Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2015, Vol. 9 Issue (1) : 84-95    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0741-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE |
Assessing the impact on groundwater safety of inter-basin water transfer using a coupled modeling approach
Haifeng JIA(),Shidong LIANG,Yansong ZHANG
School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
 Download: PDF(1974 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Surface water and groundwater always behave in a coupled manner and are major components of hydrologic cycle. However, surface water simulation models and groundwater simulation models are run separately most of the time. Few models focus on the impact of hydraulic changes in the surface water flows on the groundwater, or specifically, the impact of a water transfer project to fill a seasonally dry channel. In this study, a linked surface water and groundwater simulation model was developed to assess the impact of a trans-basin water diversion project on the groundwater. A typical plain area east of Beijing was selected as a case study, representing Beijing’s main source of groundwater used for drinking water. A surface water quality model of the Chaobai River was developed based on the Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP), and a groundwater model was developed based on the Modular Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model (MODFLOW) and the Modular 3-D transport model (MT3D). The results of the surface water simulation were used as input for the groundwater simulation. Water levels and four contaminants (NH3-N, CODMn, F, As) were simulated. With the same initial and boundary conditions, scenario analyses were performed to quantify the impact of different quantities of diversion water on the groundwater environment. The results showed the water quality of the groundwater sources was not significantly affected.

Keywords surface water      groundwater      linked model      groundwater safety impact assessment      water diversion     
Corresponding Authors: Haifeng JIA   
Online First Date: 09 July 2014    Issue Date: 31 December 2014
 Cite this article:   
Haifeng JIA,Shidong LIANG,Yansong ZHANG. Assessing the impact on groundwater safety of inter-basin water transfer using a coupled modeling approach[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(1): 84-95.
 URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-014-0741-2
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2015/V9/I1/84
Fig.1  Study area in the Shunyi District, Beijing
standard grade As/(mg·L-1) F/(mg·L-1) NH3-N/(mg·L-1) CODMn/(mg·L-1)
NESSW IV 0.1 1.5 1.5 10
V 0.1 1.5 2.0 15
NESGW I 0.005 1.0 0.02 1
II 0.01 1.0 0.02 2
Tab.1  Standards for selected contaminant from the NESSW and the NESGW
Fig.2  Technical approach used in the project: (a) the framework of this project; (b) the linkage of the coupled model
Fig.3  Spatial conceptualization: (a) the surface water; (b) the groundwater
monitoring well mean error/m mean square deviation/m median errors/%
1# 0.885 1.217 4.45
2# 1.239 1.535 8.41
3# 0.462 0.765 3.59
4# 0.448 0.806 5.14
5# 0.564 0.974 4.69
6# 0.542 0.771 3.00
7# 0.610 0.918 4.25
average 0.676 0.998 4.79
Tab.2  Statistics of calibration for ground water
Fig.4  Simulated and measured water levels and pollutant concentration: (a) water level, monitoring well 3#; (b) water level, monitoring well 5#, (c) As, monitoring well 3#; (d) NH3-N, monitoring well 3#
Fig.5  Flow field and groundwater levels after five years: (a) the basic scenario, phreatic aquifer; (b) the basic scenario, confined aquifer; (c) the first-stage project scenario, phreatic aquifer; (d) the first-stage project scenario, confined aquifer
Fig.6  Groundwater constituent concentrations after five years in the second-stage project scenario: (a) As, phreatic aquifer; (b) As, impermeable aquifer; (c) As, confined aquifer; (d) F, phreatic aquifer; (e) F, impermeable aquifer; (f) F, confined aquifer; (g) NH3-N, phreatic aquifer; (h) NH3-N, impermeable aquifer; (i) NH3-N, confined aquifer; (j) CODMn, phreatic aquifer; (k) CODMn, impermeable aquifer; (l) CODMn, confined aquifer
1 Winter T C. Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeology Journal, 1999, 7(1): 28–45
https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050178
2 Sophocleous M. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal, 2002, 10(1): 52–67
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0170-8
3 Yang Y S, Wang L. A review of modelling tools for implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in handling diffuse water pollution. Water Resources Management, 2010, 24(9): 1819–1843
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9526-y
4 Dor N, Syafalni S, Abustan I, Rahman M T A, Nazri M A A, Mostafa R, Mejus L. Verification of surface-groundwater connectivity in an irrigation canal using geophysical, water balance and stable isotope approaches. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(11): 2837–2853
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9841-y
5 Polom?i? D, Hajdin B, Stevanovi? Z, Baji? D, Hajdin K. Groundwater management by riverbank filtration and an infiltration channel: The case of Obrenovac, Serbia. Hydrogeology Journal, 2013, 21(7): 1519–1530
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-1025-9
6 Chang L C, Ho C C, Yeh M H, Yang C C. An integrating approach for conjunctive-use planning of surface and subsurface water system. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(1): 59–78
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9687-8
7 Bobba A G, Cvetkovic V. Environmental Modelling of Hydrological Systems. Lund: Lund University, 1996
8 Appelo C A J, Postma D. Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution. Leiden: August Aimé Balkema, 2005
9 Bencala K E. Interactions of solutes and streambed sediment: 2. A dynamic analysis of coupled hydrologic and chemical processes that determine solute transport. Water Resources Research, 1984, 20(12): 1804–1814
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i012p01804
10 Kollet S J, Maxwell R M. Integrated surface–groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Advances in Water Resources, 2006, 29(7): 945–958
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.006
11 Safavi H R, Bahreini G R. Conjunctive simulation of surface water and groundwater resources under uncertainty. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B, Engineering, 2009, 33(B1): 79–94
12 Bobba A G. Ground water-surface water interface (GWSWI) modeling: recent advances and future challenges. Water Resources Management, 2012, 26(14): 4105–4131
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0134-x
13 Scibek J, Allen D M, Cannon A J, Whitfield P H. Groundwater–surface water interaction under scenarios of climate change using a high-resolution transient groundwater model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2007, 333(2–4): 165–181
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.005
14 Lubczynski M W, Gurwin J. Integration of various data sources for transient groundwater modeling with spatio-temporally variable fluxes—Sardon study case, Spain. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2005, 306(1–4): 71–96
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.038
15 Gedeon M, Wemaere I, Marivoet J. Regional groundwater model of north-east Belgium. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2007, 335(1–4): 133–139
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.11.006
16 Cho J, Barone V A, Mostaghimi S. Simulation of land use impacts on groundwater levels and streamflow in a Virginia watershed. Agricultural Water Management, 2009, 96(1): 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.07.005
17 Almeida C N, Roehrig J, Wendland E. Development and integration of a groundwater simulation model to an open Geographic Information System. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2014, 50(1): 101–110
https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12119
18 Kim N W, Chung I M, Won Y S, Arnold J G. Development and application of the integrated SWAT–MODFLOW model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2008, 356(1–2): 1–16
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.024
19 Arnold J G, Allen P M, Bernhardt G. A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1993, 142(1–4): 47–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-S
20 Huang T, Pang Z. Changes in groundwater induced by water diversion in the Lower Tarim River, Xinjiang Uygur, NW China: Evidence from environmental isotopes and water chemistry. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010, 387(3–4): 188–201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.007
21 Liu C, Zheng H. South-to-north water transfer schemes for China. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2002, 18(3): 453–471
https://doi.org/10.1080/0790062022000006934
22 Rohden C, Kreuzer A, Chen Z, Kipfer R, Aeschbach-Hertig W. Characterizing the recharge regime of the strongly exploited aquifers of the North China Plain by environmental tracers. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(5): W05511
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007660.
23 Wang G, Xia J, Chen J. Quantification of effects of climate variations and human activities on runoff by a monthly water balance model: a case study of the Chaobai River basin in northern China. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(7): W00A11
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006768
24 Ambrose R B, Wool T A, Martin J L. The Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program, WASP5, Part A: Model documentation. Athens: US EPA Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling, 1993
25 Jia H, Wang S, Wei M, Zhang Y. Scenario analysis of water pollution control in the typical peri-urban river using a coupled hydrodynamic-water quality model. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2011, 5(2): 255–265
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0279-x
26 Jia H, Zhang Y, Guo Y. The development of a multi-species algal ecodynamic model for urban surface water systems and its application. Ecological Modelling, 2010, 221(15): 1831–1838
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.04.009
27 Park J Y, Park G A, Kim S J. Assessment of future climate change cmpact on cater cuality of Chungju Lake, South Korea, using WASP coupled with SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2013, 49(6): 1225–1238
https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12085
28 Jia H, Cheng S. Spatial and dynamic simulation for Miyun Reservoir waters in Beijing. Water Science and Technology, 2002, 46(11–12): 473–479
pmid: 12523796
29 Harbaugh A W, Banta E R, Hill M C, McDonald M G. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model: User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. Reston: US Geological Survey, 2000
30 Zheng C. MT3D: A Modular Three-Dimensional Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems. Bethesda: SS Papadopulos & Associates, 1992
31 Uhlík J, Baier J. Model evaluation of thermal energy potential of hydrogeological structures with flooded mines. Mine Water and the Environment, 2012, 31(3): 179–191
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-012-0186-4
32 Sun F, Shao H, Kalbacher T, Wang W, Yang Z, Huang Z, Kolditz O. Groundwater drawdown at Nakou site of Beijing Plain: model development and calibration. Environmental Earth Science, 2011, 64(5): 1323–1333
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-0957-4
33 Wang S, Shao J, Song X, Zhang Y, Huo Z, Zhou X. Application of MODFLOW and Geographic Information System to groundwater flow simulation in North China Plain, China. Environmental Geology, 2008, 55(7): 1449–1462
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-1095-x
[1] Boran Wu, Xiaoli Chai, Youcai Zhao, Xiaohu Dai. Designing an in situ remediation strategy for polluted surface water bodies through the specific regulation of microbial community[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 4-.
[2] Wenchao Jiang, Ping Tang, Shuguang Lu, Xiang Zhang, Zhaofu Qiu, Qian Sui. Enhanced reductive degradation of carbon tetrachloride by carbon dioxide radical anion-based sodium percarbonate/ Fe(II)/formic acid system in aqueous solution[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 6-.
[3] Deyi Hou, Guanghe Li, Paul Nathanail. An emerging market for groundwater remediation in China: Policies, statistics, and future outlook[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 16-.
[4] Maocong Hu, Yin Liu, Zhenhua Yao, Liping Ma, Xianqin Wang. Catalytic reduction for water treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 3-.
[5] Wentao Zhao, Ying Guo, Shuguang Lu, Pingping Yan, Qian Sui. Recent advances in pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the surface water and sediments in China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(6): 2-.
[6] Xubin Pan,Zhongkui Luo,Yongbo Liu. Environmental deterioration of farmlands caused by the irrational use of agricultural technologies[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 18-.
[7] Bingbing XU,Qiujin XU,Cunzhen LIANG,Li LI,Lijia JIANG. Occurrence and health risk assessment of trace heavy metals via groundwater in Shizhuyuan Polymetallic Mine in Chenzhou City, China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(3): 482-493.
[8] Juan XIE,Xinyu ZHANG,Zhiwei XU,Guofu YUAN,Xinzhai TANG,Xiaomin SUN,D.J. BALLANTINE. Total phosphorus concentrations in surface water of typical agro- and forest ecosystems in China, 2004–2010[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2014, 8(4): 561-569.
[9] Junlian QIAO, Zimin CUI, Yuankui SUN, Qinghai HU, Xiaohong GUAN. Simultaneous removal of arsenate and fluoride from water by Al-Fe (hydr)oxides[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2014, 8(2): 169-179.
[10] Yongjun LIU, Aining ZHANG, Xiaoyan MA, Xiaochang WANG. Genotoxicity evaluation of surface waters located in urban area of Xi’an City using Vicia faba bioassays[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(6): 860-866.
[11] Siqing XIA, Shuang SHEN, Jun LIANG, Xiaoyin XU. Study on removing selenate from groundwater by autohydrogenotrophic microorganisms[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(4): 552-558.
[12] Hong YAO, Shichao ZHANG, Xiaobo XUE, Jie YANG, Kelin HU, Xiaohua YU. Influence of the sewage irrigation on the agricultural soil properties in Tongliao City, China[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(2): 273-280.
[13] Huining ZHANG, Xiaohu Zhang, Shuting ZHANG, Bo WEI, Qipei JIANG, Xin YU. Detecting Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia by coagulation concentration and real-time PCR quantification[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(1): 49-54.
[14] Yongming ZHANG, Rong YAN, Zhen ZOU, Jiewei WANG, Bruce E. RITTMANN. Improved nitrogen removal in dual-contaminated surface water by photocatalysis[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(3): 428-436.
[15] Wenfeng SUN, Ruibao JIA, Baoyu GAO. Simultaneous analysis of five taste and odor compounds in surface water using solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(1): 66-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed