Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (2) : 24    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1203-7
REVIEW ARTICLE
Review on remediation technologies for arsenic-contaminated soil
Xiaoming Wan1,2, Mei Lei1,2(), Tongbin Chen1,2
1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
 Download: PDF(306 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• Recent progress of As-contaminated soil remediation technologies is presented.

• Phytoextraction and chemical immobilization are the most widely used methods.

• Novel remediation technologies for As-contaminated soil are still urgently needed.

• Methods for evaluating soil remediation efficiency are lacking.

• Future research directions for As-contaminated soil remediation are proposed.

Arsenic (As) is a top human carcinogen widely distributed in the environment. As-contaminated soil exists worldwide and poses a threat on human health through water/food consumption, inhalation, or skin contact. More than 200 million people are exposed to excessive As concentration through direct or indirect exposure to contaminated soil. Therefore, affordable and efficient technologies that control risks caused by excess As in soil must be developed. The presently available methods can be classified as chemical, physical, and biological. Combined utilization of multiple technologies is also common to improve remediation efficiency. This review presents the research progress on different remediation technologies for As-contaminated soil. For chemical methods, common soil washing or immobilization agents were summarized. Physical technologies were mainly discussed from the field scale. Phytoextraction, the most widely used technology for As-contaminated soil in China, was the main focus for bioremediation. Method development for evaluating soil remediation efficiency was also summarized. Further research directions were proposed based on literature analysis.

Keywords Arsenic, field-scale      Immobilization      Phytoextraction      Soil washing     
Corresponding Author(s): Mei Lei   
Issue Date: 30 December 2019
 Cite this article:   
Xiaoming Wan,Mei Lei,Tongbin Chen. Review on remediation technologies for arsenic-contaminated soil[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 24.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-019-1203-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2020/V14/I2/24
Eluent Eluent concentration Original As concentration (mg/kg) Removal rate (%) Soil property change* Reference
Acid HCl 1 M 59 40 H Im et al. (2015)
H3PO4 2 M 165 90 H Wang et al. (2017)
Base NaOH 0.5 M 101 42 H Beiyuan et al. (2017)
NaOH 2 M 165 98 H Wang et al. (2017)
Salt Na2CO3 0.5 M 55 35 H Beiyuan et al. (2017)
NH4H2PO4 0.5 M 35 25 H Jho et al. (2015)
(NH4)2HPO4 0.5 M 59 35 H Im et al. (2015)
KH2PO4 0.1 M 150 63 M Zhao et al., 2016
Chelant Na2EDTA 0.01 M 70 2 M Qiu et al., 2010
[S,S]-EDDS 2 mM 355 11 M Wen and Marshall (2011)
Organic Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) 3000 mg/L 390 88 L Lin et al. (2017)
Humic substances 0.05 M 990 18 L Rasmussen et al. (2015)
Citrate 0.05 M 990 64 M Rasmussen et al. (2015)
Nitrilotriacetic acid 0.05 M 990 60 M Rasmussen et al. (2015)
H2C2O4 0.05 M 153 22 M Wei et al. (2016)
Oxalate 0.1 M∶0.1 M 70 60 M Qiu et al., (2010)
Surfactants Tannic acid 3% weight 3574 38 M Gusiatin (2014)
Saponin 1.5% weight 85 75 M Mukhopadhyay et al. (2017)
Combined/Sequential Na2S2O4 in HCl 2%: 0.01 M 59 42 H Im et al. (2015)
Na2S2O4 in EDTA 0.1 M∶0.1 M 165 95 H Wang et al. (2017)
Na2S2O4-C6H8O7-NaHCO3 0.4 g∶1 g∶10 mL 101 81 H Beiyuan et al. (2017)
Saponin+ KH2PO4 1.5% (w∶v):150 mM 85 92 M Mukhopadhyay et al. (2017)
H3PO4-C2H2O4 -Na2EDTA 0.05 M∶0.075 M∶0.075 M 153 42 M Wei et al. (2016)
Tab.1  Reagents used in As-contaminated soil washing
Immobilization agent Soil utilization Total As concentration (mg/kg) Soil pH Reagent Concentration Immobilization efficiency (%) Period Reference
Laboratory-scale
(hydro) oxides Agricultural field 3500 7.4 Schwertmannite 5% weight 63 35 days Yang et al. (2017)
Mining site 2548 6.3 Maghemite nanoparticles 5% weight 99 10 days Arenas-Lago et al. (2019)
Mining site 479 4.6 Aluminum oxide 5% weight 31 2 days Doherty et al. (2017)
Mining site 479 4.6 Manganese (IV) oxide 3% weight 40 2 days Doherty et al. (2017)
Mining site 479 4.6 Kaolinite 10% weight 26 2 days Doherty et al. (2017)
Mining site 479 4.6 Ferric chloride+ lime 1%:1% weight 71 2 days Doherty et al. (2017)
Mining site 479 4.6 Zero valent iron powder 1% weight 90 2 days Doherty et al. (2017)
Mining site 479 4.6 Ferrihydrite (synthesized) 3% weight 84 2 days Doherty et al.(2017)
Mining-metallurgy site 70200 6.4 Zero-valent iron nanoparticles 10% weight 92 72 hours Gil–Díaz et al.(2017)
Mining-metallurgy site 25900 6.4 Zero-valent iron nanoparticles 10% weight 91-95 72 hours Gil–Díaz et al.(2017)
Agricultural field 2047 4.2 Al2O3·2SiO2·CaO 6% weight 96.2 28 day Wang et al. (2019)
biochar Mining site 15,076.80 3.7 Biochar 2% weight 22 2 hours Chen et al. (2018b)
Landfill site 1202 4.6 Biochar 10% weight 25 7 days Alozie et al. (2018)
Paddy field 47 6.9 Biochar 1% weight 16 35 day Zhu et al. (2019)
Solid waste Paddy field 131.5 6.0 Acid mine drainage sludge 3% weight 93 25 days Ko et al. (2015)
Farmland 118 6.8 Coal mine drainage sludge 7% weight 98 28 days Cui et al. (2018)
Farmland 118 6.8 Waste cow bones 3% weight 74 28 days Cui et al. (2018)
Farmland 118 6.8 Steel making slag 7% weight 98 28 days Cui et al. (2018)
Agricultural areas 54 7.4 Municipal solid waste compost 3% weight 45 2 months Abou Jaoude et al. (2019)
Combined Paddy field 47 6.9 Bismuth-impregnated biochar 2% 69 35 day Zhu et al. (2019)
Paddy field 59 4.7 Fe:biochar 5%:1% weight 41 120 day Qiao et al. (2018)
Bio-materials Paddy soil 140 5.9 Soil microbial fuel cells bioanode N/A 47 50 days Gustave et al. (2018)
Field-scale
(hydro) oxides Brownfield 43300 7.0 Nanoscale zero-valent iron 2.5% weight 57 32 month Gil-Díaz et al. (2019)
Brownfield 7280 7.2 Nanoscale zero-valent iron 2.5% weight 74 32 month Gil-Díaz et al. (2019)
Agricultural field 600 8 Zero-valent iron 1% weight 95 15 years Tiberg et al. (2016)
industrial site 8280 7.4 Fe-Mn binary oxide 10% weight 7.8 10 months Tiberg et al. (2016)
Abandoned smelter 142 4.6 Fe-based sorbent (46.1% Fe2O3, 15.4% MgO, 14.3% CaO, 12.9% SO3, 8.3% SiO2, and 1.7% Al2O3) 1% weight 18.8 1 week An et al. (2019)
Solid waste Paddy field 131.5 6.0 Acid mine drainage sludge 3% weight 45 2 years Ko et al. (2015)
Tab.2  Reagents used in As-contaminated soil immobilization
Place Facilitating measures Area (ha) Annual As removal rate (%) Reference
Baoding, Hebei Province Warming facilities for plants in winter 0.5 8 unpublished data
Chenzhou, Hunan Province Phosphate amendment 1 6.0 Chen et al. (2018a)
Fangshan, Beijing City Phosphate amendment and warming facilities for plants in winter 0.2 17 Chen et al. (2018a)
Gejiu, Yunnan Province Harvest scenario optimization 5 18 Chen et al. (2018a)
Huanjiang, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Phosphate amendment, ecotype selection, harvest scenario optimization 10 14 Wan et al. (2016)
Huize, Yunnan Province Phosphate amendment and harvest scenarios optimization 0.5 12 Chen et al. (2018a)
Jiyuan, Henan Province Warming facilities for plants in winter 1 14 Zhang et al. (2017)
Shimen, Hunan Province Phosphate amendment and water adjustment 10 13.0 Yang et al. (2018)
Tab.3  Several representative phytoextraction projects of As-contaminated soil in China
Microorganism Category Main function Efficiency Reference
Bacillus sp. SF-1 Dissimilatory As reducing prokaryotes Mobilization by reduction Increase the concentration of dissolved As by 56% within 70 h Yamamura et al. (2005)
Geobacter metallireducens GS-15 Metal reducing bacterium Mobilization by reductive dissolution of Fe and co-dissolution of As Increase the concentration of dissolved As from 10 uM to 230 uM Lee et al. (2012)
Rhodopseudomonas palustris Genetically engineered bacterium Mobilization by biovolatilization through methylation Remove 2.2%–4.5% of As by biovolatilization during 30 days Liu et al. (2011)
Acinetobacter junii Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Mobilization by biovolatilization through methylation Volatize 14% of As within 72 h Marwa et al. (2019)
Aspergillus niger Microscopic fungi Mobilization by bioleaching, bioaccumulation, and biovolatization 17% of total As was bioleached, 13% of total As was bioaccumulated, and 49% of total As was volatilized Petkova et al. (2013)
Aspergillus flavus Microscopic fungi Mobilization by bioleaching, bioaccumulation, and biovolatization Immobilization rate reached 84% Mohd et al. (2019)
Bacillus flexus Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bioaccumulation in the cell system Accumulated 12% of As in the biomass Marwa et al. (2019)
Brevibacillus sp KUMAs1 As-resistant bacterium Immobilization by oxidation Adsorption rate of 55% within 96 h Mallick and Mukherjee (2015)
Sporosarcina ginsengisoli CR5 As-tolerant bacterium Immobilization by microbially induced calcite precipitation Exchangeable fraction of As decreased by 99% within 10 d Achal et al. (2012)
Tab.4  Examples of microorganisms used in bioremediation of As-contaminated soil
1 L Abou Jaoude, G Garau, N Nassif, T Darwish, P Castaldi (2019). Metal(loid)s immobilization in soils of Lebanon using municipal solid waste compost: Microbial and biochemical impact. Applied Soil Ecology, 143: 134–143
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.06.011
2 V Achal, X L Pan, Q L Fu, D Y Zhang (2012). Biomineralization based remediation of As(III) contaminated soil by Sporosarcina ginsengisoli. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 201–202: 178–184
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.067
3 N Alozie, N Heaney, C Lin (2018). Biochar immobilizes soil-borne arsenic but not cationic metals in the presence of low-molecular-weight organic acids. Science of the Total Environment, 630: 1188–1194
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.319
4 S Amrate, D E Akretche, C Innocent, P Seta (2006). Use of cation-exchange membranes for simultaneous recovery of lead and EDTA during electrokinetic extraction. Desalination, 193(1–3): 405–410
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.06.071
5 J An, B Jeong, K Nam (2019). Evaluation of the effectiveness of in situ stabilization in the field aged arsenic-contaminated soil: Chemical extractability and biological response. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 367: 137–143
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.050
6 B T K Anh, N N Minh, N T H Ha, D D Kim, N T Kien, N Q Trung, T T Cuong, L T Danh (2018). Field survey and comparative study of Pteris vittata and Pityrogramma calomelanos grown on arsenic contaminated lands with different soil pH. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 100(5): 720–726
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-018-2325-5
7 D Arenas-Lago, M M Abreu, L Andrade Couce, F A Vega (2019). Is nanoremediation an effective tool to reduce the bioavailable As, Pb and Sb contents in mine soils from Iberian Pyrite Belt? Catena, 176: 362–371
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.01.038
8 J Beiyuan, J S Li, D C W Tsang, L Wang, C S Poon, X D Li, S Fendorf (2017). Fate of arsenic before and after chemical-enhanced washing of an arsenic-containing soil in Hong Kong. Science of the Total Environment, 599–600: 679–688
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.208
9 C H Chen, I J Chiou (2008). Remediation of heavy metal-contaminated farm soil using turnover and attenuation method guided with a sustainable management framework. Environmental Engineering Science, 25(1): 11–32
https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2006.0183
10 T Chen, M Lei, X Wan, J Yang, X Zhou (2018a). Twenty years of research and development on soil pollution and remediation in China. Luo Y, Tu C, eds. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 465–476
11 Y Chen, J Xu, Z Lv, R Xie, L Huang, J Jiang (2018b). Impacts of biochar and oyster shells waste on the immobilization of arsenic in highly contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Management 217, 646–653
12 R J R Claveria, T R Perez, M J B Apuan, D A Apuan, R E C Perez (2019). Pteris melanocaulon Fee is an As hyperaccumulator. Chemosphere, 236: 124380
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124380
13 M Cui, Y Lee, J Choi, J Kim, Z Han, Y Son, J Khim (2018). Evaluation of stabilizing materials for immobilization of toxic heavy metals in contaminated agricultural soils in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193: 748–758
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.105
14 E B da Silva, W A Mussoline, A C Wilkie, L Q Ma (2019). Arsenic removal and biomass reduction of As-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata: Coupling ethanol extraction with anaerobic digestion. Science of the Total Environment, 666: 205–211
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.161
15 S J Doherty, M K Tighe, S C Wilson (2017). Evaluation of amendments to reduce arsenic and antimony leaching from co-contaminated soils. Chemosphere, 174: 208–217
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.100
16 R Dolphen, P Thiravetyan (2019). Reducing arsenic in rice grains by leonardite and arsenic–resistant endophytic bacteria. Chemosphere, 223: 448–454
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.054
17 J R Doyle, J M Blais, R D Holmes, P A White (2012). A soil ingestion pilot study of a population following a traditional lifestyle typical of rural or wilderness areas. Science of the Total Environment, 424: 110–120
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.043
18 V C Eze, A P Harvey (2018). Extractive recovery and valorisation of arsenic from contaminated soil through phytoremediation using Pteris cretica. Chemosphere, 208: 484–492
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.027
19 E Franchi, P Cosmina, F Pedron, I Rosellini, M Barbafieri, G Petruzzelli, M Vocciante (2019). Improved arsenic phytoextraction by combined use of mobilizing chemicals and autochthonous soil bacteria. Science of the Total Environment, 655: 328–336
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.242
20 P Ghosh, B Rathinasabapathi, L Q Ma (2011). Arsenic-resistant bacteria solubilized arsenic in the growth media and increased growth of arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L. Bioresource Technology, 102(19): 8756–8761
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.064
21 M Gil-Díaz, J Alonso, E Rodríguez-Valdés, J R Gallego, M C Lobo (2017). Comparing different commercial zero valent iron nanoparticles to immobilize As and Hg in brownfield soil. Science of the Total Environment, 584–585: 1324–1332
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.011
22 M Gil-Díaz, E Rodríguez-Valdés, J Alonso, D Baragaño, J R Gallego, M C Lobo (2019). Nanoremediation and long-term monitoring of brownfield soil highly polluted with As and Hg. Science of the Total Environment, 675: 165–175
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.183
23 M Gosselin, G J Zagury (2020). Metal(loid)s inhalation bioaccessibility and oxidative potential of particulate matter from chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-contaminated soils. Chemosphere, 238: 124557
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124557
24 Z M Gusiatin (2014). Tannic acid and saponin for removing arsenic from brownfield soils: Mobilization, distribution and speciation. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 26(4): 855–864
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60534-3
25 W Gustave, Z F Yuan, R Sekar, H C Chang, J Zhang, M Wells, Y X Ren, Z Chen (2018). Arsenic mitigation in paddy soils by using microbial fuel cells. Environmental Pollution, 238: 647– 655
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.085
26 N Habibul, Y Hu, G P Sheng (2016). Microbial fuel cell driving electrokinetic remediation of toxic metal contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 318: 9–14
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.041
27 Y H Han, X Liu, B Rathinasabapathi, H B Li, Y S Chen, L Q Ma (2017). Mechanisms of efficient As solubilization in soils and As accumulation by As-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata. Environmental Pollution, 227: 569–577
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.001
28 J Im, K Yang, E H Jho, K Nam (2015). Effect of different soil washing solutions on bioavailability of residual arsenic in soils and soil properties. Chemosphere, 138: 253–258
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.004
29 P Isosaari, M Sillanpää (2012). Effects of oxalate and phosphate on electrokinetic removal of arsenic from mine tailings. Separation and Purification Technology, 86: 26–34
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.10.016
30 M Jang, J S Hwang, Choi S I (2007). Sequential soil washing techniques using hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide for remediating arsenic-contaminated soils in abandoned iron-ore mines. Chemosphere, 66(1): 8–17
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.056
31 E K Jeon, S R Ryu, K Baek (2015). Application of solar-cells in the electrokinetic remediation of As-contaminated soil. Electrochimica Acta, 181: 160–166
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.065
32 E H Jho, J Im, K Yang, Y J Kim, K Nam (2015). Changes in soil toxicity by phosphate-aided soil washing: Effect of soil characteristics, chemical forms of arsenic, and cations in washing solutions. Chemosphere, 119: 1399–1405
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.038
33 G M Kertulis-Tartar, L Q Ma, C Tu, T Chirenje (2006). Phytoremediation of an arsenic-contaminated site using Pteris vitrata L.: A two-year study. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 8(4): 311–322
https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510600992873
34 W S Kim, E K Jeon, J M Jung, H B Jung, S H Ko, C I Seo, K Baek (2014). Field application of electrokinetic remediation for multi-metal contaminated paddy soil using two-dimensional electrode configuration. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 21(6): 4482–4491
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2424-0
35 M S Ko, J Y Kim, H S Park, K W Kim (2015). Field assessment of arsenic immobilization in soil amended with iron rich acid mine drainage sludge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108: 1073–1080
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.076
36 M S Ko, H S Park, J U Lee (2017). Influence of indigenous bacteria stimulation on arsenic immobilization in field study. Catena, 148: 46–51
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.08.022
37 P Lazo, A Cullaj, A Arapi, T Deda (2007). Trace metals and other contaminants in the environment. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 237–256
38 K Y Lee, J Bosch, R U Meckenstock (2012). Use of metal-reducing bacteria for bioremediation of soil contaminated with mixed organic and inorganic pollutants. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 34(S1): 135–142
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-011-9406-2
39 J Li, Y Ding, K Wang, N Li, G Qian, Y Xu, J Zhang (2020). Comparison of humic and fulvic acid on remediation of arsenic contaminated soil by electrokinetic technology. Chemosphere, 241: 125038
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125038
40 J T Li, H K Gurajala, L H Wu, A Van Der Ent, R L Qiu, A J M Baker, Y T Tang, X E Yang, W S Shu (2018). Hyperaccumulator plants from China: A synthesis of the current state of knowledge. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(21): 11980–11994
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01060
41 Q Liang, D Zhao (2014). Immobilization of arsenate in a sandy loam soil using starch-stabilized magnetite nanoparticles. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 271: 16–23
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.055
42 K Y Lin, Y M Chen, L F Chen, M K Wang, C C Liu (2017). Remediation of arsenic-contaminated soil using alkaline extractable organic carbon solution prepared from wine-processing waste sludge. Soil & Sediment Contamination, 26(6): 569–583
https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2017.1364221
43 S Liu, F Zhang, J Chen, G X Sun (2011). Arsenic removal from contaminated soil via biovolatilization by genetically engineered bacteria under laboratory conditions. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 23(9): 1544–1550
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60570-0
44 L Q Ma, K M Komar, C Tu, W H Zhang, Y Cai, E D Kennelley (2001). A fern that hyperaccumulates arsenic. Nature, 409(6820): 579
https://doi.org/10.1038/35054664
45 I Mallick, E Islam, S Kumar Mukherjee. (2015). Fundamentals and application potential of arsenic-resistant bacteria for bioremediation in rhizosphere: A review. Soil & Sediment Contamination, 24(6): 704–718
https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2015.1010072
46 I Mallick, S K Mukherjee (2015). Bioremediation potential of an arsenic immobilizing strain Brevibacillus sp. KUMAs1 in the rhizosphere of chilli plant. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74(9): 6757–6765
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4686-y
47 X Mao, F X Han, X Shao, Z Arslan, J Mccomb, T Chang, K Guo, A Celik (2016). Remediation of lead-, arsenic-, and cesium-contaminated soil using consecutive washing enhanced with electro-kinetic field. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16(10): 2344–2353
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1435-0
48 N Marwa, N Singh, S Srivastava, G Saxena, V Pandey, N Singh (2019). Characterizing the hypertolerance potential of two indigenous bacterial strains (Bacillus flexus and Acinetobacter junii) and their efficacy in arsenic bioremediation. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 126(4): 1117–1127
https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14179
49 Ministry of Environment, Government of Japan (2006). Enforcement status of agricultural land-soil pollution prevention law in 2005 fiscal year. MOE, Japan
50 S Mohd, A S Kushwaha, J Shukla, K Mandrah, J Shankar, N Arjaria, P N Saxena, P Khare, R Narayan, S Dixit, M H Siddiqui, N Tuteja, M Das, S K Roy, M Kumar (2019). Fungal mediated biotransformation reduces toxicity of arsenic to soil dwelling microorganism and plant. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 176: 108–118
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.053
51 M A Morais, M Gasparon, I D Delbem, C L Caldeira, E T F Freitas, J C Ng, V S T Ciminelli (2019). Gastric/lung bioaccessibility and identification of arsenic-bearing phases and sources of fine surface dust in a gold mining district. Science of the Total Environment, 689: 1244–1254
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.394
52 S Mukhopadhyay, S Mukherjee, M A Hashim, B Sen Gupta (2017). Remediation of arsenic contaminated soil using phosphate and colloidal gas aphron suspensions produced from Sapindus mukorossi. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 98(3): 366–372
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1878-4
53 A Navazas, S Hendrix, A Cuypers, A González (2019). Integrative response of arsenic uptake, speciation and detoxification by Salix atrocinerea. Science of the Total Environment, 689: 422–433
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.279
54 M H Nijboer, J P Okx, E Beinat, M A Van Drunen, R Janssen, K Res Ctr (1998). REC: A decision support system for comparing soil remediation options based on risk reduction, environmental merit and costs. London: Thomas Telford Services Ltd.
55 K Petkova, L Jurkovic, A Simonovicova, S Cernansky Sgem (2013). Geoconference on ecology, economics, education and legislation, Sgem 2013, Vol I. Sofia: Stef92 Technology Ltd., 757–763
56 A Pratush, A Kumar, Z Hu (2018). Adverse effect of heavy metals (As, Pb, Hg, and Cr) on health and their bioremediation strategies: A review. International Microbiology, 21(3): 97–106
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-018-0012-3
57 J T Qiao, T X Liu, X Q Wang, F B Li, Y H Lv, J H Cui, X D Zeng, Y Z Yuan, C P Liu (2018). Simultaneous alleviation of cadmium and arsenic accumulation in rice by applying zero-valent iron and biochar to contaminated paddy soils. Chemosphere, 195: 260–271
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.081
58 R Qiu, Z Zou, Z Zhao, W Zhang, T Zhang, H Dong, X Wei (2010). Removal of trace and major metals by soil washing with Na2EDTA and oxalate. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 10(1): 45–53
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-009-0083-z
59 A E Ramírez-Rodríguez, B Bañuelos-Hernández, M J García-Soto, D G Govea-Alonso, S Rosales-Mendoza, M C Alfaro De La Torre, E Monreal-Escalante, L M T Paz-Maldonado (2019). Arsenic removal using Chlamydomonas reinhardtii modified with the gene acr3 and enhancement of its performance by decreasing phosphate in the growing media. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(7): 617–623
https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2018.1546274
60 S B Rasmussen, J K Jensen, O K Borggaard (2015). A laboratory test of NOM-assisted remediation of arsenic and copper contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(4, Part B): 3020–3023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.04.029
61 G Rebitzer, T Ekvall, R Frischknecht, D Hunkeler, G Norris, T Rydberg, W P Schmidt, S Suh, B P Weidema, D W Pennington (2004). Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International, 30(5): 701–720
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005
62 A RoyChowdhury, D Sarkar, R Datta (2019). A combined chemical and phytoremediation method for reclamation of acid mine drainage-impacted soils. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(14): 14414–14425
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04785-z
63 S-R Ryu, E-K Jeon, K Baek (2017). A combination of reducing and chelating agents for electrolyte conditioning in electrokinetic remediation of As-contaminated soil. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 70: 252–259
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.10.058
64 F Samiee, M Leili, J Faradmal, Z Torkshavand, G Asadi (2019). Exposure to arsenic through breast milk from mothers exposed to high levels of arsenic in drinking water: Infant risk assessment. Food Control, 106: 106669
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.05.034
65 M Singh, P K Srivastava, P C Verma, R N Kharwar, N Singh, R D Tripathi (2015a). Soil fungi for mycoremediation of arsenic pollution in agriculture soils. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 119(5): 1278–1290
https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12948
66 S Singh, A Shrivastava, A Barla, S Bose (2015b). Isolation of arsenic-resistant bacteria from Bengal delta sediments and their efficacy in arsenic removal from soil in association with Pteris vittata. Geomicrobiology Journal, 32(8): 712–723
https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2015.1004141
67 L H Soares Guimarães, F R Segura, L Tonani, M R Von-Zeska-Kress, J L Rodrigues, L A Calixto, F F Silva, B L Batista (2019). Arsenic volatilization by Aspergillus sp. and Penicillium sp. isolated from rice rhizosphere as a promising eco-safe tool for arsenic mitigation. Journal of Environmental Management, 237: 170–179
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.060
68 Z Souri, N Karimi, L M Sandalio (2017). Arsenic hyperaccumulation strategies: An overview. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 5: 67–74
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2017.00067
69 S Tanda, R Licbinsky, J Hegrova, J Faimon, W Goessler (2019). Arsenic speciation in aerosols of a respiratory therapeutic cave: A first approach to study arsenicals in ultrafine particles. Science of the Total Environment, 651: 1839–1848
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.102
70 C Tiberg, J Kumpiene, J P Gustafsson, A Marsz, I Persson, M Mench, D B Kleja (2016). Immobilization of Cu and As in two contaminated soils with zero-valent iron: Long-term performance and mechanisms. Applied Geochemistry, 67: 144–152
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.02.009
71 H Tong, C Liu, L Hao, E D Swanner, M Chen, F Li, Y Xia, Y Liu, Y Liu (2019). Biological Fe(II) and As(III) oxidation immobilizes arsenic in micro-oxic environments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 265: 96–108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.09.002
72 X Wan, M Lei (2018). Intercropping efficiency of four arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata populations as intercrops with Morus alba. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(13): 12600–12611
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1366-y
73 X Wan, M Lei, T Chen (2016). Cost–benefit calculation of phytoremediation technology for heavy-metal-contaminated soil. Science of the Total Environment, 563–564: 796–802
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.080
74 L Wang, D-W Cho, D C W Tsang, X Cao, D Hou, Z Shen, D S Alessi, Y S Ok, C S Poon (2019). Green remediation of As and Pb contaminated soil using cement-free clay-based stabilization/solidification. Environment International, 126: 336–345
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.057
75 Q Wang, D Xiong, P Zhao, X Yu, B Tu, G Wang (2011). Effect of applying an arsenic-resistant and plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium to enhance soil arsenic phytoremediation by Populus deltoides LH05–17. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 111(5): 1065–1074
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05142.x
76 Y Wang, F Ma, Q Zhang, C Peng, B Wu, F Li, Q Gu (2017). An evaluation of different soil washing solutions for remediating arsenic-contaminated soils. Chemosphere, 173: 368–372
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.068
77 M Wei, J J Chen, X W Wang (2016). Removal of arsenic and cadmium with sequential soil washing techniques using Na2EDTA, oxalic and phosphoric acid: Optimization conditions, removal effectiveness and ecological risks. Chemosphere, 156: 252–261
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.106
78 Y Wen, W D Marshall (2011). Simultaneous mobilization of trace elements and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) compounds from soil with a nonionic surfactant and [S,S]-EDDS in admixture: Metals. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 197: 361–368
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.097
79 Q E Xie, X L Yan, X Y Liao, X Li (2009). The arsenic hyperaccumulator fern Pteris vittata L. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(22): 8488–8495
https://doi.org/10.1021/es9014647
80 S Yamamura, N Yamamoto, M Ike, M Fujita (2005). Arsenic extraction from solid phase using a dissimilatory arsenate-reducing bacterium. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 100(2): 219–222
https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.100.219
81 H L Yan, Y W Gao, L L Wu, L Y Wang, T Zhang, C H Dai, W X Xu, L Feng, M Ma, Y G Zhu, Z Y He (2019). Potential use of the Pteris vittata arsenic hyperaccumulation-regulation network for phytoremediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 368: 386–396
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.072
82 J Yang, S S Yang, M Lei, J X Yang, X M Wan, T B Chen, X L Wang, G H Guo, J M Guo, S Q Liu (2018). Comparison among soil additives for enhancing Pteris vittata L.: Phytoremediation of As-contaminated soil. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 20(13): 1300–1306
https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.1319325
83 Z Yang, Z Wu, Y Liao, Q Liao, W Yang, L Chai (2017). Combination of microbial oxidation and biogenic schwertmannite immobilization: A potential remediation for highly arsenic-contaminated soil. Chemosphere, 181: 1–8
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.041
84 Y Yoon, S Kim, Y Chae, S W Jeong, Y J An (2016). Evaluation of bioavailable arsenic and remediation performance using a whole-cell bioreporter. Science of the Total Environment, 547: 125–131
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.141
85 Z Yu, L Zhou, Y Huang, Z Song, W Qiu (2015). Effects of a manganese oxide-modified biochar composite on adsorption of arsenic in red soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 163: 155–162
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.020
86 C Yuan, T S Chiang (2008). Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation of arsenic spiked soil by chemical reagents. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152(1): 309–315
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.099
87 Y Zhang, X M Wan, M Lei (2017). Application of arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L. to contaminated soil in Northern China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 182: 132– 137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.07.025
88 R R Zhao, X J Li, Z G Zhang, G H Zhao (2016). KH2PO4-aided soil washing for removing arsenic from water-stable soil aggregates collected in southern China. Environmental Engineering Research, 21(3): 304–310
https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2016.039
89 Y Zhou, L Niu, K Liu, S Yin, W Liu (2018). Arsenic in agricultural soils across China: Distribution pattern, accumulation trend, influencing factors, and risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 616–617: 156–163
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.232
90 N Zhu, J Qiao, T Yan (2019). Arsenic immobilization through regulated ferrolysis in paddy field amendment with bismuth impregnated biochar. Science of the Total Environment, 648: 993–1001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.200
[1] Karla Ilić Đurđić, Raluca Ostafe, Olivera Prodanović, Aleksandra Đurđević Đelmaš, Nikolina Popović, Rainer Fischer, Stefan Schillberg, Radivoje Prodanović. Improved degradation of azo dyes by lignin peroxidase following mutagenesis at two sites near the catalytic pocket and the application of peroxidase-coated yeast cell walls[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 19-.
[2] Ming Zeng, Ping Li, Nan Wu, Xiaofang Li, Chang Wang. Preparation and characterization of a novel microorganism embedding material for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(6): 15-.
[3] Lei ZHENG,Wei WANG,Wei QIAO,Yunchun SHI,Xiao LIU. Immobilization of Cu2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Cd2+ during geopolymerization[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(4): 642-648.
[4] Guangxu ZHU,Qingjun GUO,Junxing YANG,Hanzhi ZHANG,Rongfei WEI,Chunyu WANG,Marc PETERS,Xiaoyong ZHOU,Jun YANG. Washing out heavy metals from contaminated soils from an iron and steel smelting site[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(4): 634-641.
[5] Junxing YANG,Liqun WANG,Jumei LI,Dongpu WEI,Shibao CHEN,Qingjun GUO,Yibing MA. Effects of rape straw and red mud on extractability and bioavailability of cadmium in a calcareous soil[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(3): 419-428.
[6] Pei MA, Dan ZHANG. Immobilized Lentinus edodes residue as absorbent for the enhancement of cadmium adsorption performance[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(4): 498-508.
[7] Fengyu ZAN, Shouliang HUO, Beidou XI, Xiulan ZHAO. Biosorption of Cd2+ and Cu2+ on immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(1): 51-58.
[8] Jiaxi LI , Xianghua WEN , . Noncovalent immobilization of MnP from on carbon nanotubes[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2009, 3(3): 294-299.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed