Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2015, Vol. 9 Issue (1) : 84-93    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-015-1508-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Hydrophobic polyethersulfone porous membranes for membrane distillation
Heba ABDALLAH(),Ayman EL-GENDI,Maaly KHEDR,Elham EL-ZANATI
Chemical Engineering & Pilot Plant Department, Engineering Research Division, National Research Center, 33 Bohouth st. Dokki, Giza, Egypt
 Download: PDF(1693 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Membrane distillation (MD) is a thermal, vapor-driven transportation process through micro porous hydrophobic membranes that is increasingly being applied to seawater and brine desalination processes. Two types of hydrophobic microporous polyethersulfone flat sheet membranes, namely, annealed polyethersulfone and a polyethersulfone/tetraethoxysilane (PES/TEOS) blend were prepared by a phase inversion process. The membranes were characterized and their performances were investigated using the vacuum membrane distillation of an aqueous NaCl solution. The performances of the prepared membranes were also compared with two commercially available hydrophobic membranes, polytetrafluorethylene and polyvinylidene fluoride. The influence of operational parameters such as feed temperature (25–65 °C), permeate vacuum pressure (200–800 mbar), feed flow rate (8–22 mL/s) and feed salt concentration (3000 to 35000 mg/L) on the MD permeation flux were investigated for the four membranes. The hydrophobic PES/TEOS membrane had the highest salt rejection (99.7%) and permeate flux (86 kg/m2·h) at 65 °C, with a feed of 7000 ppm and a pressure of 200 mbar.

Keywords membrane distillation      hydrophobic membrane      salt rejection      permeate flux     
Corresponding Author(s): Heba ABDALLAH   
Online First Date: 30 March 2015    Issue Date: 07 April 2015
 Cite this article:   
Heba ABDALLAH,Ayman EL-GENDI,Maaly KHEDR, et al. Hydrophobic polyethersulfone porous membranes for membrane distillation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(1): 84-93.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-015-1508-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2015/V9/I1/84
Membrane PES /wt-% PVP /wt-% NMP /wt-% TEOS /wt-%
M1 20 5 75 -
M2 20 5 70 5
Tab.1  Compositions of dope solutionsa)
Fig.1  Schematic of the MD experimental laboratory setup
Fig.2  SEM of PES membrane (M1) (a) membrane surface and (b) membrane cross-section
Fig.3  SEM of PES/TEOS membrane (M2) (a) membrane surface and (b) membrane cross-section
Fig.4  SEM of PVDF membrane (M3) (a) membrane surface and (b) membrane cross-section
Fig.5  SEM of PTFE membrane (M4) (a) membrane surface and (b) membrane cross section
Fig.6  Wettability of PES membrane (a) without additives and (b) with TEOS
Fig.7  Wettability of the prepared membranes (a) M1 without annealing, (b) M1 after annealing and (c) M2 (PES/TEOS blend)
Membrane type M1 M2 M3 M4
Porosity /? 0.8 0.85 0.75 0.75
Membrane thickness /μm 200 153 200 120
Average pores diameter /μm 0.281 0.242 0.2 0.22
Tortuosity 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.4
Contact angle /° 80±2 98±2 84±2 105±2
Tab.2  Properties of the membranesa)
Fig.8  Effect of temperatures for the different hydrophobic membranes on (a) membrane flux and (b) % salt rejection
Fig.9  Effect of vacuum pressure for the hydrophobic membranes on (a) membrane flux and (b) % salt rejection
Fig.10  Effect of feed flow rate for the different hydrophobic membranes on (a) membrane flux and (b) % salt rejection
Fig.11  Effect of feed salinity for the different hydrophobic membranes on (a) membrane flux and (b) % salt rejection
1 Mannella G A, LaCarrubba V, Brucato V. Characterization of hydrophobic polymeric membranes for membrane distillation process. International Journal of Material Forming, 2010, 3(1): 563–566
2 Alkhudhiri A, Darwish N, Hilal N. Membrane distillation: A comprehensive review. Desalination, 2012, 287: 2–18
3 Al-Obaidani S, Curcio E, Macedonio F, Profio G D, Al-Hinaid H, Drioli E. Potential of membrane distillation in seawater desalination: Thermal efficiency, sensitivity study and cost estimation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 323(1): 85–98
4 Baskan R. Solar powered membrane distillation and reverse osmosis process. International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, 2014, 3(1): 75–78
5 Foster P J, Burgoyne A, Vahdati M M. Improved process topology for membrane distillation. Separation and Purification Technology, 2001, 21(3): 205–217
6 Goosen M F A, Sablani S S, Al-Maskari S S, Al-Belushi R H, Wilp M. Effect of feed temperature on permeate flux and mass transfer coefficient in spiral-wound reverse osmosis systems. Desalination, 2002, 144(1-3): 367–372
7 Li J, Lei Z, Li C, Chen B. Comments on special distillation processes. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2005, 22(4): 617–618
8 Shamel M, Chung O T. Drinking water from desalination of sea water: optimization of reverse osmosis system operating parameters. Journal of Engineering Science Technology, 2006, 1(2): 203–211
9 Alklaibi A M, Lior N. Membrane-distillation desalination: Status and potential. Desalination, 2005, 171(2): 111–131
10 Garcia-Payo M C, Rivier C A, Marison I W, Stockar U. Separation of binary mixtures by thermostatic sweeping gas membrane distillation. II. Experimental results with aqueous formic acid solutions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 198(2): 197–210
11 Curcio E, Simone S, Profio G D, Drioli E, Cassetta A, Lamba D. Membrane crystallization of lysozyme under forced solution flow. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 257(1-2): 134–143
12 Camacho L M, Dumée L, Zhang J, Li J, Duke M, Gomez J, Gray S. Advances in membrane distillation for water desalination and purification applications. Water (Basel), 2013, 5(1): 94–196
13 Sivakumar M, Ramezanianpour M, Halloran G O. Mine water treatment using a vacuum membrane distillation system. APCBEE Procedia, 2013, 5: 157–162
14 Mericq J P, Laborie S, Cabassud C. Vacuum membrane distillation for an integrated seawater desalination process. Desalination and Water Treatreatent, 2009, 9(1-3): 287–296
15 Phattaranawik J, Jiraratananon R, Fane A G. Heat transport and membrane distillation coefficients in direct contact membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, 212(1-2): 177–193
16 Khayet M, Matsuura T. Application of surface modifying macromolecules for the preparation of membranes for membrane distillation. Desalination, 2003, 158(1-3): 51–56
17 Garcia-Payo M C, Izquierdo-Gil M A, Fernández-Pineda C. Wetting study of hydrophobic membranes via liquid entry pressure measurements with aqueous alcohol solutions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2000, 230(2): 420–431
18 Cabassud C, Wirth D. Membrane distillation for water desalination: How to chose an appropriate membrane? Desalination, 2003, 157(1-3): 307–314
19 Duan S H, Ito A, Ohkawa A. Removal of trichloroethylene from water by aeration, pervaporation and membrane distillation. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 2001, 34(8): 1069–1073
20 Wang P, Chung T S. Recent advances in membrane distillation processes: Membrane development, configuration design and application exploring. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 474: 39–56
21 Lu J, Xiao T, Haijiao Q, Chen S. Effects of diluents on PVDF microporous membranes structure via thermally induced phase inversion. Technology of Water Treatment, 2013, 39: 33–36
22 Ma W, Zhou B, Liu T, Zhang J, Wang X. The supramolecular organization of PVDF lamellae formed in diphenylketone dilutions via thermally induced phase separation. Colloid & Polymer Science, 2013, 291(4): 981–992
23 Kang G D, Cao Y M. Application and modification of poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes—A review. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 463: 145–165
24 Zuo G, Wang R. Novel membrane surface modification to enhance anti-oil fouling property for membrane distillation application. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 447: 26–35
25 Tijing L D, Choi J S, Lee S, Kim S H, Shon H K. Recent progress of membrane distillation using electrospun nanofibrous membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 453(1): 435–462
26 Wang P, Chung T S. Exploring the spinning and operation of multi-bore hollow fiber membranes for vacuum membrane distillation. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2014, 40(3): 1078–1090
27 Gryta M. Desalination of thermally softened water by membrane distillation process. Desalination, 2010, 257(1-3): 30–35
28 Ali S S, Abdallah H. Development of PES/CA Blend RO Membrane for Water Desalination. International Review of Chemical Engineering, 2012, 4: 316–323
29 Ananth A, Arthanareeswaran G, Wang H. The influence of tetraethylorthosilicate and polyethyleneimine on the performance of polyethersulfone membranes. Desalination, 2012, 287: 61–70
30 Li B, Sirkar K K. Novel membrane and device for vacuum membrane distillation-based desalination process. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 257(1-2): 60–75
31 Curcio E, Drioli E. Membrane distillation and related operations (A Review). Separation and Purification Review, 2005, 34(1): 35–86
32 El-Bourawi M S, Ding Z, Ma R, Khayet M. Review a framework for better understanding membrane distillation separation process. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 285(1-2): 4–29
33 Mohammadi T, Akbarabadi M. Separation of ethylene glycol solution by vacuum membrane distillation (VMD). Desalination, 2005, 181(1-3): 35–41
34 Adiche C, Sundmacher K. Experimental investigation on a membrane distillation based micro-separator. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2010, 49(4): 425–434
35 Khayet M, Godino M P, Mengual J I. Thermal boundary layers in sweeping gas membrane distillation processes. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2002, 48(7): 1488–1497
36 Rivier C A, Garca-Payo M C, Marison I W, Stockar U. Separation of binary mixtures by thermostatic sweeping gas membrane distillation. I. Theory and simulations. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 201(1-2): 1–16
37 Martínez-Díez L, Vázquez-González M I. Temperature and concentration polarization in membrane distillation of aqueous salt solutions. Journal of Membrane Science, 1999, 156(2): 265–273
[1] Qing Li, Yingjie Qin, Yunfei Liu, Jianjun Liu, Qing Liu, Pingli Li, Liqiang Liu. Detoxification and concentration of corn stover hydrolysate and its fermentation for ethanol production[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 140-151.
[2] Xiaobin Jiang, Linghan Tuo, Dapeng Lu, Baohong Hou, Wei Chen, Gaohong He. Progress in membrane distillation crystallization: Process models, crystallization control and innovative applications[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(4): 647-662.
[3] Rongling LIU, Yingjie QIN, Xiaojun LI, Liqiang LIU. Concentrating aqueous hydrochloric acid by multiple-effect membrane distillation[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(3): 311-321.
[4] Li XU, Li-Shun DU, Jing HE. Effects of operating conditions on membrane charge property and nanofiltration[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(4): 492-499.
[5] Zhaoguang XU, Yanqiu PAN, Yalan YU. CFD simulation on membrane distillation of NaCl solution[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2009, 3(3): 293-297.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed