Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (2) : 283-300    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-021-0879-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The influences of composition and pore structure on the adsorption behavior of CH4 and CO2 on shale
Xiangzeng WANG1, Junping ZHOU2,3(), Xiao SUN1(), Shifeng TIAN2,3, Jiren TANG2,3, Feng SHEN1, Jinqiao WU1
1. Research Institute of Yanchang Petroleum (Group) Co. Ltd, Xi’an 710052, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
3. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
 Download: PDF(4015 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

CO2 enhanced shale gas recovery (CO2-ESGR) has attracted extensive attention as it can improve the shale gas recovery efficiency and sequestrate CO2 simultaneously. In this study, the relationship between mineral composition, pore structure, CH4 and CO2 adsorption behavior as well as selective adsorption coefficient of CO2 over CH4 ( αCO2/CH4) in marine and continental shales at different temperatures was investigated. The results illustrated that shale with higher total organic carbon (TOC), higher clay minerals and lower brittle mineral contents has a larger micropores and mesopores volume and specific surface area. TOC content was positively correlated with fractal dimension Df. Both CH4 and CO2 adsorption capacity in shale have positive correlations with TOC and clay mineral content. CO2 adsorption capacity of the all the tested shale samples were greater than CH4, and the α CO2 / CH4 of shale were larger than 1.00, which indicated that using CO2-ESGR technology to improve the gas recovery is feasible in these shale gas reservoirs. A higher TOC content and in shale corresponding to a lower α CO2 / CH4 due to the organic matters show stronger affinity on CH4 than that on CO2. Shale with a higher brittle mineral content corresponding to a higher αCO2/CH4, and no obvious correlation between α CO2 / CH4 and clay mineral content in shale was observed due to the complexity of the clay minerals. The α CO2 / CH4 of shale were decreased with increasing temperature for most cases, which indicated that a lower temperature is more favorable for the application of CO2-ESGR technique.

Keywords shale gas      carbon dioxide sequestration      pore structure      selective adsorption      fractal dimensions     
Corresponding Author(s): Junping ZHOU,Xiao SUN   
Online First Date: 27 May 2021    Issue Date: 26 October 2021
 Cite this article:   
Xiangzeng WANG,Junping ZHOU,Xiao SUN, et al. The influences of composition and pore structure on the adsorption behavior of CH4 and CO2 on shale[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(2): 283-300.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-021-0879-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2021/V15/I2/283
Fig.1  Shale samples for different tests.
Fig.2  PCTPro Full-automatic gas adsorption/desorption instrument of Setaram.
Wt% LMX1 LMX2 LMX3 YC1 YC2 WF
SiO2 66.9401 64.9386 65.5527 62.3361 63.1161 57.1634
Al2O3 14.5691 16.4661 18.5704 20.5182 19.6781 11.2706
Fe2O3 4.8543 5.5406 5.4699 6.7368 6.9415 5.9261
K2O 3.6754 4.2640 4.8515 3.2303 3.0904 1.0944
MgO 2.4342 2.8376 2.9271 2.5447 2.4696 4.9130
SO3 2.0545 2.2038 0.6705 0.4830 0.5164 0.7374
CaO 3.4858 1.8420 0.3081 1.3372 1.2221 18.1471
Na2O 0.7673 0.6682 0.6473 0.9119 1.0386 0.1080
TiO2 0.6366 0.6745 0.6273 1.1476 1.0697 0.1799
BaO 0.1044 0.1297 0.1065 0.0523 0.0474 ——
P2O5 0.1545 0.1139 0.1054 0.3781 0.4487 0.0949
Tab.1  Main element content (%) of shale samples
Sample
No.
Ro TOC Quartz Carbonate Feldspar Pyrite Clay
illite kaolinite chlorite montmorillonite
LMX1 1.75 3.04 39.2 1.8 6.6 2.8 24.8 3.3 17.2 4.3
LMX2 2.15 3.53 37.4 0.9 5.6 1.2 32.1 1.3 18.2 3.3
LMX3 2.45 2.47 40.8 3.8 7.9 1.8 26.1 4.3 12.4 2.9
WF1 2.76 2.89 38.2 9.2 4.8 7.7 21.8 4.7 11.8 1.8
YC1 0.93 2.38 36.6 0.4 20.3 0.9 16.6 10.3 13.3 1.6
YC2 1.06 1.89 37.1 0.7 19.0 0.7 9.4 11.9 20.1 1.1
Tab.2  Ro (%), TOC (%) and mineral composition content (%) of shale samples
Fig.3  N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of shale samples.
Sample No. Pore volume/(10−3 cm3/g) Dave/nm BET surface area/(m2·g−1)
PVtotal PVmic PVmes PVmac SSAtotal SSAmic SSAmes SSAmac
LMX1 15.2 2.21 10.70 2.32 4.34 12.88 3.165 9.598 0.114
LMX2 15.7 2.46 10.79 2.42 4.00 16.67 3.933 12.604 0.134
LMX3 8.8 0.93 6.50 1.36 4.82 6.03 1.434 4.540 0.053
WF 8.8 1.96 6.00 0.79 5.09 5.60 1.620 3.948 0.031
YC1 7.1 0.12 5.61 1.38 19.97 2.60 0.132 2.316 0.148
YC2 9.7 0.07 6.70 2.91 16.64 1.64 0.076 1.395 0.168
Tab.3  Pore structure parameters of shale samples
Fig.4  Fitting plot of ln(ln(p0/p))-ln(V) based on N2 adsorption data in shale samples.
Sample No. Fractal fitting equation Df R2
LMX1 y=−0.1894x+1.5919 2.8106 0.9773
LMX2 y=−0.1884x+1.7869 2.8116 0.9712
LMX3 y=−0.2176x+0.8177 2.7824 0.9899
WF y=−0.1930x+1.0101 2.8079 0.9913
YC1 y=−0.6860x−1.2883 2.3140 0.9994
YC2 y=−0.5381x−0.5569 2.4619 0.9967
Tab.4  FFH fractal dimensions Df, fractal fitting equation and R2
Fig.5  Relationship between Ro, TOC and pore structure parameters.
Fig.6  Relationship between clay minerals, brittle minerals and pore structure parameters.
Fig.7  Langmuir model fitting of CH4, CO2 adsorption isotherms at different temperatures.
Sample
No.
T(K) Langmuir model fitting parameter
CH4 adsorption CO2 adsorption
VL(mmol/g) PL(Mpa) R2 VL(mmol/g) PL(Mpa) R2
LMX1 298.15 0.1282 2.1286 0.9922 0.3253 1.7058 0.9648
318.15 0.1208 2.9109 0.9968 0.2739 1.8922 0.9777
338.15 0.1115 3.1434 0.9956 0.2049 2.0284 0.9931
WF 298.15 0.1052 5.1884 0.977 0.2304 3.5506 0.9641
318.15 0.1030 6.1105 0.9846 0.2075 4.1117 0.9685
338.15 0.0977 6.9852 0.9877 0.1760 4.3691 0.9780
YC1 298.15 0.0981 4.2005 0.9994 0.2628 1.8178 0.9670
318.15 0.0940 4.8517 0.9992 0.2213 1.9764 0.9717
338.15 0.0899 5.5883 0.9988 0.1846 2.1538 0.9848
YC2 298.15 0.0819 5.2670 0.9978 0.2028 1.6650 0.9558
318.15 0.0802 6.8592 0.9990 0.1850 2.2384 0.9687
338.15 0.0724 7.5409 0.9988 0.0906 2.2954 0.9901
Tab.5  Fitting parameters of Langmuir model for CH4, CO2 adsorption isotherms 
Fig.8  Relationship between Ro, TOC and maximum adsorption capacity VL.
Fig.9  Relationship between component characteristics and maximum adsorption capacity VL.
Fig.10  Relationship between PVtotal and VL.
Fig.11  Relationship between pore specific surface area and VL.
Sample No. 298.15K 318.15K 338.15K
LMX1 3.17 3.49 2.85
WF 3.20 2.99 2.88
YC1 6.19 5.78 5.33
YC2 7.83 7.07 4.11
Tab.6  αCO2/CH4 of shale samples at different temperatures
Fig.12  Relationship between mineral compositions and αCO2/CH4.
Fig.13  Relationship between pore structure parameters and αCO2/CH4.
1 H Bi, Z Jiang, J Li, P Li, L Chen, Q Pan, Y Wu (2016). The Ono–Kondo model and an experimental study on supercritical adsorption of shale gas: a case study on Longmaxi shale in southeastern Chongqing, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 35: 114–121
2 S Brunauer, P H Emmett, E Teller (1938). Adsorption of gases in multi-molecular layers. J Am Chem Soc, 60(2): 309–319
3 Y Cai, D Liu, Z Pan, Y Yao, J Li, Y Qiu (2013). Pore structure and its impact on CH4 adsorption capacity and flow capability of bituminous and subbituminous coals from Northeast China. Fuel, 103: 258–268
4 P Charoensuppanimit, S A Mohammad, K A M Gasem (2016). Measurements and modeling of gas adsorption on shales. Energy Fuels, 30: 2309–2319
5 J Cui, R Zhu, Z Mao, S Li (2019). Accumulation of unconventional petroleum resources and their coexistence characteristics in Chang7 shale formations of Ordos Basin in central China. Front Earth Sci, 13(3): 575–587
6 A M Dayal (2017). Chapter 10-role of nonconventional shale gas energy in the next century. Shale Gas Explor Environ Econ Imp, 157–164
7 X Du, M Gu, Z Hou, Z Liu, T Wu (2019). Experimental study on the kinetics of adsorption of CO2 and CH4 in gas-bearing shale reservoirs. Energy Fuels, 33(12): 12587–12600
8 S Duan, M Gu, X Du, X Xian (2016). Adsorption equilibrium of CO2 and CH4 and their mixture on Sichuan Basin shale. Energy Fuels, 30(3): 2248–2256
9 G Feng, Y Zhu, G G X Wang, S Chen, Y Wang, W Ju (2019). Supercritical methane adsorption on overmature shale: effect of pore structure and fractal characteristics. Energy Fuels, 33(9): 8323–8337
10 M Gasparik, P Bertier, Y Gensterblum, A Ghanizadeh, B M Krooss, R Littke (2014). Geological controls on the methane storage capacity in organic-rich shales. Int J Coal Geol, 123: 34–51
11 Y Gensterblum, A Merkel, A Busch, B M Krooss (2013). High-pressure CH4 and CO2 sorption isotherms as a function of coal maturity and the influence of moisture. Int J Coal Geol, 118: 45–57
12 M Gu, X Xian, S Duan, X Du (2017). Influences of the composition and pore structure of a shale on its selective adsorption of CO2 over CH4. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 46: 296–306
13 R Heller, M Zoback (2014). Adsorption of methane and carbon dioxide on gas shale and pure mineral samples. J Unconv Oil Gas Resour, 8: 14–24
14 L Hong, J Jain, V Romanov, C Lopano, C Disenhof, A Goodman, S Hedges, D Soeder, S Sanguinito, R Dilmore (2016). An investigation of factors affecting the interaction of CO2 and CH4 on shale in Appalachian Basin. J Unconv Oil Gas Resour, 14: 99–112
15 H Hou, L Shao, Y Li, Z Li, W Zhang, H Wen (2018). The pore structure and fractal characteristics of shales with low thermal maturity from the Yuqia Coalfield, northern Qaidam Basin, northwestern China. Front Earth Sci, 12(1): 148–159
16 Y Hou, S He, J Yi, B Zhang, X Chen, Y Wang, J Zhang, C Cheng (2014). Effect of pore structure on methane sorption potential of shales. Pet Explor Dev, 41: 272–281
17 R Iddphonce, J Wang, L Zhao (2020). Review of CO2 injection techniques for enhanced shale gas recovery: prospect and challenges. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 77: 103240
18 M Jaroniec (1995). Evaluation of the fractal dimension from a single adsorption isotherm. Langmuir, 11: 2316–2317
19 L Ji, J Qiu, Y Xia, T Zhang (2012a). Micro-pore characteristics and methane adsorption properties of common clay minerals by electron microscopy canning. Acta Petrol Sin, 33(2): 249–256 (in Chinese)
20 F Jiao (2019). Theoretical insights, core technologies and practices concerning “volume development” of shale gas in China. Nat Gas Ind B, 6(6): 525–538
21 A Keshavarz, R Sakurovs, M Grigore, M Sayyafzadeh (2017). Effect of maceral composition and coal rank on gas diffusion in Australian coals. Int J Coal Geol, 173: 65–75
22 I Klewiah, D S Berawala, H C Alexander Walker, P Ø Andersen, P H Nadeau (2020). Review of experimental sorption studies of CO2 and CH4 in shales. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 73: 103045
23 L Kuang, D Dong, W He, S Wen, S Sun, S Li, Z Qiu, X Liao, Y Li, J Wu, L Zhang, Z Shi, W Guo, S Zhang (2020). Geological characteristics and development potential of transitional shale gas in the east margin of the Ordos Basin, NW China. Pet Explor Dev, 47(3): 471–482
24 I Langmuir (1918). The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc, 40(9): 1361–1403
25 A Li, W Ding, J He, P Dai, S Yin, F Xie (2016). Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich shale reservoirs: a case study of lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi formation in Malong block of eastern Yunnan Province, South China. Mar Pet Geol, 70: 46–57
26 X Li, D Elsworth (2015). Geomechanics of CO2 enhanced shale gas recovery. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 26: 1607–1619
27 Z Li, X Shen, Z Qi, R Hu (2018). Study on the pore structure and fractal characteristics of marine and continental shale based on mercury porosimetry, N2 adsorption and NMR methods. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 53: 12–21
28 Y Li, Z Wang, Z Pan, X Niu, Y Yu, S Meng (2019). Pore structure and its fractal dimensions of transitional shale: a cross section from east margin of the Ordos Basin, China. Fuel, 241: 417–431
29 Y Li, J Yang, Z Pan, W Tong (2020b). Nanoscale pore structure and mechanical property analysis of coal: an insight combining AFM and SEM images. Fuel, 260: 116352
30 J Liu, X Hui Xie, Q Wang, S Chen, Z Hu (2020). Influence of pore structure on shale gas recovery with CO2 sequestration: insight into molecular mechanisms. Energy Fuels, 34: 1240–1250
31 J Liu, L Xie, D Elsworth, Q Gan (2019). CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in shale: implications for enhancement in gas production and reduction in carbon emissions. Environ Sci Technol, 53(15): 9328–9336 PMID:31318200
32 Y Liu, J Hou (2020). Selective adsorption of CO2/CH4 mixture on clay-rich shale using molecular simulations. J CO2 Util, 39: 101143
33 X Lu, F Li, A T Watson (1995). Adsorption studies of natural gas storage in Devonian shales. SPE Form Eval, 10(2): 109–113
34 X Ma, S Guo (2020). Study on pore evolution and diagenesis division of a Permian Longtan transitional shale in Southwest Guizhou, China. Energy Sci Eng, 00: 1–22
35 F Pang, Z Zhang, J Zhang, K Chen, D Shi, S Bao, S Li, T Guo (2020). Progress and prospect on exploration and development of shale gas in the Yangtze River economic belt. J China Univ Geosci, 45(6): 2152–2159
36 Q R Passey, K M Bohacs, W L Esch, R Klimentidis (2010). From oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir—geologic and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale-gas reservoirs. Soc Petrol Engi, 13150: 1–29
37 P Pei, K Ling, J He, Z Liu (2016). Shale gas reservoir treatment by a CO2-based technology. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 26: 1595–1606
38 P J Pomonis, E T Tsaousi (2009). Frenkel-Halsey-Hill equation, dimensionality of adsorption, and pore anisotropy. Langmuir, 25(17): 9986–9994
pmid: 19705894
39 R Qi, Z Ning, Q Wang, Y Zeng, L Huang, S Zhang, H Du (2018). Sorption of methane, carbon dioxide, and their mixtures on shales from Sichuan Basin, China. Energ Fuels, 32: 2926–2940
40 C Qin, Y Jiang, Y Luo, J Zhou, H Liu, X Song, D Li, F Zhou, Y Xie (2020). Effect of supercritical CO2 saturation pressures and temperatures on the methane adsorption behaviours of Longmaxi shale. Energy, 206: 118150
41 D J K Ross, R M Bustin (2009). The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs. Mar Pet Geol, 26: 916–927
42 C Shan, T Zhang, Y Wei, Z Zhang (2017). Shale gas reservoir characteristics of Ordovician-Silurian formations in the central Yangtze area, China. Front Earth Sci, 11(1): 184–201
43 V A Shcherba, A P Butolin, A Zieliński (2019). Current state and prospects of shale gas production. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth Env Sci, 272
44 K S W Sing (1982). Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Provisional). Pure Appl Chem, 54(11): 2201–2218
45 R M Slatt, N R O’Brien (2011). Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales: contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks geohorizon. AAPG Bull, 95(12): 2017–2030
46 M Thommes, K Kaneko, A V Neimark, J P Olivier, F Rodriguez-Reinoso, J Rouquerol, K S Sing (2015). Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem, 87(9−10): 1051–1069
47 J Wang, S Guo (2020). Comparison of geochemical characteristics of marine facies, marine-continental transitional facies and continental facies shale in typical areas of China and their control over organic-rich shale. Energ Source Part A: 1–13
48 M Wang, Z Guo, C Jiao, S Lu, J Li, H Xue, J Li, J Li, G Chen (2019a). Exploration progress and geochemical features of lacustrine shale oils in China. J Petrol Sci Eng, 178: 975–986
49 S Wang, Z Song, T Cao, X Song (2013). The methane sorption capacity of Paleozoic shales from the Sichuan Basin, China. Mar Pet Geol, 44: 112–119
50 Y Wang, D Dong, H Yang, L He, S Wang, J Huang, B Pu, S Wang (2014). Quantitative characterization of reservoir space in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Shale, southern Sichuan, China. Sci China Earth Sci, 57(2): 312–322
51 Y Wang, Y Zhu, S Liu, R Zhang (2016). Methane adsorption measurements and modeling for organic-rich marine shale samples. Fuel, 172: 301–309
52 C Yang, J Zhang, X Tang, J Ding, Q Zhao, W Dang, H Chen, Y Su, B Li, D Lu (2017). Comparative study on micro-pore structure of marine, terrestrial, and transitional shales in key areas, China. Int J Coal Geol, 171: 76–92
53 S Zeng, J Gu, S Yang, H Zhou, Y Qian (2019). Comparison of techno-economic performance and environmental impacts between shale gas and coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) in China. J Clean Prod, 215: 544–556
54 J Zhang, Y Tang, D He, P Sun, X Zou (2020). Full-scale nanopore system and fractal characteristics of clay-rich lacustrine shale combining FE-SEM, nano-CT, gas adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Appl Clay Sci, 196: 105748
55 Q Zhang, R H Liu, Z L Pang, W Lin, W H Bai, H Y Wang (2016). Characterization of microscopic pore structures in Lower Silurian black shale (S11), southeastern Chongqing, China. Mar Pet Geol, 71: 250–259
56 J Zhou, N Hu, X Xian, L Zhou, J Tang, Y Kang, H Wang (2019a). Supercritical CO2 fracking for enhanced shale gas recovery and CO2 sequestration: results, status and future challenges. Adv Geo-Energ Res, 3(2): 207–224
57 J Zhou, Z Jin, K H Luo (2019b). Effects of moisture contents on shale gas recovery and CO2 sequestration. Langmuir, 35(26): 8716–8725
pmid: 31244260
58 J Zhou, M Liu, X Xian, Y Jiang, Q Liu, X Wang (2019c). Measurements and modelling of CH4 and CO2 adsorption behaviors on shales: implication for CO2 enhanced shale gas recovery. Fuel, 251: 293–306
59 J Zhou, Q Liu, J Tan, Y Jiang, X Xian, H Yin, Y Ju (2017). Pore structure and adsorption characteristics of marine and continental shale in China. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 17(9): 6356–6366
60 J Zhou, S Xie, Y Jiang, X Xian, Q Liu, Z Lu, Q Lyu (2018). Influence of supercritical CO2 exposure on CH4 and CO2 adsorption behaviors of shale: implications for CO2 sequestration. Energ Fuels, 32: 6073–6089
61 J Zhou, S Tian, L Zhou, X Xian, K Yang, Y Jiang, C Zhang, Y Guo (2020). Experimental investigation on the influence of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation time on the permeability of fractured shale. Energ, 191: 116574
62 C Zou, D Dong, S Wang, J Li, X Li, Y Wang, D Li, K Cheng (2010). Geological characteristics, formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China. Pet Explor Dev, 37(6): 641–653
[1] Aikuan WANG, Pei SHAO, Qinghui WANG. Biogenic gas generation effects on anthracite molecular structure and pore structure[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(2): 272-282.
[2] Chang’an SHAN, Tingshan ZHANG, Xing LIANG, Dongchu SHU, Zhao ZHANG, Xiangfeng WEI, Kun ZHANG, Xuliang FENG, Haihua ZHU, Shengtao WANG, Yue CHEN. Effects of nano-pore system characteristics on CH4 adsorption capacity in anthracite[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(1): 75-91.
[3] Haihai HOU, Longyi SHAO, Yonghong LI, Zhen LI, Wenlong ZHANG, Huaijun WEN. The pore structure and fractal characteristics of shales with low thermal maturity from the Yuqia Coalfield, northern Qaidam Basin, northwestern China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(1): 148-159.
[4] Chang’an SHAN,Tingshan ZHANG,Yong WEI,Zhao ZHANG. Shale gas reservoir characteristics of Ordovician-Silurian formations in the central Yangtze area, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(1): 184-201.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed