects on fracture around cavities. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1992, 25( 3): 167– 186
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019710
28 V Nesetova, E Z Lajtai. Fracture from compressive stress concentrations around elastic flaws. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1973, 10( 4): 265– 284
https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(73)90038-7
29 S W Zhou, X Y Zhuang, H H Zhu, T Rabczuk. Phase field modelling of crack propagation, branching and coalescence in rocks. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 96 : 174– 192
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.04.011
30 S W Zhou, X Y Zhuang, T Rabczuk. Phase field modeling of brittle compressive-shear fractures in rock-like materials: A new driving force and a hybrid formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 355( 1): 729– 752
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.06.021
31 S W Zhou, T Rabczuk, X Y Zhuang. Phase field modeling of quasi-static and dynamic crack propagation: COMSOL implementation and case studies. Advances in Engineering Software, 2018, 122 : 31– 49
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.03.012
32 P Richard, M Cheyrezy. Composition of reactive powder concretes. Cement and Concrete Research, 1995, 25( 7): 1501– 1511
https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00144-2
33 P C Aïtcin. Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2016, 503– 523
34 K L Scrivener, A Bentur, P Pratt. Quantitative characterization of the transition zone in high strength concretes. Advances in Cement Research, 1988, 1( 4): 230– 237
https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.1988.1.4.230
35 K L Scrivener, A K Crumbie, P Laugesen. The interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between cement paste and aggregate in concrete. Interface Science, 2004, 12( 4): 411– 421
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:INTS.0000042339.92990.4c
36 C M Tam, V W Y Tam, K M Ng. Assessing drying shrinkage and water permeability of reactive powder concrete produced in Hong Kong. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 26( 1): 79– 89
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.05.006
37 N Roux, C Andrade, M A Sanjuan. Experimental study of durability of reactive powder concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 1996, 8( 1): 1– 6
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1996)8:1(1
38 Z Li L D Huang. Research on durability of reactive powder concrete with steel-fiber. Municipal Engineering Technology, 2005, 23(4): 255− 257 (in Chinese)
39 S Nemat-Nasser, H Horii. Compression-induced nonplanar crack extension with application to splitting, exfoliation, and rockburst. Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth, 1982, 87( B8): 6805– 6821
https://doi.org/10.1029/JB087iB08p06805
40 H Horii, S Nemat-Nasser. Compression-induced microcrack growth in brittle solids: Axial splitting and shear failure. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1985, 90( B4): 3105– 3125
https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB04p03105
41 H Horii, S Nemat-Nasser. Brittle failure in compression: Splitting, faulting and brittle-ductile transition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1986, 319( 1549): 337– 374
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1986.0101
42 F E Richart A Brandtzaeg R L Brown. A study of the failure of concrete under combined compressive stresses. In: Bulletin No. 185, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, 1928
43 A Noori, M Shekarchi, M Moradian, M Moosavi. Behavior of steel fiber-reinforced cementitious mortar and high-performance concrete in triaxial loading. ACI Materials Journal, 2015, 112( 1): 95– 103
https://doi.org/10.14359/51686837
44 G M Ren, H Wu, Q Fang, J Z Liu, Z M Gong. Triaxial compressive behavior of UHPCC and applications in the projectile impact analyses. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 113 : 1– 14
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.227
45 H L Wang, Q B Li. Prediction of elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio for unsaturated concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2007, 44( 5): 1370– 1379
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.028
46 C D Martin, N A Chandler. The progressive fracture of Lac du Bonnet granite. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1994, 31( 6): 643– 659
https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(94)90005-1
47 J Zhao, X T Feng, X W Zhang, Y Zhang, Y Y Zhou, C X Yang. Brittle-ductile transition and failure mechanism of Jinping marble under true triaxial compression. Engineering Geology, 2018, 232 : 160– 170
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.008
48 D Y Li, Z Sun, T Xie, X B Li, P G Ranjith. Energy evolution characteristics of hard rock during triaxial failure with different loading and unloading path. Engineering Geology, 2017, 228 : 270– 281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.08.006
49 Y H Huang, S Q Yang, W L Tian. Crack coalescence behavior of sandstone specimen containing two pre-existing flaws under different confining pressures. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 99 : 118– 130
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.11.013
50 G B Zhang, W Q Zhang, H L Wang, C Jia, K Liu, X Yu, X Song. Microscopic failure mechanism analysis of sandstone under triaxial compression. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2019, 37( 2): 683– 690
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0638-0
51 S Q Yang, B Hu, W L Tian. Effect of high temperature damage on triaxial mechanical failure behavior of sandstone specimens containing a single fissure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 233 : 107066
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107066
[1] Li JIA, Zhi FANG, Maurizio GUADAGNINI, Kypros PILAKOUTAS, Zhengmeng HUANG. Shear behavior of ultra-high-performance concrete beams prestressed with external carbon fiber-reinforced polymer tendons[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1426-1440.
[2] Dajun YUAN, Weiping LUO, Dalong JIN, Ping LU. Hydraulic fracturing pressure of concentric double-layered cylinder in cohesive soil[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 937-947.
[3] Hui ZHANG, Zhixiang ZHANG, Peiwei GAO, Lei CUI, Youqiang PAN, Kuan LI. Performance of steel bridge deck pavement structure with ultra high performance concrete based on resin bonding[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 895-904.
[4] Shuwen DENG, Xudong SHAO, Xudong ZHAO, Yang WANG, Yan WANG. Precast steel–UHPC lightweight composite bridge for accelerated bridge construction[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 364-377.
[5] Eric N. LANDIS, Roman KRAVCHUK, Dmitry LOSHKOV. Experimental investigations of internal energy dissipation during fracture of fiber-reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 190-200.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed