|
|
Assessing the impact on groundwater safety of inter-basin water transfer using a coupled modeling approach |
Haifeng JIA( ),Shidong LIANG,Yansong ZHANG |
School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
Abstract Surface water and groundwater always behave in a coupled manner and are major components of hydrologic cycle. However, surface water simulation models and groundwater simulation models are run separately most of the time. Few models focus on the impact of hydraulic changes in the surface water flows on the groundwater, or specifically, the impact of a water transfer project to fill a seasonally dry channel. In this study, a linked surface water and groundwater simulation model was developed to assess the impact of a trans-basin water diversion project on the groundwater. A typical plain area east of Beijing was selected as a case study, representing Beijing’s main source of groundwater used for drinking water. A surface water quality model of the Chaobai River was developed based on the Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP), and a groundwater model was developed based on the Modular Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model (MODFLOW) and the Modular 3-D transport model (MT3D). The results of the surface water simulation were used as input for the groundwater simulation. Water levels and four contaminants (NH3-N, CODMn, F, As) were simulated. With the same initial and boundary conditions, scenario analyses were performed to quantify the impact of different quantities of diversion water on the groundwater environment. The results showed the water quality of the groundwater sources was not significantly affected.
|
Keywords
surface water
groundwater
linked model
groundwater safety impact assessment
water diversion
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Haifeng JIA
|
Online First Date: 09 July 2014
Issue Date: 31 December 2014
|
|
1 |
Winter T C. Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeology Journal, 1999, 7(1): 28–45
https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050178
|
2 |
Sophocleous M. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal, 2002, 10(1): 52–67
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0170-8
|
3 |
Yang Y S, Wang L. A review of modelling tools for implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in handling diffuse water pollution. Water Resources Management, 2010, 24(9): 1819–1843
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9526-y
|
4 |
Dor N, Syafalni S, Abustan I, Rahman M T A, Nazri M A A, Mostafa R, Mejus L. Verification of surface-groundwater connectivity in an irrigation canal using geophysical, water balance and stable isotope approaches. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(11): 2837–2853
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9841-y
|
5 |
Polom?i? D, Hajdin B, Stevanovi? Z, Baji? D, Hajdin K. Groundwater management by riverbank filtration and an infiltration channel: The case of Obrenovac, Serbia. Hydrogeology Journal, 2013, 21(7): 1519–1530
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-1025-9
|
6 |
Chang L C, Ho C C, Yeh M H, Yang C C. An integrating approach for conjunctive-use planning of surface and subsurface water system. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(1): 59–78
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9687-8
|
7 |
Bobba A G, Cvetkovic V. Environmental Modelling of Hydrological Systems. Lund: Lund University, 1996
|
8 |
Appelo C A J, Postma D. Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution. Leiden: August Aimé Balkema, 2005
|
9 |
Bencala K E. Interactions of solutes and streambed sediment: 2. A dynamic analysis of coupled hydrologic and chemical processes that determine solute transport. Water Resources Research, 1984, 20(12): 1804–1814
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i012p01804
|
10 |
Kollet S J, Maxwell R M. Integrated surface–groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Advances in Water Resources, 2006, 29(7): 945–958
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.006
|
11 |
Safavi H R, Bahreini G R. Conjunctive simulation of surface water and groundwater resources under uncertainty. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B, Engineering, 2009, 33(B1): 79–94
|
12 |
Bobba A G. Ground water-surface water interface (GWSWI) modeling: recent advances and future challenges. Water Resources Management, 2012, 26(14): 4105–4131
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0134-x
|
13 |
Scibek J, Allen D M, Cannon A J, Whitfield P H. Groundwater–surface water interaction under scenarios of climate change using a high-resolution transient groundwater model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2007, 333(2–4): 165–181
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.005
|
14 |
Lubczynski M W, Gurwin J. Integration of various data sources for transient groundwater modeling with spatio-temporally variable fluxes—Sardon study case, Spain. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2005, 306(1–4): 71–96
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.038
|
15 |
Gedeon M, Wemaere I, Marivoet J. Regional groundwater model of north-east Belgium. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2007, 335(1–4): 133–139
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.11.006
|
16 |
Cho J, Barone V A, Mostaghimi S. Simulation of land use impacts on groundwater levels and streamflow in a Virginia watershed. Agricultural Water Management, 2009, 96(1): 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.07.005
|
17 |
Almeida C N, Roehrig J, Wendland E. Development and integration of a groundwater simulation model to an open Geographic Information System. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2014, 50(1): 101–110
https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12119
|
18 |
Kim N W, Chung I M, Won Y S, Arnold J G. Development and application of the integrated SWAT–MODFLOW model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2008, 356(1–2): 1–16
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.024
|
19 |
Arnold J G, Allen P M, Bernhardt G. A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1993, 142(1–4): 47–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-S
|
20 |
Huang T, Pang Z. Changes in groundwater induced by water diversion in the Lower Tarim River, Xinjiang Uygur, NW China: Evidence from environmental isotopes and water chemistry. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010, 387(3–4): 188–201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.007
|
21 |
Liu C, Zheng H. South-to-north water transfer schemes for China. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2002, 18(3): 453–471
https://doi.org/10.1080/0790062022000006934
|
22 |
Rohden C, Kreuzer A, Chen Z, Kipfer R, Aeschbach-Hertig W. Characterizing the recharge regime of the strongly exploited aquifers of the North China Plain by environmental tracers. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(5): W05511
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007660.
|
23 |
Wang G, Xia J, Chen J. Quantification of effects of climate variations and human activities on runoff by a monthly water balance model: a case study of the Chaobai River basin in northern China. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(7): W00A11
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006768
|
24 |
Ambrose R B, Wool T A, Martin J L. The Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program, WASP5, Part A: Model documentation. Athens: US EPA Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling, 1993
|
25 |
Jia H, Wang S, Wei M, Zhang Y. Scenario analysis of water pollution control in the typical peri-urban river using a coupled hydrodynamic-water quality model. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2011, 5(2): 255–265
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0279-x
|
26 |
Jia H, Zhang Y, Guo Y. The development of a multi-species algal ecodynamic model for urban surface water systems and its application. Ecological Modelling, 2010, 221(15): 1831–1838
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.04.009
|
27 |
Park J Y, Park G A, Kim S J. Assessment of future climate change cmpact on cater cuality of Chungju Lake, South Korea, using WASP coupled with SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2013, 49(6): 1225–1238
https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12085
|
28 |
Jia H, Cheng S. Spatial and dynamic simulation for Miyun Reservoir waters in Beijing. Water Science and Technology, 2002, 46(11–12): 473–479
pmid: 12523796
|
29 |
Harbaugh A W, Banta E R, Hill M C, McDonald M G. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model: User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. Reston: US Geological Survey, 2000
|
30 |
Zheng C. MT3D: A Modular Three-Dimensional Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems. Bethesda: SS Papadopulos & Associates, 1992
|
31 |
Uhlík J, Baier J. Model evaluation of thermal energy potential of hydrogeological structures with flooded mines. Mine Water and the Environment, 2012, 31(3): 179–191
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-012-0186-4
|
32 |
Sun F, Shao H, Kalbacher T, Wang W, Yang Z, Huang Z, Kolditz O. Groundwater drawdown at Nakou site of Beijing Plain: model development and calibration. Environmental Earth Science, 2011, 64(5): 1323–1333
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-0957-4
|
33 |
Wang S, Shao J, Song X, Zhang Y, Huo Z, Zhou X. Application of MODFLOW and Geographic Information System to groundwater flow simulation in North China Plain, China. Environmental Geology, 2008, 55(7): 1449–1462
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-1095-x
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|