Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front Chem Eng Chin    2010, Vol. 4 Issue (4) : 385-393    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-010-0501-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Effect of pressure on gasification reactivity of three Chinese coals with different ranks
Chunyu LI1,2, Jiantao ZHAO1(), Yitian FANG1(), Yang WANG1
1. Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, China; 2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
 Download: PDF(556 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The gasification reactivities of three kinds of different coal ranks (Huolinhe lignite, Shenmu bituminous coal, and Jincheng anthracite) with CO2 and H2O was carried out on a self-made pressurized fixed-bed reactor at increased pressures (up to 1.0 MPa). The physicochemical characteristics of the chars at various levels of carbon conversion were studied via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and BET surface area. Results show that the char gasification reactivity increases with increasing partial pressure. The gasification reaction is controlled by pore diffusion, the rate decreases with increasing total system pressure, and under chemical kinetic control there is no pressure dependence. In general, gasification rates decrease for coals of progressively higher rank. The experimental results could be well described by the shrinking core model for three chars during steam and CO2 gasification. The values of reaction order n with steam were 0.49, 0.46, 0.43, respectively. Meanwhile, the values of reaction order n with CO2 were 0.31, 0.28, 0.26, respectively. With the coal rank increasing, the pressure order m is higher, the activation energies increase slightly with steam, and the activation energy with CO2 increases noticeably. As the carbon conversion increases, the degree of graphitization is enhanced. The surface area of the gasified char increases rapidly with the progress of gasification and peaks at about 40% of char gasification.

Keywords coal      gasification      pressure      reaction order      shrinking core model     
Corresponding Author(s): ZHAO Jiantao,Email:zhaojt@sxicc.ac.cn; FANG Yitian,Email:fyt@sxicc.ac.cn   
Issue Date: 05 December 2010
 Cite this article:   
Chunyu LI,Jiantao ZHAO,Yitian FANG, et al. Effect of pressure on gasification reactivity of three Chinese coals with different ranks[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2010, 4(4): 385-393.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-010-0501-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2010/V4/I4/385
sampleproximate analysis W/wt-%ultimate analysis /wt-% ad
VMACHONSt
HLH coal28.8221.1819.8740.961.7314.330.861.07
HLH char1.380.4459.4036.540.771.090.501.26
SM coal27.537.1212.5663.364.1511.490.950.37
SM char0.850.3718.2876.391.062.370.880.65
JC coal7.440.8923.5266.932.633.680.821.53
JC char0.690.3621.6274.180.901.110.840.99
Tab.1  Proximate and ultimate analyses of three coal samples and chars
Fig.1  1 N; 2 CO; 3 gas inlet; 4 pressure vessel; 5 quartz crucible; 6 reaction pipe; 7 sampling entrance; 8 magnet; 9 ball valve; 10 temperature controller; 11 furnace; 12 water pump
Schematic diagram of pressurized fixed-bed reactor
Fig.2  Effect of total system pressure at constant gas composition on the carbon conversion
Fig.3  Effect of total system pressure at partial pressure of 0.08 MPa on the carbon conversion
Fig.4  Effect of gas composition on the carbon conversion
Fig.5  Effect of coal rank on the carbon conversion
Fig.6  The shrinking core model for SM char
reaction order nreaction order mactivation energy Ea/(kJ·mol-1)frequency factor A /(s-1·MPa)
HLHChar+ H2O0.493- 0.286114.394.68 × 103
Char+ CO20.312- 0.113120.464.41 × 103
SMChar+ H2O0.457- 0.199126.961.05 × 104
Char+ CO20.283- 0.055168.632.76 × 105
JCChar+ H2O0.428- 0.164138.721.90 × 104
Char+ CO20.264- 0.025209.366.05 × 106
Tab.2  Kinetic parameters for the shrinking core model
Fig.7  Optical microscope images of chars produced from three coals: (a) HLH, (b) SM, (c) JC
Fig.8  SEM photographs of JC chars at different carbon conversion with steam: (a) 14.91%; (b) 41.32%; (c) 70.04%; (d) 97.89%
Fig.9  Crystal structure with carbon conversion for coal char during gasification
Fig.10  Change in surface area with carbon conversion for coal char during gasification
1 Kajitani S, Suzuki N, Ashizawa M, Hara S. CO2 gasification rate analysis of coal char in entrained flow coal gasifier. Fuel , 2006, 85(2): 163-169
doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.07.024
2 Huang J J, Fang Y T, Chen H S, Wang Y. Coal gasification characteristic in a pressurized fluidized bed. Energy & Fuels , 2003, 17(6): 1474-1479
doi: 10.1021/ef030052k
3 Liu G, Tate A G, Bryant G W, Wall T F. Mathematical modeling of coal char reactivity with CO2 at high pressures and temperatures. Fuel , 2000, 79(10): 1145-1154
doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00274-4
4 Kajitani S, Hara S, Matsuda H. Gasification rate analysis of coal char with a pressurized drop tube furnace. Fuel , 2002, 81(5): 539-546
doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00149-1
5 Muhlen H J, van Heek K H, Juntgen H. Influence of pretreatment temperature and pressure on the char reactivity during hydrogasification. Fuel , 1986, 65(4): 591-593
doi: 10.1016/0016-2361(86)90054-2
6 Li S, Xiao X. Influence of pretreatment temperature and pressure on the char reactivity during hydrogasification. Fuel , 1993, 72: 1351-1353
7 Li S, Sun R. Kinetic studies of a lignite char pressurized gasification with CO2, H2 and steam. Fuel , 1994, 73(3): 413-416
doi: 10.1016/0016-2361(94)90095-7
8 Bhatia K S, Perlmutter S D. A random pore model for fluid-solid reactions. I. Isothermal kinetic control. American Institute of Chemical Engineers , 1980, 26(3): 379-386
9 Liu G S, Niksa S. Coal conversion submodels for design applications at elevated pressures. Part II. Char gasification. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science , 2004, 30(6): 679-717
doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2004.08.001
10 Li C Y, Zhao J T, Fang Y T, Wang Y. Pressurized fast-pyrolysis characteristics of typical Chinese coals with different ranks. Energy & Fuels , 2009, 23(10): 5099-5105
doi: 10.1021/ef900437h
11 Zhang L X, Huang J J, Fang Y T, Wang Y. Gasification reactivity and kinetics of typical Chinese anthracite chars with steam and CO2. Energy & Fuels , 2006, 20(3): 1201-1210
doi: 10.1021/ef050343o
12 Ahn D H, Gibbs B M, Ko K H, Kim J J. Gasification kinetics of an Indonesian subbituminous coal char with CO2 at elevated pressure. Fuel , 2001, 80(11): 1651-1658
doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00024-2
13 Linares-Solano A, Mahajan O P, Walker P Jr. Reactivity of heat-treated coals in steam. Fuel , 1979, 58(5): 327-332
doi: 10.1016/0016-2361(79)90148-0
14 Liu T F, Fang Y T, Wang Y. An experimental investigation into the gasification reactivity of chars prepared at high temperatures. Fuel , 2008, 87(4-5): 460-466
doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.06.019
15 Jüntgen H. Reactivities of carbon to steam and hydrogen and applications to technical gasification processes—A review. Carbon , 1981, 19(3): 167-173
doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(81)90039-7
16 Goyal A, Zabransky R F, Rehmat A. Gasification kinetics of Western Kentucky bituminous coal char. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , 1989, 28(12): 1767-1778
doi: 10.1021/ie00096a006
17 Jones R B, Mccourt C B, Morley C, King K. Maceral and rank influences on the morphology of coal char. Fuel , 1985, 64(10): 1460-1467
doi: 10.1016/0016-2361(85)90351-5
18 Hurt R H, Davis K A, Yang N Y C, Headley T J, Mitchell G D. Residual carbon from pulverized-coal-fired boilers. 2. Morphology and physicochemical properties. Fuel , 1995, 74(9): 1297-1306
doi: 10.1016/0016-2361(95)00100-J
19 Sadhukhan A K, Gupta P, Saha R K. Characterization of porous structure of coal char from a single devolatilized coal particle: Coal combustion in a fluidized bed. Fuel Processing Technology , 2009, 90(5): 692-700
doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.12.010
[1] Anna Khlyustova, Nikolay Sirotkin. Plasma-assisted oxidation of benzoic acid[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 513-521.
[2] Xiangchun Liu, Ping Cui, Qiang Ling, Zhigang Zhao, Ruilun Xie. A review on co-pyrolysis of coal and oil shale to produce coke[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 504-512.
[3] Xuantao Wu, Jie Wang. Intrinsic kinetics and external diffusion of catalytic steam gasification of fine coal char particles under pressurized and fluidized conditions[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 415-426.
[4] Alexander B. Koven, Shitang S. Tong, Ramin R. Farnood, Charles Q. Jia. Alkali-thermal gasification and hydrogen generation potential of biomass[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(3): 369-378.
[5] Xue Zou,Jin Li. On the fouling mechanism of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane in the treatment of coal gasification wastewater[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 490-498.
[6] Minhua ZHANG,Fang MENG,Zhongfeng GENG. CFD simulation on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with small-angle helical baffles[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(2): 183-193.
[7] Xiaoxue SUN,Yuzhu SUN,Jianguo YU. Leaching of aluminum from coal spoil by mechanothermal activation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(2): 216-223.
[8] D. N. SAULOV, C. R. CHODANKA, M. J. CLEARY, A. Y. KLIMENKO. Coupling the porous conditional moment closure with the random pore model: applications to gasification and CO2 capture[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(1): 84-93.
[9] Zhejun PAN. Modeling of coal swelling induced by water vapor adsorption[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(1): 94-103.
[10] Limei ZHONG, Li ZHOU. PSS sorbents for removing trace hydrogen sulfide in methane[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(3): 339-342.
[11] Geoff G.X. WANG, Xiaodong ZHANG, Xiaorong WEI, Xuehai FU, Bo JIANG, Yong QIN. A review on transport of coal seam gas and its impact on coalbed methane recovery[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(2): 139-161.
[12] Tiefeng WANG. Simulation of bubble column reactors using CFD coupled with a population balance model[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(2): 162-172.
[13] Jianglong YU, Liping CHANG, Fan LI, Kechang XIE. A review on research and development of iron-based sorbents for removal of hydrogen sulfide from hot coal gases[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2010, 4(4): 529-535.
[14] Gujun WAN, Guogang SUN, Cuizhi GAO, Ruiqian DONG, Ying ZHENG, Mingxian SHI. Modeling the gas flow in a cyclone separator at different temperature and pressure[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2010, 4(4): 498-505.
[15] Guoqiang ZHANG, Lin GAO, Hongguang JIN, Rumou LIN, Sheng LI. Sensitivity analysis of a methanol and power polygeneration system fueled with coke oven gas and coal gas[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2010, 4(4): 491-497.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed