Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (5) : 755-763    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2137-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Lithium-based draw solute for forward osmosis to treat wastewater discharged from lithium-ion battery manufacturing
Rongzhen Chen, Xinfei Dong, Qingchun Ge()
College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China
 Download: PDF(1513 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

As draw solute is the core element of forward osmosis (FO) technology, here Li-Bet-Tf2N synthesized from a customized ionic liquid betainium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([Hbet][Tf2N]) and Li2CO3 recovered from lithium-ion battery (LIB) wastes is proposed as a novel draw solute to treat Li+-containing wastewater from LIB manufacturing through FO filtration. Having high dissociation ability and an extended structure, Li-Bet-Tf2N generates a sufficiently high osmotic pressure to drive the FO filtration efficiently along with insignificant reverse solute diffusion. Li-Bet-Tf2N produces a water flux of 21.3 L·(m2·h)−1 at 1.0 mol∙L–1 against deionized water, surpassing conventional NaCl and MgCl2 draw solutes with a higher water recovery efficiency and a smaller solute loss. Li-Bet-Tf2N induces a more stable and higher water permeation flux with a 10.0% water flux decline than NaCl and MgCl2 for which the water fluxes decline 16.7% and 16.4%, respectively, during the treatment of 2000 mg∙L–1 Li+-containing wastewater for 12 h. More remarkably, unlike other draw solutes which require intensive energy input and complicated processes in recycling, Li-Bet-Tf2N is easily separated from water via solvent extraction. Reproducible results are achieved with the recycled Li-Bet-Tf2N. Li-Bet-Tf2N thus demonstrates a novel class of draw solute with great potentials to treat wastewater economically.

Keywords forward osmosis      lithium-ion battery      draw solution      lithium-containing wastewater      water treatment     
Corresponding Author(s): Qingchun Ge   
Online First Date: 09 March 2022    Issue Date: 28 March 2022
 Cite this article:   
Rongzhen Chen,Xinfei Dong,Qingchun Ge. Lithium-based draw solute for forward osmosis to treat wastewater discharged from lithium-ion battery manufacturing[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 755-763.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-022-2137-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2022/V16/I5/755
Fig.1  (a) Synthesis scheme of Li-Bet-Tf2N; (b) FTIR spectra of betaine and Li-Bet-Tf2N; (c) 1H NMR spectra of betaine and Li-Bet-Tf2N.
Fig.2  (a) The osmotic pressure of Li-Bet-Tf2N, NaCl and MgCl2; (b) the relative viscosity of Li-Bet-Tf2N, NaCl and MgCl2 at 25 °C.
Compound Concentration Osmotic pressure/bar Relative viscosity Ref.
ETAC 20 wt-% 12.0 131.9 [34]
GE3B7 56 wt-% 15.0 62.7 [35]
PSSS-PNIPAM 33.3 wt-% 52.0 76.0 [36]
PAspNa 0.3 g?mL–1 51.5 4.4 [37]
Gluconate 0.4 mol?L–1 11.0 1.2 [38]
Li-Bet-Tf2N 1.0 mol?L–1 64.5 1.9 This work
Tab.1  A comparison in osmotic pressure and relative viscosity between Li-Bet-Tf2N and other reported draw solutes at 25 °C
Fig.3  FO performance comparison between Li-Bet-Tf2N and the conventional draw solutes at room temperature: (a) under the PRO mode; (b) under the FO mode; (c) the polymeric network of Li-Bet-Tf2N in water; (d) size distribution of the Li-Bet-Tf2N polymeric network and FO membrane.
Compound Concentration Water flux/(L·(m2·h)−1) (Js·Jw–1)/(g?L–1) Ref.
ETAC 30 wt-% 2.9 0.39 [34]
GE3B7 56 wt-% 4.8 0.28 [35]
PSSS-PNIPAM 33.3 wt-% 4.0 0.5 [36]
PAspNa 0.3 g?mL–1 16.0 0.19 [37]
Gluconate 0.4 mol?L–1 6.0 0.17 [38]
Li-Bet-Tf2N 1.0 mol?L–1 21.3 0.02 This work
Tab.2  FO performance comparison between Li-Bet-Tf2N and other draw solutes at the best concentration
Fig.4  FO short-term (30 min) performance at room temperature with 0–2000 mg?L–1 Li2SO4 as feed solutions and 1.0 mol?L–1 NaCl, MgCl2 and Li-Bet-Tf2N as draw solution, in Li+ removal: (a) under the PRO mode; (b) under the FO mode; (c) the change of water flux in FO long-term (12 h) experiments under the FO mode at room temperature with 2000 mg?L–1 Li2SO4 as feed solutions and 1.0 mol?L–1 NaCl, MgCl2 and Li-Bet-Tf2N as draw solution.
Fig.5  Recycling of Li-Bet-Tf2N via solvent extraction: (a) the aqueous solution of Li-Bet-Tf2N; (b) Li-Bet-Tf2N in the mixed solvents (water in the upper layer while Li-Bet-Tf2N and [Hbet][Tf2N] in the lower layer); (c) LiCl in the upper aqueous layer, while [Hbet][Tf2N] in the lower layer is easily recycled.
1 T Mu, P Zuo, S Lou, Q Pan, Q Li, C Du, Y Gao, X Cheng, Y Ma, G Yin. A two dimensional nitrogen-rich carbon/silicon composite as high performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 341: 37–46
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.026
2 H Chen, S Wang, X Liu, X Hou, F Chen, H Pan, H Qin, K H Lam, Y Xia, G Zhou. Double-coated Si-based composite composed with carbon layer and graphene sheets with void spaces for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 288: 134–143
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.008
3 J Wu, J Liu, Z Wang, X Gong, Y Wang. A new design for Si wears double jackets used as a high-performance lithium-ion battery anode. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 370: 565–572
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.253
4 H Chen, S He, X Hou, S Wang, F Chen, H Qin, Y Xia, G Zhou. Nano-Si/C microsphere with hollow double spherical interlayer and submicron porous structure to enhance performance for lithium-ion battery anode. Electrochimica Acta, 2019, 312: 242–250
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.170
5 Y Zhou, X Hou, K Shen, S Wang, F Chen, Y Li, H Chen, B Wang. Li1.1Na0.1Mn0.534Ni0.133Co0.133O2 as cathode with ameliorated electrochemical performance based on dual Li+/Na+ electrolyte. Ionics, 2018, 25(1): 51–59
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2587-2
6 H D Miser, R E Stevens, O A Ogunseitan. Potential environmental and human health impacts of rechargeable lithium batteries in electronic waste. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(10): 5495–5503
https://doi.org/10.1021/es400614y
7 X Mao, A A Wong, R W Crawford. Cobalt toxicity—an emerging clinical problem in patients with metal-on-metal hip prostheses. Medical Journal of Australia, 2011, 194(12): 649–651
https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03151.x
8 Y Zhang, X Cheng, X Jiang, J J Urban, C H Lau, S Liu, L Shao. Robust natural nanocomposites realizing unprecedented ultrafast precise molecular separations. Materials Today, 2020, 36: 40–47
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2020.02.002
9 M J Tang, M L Liu, D A Wang, D D Shao, H J Wang, Z L Cui, X L Cao, S P Sun. Precisely patterned nanostrand surface of cucurbituril[n]Based nanofiltration membranes for effective alcohol-water condensation. Nano Letters, 2020, 20(4): 2717–2723
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00344
10 J Song, L Nghiem, X M Li, T He. Lithium extraction from Chinese salt-lake brines: opportunities, challenges, and future outlooks. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 2017, 3(4): 593–597
https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EW00020K
11 X Luo, K Zhang, J Luo, S Luo, J Crittenden. Capturing lithium from wastewater using a fixed bed packed with 3-D MnO2 ion cages. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(23): 13002–13012
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02247
12 Q Ge, T S Chung. Oxalic acid complexes: promising draw solutes for forward osmosis (FO) in protein enrichment. Chemical Communications, 2015, 51(23): 4854–4857
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC00168D
13 G Han, C Z Liang, T S Chung, M Weber, C Staudt, C Maletzko. Combination of forward osmosis (FO) process with coagulation/flocculation (CF) for potential treatment of textile wastewater. Water Research, 2016, 91: 361–370
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.031
14 X Dong, Q Ge. Metal ion-bridged forward osmosis membranes for efficient pharmaceutical wastewater reclamation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(40): 37163–37171
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b14162
15 M L Liu, L Li, Y X Sun, Z J Fu, X L Cao, S P Sun. Scalable conductive polymer membranes for ultrafast organic pollutants removal. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 617: 118644
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118644
16 Y Zhang, J Guo, G Han, Y Bai, Q Ge, J Ma, C H Lau, L Shao. Molecularly soldered covalent organic frameworks for ultrafast precision sieving. Science Advances, 2021, 7(13): eabe8706
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe8706
17 Z Y Wang, Z J Fu, D D Shao, M J Lu, Q C Xia, H F Xiao, B W Su, S P Sun. Bridging the miscibility gap to fabricate delamination-free dual-layer nanofiltration membranes via incorporating fluoro substituted aromatic amine. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 610: 118270
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118270
18 G Han, J S de Wit, T S Chung. Water reclamation from emulsified oily wastewater via effective forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes under the PRO mode. Water Research, 2015, 81: 54–63
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.048
19 P Mondal, A T K Tran, B V der Bruggen. Removal of As(V) from simulated groundwater using forward osmosis: effect of competing and coexisting solutes. Desalination, 2014, 348: 33–38
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.001
20 Q Ge, J Su, G L Amy, T S Chung. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes. Water Research, 2012, 46(4): 1318–1326
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.043
21 Q Zhao, N Chen, D Zhao, X Lu. Thermoresponsive magnetic nanoparticles for seawater desalination. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5(21): 11453–11461
https://doi.org/10.1021/am403719s
22 X Fan, H Liu, Y Gao, Z Zou, V S J Craig, G Zhang, G Liu. Forward-osmosis desalination with poly(ionic liquid) hydrogels as smart draw agents. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(21): 4156–4161
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201600205
23 Y Zhong, X Wang, X Feng, S Telalovic, Y Gnanou, K W Huang, X Hu, Z Lai. Osmotic heat engine using thermally responsive ionic liquids. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(16): 9403–9409
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02558
24 D Dutta, A Kumari, R Panda, S Jha, D Gupta, S Goel, M K Jha. Close loop separation process for the recovery of Co, Cu, Mn, Fe and Li from spent lithium-ion batteries. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 200: 327–334
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.02.022
25 X Chen, H Ma, C Luo, T Zhou. Recovery of valuable metals from waste cathode materials of spent lithium-ion batteries using mild phosphoric acid. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 326: 77–86
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.12.021
26 P Nockemann, B Thijs, K V Hecke, L V Meervelt, K Binnemans. Polynuclear metal complexes obtained from the task-specifific ionic liquid betainium bistriflimide. Crystal Growth & Design, 2008, 8(4): 1353–1363
https://doi.org/10.1021/cg701187t
27 Y Wu, W Zhang, Q Ge. Piperazine-based functional materials as draw solutes for desalination via forward osmosis. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018, 6(11): 14170–14177
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02796
28 X Liao, W Zhang, Q Ge. A cage-like supramolecular draw solute that promotes forward osmosis for wastewater remediation and source recovery. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 600: 117862
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117862
29 J Meng, C H Lau, Y Xue, R Zhang, B Cao, P Li. Compatibilizing hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymers via spray coating for desalination. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2020, 8(17): 8462–8468
https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA00871K
30 M L Stone, A D Wilson, M K Harrup, F F Stewart. An initial study of hexavalent phosphazene salts as draw solutes in forward osmosis. Desalination, 2013, 312: 130–136
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.09.030
31 A Razmjou, G P Simon, H Wang. Effect of particle size on the performance of forward osmosis desalination by stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a draw agent. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 215: 913–920
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.088
32 Y Zhang, L Yang, K P Pramoda, W Gai, S Zhang. Highly permeable and fouling resistant hollow fiber membranes for reverse osmosis. Chemical Engineering Science, 2019, 207: 903–910
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.07.014
33 B Brzezinski, J Olejnik, G Zundel, R Kramer. Intramolecular O−Li+…ON⇌O−…Li+ON bonds with large Li+ polarizability. Chemical Physics Letters, 1989, 156(2-3): 213–217
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(89)87122-2
34 S Laohaprapanona, Y J Fub, C C Hua, S J Youc, H A Tsaia, W S Hunga, K R Leea, J Y Lai. Evaluation of a natural polymer-based cationic polyelectrolyte as a draw solute in forward osmosis. Desalination, 2017, 421: 72–78
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.04.027
35 A Inada, K Yumiya, T Takahashi, K Kumagai, Y Hashizume, H Matsuyam. Development of thermoresponsive star oligomers with a glycerol backbone as the draw solute in forward osmosis process. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 574: 147–153
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.067
36 D Zhao, P Wang, Q Zhao, N Chen, X Lu. Thermoresponsive copolymer-based draw solution for seawater desalination in a combined process of forward osmosis and membrane distillation. Desalination, 2014, 348: 26–32
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.009
37 G Gwak, B Jung, S Han, S Hong. Evaluation of poly (aspartic acid sodium salt) as a draw solute for forward osmosis. Water Research, 2015, 80: 294–305
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.041
38 Q Long, G Qi, Y Wang. Evaluation of renewable gluconate salts as draw solutes in forward osmosis process. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2016, 4(1): 85–93
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00784
39 Z Wang, S Wu, Z He. Production of electricity and water in an osmotic microbial fuel cell by using EDTA-2Na as a recoverable draw solute. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 677: 382–389
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.319
40 C H Hsu, C Ma, N Bui, Z Song, A D Wilson, R Kostecki, J J Urban. Enhanced forward osmosis desalination with a hybrid ionic liquid/hydrogel thermoresponsive draw agent system. ACS Omega, 2019, 4(2): 4296–4303
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02827
41 J Heikkinen, H Kyllönen, E Järvelä, A Grönroos, C Y Tang. Ultrasound-assisted forward osmosis for mitigating internal concentration polarization. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 528: 147–154
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.035
42 W Xu, Q Ge. Synthetic polymer materials for forward osmosis (FO) membranes and FO applications: a review. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 2019, 35(2): 191–209
https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2017-0067
43 A G Volkov, S Paula, D W Deamer. Two mechanisms of permeation of small neutral molecules and hydrated ions across phospholipid bilayers. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 1997, 42(2): 153–160
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-4598(96)05097-0
44 A Behboudia, S Ghiasia, T Mohammadia, M Ulbricht. Preparation and characterization of asymmetric hollow fiber polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane for forward osmosis application. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 270(1): 118801
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118801
45 P Sun, Y Jang, S Ham, H S Ryoo, H D Park. Effects of reverse solute diffusion on membrane biofouling in pressure-retarded osmosis processes. Desalination, 2021, 512(15): 115145
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115145
46 Q She, D Hou, J Liu, K H Tan, C Y Tang. Effect of feed spacer induced membrane deformation on the performance of pressure retarded osmosis (PRO): implications for PRO process operation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 445: 170–182
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.061
47 Q She, R Wang, A G Fane, C Y Tang. Membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes: a review. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 499: 201–233
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.040
48 W Xu, Q Ge. Novel functionalized forward osmosis (FO) membranes for FO desalination: improved process performance and fouling resistance. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 555: 507–516
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.054
49 Q Ge, C H Lau, M Liu. A novel multi-charged draw solute that removes organic arsenicals from water in a hybrid membrane process. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(6): 3812–3819
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06506
50 Y Wu, Y Liu, R Chen, W Zhang, Q Ge. A pH-responsive supramolecular draw solute that achieves high-performance in arsenic removal via forward osmosis. Water Research, 2019, 165: 114993
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.114993
51 C Ding, X Zhang, S Xiong, L Shen, M Yi, B Liu, Y Wang. Organophosphonate draw solution for produced water treatment with effectively mitigated membrane fouling via forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 593: 117429
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117429
[1] Linwei Zhu, Chun Ding, Tengyang Zhu, Yan Wang. A review on the forward osmosis applications and fouling control strategies for wastewater treatment[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 661-680.
[2] Fan Yang, Junhui Huang, Lijun Deng, Yanqiu Zhang, Guodong Dang, Lu Shao. Hydrophilic modification of poly(aryl sulfone) membrane materials toward highly-efficient environmental remediation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 614-633.
[3] Rusen Zhou, Xiaoxiang Wang, Renwu Zhou, Janith Weerasinghe, Tianqi Zhang, Yanbin Xin, Hao Wang, Patrick Cullen, Hongxia Wang, Kostya (Ken) Ostrikov. Non-thermal plasma enhances performances of biochar in wastewater treatment and energy storage applications[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(4): 475-483.
[4] Laura Donato, Enrico Drioli. Imprinted membranes for sustainable separation processes[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 775-792.
[5] Hong Li, Fang Yi, Xingang Li, Xin Gao. Numerical modeling of mass transfer processes coupling with reaction for the design of the ozone oxidation treatment of wastewater[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 602-614.
[6] Wenming Li, Weijian Tang, Maoqin Qiu, Qiuge Zhang, Muhammad Irfan, Zeheng Yang, Weixin Zhang. Effects of gradient concentration on the microstructure and electrochemical performance of LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 cathode materials[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 988-996.
[7] Chunlong Zhao, Mingming He, Hongbin Cao, Xiaohong Zheng, Wenfang Gao, Yong Sun, He Zhao, Dalong Liu, Yanling Zhang, Zhi Sun. Investigation of solution chemistry to enable efficient lithium recovery from low-concentration lithium-containing wastewater[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 639-650.
[8] Ali Akbari, Nasser Arsalani, Bagher Eftekhari-Sis, Mojtaba Amini, Gholamreza Gohari, Esmaiel Jabbari. Cube-octameric silsesquioxane (POSS)-capped magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for the efficient removal of methylene blue[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 563-573.
[9] Leila Ouni, Ali Ramazani, Saeid Taghavi Fardood. An overview of carbon nanotubes role in heavy metals removal from wastewater[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 274-295.
[10] Linghui Yu, Jiansong Miao, Yi Jin, Jerry Y.S. Lin. A comparative study on polypropylene separators coated with different inorganic materials for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(3): 346-352.
[11] Baicang Liu,Chen Chen,Pingju Zhao,Tong Li,Caihong Liu,Qingyuan Wang,Yongsheng Chen,John Crittenden. Thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate layer composed of polysulfone blended with PEG or polysulfone grafted PEG methyl ether methacrylate[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 562-574.
[12] Gautam SEN, G. Usha RANI, Sumit MISHRA. Microwave assisted synthesis of poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) grafted agar (Ag-g-P(HEMA)) and its application as a flocculant for wastewater treatment[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2013, 7(3): 312-321.
[13] Jing DONG, Huilong WANG. A study on rapid acid chrome black (MB 7) spectrophotometric determination of ClO2 and catalytic degradation of 2,6-dinitro-p-cresol (DNPC) by ClO2[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(2): 245-251.
[14] XU Yunlong, TAO Lili, MA Hongyan, HUANG Huaqing. LiFePO/C cathode materials synthesized by co-precipitation and microwave heating [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2008, 2(4): 422-427.
[15] QI Jingyao, LI Xin, LI Ying, ZHU Jianhua, QIANG Liangsheng. Selective removal of Cu(II) from contaminated water using molecularly imprinted polymer[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2008, 2(1): 109-114.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed