|
|
Comparative experiment on treating digested piggery wastewater with a biofilm MBR and conventional MBR: simultaneous removal of nitrogen and antibiotics |
Xiaoyan Song1,Rui Liu1(),Lujun Chen1,2(),Tomoki Kawagishi3 |
1. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Science and Technology, Department of Environment in Yangtze Delta Region Institute of Tsinghua University-Zhejiang, Jiaxing 314006, China 2. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 3. Aqua Development Center, Mitsubishi Rayon Co. Ltd., Toyohashi 4408601, Japan |
|
|
Abstract The BF-MBR displayed higher removal rates of nitrogen, phosphorous and antibiotics. The BF-MBR saved alkali consumption. The removal of antibiotics was influenced significantly by HRT. Membrane filtration greatly contributed to antibiotics removal. A biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR) and a conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR) were parallelly operated for treating digested piggery wastewater. The removal performance of COD, TN, NH4+-N, TP as well as antibiotics were simultaneously studied when the hydraulic retention time (HRT) was gradually shortened from 9 d to 1 d and when the ratio of influent COD to TN was changed. The results showed that the effluent quality in both reactors was poor and unstable at an influent COD/TN ratio of 1.0±0.2. The effluent quality was significantly improved as the influent COD/TN ratio was increased to 2.3±0.5. The averaged removal rates of COD, NH4+-N, TN and TP were 92.1%, 97.1%, 35.6% and 54.2%, respectively, in the BF-MBR, significantly higher than the corresponding values of 91.7%, 90.9%, 17.4% and 31.9% in the MBR. Analysis of 11 typical veterinary antibiotics (from the tetracycline, sulfonamide, quinolone, and macrolide families) revealed that the BF-MBR removed more antibiotics than the MBR. Although the antibiotics removal decreased with a shortened HRT, high antibiotics removals of 86.8%, 80.2% and 45.3% were observed in the BF-MBR at HRT of 5–4 d, 3–2 d and 1 d, respectively, while the corresponding values were only 83.8%, 57.0% and 25.5% in the MBR. Moreover, the BF-MBR showed a 15% higher retention rate of antibiotics and consumed 40% less alkalinity than the MBR. Results above suggest that the BF-MBR was more suitable for digested piggery wastewater treatment.
|
Keywords
Alkalinity
Antibiotics
Biofilm
Digested piggery wastewater (DPW)
Membrane bioreactor
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Rui Liu,Lujun Chen
|
Issue Date: 07 April 2017
|
|
1 |
Zhao B W, Li J Z, Leu S Y. An innovative wood-chip-framework soil infiltrator for treating anaerobic digested swine wastewater and analysis of the microbial community. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 173: 384–391
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.135
|
2 |
Bernet N, Béline F. Challenges and innovations on biological treatment of livestock effluents. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(22): 5431–5436
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.003
|
3 |
Vanotti M B, Szogi A A, Hunt P G, Millner P D, Humenik F J. Development of environmentally superior treatment system to replace anaerobic swine lagoons in the USA. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(17): 3184–3194
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.009
|
4 |
Massé D, Rajagopal R, Singh G. Technical and operational feasibility of psychrophilic anaerobic digestion biotechnology for processing ammonia-rich waste. Applied Energy, 2014, 120: 49–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.034
|
5 |
Wei D, Wan M, Liu R, Wang G R, Zhang X D, Wen X G, Zhao Y, Chen L J. Study on the quality of digested piggery wastewater in large-scale farms in Jiaxing. Environmental Sciences, 2014, 35(7): 2650–2657 (in Chinese)
|
6 |
Deng L W, Zheng P, Chen Z A, Mahmood Q. Improvement in post-treatment of digested swine wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(8): 3136–3145
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.061
|
7 |
Sui Q W, Liu C, Dong H M, Zhu Z P. Effect of ammonium nitrogen concentration on the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria community in a membrane bioreactor for the treatment of anaerobically digested swine wastewater. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2014, 118(3): 277–283
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.02.017
|
8 |
Rajagopal R, Rousseau P, Bernet N, Béline F. Combined anaerobic and activated sludge anoxic/oxic treatment for piggery wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(3): 2185–2192
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.112
|
9 |
Huang H M, Liu J H, Wang S F, Jiang Y, Xiao D, Ding L, Gao F M. Nutrients removal from swine wastewater by struvite precipitation recycling technology with the use of Mg3(PO4)2 as active component. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 92: 111–118
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.023
|
10 |
Zhang M C, Lawlor P G, Hu Z H, Zhan X M. Nutrient removal from separated pig manure digestate liquid using hybrid biofilters. Environmental Technology, 2013, 34(5): 645–651
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2012.710406
|
11 |
Gao L H, Shi Y L, Li W H, Niu H Y, Liu J M, Cai Y Q. Occurrence of antibiotics in eight sewage treatment plants in Beijing, China. Chemosphere, 2012, 86(6): 665–671
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.11.019
|
12 |
Wang S H, Wang H. Adsorption behavior of antibiotic in soil environment: a critical review. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(4): 565–574
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-015-0801-2
|
13 |
Pan X, Qiang Z M, Ben W W, Chen M X. Residual veterinary antibiotics in swine manure from concentrated animal feeding operations in Shandong Province, China. Chemosphere, 2011, 84(5): 695–700
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.022
|
14 |
Braschi I, Blasioli S, Fellet C, Lorenzini R, Garelli A, Pori M, Giacomini D. Persistence and degradation of new b-lactam antibiotics in the soil and water environment. Chemosphere, 2013, 93(1): 152–159
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.016
|
15 |
Fan X, Tao Y, Wei D, Zhang X, Lei Y, Noguchi H. Removal of organic matter and disinfection by-products precursors in a hybrid process combining ozonation with ceramic membrane ultrafiltration. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 112–120
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0745-y
|
16 |
Prado N, Ochoa J, Amrane A. Zero Nuisance Piggeries: Long-term performance of MBR (membrane bioreactor) for dilute swine wastewater treatment using submerged membrane bioreactor in semi-industrial scale. Water Research, 2009, 43(6): 1549–1558
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.043
|
17 |
Capodici M, Di Bella G, Di Trapani D, Torregrossa M. Pilot scale experiment with MBR operated in intermittent aeration condition: analysis of biological performance. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 177: 398–405
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.075
|
18 |
Kornboonraksa T, Lee H S, Lee S H, Chiemchaisri C. Application of chemical precipitation and membrane bioreactor hybrid process for piggery wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(6): 1963–1968
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.10.033
|
19 |
Sahar E, Messalem R, Cikurel H, Aharoni A , Brenner A, Godehardt M, Jekel M, Ernst M. Fate of antibiotics in activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration (CAS-UF) and in a membrane bioreactor (MBR). Water Research, 2011, 45(16): 4827–4836
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.023
|
20 |
Göbel A, McArdell C, Joss A, Siegrist H, Giger W. Fate of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in different wastewater treatment technologies. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 372(2–3): 361–371
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.07.039
|
21 |
Radjenovic J, Petrovic M, Barceló D. Analysis of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and removal using a membrane bioreactor. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2007, 387(4): 1365–1377
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0883-6
|
22 |
MEPPRC (Ministry Environmental Protection of People’s Republic of China). Standard Methods for Water and Wastewater Monitoring and Analysis. 4th ed.Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002, 238–239, 252–256, 260–263, 266–269, 345–356 (in Chinese)
|
23 |
Anthonisen A C, Loehr R C, Prakasam T B S, Srinath E G. Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. Journal- Water Pollution Control Federation, 1976, 48(5): 835–852
|
24 |
Luo Y, Xu L, Rysz M, Wang Y Q, Zhang H, Alvarez P J J. Occurrence and transport of tetracycline, sulfonamide, quinolone, and macrolide antibiotics in the Haihe River Basin, China. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(5): 1827–1833
https://doi.org/10.1021/es104009s
|
25 |
Yang S, Yang F L, Fu Z M, Lei R B. Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(8): 2369–2374
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.022
|
26 |
Rodríguez-Hernández L, Esteban-García A L, Tejero I. Comparison between a fixed bed hybrid membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment: a pilot-scale study. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 152: 212–219
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.081
|
27 |
Khan S J, llyas S, Javid S, Visvanathan C, Jegatheesan V. Performance of suspended and attached growth MBR systems in treating high strength synthetic wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(9): 5331–5336
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.100
|
28 |
Wei R C, Ge F, Huang S Y, Chen M, Wang R. Occurrence of veterinary antibiotics in animal wastewater and surface water around farms in Jiangsu Province, China. Chemosphere, 2011, 82(10): 1408–1414
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.067
|
29 |
Brown K D, Kulis J, Thomson B, Chapman T H, Mawhinney D B. Occurrence of antibiotics in hospital, residential, and dairy effluent, municipal wastewater, and the Rio Grande in New Mexico. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 366(2–3): 772–783
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.10.007
|
30 |
Zorita S, Mårtensson L, Mathiasson L. Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals in a municipal sewage treatment system in the south of Sweden. Science of the Total Environment, 2009, 407(8): 2760–2770
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.12.030
|
31 |
Choi Y J, KimL H, Zoh K D. Removal characteristics and mechanism of antibiotics using constructed wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 91: 85–92
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.058
|
32 |
Carranza-Diaz O, Schultze-Nobre L, Moeder M, Nivala J, Kuschk P, Koeser H. Removal of selected organic micropollutants in planted and unplanted pilot-scale horizontal flow constructed wetlands under conditions of high organic load. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 71: 234–245
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.048
|
33 |
McAdam E J, Bagnall J P, Soares A, Koh Y K K, Chiu T Y, Scrimshaw M D, Lester J N, Cartmell E. Fate of alkylphenolic compounds during activated sludge treatment: impact of loading and organic composition. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(1): 248–254
https://doi.org/10.1021/es100915j
|
34 |
Li W, Shi Y, Gao L, Liu J, Cai Y. Occurrence and removal of antibiotics in a municipal wastewater reclamation plant in Beijing, China. Chemosphere, 2013, 92(4): 435–444
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.040
|
35 |
Yang S F, Lin C F, Wu C J, Ng K K, Lin A Y C, HongP K A. Fate of sulfonamide antibiotics in contact with activated sludge sorption and biodegradation. Water Research, 2012, 46(4): 1301–1308
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.035
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|