Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Business Research in China

ISSN 1673-7326

ISSN 1673-7431(Online)

CN 11-5746/F

Postal Subscription Code 80-977

Front. Bus. Res. China    2017, Vol. 11 Issue (1) : 101-137    https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-017-0005-7
Orginal Article
Impact of Ownership Types on R&D Intensity and Innovation Performance—Evidence from Transitional China
Da Teng1(), Jingtao Yi2()
1. Coventry Business School, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
2. School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
 Download: PDF(618 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This paper examines the effects of ownership types on firms’ R&D intensity and innovation performance, using a sample of 357,857 Chinese firms from 2005–2007. This study finds considerable divergence among Chinese domestic enterprises in terms of R&D intensity and innovation performance. Firms owned by the central government are the key drivers for firms’ R&D activities, while local government, private and foreign ownerships are negatively related to both R&D intensity and innovation performance. Significant divergence within government ownership category and argues that China’s institutional changes generate varied government ownership groups with different levels of resource endowment, which in turn influence firms’ R&D activities.

Keywords ownership      R&D intensity      innovation performance      institutional changes      China     
Issue Date: 20 June 2017
 Cite this article:   
Da Teng,Jingtao Yi. Impact of Ownership Types on R&D Intensity and Innovation Performance—Evidence from Transitional China[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2017, 11(1): 101-137.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fbr/EN/10.1186/s11782-017-0005-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fbr/EN/Y2017/V11/I1/101
[1] Shimiao Li, Nor Siah Jaharuddin. Identifying the key purchase factors for organic food among Chinese consumers[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2020, 14(4): 475-497.
[2] Yibo Bi, Zhiyi Ren, Kun Bao. Does distance matter in foreign direct investment sub-national location choice? Evidence from China[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2020, 14(2): 237-255.
[3] Yu Hu, Yonggui Wang. Marketing research in China during the 40-year reform and opening up[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2020, 14(1): 1-29.
[4] Jinran Chen, Lijuan Xie. Industrial policy, structural transformation and economic growth: Evidence from China[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2019, 13(4): 449-467.
[5] Zhen Wang, Yuan Liu, Songbo Liu. Authoritarian leadership and task performance: The effects of leader-member exchange and dependence on leader[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2019, 13(4): 416-430.
[6] Yan Li, Bao Sun, Shangyao Yu. Employee stock ownership plan and stock price crash risk[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2019, 13(3): 251-283.
[7] Mingming Shi, Jun Zhou, Zhou Jiang. Consumer heterogeneity and online vs. offline retail spatial competition[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2019, 13(2): 231-249.
[8] Jingya Li, Ming-Hua Liu. Interest rate liberalization and pass-through of monetary policy rate to bank lending rates in China[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2019, 13(2): 212-230.
[9] Sihan Zhang, Chuanlu Hou, Jing Chen. Homeownership, city integration, and the sense of happiness of migrants in urban China[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2019, 13(1): 33-52.
[10] Dongmin Kong, Maobin Wang, Xiyu Zhang. The effects of entrepreneurial long-term commitment on post-IPO performance: Chinese evidence[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2018, 12(4): 381-398.
[11] Jiang Wei, Ding Wang, Yang Liu. Towards an asymmetry-based view of Chinese firms’ technological catch-up[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2018, 12(4): 331-343.
[12] Ji-Ye Mao. Forty Years of Business Research in China: A Critical Reflection and Projection[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2018, 12(4): 323-330.
[13] William Gonzalo Vega Salas, Ziliang Deng. High ownership concentration and exporting of emerging market firms: evidence from Peru[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2017, 11(3): 427-451.
[14] Lu Lu, Jun Liu, Na Zhao. Why employees stay: the roles of psychological ownership, territoriality and work relationship closeness in affecting employee turnover intention[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2017, 11(2): 186-207.
[15] Karin Sanders, Julie A. Cogin, Cai-Hui Veronica Lin. Methodological choices of HR research conducted in Asia[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2017, 11(2): 167-185.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed