Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Business Research in China

ISSN 1673-7326

ISSN 1673-7431(Online)

CN 11-5746/F

Postal Subscription Code 80-977

Front Bus Res Chin    2012, Vol. 6 Issue (2) : 218-244    https://doi.org/10.3868/s070-001-012-0011-3
research-article
The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: An Application of Quantile Regression
Yungchih George Wang1(), Wen-Hsi Lydia Hsu2(), Kuang-Wen Chang3()
1. Department of International Business, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences; 2. Department of Business Administration, National Ping-Tung University of Science and Technology, Ping-Tung, Taiwan, China; 3. Department of Business Administration, Soochow University, Taiwan, China
 Download: PDF(645 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This study empirically examines the relationship between a firm’s fulfilling of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and performance. We developed a CSR index (CSRI) to quantitatively evaluate CSR, which consists of four dimensions measuring a firm’s contributions to the economy, society, environment, and corporate governance, respectively. With data from publicly-listed firms in Taiwan during the period of 2004–2009, results of quantile regression show that fulfilling CSR has a significantly positive impact on firm performance, and that the impact in a more profitable firm tends to be significantly greater than that in a less profitable firm. Specifically, when a firm is more profitable, its management would be more willing to implement CSR. The implication is that a firm could pursue better performance while serving as a good corporate citizen.

Keywords corporate social responsibility (CSR)      corporate social responsibility index (CSRI)      stakeholders      firm performance      socially responsible investment     
Corresponding Author(s): Yungchih George Wang,Email:gwang@cc.kuas.edu.tw; Wen-Hsi Lydia Hsu,Email:hsuw@npust.edu.tw; Kuang-Wen Chang,Email:kwchang@scu.edu.tw   
Issue Date: 05 June 2012
 Cite this article:   
Yungchih George Wang,Wen-Hsi Lydia Hsu,Kuang-Wen Chang. The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: An Application of Quantile Regression[J]. Front Bus Res Chin, 2012, 6(2): 218-244.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fbr/EN/10.3868/s070-001-012-0011-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fbr/EN/Y2012/V6/I2/218
[1] Ting Ren, Youzhi Xiao, Xinguo Yu, Hongyan Yang, Jianmei Ge. Resignation of officials as independent directors and firm performance[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2020, 14(4): 498-518.
[2] Bing Guo, Jing Wang, Steven X. Wei. R&D spending, strategic position and firm performance[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2018, 12(3): 277-295.
[3] Haina Shi, Xin Zhang, Jing Zhou. Cross-listing and CSR performance: evidence from AH shares[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2018, 12(2): 126-140.
[4] Wen Wen, Jianbo Song. Can returnee managers promote CSR performance? Evidence from China[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2017, 11(3): 309-340.
[5] Zhengping Fu, Wei Peng. Effect of Alliance Orientation on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study on High-Technology Firms in China[J]. Front Bus Res Chin, 2012, 6(3): 375-397.
[6] Kangtao Ye, Hang Liu. State Ownership and Firm Performance: A Revisit[J]. Front Bus Res Chin, 2012, 6(2): 201-217.
[7] Yujun Lian, Zhi Su, Yuedong Gu. Evaluating the Effects of Equity Incentives Using PSM: Evidence from China[J]. Front Bus Res Chin, 2011, 5(2): 266-290.
[8] YAO Xianguo, WEN Weixiang, REN Zhouqi, . Corporate entrepreneurship in the enterprise clusters environment —Influence of network resources and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2009, 3(4): 566-582.
[9] LI Shanmin, ZHOU Xiaochun. Firm characteristics, industry characteristics and acquisition strategy: An empirical study of Chinese listed firms[J]. Front Bus Res Chin, 2009, 3(2): 224-241.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed