Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Computer Science

ISSN 2095-2228

ISSN 2095-2236(Online)

CN 10-1014/TP

Postal Subscription Code 80-970

2018 Impact Factor: 1.129

Front. Comput. Sci.    2023, Vol. 17 Issue (2) : 172501    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-021-0375-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A location-based fog computing optimization of energy management in smart buildings: DEVS modeling and design of connected objects
Abdelfettah MAATOUG1,2(), Ghalem BELALEM1, Saïd MAHMOUDI3
1. Computer Science Department, Faculty of Exact and Applied Sciences, University of Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella, Oran 31000, Algeria
2. Science and Technology Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of TIARET, Tiaret 14000, Algeria
3. Computer Science Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mons, Mons 7000, Belgium
 Download: PDF(45328 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Nowadays, smart buildings rely on Internet of things (IoT) technology derived from the cloud and fog computing paradigms to coordinate and collaborate between connected objects. Fog is characterized by low latency with a wider spread and geographically distributed nodes to support mobility, real-time interaction, and location-based services. To provide optimum quality of user life in modern buildings, we rely on a holistic Framework, designed in a way that decreases latency and improves energy saving and services efficiency with different capabilities. Discrete EVent system Specification (DEVS) is a formalism used to describe simulation models in a modular way. In this work, the sub-models of connected objects in the building are accurately and independently designed, and after installing them together, we easily get an integrated model which is subject to the fog computing Framework. Simulation results show that this new approach significantly, improves energy efficiency of buildings and reduces latency. Additionally, with DEVS, we can easily add or remove sub-models to or from the overall model, allowing us to continually improve our designs.

Keywords smart building      energy consumption      IoT      fog computing Framework      DEVS simulation models     
Corresponding Author(s): Abdelfettah MAATOUG   
Just Accepted Date: 03 March 2021   Issue Date: 01 March 2022
 Cite this article:   
Abdelfettah MAATOUG,Ghalem BELALEM,Saïd MAHMOUDI. A location-based fog computing optimization of energy management in smart buildings: DEVS modeling and design of connected objects[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2023, 17(2): 172501.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/EN/10.1007/s11704-021-0375-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/EN/Y2023/V17/I2/172501
Fig.1  The logical roadmap of this work
Fig.2  Fog location-based framework [7]
Fig.3  Description of a DEVS atomic model
Fig.4  Graphical notations of transition, (a) external and (b) internal
Fig.5  Description of a DEVS coupled model
Fig.6  How to locate the user in our approach
  
  
  
Fig.7  Multilevel model for the building EMS (house or office EMS)
Fig.8  DEVS atomic model of a simple lamp
Fig.9  DEVS atomic model of an optimizer
Fig.10  DEVS atomic model of a solver
Fig.11  DEVS simulation model of the energy management in house and office
Fig.12  View of JDEVS software modules
Fig.13  Representation of the global model using the JDEVS tool
Fig.14  Representation of the house EMS coupled model using the JDEVS tool
Lighting/wh Fridge/wh Washing machine/wh Other appliances/wh HVAC/wh Total/kwh
Plenty mode 8000 2100 2000 3000 16500 31.60
Ordinary mode 4000 2100 1000 2400 10518 20.02
Economic mode 2400 2100 600 1500 8410 15.01
Tab.1  Daily house energy consumption estimation
Lighting/wh Small fridge/wh Electric kettle/wh Desktop computer/wh HVAC/wh Total/kwh
Plenty mode 1360 800 700 3360 4850 11.07
Ordinary mode 941 800 450 1720 3256 7.17
Economic mode 487 800 210 672 2798 4.97
Tab.2  Daily office energy consumption estimation
Fig.15  Comparison of the energy consumption of the house with the three modes’ energy estimation
Fig.16  Comparison of the energy consumption of office with the three modes’ energy estimation
Date Distance house/user Lighting Fridge Washing machine HVAC
June 18, 201912:06:49 (time 0) 12.75 863 374 0 614
June 18, 201912:09:31 (time 1) 0.00 871 402 6 698
Tab.3  House simulation data
Date Distance office/user Lighting Small fridge Electric kettle Desktop computer HVAC
June 18, 201911:57:32 (time 0) 3.87 680 345 256 1269 2419
June 18, 201912:00:11 (time 1) 26.47 683 362 256 1287 2468
Tab.4  Office simulation data
Fig.17  Daily house’s lighting energy consumption
Fig.18  Daily office’s lighting energy consumption
Fig.19  Weekly house energy gain
Fig.20  Weekly office energy gain
The proposed work Scenario Total energy consumption/kw Energy gained/% Simulation time
[20] Fixed schedule 675.47 12.19 One week
Modified schedule 593.14
Our work Framework not applied 197.13 21.34 One week
Framework applied 155.07
Tab.5  Total weekly Energy consumption in both works
  
  
  
1 P Bellavista, J Berrocal, A Corradi, S K Das, L Foschini, A Zanni. A survey on fog computing for the Internet of Things. Journal of Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2019, 52: 71– 99
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.12.007
2 F Jalali S Khodadustan C Gray K Hinton F Suits. Greening IoT with fog: a survey. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE). 2017, 25– 31
3 H F Atlam, R J Walters, G B Wills. Fog computing and the internet of things: a review. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 2018, 2( 2): 10
https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc2020010
4 A Maatoug, G Belalem. Conception and validation of smart building energy management system BEMS using the discrete event system specification DEVS. Journal of Communications Software and Systems, 2014, 10( 2): 107– 113
https://doi.org/10.24138/jcomss.v10i2.131
5 B P L Lau, S H Marakkalage, Y Zhou, N U Hassan, C Yuen, M Zhang, U X Tan. A survey of data fusion in smart city applications. Information Fusion, 2019, 52: 357– 374
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.05.004
6 J K Zao T T Gan C K You S J R Méndez C E Chung Y T Wang T Mullen T P Jung. Augmented brain computer interaction based on fog computing and linked data. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Environments. 2014, 374– 377
7 A Maatoug, G Belalem, S Mahmoudi. Fog computing framework for location-based energy management in smart buildings. Multiagent and Grid Systems, 2019, 15( 1): 39– 56
https://doi.org/10.3233/MGS-190301
8 M Etemad M Aazam M St-Hilaire. Using DEVS for modeling and simulating a Fog Computing environment. In: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC). 2017, 849– 854
9 Y Himeur, A Alsalemi, A Al-Kababji, F Bensaali, A Amira. Data fusion strategies for energy efficiency in buildings: overview, challenges and novel orientations. Information Fusion, 2020, 64: 99– 120
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.07.003
10 B L R Stojkoska, K V Trivodaliev. A review of internet of things for smart home: challenges and solutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140: 1454– 1464
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.006
11 E Carrillo V Benitez C Mendoza J Pacheco. IoT framework for smart buildings with cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2). 2015, 1– 6
12 W Tushar, C Yuen, K Li, K L Wood, Z Wei, L Xiang. Design of cloud-connected IoT system for smart buildings on energy management (invited paper). EAI Endorsed Transactions on Industrial Networks and Intelligent Systems, 2016, 3( 6): e3
https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.1-1-2016.150813
13 M A Al Faruque, K Vatanparvar. Energy management-as-a-service over fog computing platform. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2016, 3( 2): 161– 169
https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2471260
14 A Javed O Rana C Marmaras L Cipcigan. Fog paradigm for local energy management systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd EAI International Conference on Cloud Infrastructures, Services, and IoT Systems for Smart Cities. 2018, 162– 176
15 P G V Naranjo, Z Pooranian, M Shojafar, M Conti, R Buyya. FOCAN: a Fog-supported smart city network architecture for management of applications in the Internet of Everything environments. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 2019, 132: 274– 283
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2018.07.003
16 H Lin, G Liu, F Li, Y Zuo. Where to go? Predicting next location in IoT environment.. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2021, 15( 1): 151306
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-019-9118-9
17 J Pan, R Jain, S Paul, T Vu, A Saifullah, M Sha. An internet of things framework for smart energy in buildings: designs, prototype, and experiments. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2015, 2( 6): 527– 537
https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2413397
18 M V Moreno, M A Zamora, A F Skarmeta. User-centric smart buildings for energy sustainable smart cities. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 2014, 25( 1): 41– 55
https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.2771
19 T H Luan L Gao Z Li Y Xiang G Wei L Sun. Fog computing: focusing on mobile users at the edge. 2015, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1502.01815
20 M Albataineh, M Jarrah. DEVS-IoT: performance evaluation of smart home devices network. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2021, 80( 11): 16857– 16885
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09186-w
21 D Bonino F Corno. DogSim: a state chart simulator for domotic environments. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops). 2010, 208– 213
22 S Yi Z Hao Z Qin Q Li. Fog computing: platform and applications. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in Web Systems and Technologies (HotWeb). 2015, 73– 78
23 B P Zeigler H Praehofer T G Kim. Theory of Modelling and Simulation: Integrating Discrete Event and Continuous Complex Dynamic Systems. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000
24 L Capocchi, F Bernardi, D Federici, P A Bisgambiglia. BFS-DEVS: a general DEVS-based formalism for behavioral fault simulation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2006, 14( 7): 945– 970
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2006.05.002
25 I Stojmenovic S Wen. The fog computing paradigm: scenarios and security issues. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS). 2014, 1– 8
26 B Varghese N Wang D S Nikolopoulos R Buyya. Feasibility of fog computing. 2017, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1701.05451
27 X Guo, N Ansari, F Hu, Y Shao, N R Elikplim, L Li. A survey on fusion-based indoor positioning. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2020, 22( 1): 566– 594
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2019.2951036
28 J Cesconetto, Silva L Augusto, F Bortoluzzi, M Navarro-Cáceres, C A Zeferino, V R Q Leithardt. PRIPRO—privacy profiles: user profiling management for smart environments. Electronics, 2020, 9( 9): 1519
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9091519
29 A Y Abyaneh, V Pourahmadi, A H G Foumani. CSI-based authentication: extracting stable features using deep neural networks. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 2020, 31( 2): e3795
https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.3795
30 A Belhadi, Y Djenouri, G Srivastava, D Djenouri, J C W Lin, G Fortino. Deep learning for pedestrian collective behavior analysis in smart cities: a model of group trajectory outlier detection. Information Fusion, 2021, 65: 13– 20
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.003
31 L F Bittencourt, J Diaz-Montes, R Buyya, O F Rana, M Parashar. Mobility-aware application scheduling in fog computing. IEEE Cloud Computing, 2017, 4( 2): 26– 35
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCC.2017.27
32 J B Filippi, P Bisgambiglia. JDEVS: an implementation of a DEVS based formal framework for environmental modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2004, 19( 3): 261– 274
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.08.016
33 GeoTools. Geotools Users Group, 2002. Available from Geotools.org. website
34 A S Shah, H Nasir, M Fayaz, A Lajis, A Shah. A review on energy consumption optimization techniques in IoT based smart building environments. Information, 2019, 10( 3): 108
https://doi.org/10.3390/info10030108
[1] Shuzhe LI, Hongwei XU, Qiong LI, Qi HAN. Simulation study on the security of consensus algorithms in DAG-based distributed ledger[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2024, 18(3): 183704-.
[2] Ningning CHEN, Huibiao ZHU. A proof system of the CaIT calculus[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2024, 18(2): 182401-.
[3] Arpita BISWAS, Abhishek MAJUMDAR, Soumyabrata DAS, Krishna Lal BAISHNAB. OCSO-CA: opposition based competitive swarm optimizer in energy efficient IoT clustering[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2022, 16(1): 161501-.
[4] Kangli HE, Holger HERMANNS, Hengyang WU, Yixiang CHEN. Connection models for the Internet-of-Things[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2020, 14(3): 143401-.
[5] Xiaodong MENG, Chentao WU, Minyi GUO, Long ZHENG, Jingyu ZHANG. PAM: an efficient power-aware multilevel cache policy to reduce energy consumption of storage systems[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2019, 13(4): 850-863.
[6] Satoshi MIYAZAWA, Xuan SONG, Tianqi XIA, Ryosuke SHIBASAKI, Hodaka KANEDA. Integrating GPS trajectory and topics from Twitter stream for human mobility estimation[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2019, 13(3): 460-470.
[7] Xiong FU,Chen ZHOU. Virtual machine selection and placement for dynamic consolidation in Cloud computing environment[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2015, 9(2): 322-330.
[8] Xudong ZHU, Zhijing LIU. Human behavior clustering for anomaly detection[J]. Front Comput Sci Chin, 2011, 5(3): 279-289.
[9] Lei CHEN, Mitchell TSENG, Xiang LIAN, . Development of foundation models for Internet of Things[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2010, 4(3): 376-385.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed