Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (3) : 39    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1356-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The size distribution of airborne bacteria and human pathogenic bacteria in a commercial composting plant
Min Gao1, Ziye Yang1,2, Yajie Guo1, Mo Chen1, Tianlei Qiu1, Xingbin Sun2(), Xuming Wang1()
1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Beijing Agro-Biotechnology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
2. College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
 Download: PDF(1089 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

•Bacterial concentrations from eight stages were 104–105copies/m3.

•Diameter influenced clustering of bacterial and HPB lineages.

•Dg of 8 HPB ranged from 2.42 to 5.09 μm in composting areas.

•Dg of 8 HPB ranged from 3.70 to 8.96 μm in packaging areas.

•HPB had high concentrations and small sizes in composting areas.

Composting plants are regarded as one of the important sources of environmental bioaerosols. However, limitations in the size distribution of airborne bacteria have prevented our comprehensive understanding of their risk to human health and their dispersal behavior. In this study, different sizes of airborne bacteria were collected using an eight-stage impactor from a full-scale composting facility. Size-related abundance and communities of airborne bacteria as well as human pathogenic bacteria (HPB) were investigated using 16S rRNA gene sequencing coupled with droplet digital PCR. Our results indicate that the bacterial concentrations from the eight stages were approximately 104–105copies/m3. Although no statistical correlation was detected between the particle size and the Shannon index, the influence of size on bacterial lineages was observed in both composting and packaging areas. For airborne bacteria from different stages, the dominant phyla were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, and the dominant genera was Bacillus. Seven out of eight HPB with a small geometric mean aerodynamic diameter had a high concentration in composting areas. Based on diameters of 2.42 to 5.09 μm, most HPB in the composting areas were expected to be deposited on the bronchus and secondary bronchus. However, in the packaging areas, the deposition of HPB (diameters 3.70 to 8.96 μm) occurred in the upper part of the respiratory tract. Our results on the size distribution, abundance, and diversity of these bacteria offer important information for the systematic evaluation of bacterial pathogenicity and the potential health impacts on workers in composting plants and the surrounding residents.

Keywords Size distribution      Airborne bacteria      Biological diversity      Human pathogenic bacteria      Composting plants     
Corresponding Author(s): Xingbin Sun,Xuming Wang   
Issue Date: 10 November 2020
 Cite this article:   
Min Gao,Ziye Yang,Yajie Guo, et al. The size distribution of airborne bacteria and human pathogenic bacteria in a commercial composting plant[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 39.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-020-1356-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2021/V15/I3/39
Fig.1  Bacterial abundance and diversity were related to different particle sizes in the composting and packaging areas. C(I–VIII) and P(I–VIII) present the eight stages in the composting and packaging areas, respectively. In the box plots, boxes frame upper and lower quartiles, lines represent the medians, whiskers denote ranges, and “○” represent the means.
Fig.2  The size-related dominant genera of airborne bacteria in the composting and packaging areas (representing 60 dominant genera).
Fig.3  Constrained principal-coordinate analysis (CPCoA) of bacterial lineages from eight sizes of particles in both the composting and packaging areas based on relative abundances of genera.
Fig.4  The size distributions of particles associated with human pathogenic bacteria (HPB) in the atmospheric environment of composting and packaging areas.
Human pathogenic bacteria Composting area Packaging area Previous pure culture studies Diameters (Holtetal., 1994) dg (μm)
Concentration
(Copies/m3)
Aerodynamic diameters Concentration
(Copies/m3)
Aerodynamic diameters
dg (μm) sg dg (μm) sg
Streptococcus 3.53 × 102 2.67 2.37 2.29 × 102 7.10 2.02 0.6–1.0
Acinetobacter 6.15 × 104 2.42 3.04 1.21 × 105 4.25 1.66 (1.0–1.5) × (1.5–2.5)
Enterococcus 1.23 × 104 2.95 2.24 8.87 × 103 8.80 1.66 (0.6–2.0) × (0.6–2.5)
Arcobacter 3.07 × 102 5.09 3.01 7.22 × 101 3.70 1.81 (0.2–0.9) × (0.5–3)
Escherichia 4.34 × 103 2.93 2.61 1.19 × 103 4.73 2.96 (1.1–1.5) × (2.0–6.0)
Staphylococcus 2.84 × 103 3.33 3.17 6.30 × 102 3.98 2.22 0.5–1.5
Fusobacterium 8.38 × 103 2.57 1.92 7.19 × 103 8.96 1.49 (0.6–0.8) × (0.8–1.4)
Mycobacterium 1.43 × 103 3.86 2.89 1.04 × 103 5.33 2.17 (0.2–0.6) × (1.0–10)
Tab.1  The concentration, and geometric s.d. and aerodynamic diameters of particles associated with eight HPB genes in atmospheric environments from the composting and packaging areas
1 L Bonifait, G Marchand, M Veillette, H Mbareche, M E Dubuis, C Pépin, Y Cloutier, Y Bernard, C Duchaine (2017). Workers’ exposure to bioaerosols from three different types of composting facilities. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 14(10): 815–822
https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1335054
2 J H Byeon, C W Park, K Y Yoon, J H Park, J Hwang (2008). Size distributions of total airborne particles and bioaerosols in a municipal composting facility. Bioresource Technology, 99(11): 5150–5154
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.014
3 Y Cormier, G U Y Tremblay, A Meriaux, G Brochu, J Lavoie (1990). Airborne microbial contents in two types of swine confinement buildings in Quebec. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 51(6): 304–309
https://doi.org/10.1080/15298669091369709
4 P Di Filippo, D Pomata, C Riccardi, F Buiarelli, F Castellani, G Calitri, G Simonetti, E Sonego, E Bruni, D Uccelletti (2020). Concentrations of bacteria and bacterial and fungal spores calculated from chemical tracers associated with size-segregated aerosol in a composting plant. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13(4): 469–476
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00802-0
5 R P Dickson, G B Huffnagle (2015). The Lung Microbiome: New principles for respiratory bacteriology in health and disease. PLoS Pathogens, 11(7): e1004923
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004923
6 E Pagans, R Barrena, X Font, A Sánchez (2006). Ammonia emissions from the composting of different organic wastes. Dependency on process temperature. Chemosphere, 62(9): 1534–1542
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.06.044
7 A Galès, V Bru-Adan, J J Godon, K Delabre, P Catala, A Ponthieux, M Chevallier, E Birot, J P Steyer, N Wéry (2015). Predominance of single bacterial cells in composting bioaerosols. Atmospheric Environment, 107: 225–232
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.035
8 M Gao, R Jia, T Qiu, M Han, Y Song, X Wang (2015). Seasonal size distribution of airborne culturable bacteria and fungi and preliminary estimation of their deposition in human lungs during non-haze and haze days. Atmospheric Environment, 118: 203–210
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.004
9 M Gao, R Jia, T Qiu, M Han, X Wang (2017). Size-related bacterial diversity and tetracycline resistance gene abundance in the air of concentrated poultry feeding operations. Environmental Pollution, 220, Part B: 1342–1348
10 M Gao, T Qiu, Y Sun, X Wang (2018). The abundance and diversity of antibiotic resistance genes in the atmospheric environment of composting plants. Environment International, 116: 229–238
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.028
11 B Gutarowska, J Szulc, A Nowak, A Otlewska, M Okrasa, A Jachowicz, K Majchrzycka (2018). Dust at various workplaces—microbiological and toxicological threats. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5): 877–895
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050877
12 J G Holt, N R Krieg, P H A Sneath, J T Staley, S T Williams (1994). Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 385–1161
13 P Y Hong, X Li, X Yang, T Shinkai, Y Zhang, X Wang, R I Mackie (2012). Monitoring airborne biotic contaminants in the indoor environment of pig and poultry confinement buildings. Environmental Microbiology, 14(6): 1420–1431
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02726.x
14 N Just, S Kirychuk, Y Gilbert, V Létourneau, M Veillette, B Singh, C Duchaine (2011). Bacterial diversity characterization of bioaerosols from cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations. Environmental Research, 111(4): 492–498
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.009
15 J Lelieveld, J S Evans, M Fnais, D Giannadaki, A Pozzer (2015). The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, 525(7569): 367–371
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371
16 H Liu, X Zhang, H Zhang, X Yao, M Zhou, J Wang, Z He, H Zhang, L Lou, W Mao, P Zheng, B Hu (2018). Effect of air pollution on the total bacteria and pathogenic bacteria in different sizes of particulate matter. Environmental Pollution, 233: 483–493
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.070
17 Q Q Liu, M Li, R Liu, Q Zhang, D Wu, D Zhu, X H Shen, C P Feng, F W Zhang, X Liu (2019). Removal of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole in artificial composite soil treatment systems and diversity of microbial communities. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(2): 28
18 H Mbareche, E Brisebois, M Veillette, C Duchaine (2017). Bioaerosol sampling and detection methods based on molecular approaches: No pain no gain. Science of the Total Environment, 599–600: 2095–2104
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.076
19 H Mbareche, M Veillette, G J Bilodeau, C Duchaine (2019). Fungal aerosols at dairy farms using molecular and culture techniques. Science of the Total Environment, 653: 253–263
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.345
20 W W Nazaroff (2004). Indoor particle dynamics. Indoor Air, 14(Suppl 7): 175–183
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00286.x
21 J Peng,K Wang, X B Yin, X Q Yin, M F Du, Y Z Gao, P Antwi, N Q Ren, A J Wang (2019). Trophic Mode and Organics Metabolic Characteristic of Fungal Community in Swine Manure Composting. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(6): 93
22 X Qian, W Sun, J Gu, X J Wang, Y J Zhang, M L Duan, H C Li, R R Zhang (2016). Reducing antibiotic resistance genes, integrons, and pathogens in dairy manure by continuous thermophilic composting. Bioresource Technology, 220: 425–432
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.101
23 T A Reponen, S V Gazenko, S A Grinshpun, K Willeke, E C Cole (1998). Characteristics of airborne Actinomycete spores. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64(10): 3807–3812
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.64.10.3807-3812.1998
24 S Robertson, P Douglas, D Jarvis, E Marczylo (2019). Bioaerosol exposure from composting facilities and health outcomes in workers and in the community: A systematic review update. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 222(3): 364–386
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.02.006
25 E Robine, D Dérangère, D Robin (2000). Survival of a Pseudomonas fluorescens and Enterococcus faecalis aerosol on inert surfaces. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 55(1-3): 229–234
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00188-4
26 P Sykes, K Jones, J D Wildsmith (2007). Managing the potential public health risks from bioaerosol liberation at commercial composting sites in the UK: An analysis of the evidence base. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(2): 410–424
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.05.005
27 M P M Taha, S J T Pollard, U Sarkar, P Longhurst (2005). Estimating fugitive bioaerosol releases from static compost windrows: feasibility of a portable wind tunnel approach. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 25(4): 445–450
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.02.013
28 R Tellier (2006). Review of aerosol transmission of influenza A virus. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 12(11): 1657–1662
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1211.060426
29 R J Thomas, D Webber, W Sellors, A Collinge, A Frost, A J Stagg, S C Bailey, P N Jayasekera, R R Taylor, S Eley, R W Titball (2008). Characterization and deposition of respirable large- and small-particle bioaerosols. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(20): 6437–6443
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01194-08
30 M Veillette, L Bonifait, H Mbareche, G Marchand, C Duchaine (2018). Preferential aerosolization of Actinobacteria during handling of composting organic matter. Journal of Aerosol Science, 116: 83–91
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.11.004
31 S M Walser, D G Gerstner, B Brenner, J Bünger, T Eikmann, B Janssen, S Kolb, A Kolk, D Nowak, M Raulf, H Sagunski, N Sedlmaier, R Suchenwirth, G Wiesmüller, K M Wollin, I Tesseraux, C E W Herr (2015). Evaluation of exposure–response relationships for health effects of microbial bioaerosols: A systematic review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 218(7): 577–589
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.07.004
32 N Yamamoto, K Bibby, J Qian, D Hospodsky, H Rismani-Yazdi, W W Nazaroff, J Peccia (2012). Particle-size distributions and seasonal diversity of allergenic and pathogenic fungi in outdoor air. ISME Journal, 6(10): 1801–1811
https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.30
[1] FSE-20123-OF-GM_suppl_1 Download
[1] Yu Miao, Nicholas W. Johnson, Kimberly Heck, Sujin Guo, Camilah D. Powell, Thien Phan, Phillip B. Gedalanga, David T. Adamson, Charles J. Newell, Michael S. Wong, Shaily Mahendra. Microbial responses to combined oxidation and catalysis treatment of 1,4-dioxane and co-contaminants in groundwater and soil[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(5): 2-.
[2] Xinghua Li, Junzan Han, Lei Duan. PM10 emissions from industrial coal-fired chain-grate boilers[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(6): 18-.
[3] Jieqiong LIU,Jingkun JIANG,Qiang ZHANG,Jianguo DENG,Jiming HAO. A spectrometer for measuring particle size distributions in the range of 3 nm to 10 μm[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(1): 63-72.
[4] Xinfeng WANG, Wenxing WANG, Likun XUE, Xiaomei GAO, Wei NIE, Yangchun YU, Yang ZHOU, Lingxiao YANG, Qingzhu ZHANG, Tao WANG. Size-resolved aerosol ionic composition and secondary formation at Mount Heng in South Central China[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(6): 815-826.
[5] Can DONG, Lingxiao YANG, Chao YAN, Qi YUAN, Yangchun YU, Wenxing WANG. Particle size distributions, PM2.5 concentrations and water-soluble inorganic ions in different public indoor environments: a case study in Jinan, China[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(1): 55-65.
[6] Xiaoyan SHI, Kebin HE, Jie ZHANG, Yongliang MA, Yunshan GE, Jianwei TAN, . A comparative study of particle size distribution from two oxygenated fuels and diesel fuel[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2010, 4(1): 30-34.
[7] ZHAO Peng, ZHU Tong, LIANG Baosheng, HU Min, KANG Ling, GONG Jicheng. Characteristics of mass distributions of aerosol particle and its inorganic water-soluble ions in summer over a suburb farmland in Beijing[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(2): 159-165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed