Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2015, Vol. 9 Issue (2) : 183-193    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-015-1510-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
CFD simulation on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with small-angle helical baffles
Minhua ZHANG1,2,Fang MENG1,2,Zhongfeng GENG1,2,*()
1. Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Technology of Ministry of Education, R & D Center for Petrochemical Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tianjin 300072, China
 Download: PDF(5165 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Shell-and-tube heat exchanger with helical baffles is superior to that with segmental baffles in reducing pressure drop, eliminating dead zone and lowering the risks of vibration of tube bundle. This paper focused on the small-angle helical baffles that have been merely reported in open literature. These baffles are noncontinuous helical baffles with a helix angle of 10° to 30°, and their shapes are 1/4 ellipse, 1/4 sector and 1/3 sector. To assess the integrative performance, α/?p is employed, and the calculated results show that among the three baffle shapes the heat exchangers with a 1/4 sector helical baffle have the lowest pressure drop. At β = 10° and 20°, 1/4 sector helical baffle heat exchangers show the best integrative performance; at β = 30°, 1/4 ellipse and 1/4 sector helical baffle heat exchangers perform almost the same. For the study of helix angles, we found that 30° has the best integrative performance at low mass flow rate, almost the same as 20° at high mass flow rate.

Keywords heat transfer      pressure drop      helical baffle      CFD     
Corresponding Author(s): Zhongfeng GENG   
Online First Date: 26 May 2015    Issue Date: 14 July 2015
 Cite this article:   
Fang MENG,Zhongfeng GENG,Minhua ZHANG. CFD simulation on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with small-angle helical baffles[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(2): 183-193.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-015-1510-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2015/V9/I2/183
Fig.1  Configurations of helical baffle heat exchanger: (a) Front view; (b) Left view
Item Dimensions and description
segmental Helical baffle
Baffle shape 1/4 ellipse 1/4 sector 1/3 sector
Cases A1 A2 B1 B3 C1 C2
Shell inside diameter Di /mm 120 120 120 120
Length of heat exchanger /mm 738 738 738 738
Tube diameter d0 /mm 19 19 19 19
Tube number n 12 12 12 12
Tube pitch p /mm 25 25 25 25
Helix angle β 10° 20° 30° 10° 20° 30° 10° 20° 30°
Baffle Pitch B /mm 87 42 87 138 60 175 196 55 113 180
Baffle thickness /mm 3 3 3 3
Tab.1  Geometry parameters of the models
Parameter Unit Value
Density, ρ kg·m?3 994.71
Conductivity factor, λ W·m–1·K–1 0.62
Specific heat, Cp J·kg?1·K?1 4179.7
Dynamic viscosity, μ kg·m?1·s?1 0.00075128
Tab.2  Thermo physical properties of shell side water
Fig.6  Meshes on the helical baffle heat exchanger: (a) left view; (b) outside wall
Fig.7  Comparison of the experimental results and simulated results in the shell side: (a) pressure drop ?P; (b) heat transfer coefficient α
Fig.8  Path lines of segmental baffle and helical baffle heat exchangers. (a) segmental baffle heat exchanger; (b) helical baffle heat exchanger
Fig.9  Velocity vectors both in longitudinal and cross section. (a) segmental baffle; (b) helical baffle
Fig.10  Contours of temperature both in longitudinal and cross section. (a) segmental baffle; (b) helical baffle
Fig.11  Comparison of the pressure drop (a) ?P, heat transfer coefficient (b) α, heat transfer coefficient per unit pressure drop (c) α/?P on the shell side between segmental baffle and helical baffle heat exchangers
Fig.12  The performance comparison of the heat exchanger with different baffle shapes: (a?c) β= 10°, (d?f) β = 20°, and (g?i) β = 30°
Fig.13  Comparison of the helical baffle heat exchanger with different helix angles
<?PubTbl row rht="0.39in"?>
AHeat transfer area (m2)
AminMinimum transverse area (m2)
BBaf?e spacing for segmental baf?es or helical pitch for helical baf?es (mm)
CpSpeci?c heat (J?kg?1?K?1)
DiInside diameter of shell (mm)
D1Tube bundle-circumscribed circle diameter (mm)
doOuter diameter of tube (mm)
lEffective length of tube (mm)
MMass ?ux (kg?s?1)
nTube number
?PPressure drop (Pa)
PrPrandtl number
ReReynolds number
EijMean rate-of-strain tensor
?tmLogarithmic mean temperature difference (K)
tTemperature (K)
pTube pitch (mm)
QHeat exchange quantity (W)
Tab.1  
<?PubTbl row rht="0.36in"?><?PubTbl row rht="0.35in"?><?PubTbl row rht="0.37in"?>
αHeat transfer coefficient (W·m?2?K?1)
βHelix angle
λConductivity factor (W·m?1?K?1)
ρDensity (kg?m?3)
υKinematics viscosity (m2?s?1)
μDynamic viscosity of fluid (Pa?s)
Tab.2  Greek symbols
<?PubTbl row rht="0.35in"?><?PubTbl row rht="0.35in"?>
inInlet
outOutlet
sShell side
tTube side
wTube wall
Tab.3  Subscripts
1 Zhang Z G, Wu C S, Fang X M, Gao X, Wang Z. Experimental study of shell-side heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop for an integrally helical baffled heat exchanger combined with different enhanced tubes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(8): 4040–4044
2 Lutcha J, Nemcansky J. Performance improvement of tubular heat exchangers by helical baffles. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1990, 68: 263–270
3 Kral D, Stehlik P, van der Ploeg H J, Master B A S H I R I. Helical baffles in shell-and-tube heat exchangers. Part I: Experimental verification. Heat Transfer Engineering, 1996, 17(1): 93–101
4 Jafari Nasr M R, Shafeghat A. Fluid flow analysis and extension of rapid design algorithm for helical baffle heat exchangers. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 28(11–12): 1324–1332
5 Wang L, Luo L Q, Wang Q W. Effect of inserting block plates on pressure drop and heat transfer in shell-and-tube heat exchangers with helical baffles. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2001, 22(6): 173–176
6 Wang C, Zhu J G, Sang Z F. Experimental studies on thermal performance and flow resistance of heat exchangers with helical baffles. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2009, 30(5): 353–358
7 Jafari Nasr M R, Shafeghat A. Fluid flow analysis and extension of rapid design algorithm for helical baffle heat exchangers. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 28(11): 1324–1332
8 Xie G N, Wang Q W, Zeng M, Luo L Q. Heat transfer analysis for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with experimental data by artificial neural networks approach. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2007, 27(5): 1096–1104
9 Stehlik P, Něm?ansky J, Kral D, Swanson L W. Comparison of correction factors for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with segmental or helical baffles. Heat Transfer Engineering, 1994, 15(1): 55–65
10 Kral D, Stehlik P, van der Ploeg H J, Master B A S H I R I. Msster B l. Helical baffles in shell-and-tube heat exchangers. Part one: Experimental verification. Heat Transfer Engineering, 1996, 17(1): 93–101
11 Wang S L. Hydrodynamic studies on heat exchangers with helical baffles. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2002, 23(3): 43–49
12 Zhang Z G, Xu T, Fang X M. Experimental study on heat transfer enhancement of a helically baffled heat exchanger combined with three-dimensional finned tubes. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2004, 24(14-15): 2293–2300
13 Zhang L H, Xia Y M, Jiang B, Xiao X, Yang X. Pilot experimental study on shell and tube heat exchangers with small-angles helical baffles. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2013, 69: 112–118
14 Yakhot V, Orissa S A. Renormalization-group analysis of turbulence: Basic theory. Journal of Scientific Computing, 1986, 1(1): 3–11
15 Ji S. Shell side flow and heat transfer mechanism research of STHXs with helical baffles. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Jinan: Shandong University, 2011 (in Chinese)
16 Hewitt G F. Heat Exchanger Design Handbook. Begell House, 2008
17 Cao R. Research of helix baffle heat exchanger. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2011 (in Chinese)
[1] M Helal Uddin, Nesrin Ozalp, Jens Heylen, Cedric Ophoff. A new approach for fuel injection into a solar receiver/reactor: Numerical and experimental investigation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 683-696.
[2] Petro Kapustenko, Jiří J. Klemeš, Olga Arsenyeva, Olexandr Matsegora, Oleksandr Vasilenko. Accounting for local features of fouling formation on PHE heat transfer surface[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 619-629.
[3] Anan Wang,Helen H. Lou,Daniel Chen,Anfeng Yu,Wenyi Dang,Xianchang Li,Christopher Martin,Vijaya Damodara,Ajit Patki. Combustion mechanism development and CFD simulation for the prediction of soot emission during flaring[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 459-471.
[4] Ali SHAHMOHAMMADI,Arezou JAFARI. Application of different CFD multiphase models to investigate effects of baffles and nanoparticles on heat transfer enhancement[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2014, 8(3): 320-329.
[5] W. Widiyastuti, Adhi Setiawan, Sugeng Winardi, Tantular Nurtono, Heru Setyawan. Particle formation of hydroxyapatite precursor containing two components in a spray pyrolysis process[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2014, 8(1): 104-113.
[6] Chong PANG, Wei TAN, Endian SHA, Yuanqing TAO, Liyan LIU. Simulating multiphase flow in a two-stage pusher centrifuge using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(3): 329-338.
[7] Mona EBRAHIMIFAKHAR, Elmira MOHSENZADEH, Sadegh MORADI, Mostafa MORAVEJI, Mahmoud SALIMI. CFD simulation of the hydrodynamics in an internal air-lift reactor with two different configurations[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(4): 455-462.
[8] Krishnendu Bhattacharyya. Effects of radiation and heat source/sink on unsteady MHD boundary layer flow and heat transfer over a shrinking sheet with suction/injection[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(3): 376-384.
[9] Haoyi SUN, Tao LI, Weiyong YING, Dingye FANG. Experimental study on bubble behavior and CFD simulation of large-scale slurry bubble column reactor[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2010, 4(4): 515-522.
[10] Zhaoguang XU, Yanqiu PAN, Yalan YU. CFD simulation on membrane distillation of NaCl solution[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2009, 3(3): 293-297.
[11] Yiqun WANG, Lifeng YAN. CFD based combustion model for sewage sludge gasification in a fluidized bed[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 138-145.
[12] Zhenhao XI, Weizhen SUN, Ling ZHAO, Zhaoyan LIU. Combined static mixers for high viscous fluids mixing[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2009, 3(1): 93-96.
[13] CHEN Yunhua, ZHU Xuedong, WU Yongqiang, ZHU Zibin. The investigation of pressure drop in moving-beds[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2007, 1(2): 184-189.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed