Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (4) : 872-881    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-2001-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Recovery of free volume in PIM-1 membranes through alcohol vapor treatment
Faiz Almansour1, Monica Alberto1, Rupesh S. Bhavsar2, Xiaolei Fan1, Peter M. Budd2, Patricia Gorgojo1()
1. Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, School of Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
2. Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
 Download: PDF(1191 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Physical aging is currently a major obstacle for the commercialization of PIM-1 membranes for gas separation applications. A well-known approach to reversing physical aging effects of PIM-1 membranes at laboratory scale is soaking them in lower alcohols, such as methanol and ethanol. However, this procedure does not seem applicable at industrial level, and other strategies must be investigated. In this work, a regeneration method with alcohol vapors (ethanol or methanol) was developed to recover permeability of aged PIM-1 membranes, in comparison with the conventional soaking-in-liquid approach. The gas permeability and separation performance, before and post the regeneration methods, were assessed using a binary mixture of CO2 and CH4 (1:1, v:v). Our results show that an 8-hour methanol vapor treatment was sufficient to recover the original gas permeability, reaching a CO2 permeability>7000 barrer.

Keywords polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM)      PIM-1      physical aging      gas separation      vapor-phase regeneration     
Corresponding Author(s): Patricia Gorgojo   
Just Accepted Date: 09 December 2020   Online First Date: 11 February 2021    Issue Date: 04 June 2021
 Cite this article:   
Faiz Almansour,Monica Alberto,Rupesh S. Bhavsar, et al. Recovery of free volume in PIM-1 membranes through alcohol vapor treatment[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 872-881.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-020-2001-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2021/V15/I4/872
Membrane code Aging time/d CO2 Permeability/barrer Selectivity/ aCO2/CH4 Average
thickness/µm
PIM-1 (as-cast)b) 2 2755±137 18.1±4.2 (39±1) (35±3) (44±3)
PIM-1-MeOH-L(1)b) 1 6272±142 12.1±1.0 (34±2) (30±5) (36±3)
26 3810±868 18.1±4.0 (41±2) (40±4) (43±4)
PIM-1-EtOH-L(1)b) 2 4513±1228 19.1±1.4 (48±4) (56±5) (53±3)
27 3217±614 22.6±2.7 (53±6) (47±9) (51±8)
PIM-1-MeOH-L(1)-V(120)-a 4 6314 11.8 34±4
26 4432 13.9
92 3067 17.9
118 2732 20.7
121c) 7020 11.4
PIM-1-MeOH-L(1)-V(114)-b 4 6432 11.2 30±5
92 3221 17.2
115c) 7165 10.1
PIM-1-EtOH-L(1)-V(124)-a 14 5422 16.1 65±9
73 3760 17.4
101 3216 17
125c) 4306 15.3
PIM-1-EtOH-L(1)-V(120)-b 26 3364 15.4 25±2
92 1802 22.1
119 1327 23.6
121c) 3712 13.3
Tab.1  CO2 permeability and CO2/CH4 selectivity of fresh and aged PIM-1 membranes
Fig.1  Schematic of the apparatus used for the alcohol treatment of PIM-1 membranes (alcohol is kept at constant temperature by means of a water bath) and components of the membrane cell in more detail.
Fig.2  (a) N2 adsorption/desorption at 77 K for PIM-1 (square and circle symbols represent the adsorption and desorption data, respectively), and (b) TGA curves of PIM-1 powder and a PIM-1 membrane that has undergone methanol-vapor treatment.
Fig.3  SEM images of (a) the surface of an ethanol-treated PIM-1 membrane, (b) cross-section of as-cast PIM-1 membrane, and (c) cross-section of ethanol-treated membrane (PIM-1-EtOH-L(1)-V(120)-b).
Fig.4  FTIR spectrum of an as-cast PIM-1 freestanding membrane.
Fig.5  CO2 permeability of freestanding PIM-1 membranes treated with (a) methanol and (b) ethanol vapor, and CO2/CH4 selectivity for the same membranes treated with (c) methanol and (d) ethanol vapor. Membranes were tested using a CO2/CH4 binary mixture (1:1, v:v) as feed at 25 °C under a transmembrane pressure of approximately 2 bar. Values are the average permeability and selectivity for 3 membranes for those showing error bars and errors are the calculated standard deviation. PIM-1 membranes were initially treated by soaking in liquid ethanol or liquid methanol and their CO2/CH4 separation performance was determined at different intervals up to ca. 120 d. The membranes represented by triangles in the plot were last treated with alcohol vapor (methanol or ethanol) after ca. 4 months; the last data points give their CO2 permeability and selectivity at that stage. All the other points in between refer to an aged state of the membrane. Filled symbols are used for CO2 permeability values and open symbols are used for CO2/CH4 selectivity. Squares (n,□) correspond to PIM-1 as-cast, circles (l,○) correspond to PIM-1 membranes soaked in liquid methanol, stars (★,☆) correspond to a PIM-1 membranes soaked in liquid ethanol, and triangles (????) correspond to membranes initially soaked in liquid alcohol, further aged and treated with vapor methanol or vapor ethanol after at least 114 d have passed.
Fig.6  Aging rate constant (bP) as a function of the square of the effective gas diameter for PIM-1 membranes.
Fig.7  Robeson plot displaying the aging behavior of PIM-1 membranes PIM-1-MeOH-L(1)-V(120)-a and PIM-1-MeOH-L(1)-V(114)-b, which were initially treated by soaking in methanol, aged for ca. 4 months (120 and 114 d, respectively) and subsequently treated with methanol vapor, for the separation of CO2/CH4 (1:1, v:v) mixtures. Testing was done at 25 °C and approximately 2 bar feed pressure. The solid line corresponds to the revisited 2008 Robeson upper bound [45] and the dotted line represents the proposed 2019 upper bound [47]. The arrows show the aging process over the tested period and they point towards the most aged membranes.
1 Z X Low, P M Budd, N B McKeown, D A Patterson. Gas permeation properties, physical aging, and its mitigation in high free volume glassy polymers. Chemical Reviews, 2018, 118(12): 5871–5911
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00629
2 P M Budd, B S Ghanem, S Makhseed, N B McKeown, K J Msayib, C E Tattershall. Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): robust, solution-processable, organic nanoporous materials. Chemical Communications, 2004, (2): 230–231
https://doi.org/10.1039/b311764b
3 P M Budd, N B McKeown, D Fritsch. Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): high free volume polymers for membrane applications. Macromolecular Symposia, 2006, 245-246(1): 403–405
4 S Kim, Y M Lee. Rigid and microporous polymers for gas separation membranes. Progress in Polymer Science, 2015, 43: 1–32
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.10.005
5 N Du, M M D Cin, I Pinnau, A Nicalek, G P Robertson, M D Guiver. Azide-based cross-linking of polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs) for condensable gas separation. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2011, 32(8): 631–636
https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201000775
6 C R Mason, L Maynard-Atem, K W J Heard, B Satilmis, P M Budd, K Friess, M Lanc P Bernardŏ, G Clarizia, J C Jansen. Enhancement of CO2 affinity in a polymer of intrinsic microporosity by amine modification. Macromolecules, 2014, 47(3): 1021–1029
https://doi.org/10.1021/ma401869p
7 D S Bakhtin, L A Kulikov, S A Legkov, V S Khotimskiy, I S Levin, I L Borisov, A L Maksimov, V V Volkov, E A Karakhanov, A V Volkov. Aging of thin-film composite membranes based on PTMSP loaded with porous aromatic frameworks. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 554: 211–220
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.001
8 S Harms, K Rätzke, F Faupel, N Chaukura, P M Budd, W Egger, L Ravelli. Aging and free volume in a polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1). Journal of Adhesion, 2012, 88(7): 608–619
https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2012.682902
9 R R Tiwari, J Jin, B D Freeman, D R Paul. Physical aging, CO2 sorption and plasticization in thin films of polymer with intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1). Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 537: 362–371
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.069
10 K Nagai, T Nakagawa. Effects of aging on the gas permeability and solubility in poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) membranes synthesized with various catalysts. Journal of Membrane Science, 1995, 105(3): 261–272
https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00065-K
11 M L Jue, C S McKay, B A McCool, M G Finn, R P Lively. Effect of nonsolvent treatments on the microstructure of PIM-1. Macromolecules, 2015, 48(16): 5780–5790
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01507
12 R Swaidan, B Ghanem, E Litwiller, I Pinnau. Physical aging, plasticization and their effects on gas permeation in “rigid” polymers of intrinsic microporosity. Macromolecules, 2015, 48(18): 6553–6561
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01581
13 P M Budd, N B McKeown, B S Ghanem, K J Msayib, D Fritsch, L Starannikova, N Belov, O Sanfirova, Y Yampolskii, V Shantarovich. Gas permeation parameters and other physicochemical properties of a polymer of intrinsic microporosity: polybenzodioxane PIM-1. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 325(2): 851–860
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.010
14 A F Bushell, M P Attfield, C R Mason, P M Budd, Y Yampolskii, L Starannikova, A Rebrov, F Bazzarelli, P Bernardo, J Carolus Jansen, M Lanč, K Friess, V Shantarovich, V Gustov, V Isaeva. Gas permeation parameters of mixed matrix membranes based on the polymer of intrinsic microporosity PIM-1 and the zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-8. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 427: 48–62
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.035
15 M Carta, R Malpass-Evans, M Croad, Y Rogan, J C Jansen, P Bernardo, F Bazzarelli, N B McKeown. An efficient polymer molecular sieve for membrane gas separations. Science, 2013, 339(6117): 303–307
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228032
16 M Carta, M Croad, R Malpass-Evans, J C Jansen, P Bernardo, G Clarizia, K Friess, M Lanč, N B McKeown. Triptycene induced enhancement of membrane gas selectivity for microporous Tröger’s base polymers. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(21): 3526–3531
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305783
17 I Rose, M Carta, R Malpass-Evans, M C Ferrari, P Bernardo, G Clarizia, J C Jansen, N B McKeown. Highly permeable benzotriptycene-based polymer of intrinsic microporosity. ACS Macro Letters, 2015, 4(9): 912–915
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00439
18 X Ma, M Mukaddam, I Pinnau. Bifunctionalized intrinsically microporous polyimides with simultaneously enhanced gas permeability and selectivity. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2016, 37(11): 900–904
https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201600023
19 Q Song, S Cao, R H Pritchard, B Ghalei, S A Al-Muhtaseb, E M Terentjev, A K Cheetham, E Sivaniah. Controlled thermal oxidative crosslinking of polymers of intrinsic microporosity towards tunable molecular sieve membranes. Nature Communications, 2014, 5(1): 4813
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5813
20 F Y Li, T S Chung. Physical aging, high temperature and water vapor permeation studies of UV-rearranged PIM-1 membranes for advanced hydrogen purification and production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(23): 9786–9793
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.056
21 M Alberto, R Bhavsar, J M Luque-Alled, A Vijayaraghavan, P M Budd, P Gorgojo. Impeded physical aging in PIM-1 membranes containing graphene-like fillers. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 563: 513–520
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.06.026
22 R S Bhavsar, T Mitra, D J Adams, A I Cooper, P M Budd. Ultrahigh-permeance PIM-1 based thin film nanocomposite membranes on PAN supports for CO2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 564: 878–886
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.07.089
23 W F Yong, K H A Kwek, K S Liao, T S Chung. Suppression of aging and plasticization in highly permeable polymers. Polymer, 2015, 77: 377–386
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2015.09.075
24 N R Horn, D R Paul. Carbon dioxide plasticization of thin glassy polymer films. Polymer, 2011, 52(24): 5587–5594
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.10.004
25 A G McDermott, P M Budd, N B McKeown, C M Colina, J Runt. Physical aging of polymers of intrinsic microporosity: a SAXS/WAXS study. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2014, 2(30): 11742–11752
https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA02165G
26 A J Hill, S J Pas, T J Bastow, M I Burgar, K Nagai, L G Toy, B D Freeman. Influence of methanol conditioning and physical aging on carbon spin-lattice relaxation times of poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne). Journal of Membrane Science, 2004, 243(1): 37–44
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.007
27 M Razali, C Didaskalou, J F Kim, M Babaei, E Drioli, Y M Lee, G Szekely. Exploring and exploiting the effect of solvent treatment in membrane separations. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(12): 11279–11289
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b01879
28 M F Jimenez Solomon, Y Bhole, A G Livingston. High flux hydrophobic membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)—interfacial polymerization, surface modification and solvent activation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 434: 193–203
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.055
29 P Gorgojo, M F Jimenez-Solomon, A G Livingston. Polyamide thin film composite membranes on cross-linked polyimide supports: improvement of RO performance via activating solvent. Desalination, 2014, 344: 181–188
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.009
30 Y Zhao, Q Yuan. Effect of membrane pretreatment on performance of solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes in methanol solutions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 280(1): 195–201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.01.026
31 R Shukla, M Cheryan. Performance of ultrafiltration membranes in ethanol-water solutions: effect of membrane conditioning. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 198(1): 75–85
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00638-X
32 F M Penha, K Rezzadori, M C Proner, V Zanatta, G Zin, D W Tondo, J Vladimir de Oliveira, J C C Petrus, M Di Luccio. Influence of different solvent and time of pre-treatment on commercial polymeric ultrafiltration membranes applied to non-aqueous solvent permeation. European Polymer Journal, 2015, 66: 492–501
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.010
33 Q T Nguyen, E Favre, Z H Ping, J Néel. Clustering of solvents in membranes and its influence on membrane transport properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 1996, 113(1): 137–150
https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00219-7
34 N Du, J Song, G P Robertson, I Pinnau, M D Guiver. Linear high molecular weight ladder polymer via fast polycondensation of 5,5′,6,6′-tetrahydroxy-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylspirobisindane with 1,4-dicyanotetrafluorobenzene. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2008, 29(10): 783–788
35 B Satilmis, P M Budd. Base-catalysed hydrolysis of PIM-1: amide versus carboxylate formation. RSC Advances, 2014, 4(94): 52189–52198
36 L Hao, K S Liao, T S Chung. Photo-oxidative PIM-1 based mixed matrix membranes with superior gas separation performance. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2015, 3(33): 17273–17281
37 L Zhang, W Fang, J Jiang. Effects of residual solvent on membrane structure and gas permeation in a polymer of intrinsic microporosity: insight from atomistic simulation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115(22): 11233–11239
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2029888
38 T Mitra, R S Bhavsar, D J Adams, P M Budd, A I Cooper. PIM-1 mixed matrix membranes for gas separations using cost-effective hypercrosslinked nanoparticle fillers. Chemical Communications, 2016, 52(32): 5581–5584
https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CC00261G
39 N S Abd Halim, M D H Wirzal, M R Bilad, N A H Md Nordin, Z Adi Putra, N S Sambudi, A R Mohd Yusoff. Improving performance of electrospun nylon 6,6 nanofiber membrane for produced water filtration via solvent vapor treatment. Polymers, 2019, 11(12): 2117
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11122117
40 A Rianjanu, A Kusumaatmaja, E A Suyono, K Triyana. Solvent vapor treatment improves mechanical strength of electrospun polyvinyl alcohol nanofibers. Heliyon, 2018, 4(4): e00592
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00592
41 A Brunetti, M Cersosimo, J S Kim, G Dong, E Fontananova, Y M Lee, E Drioli, G Barbieri. Thermally rearranged mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separation: an aging study. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 61: 16–26
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.024
42 P Bernardo, E Bazzarelli, F Tasselli, G Clarizia, C R Mason, L Maynard-Atem, P M Budd, M Lanc, K Pilnacek, O Vopicka, K Friess, D Fritsch, Y P Yampolskii, V Shantarovich, J C Jansen. Effect of physical aging on the gas transport and sorption in PIM-1 membranes. Polymer, 2017, 113: 283–294
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.10.040
43 C A Scholes, S Kanehashi. Polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1) membranes treated with supercritical CO2. Membranes, 2019, 9(3): 1–12
https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes9030041
44 S V Adymkanov, Y P Yampol’skii, A M Polyakov, P M Budd, K J Reynolds, N B McKeown, K J Msayib. Pervaporation of alcohols through highly permeable PIM-1 polymer films. Polymer Science, Series A, 2008, 50(4): 444–450
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X08040135
45 L M Robeson. The upper bound revisited. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 320(1): 390–400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030
46 L M Robeson. Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1991, 62(2): 165–185
https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-J
47 B Comesaña-Gándara, J Chen, C G Bezzu, M Carta, I Rose, M C Ferrari, E Esposito, A Fuoco, J C Jansen, N B McKeown. Redefining the Robeson upper bounds for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 separations using a series of ultrapermeable benzotriptycene-based polymers of intrinsic microporosity. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(9): 2733–2740
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EE01384A
[1] Huaiwei Shi, Teng Zhou. Computational design of heterogeneous catalysts and gas separation materials for advanced chemical processing[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 49-59.
[2] Colin A. Scholes. Pilot plants of membrane technology in industry: Challenges and key learnings[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 305-316.
[3] Guozhao JI, Guoxiong WANG, Kamel HOOMAN, Suresh BHATIA, Jo?o C. DINIZ da COSTA. Computational fluid dynamics applied to high temperature hydrogen separation membranes[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(1): 3-12.
[4] S. A. A. MANSOORI, M. PAKIZEH, A. JOMEKIAN. CO2 and H2 selectivity properties of PDMS/PSf membrane prepared at different conditions[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(4): 500-513.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed