Impacts of inter-sectoral trade on carbon emissions—a case of China in 2007

doi:10.1007/s11783-012-0396-9

Front Envir Sci Eng

0, Vol.

Issue () : 387-402 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0396-9

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Impacts of inter-sectoral trade on carbon emissions—a case of China in 2007

Xiuqi FANG¹, Benyong WEI²(

), Yuan WANG³

1. School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 2. Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China; 3. School of Environment Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Download: PDF(271 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

With the increase in international trade, more attention has been given to quantifying the impacts of international trade on energy use and carbon emissions. Input-output analysis is a suitable tool for assessing resources or pollutants embodied in trade and it has become a critical tool for performing such analysis. This study estimated the national and sectoral carbon emissions embodied in Chinese international trade using the latest available China input-output table of 2007. The results showed that a significant exporting behavior of embodied carbon emissions existed in China’s trade. Over 1/3 of the emissions in Chinese domestic production processes were generated for exports in 2007. The net balance of emissions embodied in exports and imports accounted for nearly 30% of China’s domestic emissions, which means that any policy made to increase the exports would result in a significant growth of China’s domestic emissions. Since over half of China’s export trade is processing trade, the re-exported emissions could not be overlooked; otherwise, it would hard to capture the actual emissions generated abroad to obtain China’s domestic consumption. The enlargement of export scale is a primary driven factor to the rapid growth of China’s exported emissions. It is necessary for China to adjust its economic and industrial structure to reduce the dependence of economic growth on the export trade. However, when adjusting industry structures or making policies on carbon emission reduction, it will be more reasonable to consider the relationship between production and consumption, rather than just focus on the emission values of sectors’ direct production, as a large part of carbon emissions emitted by the principal direct polluters were generated to obtain the products which were required by other sectors.

Keywords international trade carbon emissions input-output analysis China

Corresponding Author(s): WEI Benyong,Email:bywei1982@163.com

Issue Date: 01 June 2012

Cite this article:

Xiuqi FANG,Benyong WEI,Yuan WANG. Impacts of inter-sectoral trade on carbon emissions—a case of China in 2007[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 0, (): 387-402.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-012-0396-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y0/V/I/387

Tab.1 The basic structure of input-output table

Fig.1 Emissions in China’s domestic consumption and exports in 2007 (Mtce)

Fig.2 Domestic emissions and imported emissions of China in 2007 (Mtce)

sectors	direct emissions	domestic emissions	total emissions	total imported emissions	actual imported emissions	re-exported emissions	total exported emissions	domestic exported emissions	BEET	CdFd	CdCt/%	CmzCtm/%	CzCm
BoldItalic^d/Mtce	BoldItalic^d/Mtce	BoldItalic^t/Mtce	BoldItalic^tm/Mtce	BoldItalic^m/Mtce	BoldItalic^mz/Mtce	BoldItalic^tz/Mtce	BoldItalic^z/Mtce	BoldItalic^b/Mtce
agriculture	31.13	52.65	54.69	2.04	1.64	0.40	2.56	2.16	0.52	1.69	96.27	19.50	1.32
mining and washing of coal	89.78	3.58	4.44	0.86	0.58	0.29	4.18	3.89	3.32	0.04	80.54	33.32	6.76
extraction of petroleum and natural gas	19.25	0.90	13.58	12.68	8.16	4.52	5.93	1.41	-6.75	0.05	6.61	35.63	0.17
mining and processing of metal ores	2.52	2.19	14.03	11.83	6.89	4.94	5.82	0.88	-6.01	0.87	15.64	41.73	0.13
mining and processing of non-mental ores	3.78	1.13	1.83	0.70	0.54	0.17	1.48	1.31	0.77	0.30	61.56	23.90	2.44
foods, beverages, tobacco	17.41	83.53	85.26	1.73	1.51	0.22	7.97	7.75	6.24	4.80	97.97	12.80	5.14
textile	13.77	50.03	51.41	1.38	0.61	0.77	52.18	51.41	50.80	3.63	97.31	55.72	83.98
textile wearing apparel, leather, feather and related products	2.30	57.71	58.51	0.80	0.64	0.16	27.68	27.52	26.88	25.07	98.64	19.82	43.04
processing of timber and furniture	2.37	22.96	23.40	0.44	0.33	0.11	14.65	14.54	14.21	9.67	98.13	24.67	44.07
paper, printing and articles for culture, education	19.32	18.64	20.32	1.68	1.17	0.51	17.46	16.95	15.79	0.96	91.75	30.41	14.54
processing of petroleum, coking and nuclear fuel	395.42	16.48	26.54	10.06	6.85	3.21	22.94	19.72	12.88	0.04	62.11	31.93	2.88
chemical industry	131.93	104.78	132.98	28.20	17.86	10.34	93.37	83.03	65.17	0.79	78.79	36.66	4.65
non-metallic mineral products	102.52	17.64	19.08	1.44	1.25	0.19	21.19	21.00	19.75	0.17	92.44	13.06	16.75
smelting and pressing of metals	329.78	60.66	79.37	18.70	12.00	6.70	89.35	82.65	70.65	0.18	76.44	35.84	6.89
metal products	2.96	46.55	48.23	1.67	1.15	0.52	38.26	37.74	36.59	15.74	96.53	31.21	32.77
general and special purpose machinery	10.79	149.41	164.66	15.25	12.25	3.00	49.01	46.01	33.76	13.85	90.74	19.69	3.76
transport equipment	6.31	107.43	112.82	5.39	4.58	0.81	22.64	21.82	17.24	17.03	95.22	15.06	4.77
electrical machinery and communication electronic equipment	3.57	232.72	266.01	33.29	20.58	12.71	188.94	176.23	155.65	65.17	87.48	38.18	8.56
measuring instruments and machinery for cultural activity and office work	0.26	18.41	23.86	5.45	4.01	1.43	18.05	16.62	12.61	70.33	77.17	26.30	4.14
other manufacturing	2.68	16.98	18.98	2.00	1.40	0.60	6.70	6.10	4.70	6.33	89.46	30.21	4.37
production and distribution of electric power and heat power	716.25	48.88	49.08	0.20	0.14	0.06	2.75	2.68	2.55	0.07	99.59	31.60	19.60
production and distribution of gas	8.78	5.40	5.40	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.61	100.00	0.00	0.00
production and distribution of water	0.22	3.10	3.10	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	14.16	100.00	0.00	0.00
construction	8.79	547.57	548.11	0.54	0.54	0.00	3.69	3.69	3.15	62.32	99.90	0.46	6.88
transport	108.62	85.16	88.24	3.08	2.39	0.69	42.30	41.61	39.22	0.78	96.51	22.38	17.43
retail and restaurants	14.55	71.75	72.24	0.49	0.40	0.08	16.49	16.41	16.00	4.93	99.32	17.16	40.53
other services	21.22	240.05	243.88	3.83	3.40	0.43	15.59	15.15	11.76	11.31	98.43	11.26	4.46
total	2066.30	2066.30	2230.04	163.74	110.87	52.87	771.18	718.31	607.44

Tab.2 Embodied carbon emissions of China in 2007

sectors	direct emissions	domestic emissions	total emissions	total imported emissions	actual imported emissions	emissions imported and later exported	total exported emissions	domestic exported emissions	BEET
BoldItalic^d	BoldItalic^d	BoldItalic^t	BoldItalic^tm	BoldItalic^m	BoldItalic^mz	BoldItalic^tz	BoldItalic^z	BoldItalic^b
agriculture	1.51	2.55	2.45	1.25	1.48	0.75	0.33	0.30	0.09
mining and washing of coal	4.35	0.17	0.20	0.53	0.52	0.54	0.54	0.54	0.55
extraction of petroleum and natural gas	0.93	0.04	0.61	7.75	7.36	8.55	0.77	0.20	-1.11
mining and processing of metal ores	0.12	0.11	0.63	7.23	6.22	9.34	0.75	0.12	-0.99
mining and processing of non-mental ores	0.18	0.05	0.08	0.43	0.48	0.32	0.19	0.18	0.13
foods, beverages, tobacco	0.84	4.04	3.82	1.06	1.36	0.42	1.03	1.08	1.03
textile	0.67	2.42	2.31	0.84	0.55	1.46	6.77	7.16	8.36
textile wearing apparel, leather, feather and related products	0.11	2.79	2.62	0.49	0.58	0.30	3.59	3.83	4.43
processing of timber and furniture	0.11	1.11	1.05	0.27	0.30	0.20	1.90	2.02	2.34
paper, printing and articles for culture, education	0.94	0.90	0.91	1.02	1.05	0.96	2.26	2.36	2.60
processing of petroleum, coking and nuclear fuel	19.14	0.80	1.19	6.14	6.18	6.07	2.97	2.75	2.12
chemical industry	6.38	5.07	5.96	17.22	16.11	19.55	12.11	11.56	10.73
non-metallic mineral products	4.96	0.85	0.86	0.88	1.13	0.36	2.75	2.92	3.25
smelting and pressing of metals	15.96	2.94	3.56	11.42	10.82	12.68	11.59	11.51	11.63
metal products	0.14	2.25	2.16	1.02	1.04	0.99	4.96	5.25	6.02
general and special purpose machinery	0.52	7.23	7.38	9.31	11.05	5.68	6.35	6.40	5.56
transport equipment	0.31	5.20	5.06	3.29	4.13	1.54	2.94	3.04	2.84
electrical machinery and communication electronic equipment	0.17	11.26	11.93	20.33	18.57	24.04	24.50	24.53	25.62
measuring instruments and machinery for cultural activity and office work	0.01	0.89	1.07	3.33	3.62	2.71	2.34	2.31	2.08
other manufacturing	0.13	0.82	0.85	1.22	1.26	1.14	0.87	0.85	0.77
production and distribution of electric power and heat power	34.66	2.37	2.20	0.12	0.12	0.12	0.36	0.37	0.42
production and distribution of gas	0.43	0.26	0.24	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
production and distribution of water	0.01	0.15	0.14	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
construction	0.43	26.50	24.58	0.33	0.48	0.00	0.48	0.51	0.52
transport	5.26	4.12	3.96	1.88	2.15	1.30	5.48	5.79	6.46
retail and restaurants	0.70	3.47	3.24	0.30	0.37	0.16	2.14	2.28	2.63
other services	1.03	11.62	10.94	2.34	3.06	0.82	2.02	2.11	1.94

Tab.3 Sectoral percentages of each component/%

Fig.3 The estimations of domestic exported emissions (a) and net exported emissions (b)

Tab.4 Relationship between contribution of exports to GDP and share of exported emissions in domestic emissions

1	Machado G, Schaeffer R, Worrell E. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input-output approach. Ecological Economics , 2001, 39(3): 409-424 doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00230-0
2	Wyckoff A W, Roop J M. The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products: implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy , 1994, 22(3): 187-194 doi: 10.1016/0301-4215(94)90158-9
3	Peters G P, Hertwich E G. CO₂ embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environmental Science and Technology , 2008, 42(5): 1401-1407 doi: 10.1021/es072023k pmid:18441780
4	Davis S J, Caldeira K. Consumption-based accounting of CO₂ emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 2010, 107(12): 5687-5692 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906974107 pmid:20212122
5	Tolmasquim M T, Machado G. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 2003, 8(2): 139-155 doi: 10.1023/A:1026013814547
6	Munksgaard J, Pedersen K A. CO₂ accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility? Energy Policy , 2001, 29(4): 327-335 doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00120-8
7	Bastianoni S, Pulselli F M, Tiezzi E. The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics , 2004, 49(3): 253-257 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.018
8	Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, Wiedmann T. Shared producer and consumer responsibility-theory and practice. Ecological Economics , 2007, 61(1): 27-42 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.018
9	Peters G P. From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecological Economics , 2008, 65(1): 13-23 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.014
10	Peters G P, Hertwich E G. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption. Climatic Change , 2008b, 86(1-2): 51-66 doi: 10.1007/s10584-007-9280-1
11	National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook 2008. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2008 (in Chinese)
12	Pan J H, Phillips J, Chen Y. China’s balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxford Review of Economic Policy , 2008, 24(2): 354-376 doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grn016
13	Weber C L, Peters G P, Guan D B, Hubacek K. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy , 2008, 36(9): 3572-3577 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.009
14	Yan Y F, Yang L K. China’s foreign trade and climate change: A case study of CO₂ emissions. Energy Policy , 2010, 38(1): 350-356 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.025
15	Lin B Q, Sun C W. Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy Policy , 2010, 38(1): 613-621 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.014
16	Shui B, Harriss R C. The role of CO₂ embodiment in US-China trade. Energy Policy , 2006, 34(18): 4063-4068 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.010
17	Li Y, Hewitt C N. The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy , 2008, 36(6): 1907-1914 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.005
18	Xu M, Allenby B, Chen W Q. Energy and air emissions embodied in China-US trade: eastbound assessment using adjusted bilateral trade data. Environmental Science & Technology , 2009, 43(9): 3378-3384 doi: 10.1021/es803142v pmid:19534161
19	Wei B Y, Fang X Q, Wang Y, Yang H M, Zhang D. Estimation of carbon emissions embodied in international trade for China: an input-output analysis. Journal of Beijing Normal University , 2009, 45(4): 413-419
20	Sánchez-Chóliz J, Duarte R. CO₂ emissions embodied in international trade: evidence for Spain. Energy Policy , 2004, 32(18): 1999-2005 doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00199-X
21	Ahmad N, Wyckoff A W. Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade of goods. OECD Publications , 2003. http://www.oecd.org/sti/working-papers
22	Wiedmann T, Lenzen M, Turner K, Barrett J. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities-Part 2: review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics , 2007, 61(1): 15-26 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.003
23	Leontief W. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Review of Economics and Statistics , 1970, 52(3): 262-271 doi: 10.2307/1926294
24	Schaeffer R, Leal de Sá A. The embodiment of carbon associated with Brazilian imports and exports. Energy Conversion and Management , 1996, 37(6-8): 955-960 doi: 10.1016/0196-8904(95)00283-9
25	Lenzen M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy , 1998, 26(6): 495-506 doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00012-3
26	Lenzen M. A generalized input-output multiplier calculus for Australia. Economic Systems Research , 2001, 13(1): 65-92 doi: 10.1080/09535310120026256
27	Mongelli I, Tassielli G, Notarnicola B. Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: an input-output approach to the Italian case. Energy Policy , 2006, 34(1): 88-100 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.004
28	Ackerman F, Ishikawa M, Suga M. The carbon content of Japan-US trade. Energy Policy , 2007, 35(9): 4455-4462 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.010
29	Liu X B, Wang C. Quantitative analysis of CO₂ embodiment in international trade: an overview of emerging literatures. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China , 2009, 3(1): 12-19 doi: 10.1007/s11783-009-0011-x
30	Peters G P, Hertwich E G. Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian case. Global Environmental Change , 2006, 16(4): 379-387 doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.001
31	Herendeen R A, Bullard C W. US Energy Balance of Trade, 1963-1967. Energy Systems and Policy , 1976, 1(4): 383-390
32	National Bureau of Statistics, National Accounts Division. Input-output Tables of China, 2007. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009 (in Chinese)
33	Chen Y, Pan J H, Xie L H. Energy embodied in goods of international trade in China: calculation and policy implications. Economic Research Journal , 2008, 9(1): 11-25
34	Research Team of China Climate Change Country Study. China Climate Change Country Study. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2000 (in Chinese)
35	US Energy Information Administration. International Energy Statistics. 2009, http://www.eia.doe.gov/
36	Su B, Huang H C, Ang B W, Zhou P. Input-output analysis of CO₂ emissions embodied in trade: the effects of sector aggregation. Energy Economics , 2010, 32(1): 166-175 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.07.010
37	Lenzen M. Errors in conventional and input-output-based lifecycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology , 2001, 4(4): 127-148 doi: 10.1162/10881980052541981
38	Lenzen M, Pade L L, Munksgaard J. CO₂ multipliers in multi-region input-output models. Economic Systems Research , 2004, 16(4): 391-412 doi: 10.1080/0953531042000304272

[1]	Zhou Yang, Murui Zheng, Ze-Lin Yan, Hui Liu, Xiangyi Liu, Jie-Qi Jin, Jiagang Wu, Chun-Quan Ou. Magnitude and direction of temperature variability affect hospitalization for myocardial infarction and stroke: population-based evidence from Guangzhou, China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(3): 27-.
[2]	Hao Zheng, Jian Cheng, Hung Chak Ho, Baoli Zhu, Zhen Ding, Wencong Du, Xin Wang, Yang Yu, Juan Fei, Zhiwei Xu, Jinyi Zhou, Jie Yang. Evaluating the short-term effect of ambient temperature on non-fatal outdoor falls and road traffic injuries among children and adolescents in China: a time-stratified case-crossover study[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(9): 105-.
[3]	Yujie Pan, Yalan Li, Hongxia Peng, Yiping Yang, Min Zeng, Yang Xie, Yao Lu, Hong Yuan. Relationship between groundwater cadmium and vicinity resident urine cadmium levels in the non-ferrous metal smelting area, China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 56-.
[4]	Xiao Li, Yanan Ren, Xuezhao Chen, Yang Li, Marian R. Chertow. Exploring the development of municipal solid waste disposal facilities in Chinese cities: patterns and drivers[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(11): 139-.
[5]	Yuan Cheng, Qinqin Yu, Jiumeng Liu, Youwen Sun, Linlin Liang, Zhenyu Du, Guannan Geng, Wanli Ma, Hong Qi, Qiang Zhang, Kebin He. Formation of secondary inorganic aerosol in a frigid urban atmosphere[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(2): 18-.
[6]	Shansi Wang, Siwei Li, Jia Xing, Jie Yang, Jiaxin Dong, Yu Qin, Shovan Kumar Sahu. Evaluation of the influence of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on air quality in southern China from long-term historical observations[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(2): 26-.
[7]	Yangyan Cheng, Ye Shan, Yuhuan Xue, Yujiao Zhu, Xinfeng Wang, Likun Xue, Yanguang Liu, Fangli Qiao, Min Zhang. Variation characteristics of atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide in summertime at a coastal site in the South China Sea[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(11): 139-.
[8]	Fengping Hu, Yongming Guo. Health impacts of air pollution in China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 74-.
[9]	Chi Zhang, Wenhui Kuang, Jianguo Wu, Jiyuan Liu, Hanqin Tian. Industrial land expansion in rural China threatens environmental securities[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 29-.
[10]	Jiuhui Qu, Hongchen Wang, Kaijun Wang, Gang Yu, Bing Ke, Han-Qing Yu, Hongqiang Ren, Xingcan Zheng, Ji Li, Wen-Wei Li, Song Gao, Hui Gong. Municipal wastewater treatment in China: Development history and future perspectives[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 88-.
[11]	Dong Huang, Xiuhong Liu, Songzhu Jiang, Hongchen Wang, Junyan Wang, Yuankai Zhang. Current state and future perspectives of sewer networks in urban China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 2-.
[12]	Xiaolong Song, Jingwei Wang, Jianxin Yang, Bin Lu. An updated review and conceptual model for optimizing WEEE management in China from a life cycle perspective[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(5): 3-.
[13]	Yan Ma, Xiaoming Du, Yi Shi, Deyi Hou, Binbin Dong, Zhu Xu, Huiying Li, Yunfeng Xie, Jidun Fang, Zheng Li, Yunzhe Cao, Qingbao Gu, Fasheng Li. Engineering practice of mechanical soil aeration for the remediation of volatile organic compound-contaminated sites in China: Advantages and challenges[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(6): 6-.
[14]	Hallvard Ødegaard. A road-map for energy-neutral wastewater treatment plants of the future based on compact technologies (including MBBR)[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 2-.
[15]	Fei LI,Suocheng DONG,Fujia LI,Libiao YANG. Is there an inverted U-shaped curve? Empirical analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in agrochemicals[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(2): 276-287.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed