LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY MANURE MANAGEMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CARBON NEUTRALITY IN CHINA

doi:10.15302/J-FASE-2023509

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.

2023, Vol. 10

Issue (3) : 341-362 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2023509

REVIEW

LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY MANURE MANAGEMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CARBON NEUTRALITY IN CHINA

Leli ZHANG^1,², Reaihan E^1,², Mahmoud M. ALI^1,^2,³, Hongjian LIN⁴, Shuai ZHANG⁵, Shuqin JIN⁶, Zhiping ZHU⁷, Jianjun HU⁸, Yiqing YAO⁹, Yong SUN¹⁰, Shuiping YAN¹¹, Zhidan LIU^1,²(

)

¹. Laboratory of Environment-Enhancing Energy (E2E), College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
². Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
³. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12311, Egypt
⁴. College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
⁵. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
⁶. Research Center for Rural Economy, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100810, China
⁷. Institute of Environmental and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
⁸. College of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
⁹. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
¹⁰. College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
¹¹. College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Download: PDF(2244 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

● Carbon reduction potential of manure treatment technologies was summarized.

● Accounting methodologies of carbon emission and footprint of manure were analyzed.

● The quote of carbon trading market at home and abroad was analyzed.

● Some points for the boost of potential of manure carbon trading were advised.

The rapid growth of the livestock and poultry production in China has led to a rise in manure generation, which contributes to the emissions of GHGs (greenhouse gases including CH₄, N₂O and CO₂) and other harmful gases (NH₃, H₂S). Reducing and managing carbon emissions has become a critical global environmental imperative due to the adverse impacts of GHGs. Unlike previous reviews that focused on resource recovery, this work provides an unique insight of transformation from resource-oriented manure treatment to integration of resource recovery with pollution reduction, carbon accounting and trading, focusing on the sustainable development of manure management system. Considering the importance of accounting methodologies for carbon emission and trading system toward carbon neutrality society, suggestions and strategies including attaching high importance to the development of more accuracy accounting methodologies and more practical GHG emission reduction methodologies are given in this paper. This work directs the establishment of carbon reduction methodologies and the formulation of governmental policies for livestock and poultry manure management system in China.

Keywords valorization of animal manure manure management carbon emission carbon footprint methodology carbon trading

Corresponding Author(s): Zhidan LIU

Just Accepted Date: 28 July 2023 Online First Date: 07 September 2023 Issue Date: 20 September 2023

Cite this article:

Leli ZHANG,Reaihan E,Mahmoud M. ALI, et al. LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY MANURE MANAGEMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CARBON NEUTRALITY IN CHINA[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2023, 10(3): 341-362.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2023509
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2023/V10/I3/341

Fig.1 Relationships between livestock and poultry manure treatment technologies, and carbon accounting and trading systems in the context of low-carbon agriculture.

Fig.2 Negative effects on the environment caused by the indiscriminate use of livestock and poultry manure.

Fig.3 Schematic (a) and comparative analysis (b) of livestock and poultry manure treatment technologies. This graph is drawn by the authors with comprehensive reference to a number of literature^[⁹–²²,³³–⁶⁸^].

Tab.1 GHG emission coefficients^* of livestock and poultry manure management system in different regions of Chinese mainland (kg·head⁻¹·yr⁻¹)^[⁶⁹^]

Tab.2 Summary of carbon emission accounting methods^[⁸⁶^]

Tab.3 Main differences between the two main modes of the global carbon trading market

Fig.4 Development of the carbon trading market in China.

Fig.5 Trading mechanisms of the carbon quota trading market and Chinese-certified emission reduction (CCER) trading market.

1	M L Wang . China’s livestock industry development: achievement, experiences and future trends. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2018, (8): 60−70 (in Chinese)
2	X Q, Ye Y, Cheng Y M, Zhang Z J, Wu Q, Li C Q Liu . Scenario simulation, main paths and policy measures of greenhouse gas emission reduction of agricultural activities in China. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2022, (2): 4−16 (in Chinese)
3	S, Wei Z P, Zhu J, Zhao D R, Chadwick H M Dong . Policies and regulations for promoting manure management for sustainable livestock production in China: a review. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2021, 8(1): 45–57 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020369
4	Y, Qian K, Song T, Hu T Ying . Environmental status of livestock and poultry sectors in China under current transformation stage. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 622–623: 702–709
5	C, Zhang S, Liu S, Wu S, Jin S, Reis H, Liu B Gu . Rebuilding the linkage between livestock and cropland to mitigate agricultural pollution in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 144: 65–73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.011
6	Y, Hu H, Cheng S Tao . Environmental and human health challenges of industrial livestock and poultry farming in China and their mitigation. Environment International, 2017, 107: 111–130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.003
7	H W, Wu X Q, Sun B W, Liang J B, Chen X F Zhou . Analysis of livestock and poultry manure pollution in China and its treatment and resource utilization. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(6): 1168−1176 (in Chinese)
8	Z, Zhu X, Zhang H, Dong S, Wang S, Reis Y, Li B Gu . Integrated livestock sector nitrogen pollution abatement measures could generate net benefits for human and ecosystem health in China. Nature Food, 2022, 3(2): 161–168 https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00462-6
9	Z P, Zhu H M, Dong S, Wei J Z, Ma P Y Xue . Impact of changes in livestock manure management on greenhouse gas emissions in China. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(4): 743−748 (in Chinese)
10	H B, Zhou J T, Ding H B, Meng Y J, Shen J, Wang X, Zhang H S, Cheng L Q, Song P X, Xu P Y, Zhang X Y Wang . Survey and development analysis of resource utilization technology of livestock and poultry wastes in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(9): 237−246 (in Chinese)
11	X, Sun P, Lu T, Jiang F, Schuchardt G Li . Influence of bulking agents on CH4, N2O, and NH3 emissions during rapid composting of pig manure from the Chinese Ganqinfen system. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2014, 15(4): 353−364 (in Chinese)
12	A, Swati S Hait . Greenhouse gas emission during composting and vermicomposting of organic wastes—A review. Clean, 2018, 46(6): 1700042 https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201700042
13	K, Wang W, Li X, Li N Ren . Spatial nitrifications of microbial processes during composting of swine, cow and chicken manure. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5(1): 14932 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14932
14	W, Berg R, Brunsch I Pazsiczki . Greenhouse gas emissions from covered slurry compared with uncovered during storage. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 112(2−3): 129−134
15	J, Clemens M, Trimborn P, Weiland B Amon . Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 112(2−3): 171−177
16	D R Chadwick . Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from cattle manure heaps: effect of compaction and covering. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(4): 787–799 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.012
17	A, Miranda-Carrazco D A, Ramírez-Villanueva L Dendooven . Greenhouse gas emissions of biosolid and cow manure during composting and vermicomposting and when applied to soil cultivated with wheat (Triticum sp. L.). Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2022, 29(17): 24968–24982 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17624-x
18	S O Petersen . Greenhouse gas emissions from liquid dairy manure: prediction and mitigation. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(7): 6642–6654 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13301
19	F, Yang G, Li B, Zang Z Zhang . The maturity and CH4, N2O, NH3 emissions from vermicomposting with agricultural waste. Compost Science & Utilization, 2017, 25(4): 262–271 https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2017.1329037
20	A, Nigussie T W, Kuyper S, Bruun Neergaard A de . Vermicomposting as a technology for reducing nitrogen losses and greenhouse gas emissions from small-scale composting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 139: 429–439 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.058
21	W, Chen X, Liao Y, Wu J B, Liang J, Mi J, Huang H, Zhang Y, Wu Z, Qiao X, Li Y Wang . Effects of different types of biochar on methane and ammonia mitigation during layer manure composting. Waste Management, 2017, 61: 506–515 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.014
22	M K, Awasthi Y, Duan S K, Awasthi T, Liu Z, Zhang S H, Kim A Pandey . Effect of biochar on emission, maturity and bacterial dynamics during sheep manure compositing. Renewable Energy, 2020, 152: 421–429 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.065
23	B, Li J B, Zhang H P Li . Research on spatial-temporal characteristics and affecting factors decomposition of agricultural carbon emission in China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(8): 80−86 (in Chinese)
24	X H, Meng G Q, Cheng J B, Zhang Y B, Wang H C Zhou . Analyze on the spatial temporal characteristics of GHG estimation of livestock’s by lifecycle assessment in China. China Environmental Science, 2014, 34(8): 2167−2176 (in Chinese)
25	and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Food . Livestock’s Long Shadow—Environmental Issues and Options. Rome: FAO, 2006
26	Y N, Xue W X, Luan H, Wang Y J Yang . Environmental and economic benefits of carbon emission reduction in animal husbandry via the circular economy: Case study of pig farming in Liaoning, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 238: 117968 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117968
27	F, Weiss A Leip . Greenhouse gas emissions from the EU livestock sector: a life cycle assessment carried out with the CAPRI model. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2012, 149: 124–134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.015
28	M Q, Li S L, Liu Y X, Sun Y X Liu . Agriculture and animal husbandry increased carbon footprint on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau during past three decades. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 278: 123963 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123963
29	P J, Gerber H, Steinfeld B, Henderson A, Mottet C, Opio J, Dijkman A, Falcucci G Tempio . Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2013
30	M, Yan K, Cheng T, Luo Y, Yan G, Pan R M Rees . Carbon footprint of grain crop production in China-based on farm survey data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 104: 130–138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.058
31	S, Wei Z H, Bai D, Chadwick Y, Hou W, Qin Z Q, Zhao R F, Jiang L Ma . Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions and mitigation options from livestock production in peri-urban agriculture: Beijing—A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 178: 515–525 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.257
32	Z, Niu L Zhao . The deputy to the National People’s Congress and the director of the Institute of Agricultural Environment and Sustainable Development of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, answered the reporter’s question: How to achieve “carbon peak” and “carbon neutrality” in agriculture and rural areas? Agricultural Communication, 2021(06): 32–33 (in Chinese)
33	der Weerden T J, van S, Laurenson I, Vogeler P C, Beukes S M, Thomas R M, Rees C F E, Topp G, Lanigan Klein C A M de . Mitigating nitrous oxide and manure-derived methane emissions by removing cows in response to wet soil conditions. Agricultural Systems, 2017, 156: 126–138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.010
34	M, Sharara D, Kim S, Sadaka G Thoma . Consequential life cycle assessment of swine manure management within a thermal gasification scenario. Energies, 2019, 12(21): 4081 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12214081
35	B, Amon V, Kryvoruchko T, Amon S Zechmeister-Boltenstern . Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 112(2−3): 153−162
36	D, Chadwick S, Sommer R, Thorman D, Fangueiro L, Cardenas B, Amon T Misselbrook . Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011, 166−167: 514−531
37	B, Khoshnevisan N, Duan P, Tsapekos M K, Awasthi Z D, Liu A, Mohammadi I, Angelidaki D C W, Tsang Z Q, Zhang J T, Pan L, Ma M, Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei H B Liu . A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 135: 110033 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110033
38	M M, Ali A M, Mustafa X, Zhang X, Zhang U A., Danhassaan H, Lin U, Choe K, Wang K Sheng . Combination of ultrasonic and acidic pretreatments for enhancing biohythane production from tofu processing residue via one-stage anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 344(Part B): 126244
39	Y, Li A, Manandhar G, Li A Shah . Life cycle assessment of integrated solid state anaerobic digestion and composting for on-farm organic residues treatment. Waste Managemen, 2018, 76: 294–305 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.025
40	J, Zhou W, Zhang R, Dong C, Pang L Chen . The influence of biogas fermentation management system on greenhouse gas emission. Renewable Energy Resources, 2012, 30(8): 59−63 (in Chinese)
41	E, Ghafoori P C, Flynn M D Checkel . Global warming impact of electricity generation from beef cattle manure: a life cycle assessment study. International Journal of Green Energy, 2006, 3(3): 257–270 https://doi.org/10.1080/01971520600704423
42	S Y A, Siddiki M N, Uddin M, Mofijur I M R, Fattah H C, Ong S S, Lam P S, Kumar S F Ahmed . Theoretical calculation of biogas production and greenhouse gas emission reduction potential of livestock, poultry and slaughterhouse waste in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(3): 105204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105204
43	R, Arthur M F, Baidoo G, Osei L, Boamah S Kwofie . Evaluation of potential feedstocks for sustainable biogas production in Ghana: quantification, energy generation, and CO2 abatement. Cogent Environmental Science, 2020, 6(1): 1868162 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2020.1868162
44	J, Wang Z, Hu X, Xu X, Jiang B, Zheng X, Liu X, Pan P Kardol . Emissions of ammonia and greenhouse gases during combined pre-composting and vermicomposting of duck manure. Waste Management, 2014, 34(8): 1546–1552 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.04.010
45	B X, Zhang W H, Luo R D, Yang L L, Liu Q Q, Wei G X Li . Effects of spent mushroom substrate on the maturity and gaseou s emissions in co-composting of chicken manure and tobacco wastes. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(11): 2578−2586 (in Chinese)
46	Z, Xu G, Li N, Huda B, Zhang M, Wang W Luo . Effects of moisture and carbon/nitrogen ratio on gaseous emissions and maturity during direct composting of cornstalks used for filtration of anaerobically digested manure centrate. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 298: 122503 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122503
47	Y S Li . Research on the efficiency of thermophilic aerobic composting enhanced by microbial agents combined with nano-membrane. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Beijing: Beijing forestry university, 2021 (in Chinese)
48	X Q, Zhang Z Y, Lu Y C, Cheng D J, Zhang R Q, Ma Z J, Mu X H, Jiao S Q Guo . Development and application of nanofilm organic waste composting technology. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2020, 48(6): 56−61 (in Chinese)
49	B, Lv Y, Cui H, Wei Q, Chen D Zhang . Elucidating the role of earthworms in N2O emission and production pathway during vermicomposting of sewage sludge and rice straw. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 400: 123215 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123215
50	A, Parodi Boer I J M, De W J J, Gerrits Loon J J A, Van M J W, Heetkamp Schelt J, Van J E, Bolhuis Zanten H H E Van . Bioconversion efficiencies, greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions during black soldier fly rearing—A mass balance approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 271: 122488 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122488
51	K A, Boakye-Yiadom A, Ilari D Duca . Greenhouse gas emissions and life cycle assessment on the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.). Sustainability, 2022, 14(16): 10456 https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610456
52	J S, Matos Aráujo L P, de I B, Allaman I P, Lôbo Oliva S T, de T M, Tavares Almeida Neto J A de . Evaluation of the reduction of methane emission in swine and bovine manure treated with black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2021, 193(8): 480 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09252-2
53	A, Parodi W J J, Gerrits Loon J J A, Van Boer I J M, De A J A, Aarnink Zanten H H E Van . Black soldier fly reared on pig manure: bioconversion efficiencies, nutrients in the residual material, greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions. Waste Management, 2021, 126: 674–683 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.001
54	T, Han T, Wang Z, Wang T, Xiao M, Wang Y, Zhang J, Zhang D Liu . Evaluation of gaseous and solid waste in fermentation bedding system and its impact on animal performance: a study of breeder ducks in winter. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 836: 155672 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155672
55	F X, Philippe M, Laitat B, Nicks J F Cabaraux . Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions during the fattening of pigs kept on two types of straw floor. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2012, 150: 45–53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.006
56	Q K, Sheng C, Wang Y, Wu J F, Guo H B, Zhao G Z Zhang . Effects of deep-litter systems on enviroment in swine house and swine productivity in cold seasons. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology, 2009, 30(1): 82−85 (in Chinese)
57	Z, Meiirkhanuly J A, Koziel B, Chen A, Białowiec M, Lee J, Wi C, Banik R C, Brown S Bakshi . Mitigation of gaseous emissions from swine manure with the surficial application of biochars. Atmosphere, 2020, 11(11): 1179 https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11111179
58	B, Zhang T, Fu C, Guan S, Cui B, Fan Y, Tan W, Luo Q, Wei G, Li Y Peng . Environmental life cycle assessments of chicken manure compost using tobacco residue, mushroom bran, and biochar as additives. Sustainability, 2022, 14(9): 4976 https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094976
59	X Q, Gong L, Zou L, Wang B, Zhang J X Jiang . Biochar improves compost humification, maturity and mitigates nitrogen loss during the vermicomposting of cattle manure-maize straw. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 325 (Part B): 116432
60	H, Li J, Watson Y, Zhang H, Lu Z Liu . Environment-enhancing process for algal wastewater treatment, heavy metal control and hydrothermal biofuel production: a critical review. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 298: 122421 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122421
61	J, Kang T, Wang H, Xin Z Wen . A laboratory study of microalgae-based ammonia gas mitigation with potential application for improving air quality in animal production operations. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2014, 64(3): 330–339 https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.859185
62	K, Chandrasekhar T, Raj S V, Ramanaiah G, Kumar J R, Banu S, Varjani P, Sharma A, Pandey S, Kumar S H Kim . Algae biorefinery: a promising approach to promote microalgae industry and waste utilization. Journal of Biotechnology, 2022, 345: 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.12.008
63	R, Rajagopal S E, Mousavi B, Goyette S Adhikary . Coupling of microalgae cultivation with anaerobic digestion of poultry wastes: toward sustainable value added bioproducts. Bioengineering, 2021, 8(5): 57 https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8050057
64	R, Chowdhury F Freire . Bioenergy production from algae using dairy manure as a nutrient source: life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission analysis. Applied Energy, 2015, 154: 1112–1121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.045
65	N, Duan B, Khoshnevisan C, Lin Z, Liu H Liu . Life cycle assessment of anaerobic digestion of pig manure coupled with different digestate treatment technologies. Environment International, 2020, 137: 105522 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105522
66	D P, Guillen E R, Coats A G, McDonald K Feris . An eco-friendly system for the production of value-added materials from dairy manure. Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials Society, 2018, 70(10): 1946–1957 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-2995-9
67	J, Joshi J Wang . Manure management coupled with bioenergy production: an environmental and economic assessment of large dairies in New Mexico. Energy Economics, 2018, 74: 197–207 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.008
68	N, Yasmin M, Jamuda A K, Panda K, Samal J N Nayak . Emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) during composting and vermicomposting: measurement, mitigation, and perspectives. Energy Nexus, 2022, 7: 100092 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100092
69	S Y, Gu Z J, Qiu Y B, Zhan K, Qian R N, Xiong H Y, Dai J, Yin W S Shen . Spatial-temporal characteristics and trend prediction of carbon emissions from animal husbandry in China. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2023, 42(3): 705−714 (in Chinese)
70	X P C, Vergé J A, Dyer R L, Desjardins D Worth . Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian dairy industry in 2001. Agricultural Systems, 2007, 94(03): 683–693 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2007.02.008
71	H Q Ma . Study on emission characteristics of NH3, CO2 and CH4 from cattle sheds in different seasons and emission reduction measures. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Xining: Qinghai Normal University, 2022 (in Chinese)
72	J, Wang C, Duan Y, Ji Y Sun . Methane emissions during storage of different treatments from cattle manure in Tianjin. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2010, 22(10): 1564–1569 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60290-4
73	H K, Ahn W, Mulbry J W, White S L Kondrad . Pile mixing increases greenhouse gas emissions during composting of dairy manure. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(3): 2904–2909 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.142
74	Commission-Joint Research Centre European . Evaluation of the Livestock Sector’s Contribution to the EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GGELS): Final Report. Ispra: European Commission-Joint Research Centre, 2010, 32
75	C H, Xie L X, Wang Z L Shao . Review of carbon emission research at home and abroad. Arid Land Geography, 2014, 37(4): 720−730 (in Chinese)
76	B W, Ang F L, Liu H S Chung . A generalized fisher index approach to energy decomposition analysis. Energy Economics, 2004, 26(5): 757–763 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.02.002
77	S N Qu . The decomposition analysis of carbon emissions: theoretical basis, methods and their evaluations. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 2020, 8(4): 42–59 https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748120500207
78	A, Sturm K, Muller S Upasena . Manual for the Preparers and Users of Eco-efficiency Indicators. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2004
79	L, Zhang J, Pang X, Chen Z Lu . Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from the agricultural sector of China’s main grain-producing areas. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 665: 1017–1025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.162
80	X C, Wang J J, Klemes Y T, Wang X B, Dong H J, Wei J H, Xu P S Varbanov . Water-Energy-Carbon Emissions nexus analysis of China: an environmental input-output model-based approach. Applied Energy, 2020, 261: 114431 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114431
81	Z H, Huang S H Mi . Research on agricultural carbon footprint—A case study of Zhejiang Province. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2011, 32(11): 40–47, 111 (in Chinese)
82	K H, Ominski D A, Boadi K M, Wittenberg D L, Fulawka J A Basarab . Estimates of enteric methane emissions from cattle in Canada using the IPCC Tier 2 methodology. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2007, 87(3): 459–467 https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS06034
83	R A Rosen . Is the IPCC’s 5th assessment a denier of possible macroeconomic benefits from mitigating climate change. Climate Change Economics, 2016, 7(1): 1640003 https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007816400030
84	R Mendelsohn . Should the IPCC assessment reports be an integrated assessment. Climate Change Economics, 2016, 7(1): 1640002 https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007816400029
85	B, Su B W, Ang Y Z Li . Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of Singapore’s carbon emissions. Energy Policy, 2017, 105: 484–492 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.027
86	Y L, Xi X M, Ye J, Du X P, Kong L, Wang F, Zhu T Han . Research progress of carbon emission accounting methods in livestock and poultry industry. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(4): 1−8 (in Chinese)
87	International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) The . 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC, 2019
88	B Q, Zhu J, Kros J P, Lesschen I G, Staritsky Vries W de . Assessment of uncertainties in greenhouse gas emission proﬁles of livestock sectors in Africa, Latin America and Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 2016, 16(6): 1571–1582 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0896-9
89	J Ma . Analysis of CO2 emissions and uncertainties in the embodied stage of buildings. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2022, 44(6): 209−218 (in Chinese)
90	M A J, Huijbregts W, Gilijamse A M J, Ragas L Reijnders . Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(11): 2600–2608 https://doi.org/10.1021/es020971+
91	J L, Gao X Y, Xu F Q, Zheng R Huo . Coal carbon emission inventory calculation and uncertainties analysis based on lifecycle analysis. China Coal, 2017, 43(6): 22−26 (in Chinese)
92	H, Imbeault-tétreault O, Jolliet L, Deschênes R K Rosenbaum . Analytical propagation of uncertainty in life cycle assessment using matrix formulation. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2013, 17(4): 485–492 https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12001
93	K, Wang S L, Li S Y, Li Z X Wang . Reviews of China’s carbon market and prospects of its optimal rolling out plan (2023). Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2023, 25(2): 36−44 (Social Sciences Edition)
94	F, Sun E D Lin . The challenges and opportunities of China’s agricultural greenhouse gas emission trading. Climate Change Research, 2018, 8(01): 54−59 (in Chinese)
95	of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China Ministry . Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control and Supervision and Guidance Implementation Plan (Trial). Available at website of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China on March 23, 2021
96	of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China (MARAC) Ministry . The Implementation Plan for Emission Reduction and Carbon Fixation in Agriculture and Rural Areas. Jointly Issued by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs and the National Development and Reform Commission. Beijing: MARAC, 2022. Available at MARAC website on June 29, 2022
97	K, He F L, Li Y Liu . Green development of livestock and poultry farming under the goal of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Environmental Protection, 2022, 50(16): 28−33 (in Chinese)
98	M, Stevanović A, Popp B L, Bodirsky F, Humpenöder C, Müller I, Weindl J P, Dietrich H, Lotze-Campen U, Kreidenweis S, Rolinski A, Biewald X Wang . Mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and land-use change: consequences for food prices. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(1): 365–374 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04291
99	B L, Bodirsky A, Popp H, Lotze-Campen J P, Dietrich S, Rolinski I, Weindl C, Schmitz C, Müller M, Bonsch F, Humpenöder A, Biewald M Stevanovic . Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. Nature Communications, 2014, 5(1): 3858 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4858
100	M, Springmann M, Clark D, Mason-D’Croz K, Wiebe B L, Bodirsky L, Lassaletta Vries W, de S J, Vermeulen M, Herrero K M, Carlson M, Jonell M, Troell F, DeClerck L J, Gordon R, Zurayk P, Scarborough M, Rayner B, Loken J, Fanzo H C J, Godfray D, Tilman J, Rockström W Willett . Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 2018, 562(7728): 519–525 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
101	T L, Zhang L, Yan D M Wei . Characteristic distribution of livestock manure and warning analysis of environmental carrying capacity based on the consumption of cultivated land in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(5): 745−755 (in Chinese)

[1]	Zhiping ZHU, Yue WANG, Ting YAN, Zherui ZHANG, Shunli WANG, Hongmin DONG. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM LIVESTOCK IN CHINA AND MITIGATION OPTIONS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF CARBON NEUTRALITY[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2023, 10(2): 226-233.
[2]	Kai WANG, Qunfeng ZHOU, Tianze YAN, Shilong XU, Longyi ZHAO, Weicheng WANG, Zhigang JIN, Peng QIN, Chenjian FU, Liangbi CHEN, Yuanzhu YANG. *Characterization of grain cadmium concentration in indica* hybrid rice**[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(4): 523-529.
[3]	David R. CHADWICK, John R. WILLIAMS, Yuelai LU, Lin MA, Zhaohai BAI, Yong HOU, Xinping CHEN, Thomas H. MISSELBROOK. Strategies to reduce nutrient pollution from manure management in China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(1): 45-55.
[4]	Alexey MORGOUNOV, Fatih OZDEMIR, Mesut KESER, Beyhan AKIN, Thomas PAYNE, Hans-Joachim BRAUN. International Winter Wheat Improvement Program: history, activities, impact and future[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(3): 240-250.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed