|
|
PM10 emissions from industrial coal-fired chain-grate boilers |
Xinghua Li1( ), Junzan Han1, Lei Duan2 |
1. School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China 2. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
Abstract PM in submicron mode emitted from raw coal burning contribute to 33 % of PM10. PM in submicron mode from briquette coal burning contribute to 86 % of PM10. Collection efficiency of muticlones and scrubbers is 34% for submicron particle. Peak of submicron mode in normal operation period is larger than start-up period.
![]() Industrial coal-fired boiler is an important air pollutant emission source in China. The chain-grate boiler is the most extensively used type of industrial coal-fired boiler. An electrical low-pressure impactor, and a Dekati® Low Pressure Impactor were applied to determine mass and number size distributions of PM10 at the inlet and the outlet of the particulate emission control devices at six coal-fired chain-grate boilers. The mass size distribution of PM10 generated from coal-fired chain-grate boilers generally displays a bimodal distribution that contains a submicron mode and a coarse mode. The PM in the submicron mode for burning with raw coal contributes to 33%±10 % of PM10 emissions, much higher than those for pulverized boilers. And the PM in the submicron mode for burning with briquette contributes up to 86 % of PM10 emissions. Multiclones and scrubbers are not efficient for controlling PM10 emission. Their average collection efficiencies for sub-micron particle and super-micron particle are 34% and 78%, respectively. Operating conditions of industrial steam boilers have influence on PM generation. Peak of the submicron mode during normal operation period is larger than the start-up period.
|
Keywords
coal-fired chain-grate boiler
PM10
size distribution
particulate emission control devices
size-dependent collection efficiency
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Xinghua Li
|
Issue Date: 12 July 2017
|
|
1 |
Ministry of Environmental Protection. China. Available online at . (accessed 12th Dec. 12, 2015)
|
2 |
NevilleM, QuannR J, HaynesB S, SarofimA F. Vaporization and condensation of mineral matter during pulverized coal combustion.Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 1981, 18(1): 1267–1274
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(81)80130-0
|
3 |
QuannR J, NevilleM, JanghorbaniM, MimsC A, SarofimA F. Mineral matter and trace-element vaporization in a laboratory-pulverized coal combustion system.Environmental Science & Technology, 1982, 16(11): 776–781
https://doi.org/10.1021/es00105a009
pmid: 22299785
|
4 |
McElroyM W, CarrR C, EnsorD S, MarkowskiG R. Size distribution of fine particles from coal combustion.Science, 1982, 215(4528): 13–19
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.215.4528.13
pmid: 17790449
|
5 |
MoisioM. Real time size distribution measurement of combustion aerosols. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology, 1999
|
6 |
YiH, HaoJ, DuanL, LiX, GuoX. Characteristics of inhalable particulate matter concentration and size distribution from power plants in China.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2006, 56(9): 1243–1251
https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464590
pmid: 17004679
|
7 |
SuiJ, XuM, DuY, LiuY, YuD, YiG. Emission characteristics and chemical composition of PM10 from two coal fired power plants in China.Journal of the Energy Institute, 2007, 80(4): 192–198 doi:10.1179/174602207X242418
|
8 |
SeamesW S. An initial study of the fine fragmentation fly ash particle mode generated during pulverized coal combustion.Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 81(2): 109–125 doi:10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00006-7
|
9 |
LinakW P, MillerC A, SeamesW S, WendtJ O L, IshinomoriT, EndoY, MiyamaeS. On trimodal particle size distributions in fly ash from pulverized-coal combustion.Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2002, 29(1): 441–447
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80058-X
|
10 |
YuD, XuM, YaoH, SuiJ, LiuX, YuY, CaoQ. Use of elemental size distributions in identifying particle formation modes.Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): 1921–1928
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.115
|
11 |
ZhaoZ, DuQ, ZhaoG, GaoJ, DongH, CaoY, HanQ, YuanP, SuL. Fine particle emission from an industrial coal-fired circulating fluidized-bed boiler equipped with a fabric filter in China.Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(7): 4769–4780
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500558g
|
12 |
TurnS R. An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications. 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2000
|
13 |
ZhangY, SchauerJ J, ZhangY, ZengL, WeiY, LiuY, ShaoM. Characteristics of particulate carbon emissions from real-world Chinese coal combustion.Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(14): 5068–5073
https://doi.org/10.1021/es7022576
pmid: 18754349
|
14 |
GeS, BaiZ, LiuW, ZhuT, WangT, QingS, ZhangJ. Boiler briquette coal versus raw coal: Part I—Stack gas emissions.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2001, 51(4): 524–533
https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2001.10464293
pmid: 28072241
|
15 |
China Pollution Source Census. Available online at (accessed Dec. 12, 2015)
|
16 |
KeskinenJ, PietarinenK, LehtimäkiM J. Electrical low pressure impactor.Journal of Aerosol Science, 1992, 23(4): 353–360
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(92)90004-F
|
17 |
Dekati Ltd Technical Note.Unidealities in ELPITM mass measurement.
|
18 |
Dekati@ DI-1000 diluter brochure. Available online at (accessed Dec. 12, 2015)
|
19 |
DLPI brochure. Available online at . (accessed Dec. 12, 2015)
|
20 |
State Environmental Protection Administration of China. Handbook of Pollutant Generation and Emission Factors from Industrial Sources. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1996
|
21 |
LichtW. Air Pollution Control Engineering: Basic Calculations for Particulate Collection, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1988
|
22 |
KimH T, JungC H, OhS N, LeeK W. Particle removal efficiency of gravitational wet scrubber considering diffusion, interception, and impaction.Environmental Engineering Science, 2001, 18(2): 125–136
https://doi.org/10.1089/10928750151132357
|
23 |
DirgoJ, LeithD. Cyclone collection efficiency: comparison of experimental results with theoretical predictions.Aerosol Science and Technology, 1985, 4(4): 401–415
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828508959066
|
24 |
ZhaoB. Development of a new method for evaluating cyclone efficiency.Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2005, 44(4): 447–451
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(04)00149-7
|
25 |
LeeB K, MohanB R, ByeonS H, LimK S, HongE P. Evaluating the performance of a turbulent wet scrubber for scrubbing particulate matter.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2013, 63(5): 499–506
https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.738626
pmid: 23786141
|
26 |
LiuX, XuM, YaoH, YuD, GaoX, CaoQ, CaiY. Effect of combustion parameters on the emission and chemical composition of particulate matter during coal combustion.Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21(1): 157–162
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef060324u
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|