Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (5) : 86    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1380-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Exogenously applied oxalic acid assists in the phytoremediation of Mn by Polygonum pubescens Blume cultivated in three Mn-contaminated soils
Kehui Liu1,2, Jie Xu1,2, Chenglong Dai1,2, Chunming Li1,2,4, Yi Li1,3(), Jiangming Ma1,2,5, Fangming Yu1,3()
1. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Ministry of Education), Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
2. College of Life Science, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
3. College of Environment and Resource, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
4. School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
5. Institute of Sustainable Development and Innovation, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, China
 Download: PDF(1843 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• The OA supply significantly increased the water-extractable Mn in all soils.

• All OA supply levels promoted plant growth in unexplored soil.

• Low OA supply level promoted plant growth in explored and tailing soils.

• OA amendment increased the Mn concentrations and total Mn in P. pubescens.

P. pubescens experienced less Mn stress in unexplored soil than in the other two soils.

The current study evaluated the effects of oxalic acid (OA) application on the growth and Mn phytoremediation efficiency of Polygonum pubescens Blume cultivated in three different manganese (Mn)-contaminated soils sampled from an unexplored area (US), an explored area (ES) and a tailing area (TS) of the Ertang Mn mine, South China. The supplied levels of OA were 0 (control), 1 (low level), 3 (medium level), and 9 (high level) mmol/kg, referred to as CK, OA1, OA3 and OA9, respectively. The results revealed that the average water-extractable Mn concentrations US, ES and TS amended with OA increased by 214.13, 363.77 and 266.85%, respectively. All OA supply levels increased plant growth and Mn concentrations in US. The low OA supply level increased plant growth in ES and TS; however, contrasting results were found for the medium and high OA supply levels. Plant Mn concentrations and total Mn increased in ES and TS in response to all OA supply levels. Total Mn in the aerial parts increased by 81.18, 44.17 and 83.17% in US, ES and TS, respectively; the corresponding percentages for the whole plants were 81.53, 108.98 and 77.91%, respectively. The rate of ·O2 production and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations increased in response to OA amendment, especially the medium and high OA supply levels in ES and TS. In general, antioxidant enzymes might play a vital role in alleviating Mn stress in plants cultivated in US, while non-enzymatic antioxidants might be the main factor for plants cultivated in ES and TS.

Keywords Phytoremediation      Mn-contaminated soil      Mn hyperaccumulator      Oxalic acid      Remediation efficiency     
Corresponding Author(s): Yi Li,Fangming Yu   
Issue Date: 17 December 2020
 Cite this article:   
Kehui Liu,Jie Xu,Chenglong Dai, et al. Exogenously applied oxalic acid assists in the phytoremediation of Mn by Polygonum pubescens Blume cultivated in three Mn-contaminated soils[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 86.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-020-1380-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2021/V15/I5/86
Fig.1  Water-extractable Mn concentration in three Mn-contaminated soils in response to OA amendment.
Fig.2  Changes in Mn concentrations (g/kg) and accumulation (g/plant) in P. pubescens cultivated in three Mn-contaminated soils amended with OA.
Fig.3  Changes in BF and TF values of Mn in response to OA amendment. (1) The BFs for the roots, stems and leaves represent the Mn concentration in each organ relative to that in the soil. (2) The TFs for S/R, L/R and L/S represent the Mn concentration in the stems relative to that in the roots, the Mn concentration in the leaves relative to that in the roots, and the Mn concentration in the leaves relative to that in the stems, respectively.
Fig.4  Changes in plant height (cm/plant), root length (cm/plant) and plant biomass (g/plant, dry weight) of P. pubescens cultivated in three Mn-contaminated soils amended with OA.
Fig.5  Changes in photosynthetic pigments in P. pubescens cultivated in three Mn-contaminated soils amended with OA. Chla, Chlb, the Chla/Chlb and Cars represent chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, the ratio of chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b and carotenoids, respectively.
Soil OA treatment (mmol/kg) H2O2 (nmol/(mg·min)) O2.? (nmol/(mg·min)) MDA (µmol/kg)
US CK 21.7±0.16aB 5.60±0.45bA 9.03±1.32bA
OA1 21.16±2.27aA 5.48±0.11bA 8.72±0.73cC
OA3 20.80±1.74aC 6.13±0.24aB 10.07±1.35abcA
OA9 22.91±1.73aA 6.30±0.09aA 11.80±0.39aA
ES CK 25.84±0.86aA 4.26±0.10bB 9.78±0.32bC
OA1 20.38±1.36bA 6.06±0.58aA 11.39±0.16aB
OA3 24.40±2.11aB 6.54±0.17aA 11.50±0.42aA
OA9 22.59±2.42abA 6.13±0.55aA 12.24±0.39aA
TS CK 21.60±1.42bB 5.76±0.10abA 10.00±0.56bB
OA1 22.26±0.35bA 5.27±0.61bA 12.62±1.20aA
OA3 28.05±1.40aA 6.32±0.11aAB 14.08±0.70bA
OA9 24.12±3.14bA 6.25±0.45aA 16.38±0.91bB
Tab.1  Changes in H2O2, ·O2.? and MDA concentrations of P. pubescens cultivated in three different Mn-contaminated soils amended with OA
Fig.6  Changes in SOD, POD, CAT and APX activity in P. pubescens cultivated in three different Mn-contaminated soils in response to OA amendment. SOD, POD, CAT and APX represent superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase and ascorbate peroxidase, respectively.
Soil OA treatment (mmol/kg) GSH (mg/kg) PCs (mg/kg) -SH (mg/kg)
US CK 61.64±4.65aAB 214.33±6.92aA 275.97±5.55aA
OA1 47.57±3.35bB 232.33±4.17aA 253.23±44.75aA
OA3 45.02±4.27bB 232.26±2.85aA 277.27±3.42aA
OA9 47.36±1.08bB 240.21±29.93aA 287.57±29.38aA
ES CK 68.39±5.68aA 179.50±6.57bB 247.89±2.69bB
OA1 51.54±4.85bB 264.35±25.56aA 315.89±27.51aA
OA3 57.68±8.69bA 188.61±2.00bB 246.29±10.54bB
OA9 58.85±3.36bA 163.63±16.67bB 222.48±20.00bB
TS CK 56.56±2.50bB 170.29±19.10bB 226.85±18.59bB
OA1 63.32±1.81aA 244.64±12.48aA 307.96±49.71aA
OA3 60.74±4.05aA 192.09±17.72bB 252.83±16.52abB
OA9 63.10±1.76aA 193.01±11.07bB 256.11±12.78abAB
Tab.2  Changes in GSH, PCs and -SH of P. pubescens cultivated in three different Mn-contaminated soils amended with OA
1 H Ali, E Khan, M A Sajad (2013). Phytoremediation of heavy metals—concepts and applications. Chemosphere, 91(7): 869–881
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.075 pmid: 23466085
2 Y A Almaroai, A R Usman, M Ahmad, K R Kim, D H Moon, S S Lee, Y S Ok (2012). Effects of synthetic chelators and low-molecular-weight organic acids on chromium, copper, and arsenic uptake and translocation in maize (Zea mays L.). Soil Science, 177(11): 655–663
https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31827ba23f
3 M E Anderson (1985). Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide in biological samples. Methods in Enzymology, 113: 548–555
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(85)13073-9 pmid: 4088074
4 N A Anjum, I Ahmad, I Mohmood, M Pacheco, A C Duarte, E Pereira, S Umar, A Ahmad, N A Khan, M Iqbal, M N V Prasad (2012). Modulation of glutathione and its related enzymes in plants’ responses to toxic metals and metalloids: A review. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 75: 307–324
5 AK, Anning R Akoto (2018) Assisted phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil from a mined site with Typha latifolia and Chrysopogon zizanioides. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 148: 97–104
6 D Arsenov, M Zupunski, M Borisev, N Nikolic, S Orlovic, A Pilipovic, S Pajevic (2017) Exogenously applied citric acid enhances antioxidant defense and phytoextraction of cadmium by Willows (Salix spp.). Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 228 (6), 221.1–221.12
7 O K Borggaard, P E Holm, B W Strobel (2019). Potential of dissolved organic matter (DOM) to extract As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn from polluted soils: A review. Geoderma, 343: 235–246
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.02.041
8 H Chen, J Dou, H Xu (2018). The effect of low-molecular-weight organic-acids (LMWOAs) on treatment of chromium-contaminated soils by compost-phytoremediation: Kinetics of the chromium release and fractionation. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 70: 45–53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.11.007 pmid: 30037410
9 S Ehsan, S Ali, S Noureen, K Mahmood, M Farid, W Ishaque, M B Shakoor, M Rizwan (2014). Citric acid assisted phytoremediation of cadmium by Brassica napus L. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 106: 164–172
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.03.007 pmid: 24840879
10 A Ferraro, E D van Hullebusch, D Huguenot, M Fabbricino, G Esposito (2015). Application of an electrochemical treatment for EDDS soil washing solution regeneration and reuse in a multi-step soil washing process: Case of a Cu contaminated soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 163: 62–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.004 pmid: 26292775
11 D Guo, A Ali, C Ren, J Du, R Li, A H Lahori, R Xiao, Z Zhang, Z Zhang (2019). EDTA and organic acids assisted phytoextraction of Cd and Zn from a smelter contaminated soil by potherb mustard (Brassica juncea, Coss) and evaluation of its bioindicators. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 167: 396–403
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.038 pmid: 30366273
12 M C Hernandez-Soriano, J C Jimenez-Lopez (2012). Effects of soil water content and organic matter addition on the speciation and bioavailability of heavy metals. The Science of the Total Environment, 423: 55–61
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.033 pmid: 22417881
13 N Hu, T Lang, D Ding, J Hu, C Li, H Zhang, G Li (2019). Enhancement of repeated applications of chelates on phytoremediation of uranium contaminated soil by Macleaya cordata. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 199–200: 58–65
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.12.023 pmid: 30685639
14 G Huang, J You, X Zhou, C Ren, M S Islam, H Hu (2020). Effects of low molecular weight organic acids on Cu accumulation by castor bean and soil enzyme activities. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 203: 110983
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110983 pmid: 32678760
15 W Huang, H Shao, S Zhou, Q Zhou, W Li, W Xing (2017). Modulation of cadmium-induced phytotoxicity in Cabomba caroliniana by urea involves photosynthetic metabolism and antioxidant status. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 144: 88–96
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.003 pmid: 28601521
16 K Khanna, V L Jamwal, A Sharma, S G Gandhi, P Ohri, R Bhardwaj, A A Al-Huqail, M H Siddiqui, H M Ali, P Ahmad (2019). Supplementation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) alleviates cadmium toxicity in Solanum lycopersicum by modulating the expression of secondary metabolites. Chemosphere, 230: 628–639
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.072 pmid: 31128509
17 C Li, F Yu, Y Li, W Niu, J Li, J Yang, K Liu (2020 a). Comparative analysis of the seed germination of pakchoi and its phytoremediation efficacy combined with chemical amendment in four polluted soils. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 22(11): 1156–1167
https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2020.1741508 pmid: 32202138
18 H Li, (2000) Theory and Technique of Plant Physiological and Biochemical experiments. Beijing: Higher Education Press (in Chinese)
19 M S Li, Y P Luo, Z Y Su (2007). Heavy metal concentrations in soils and plant accumulation in a restored manganese mineland in Guangxi, South China. Environmental Pollution, 147(1): 168–175
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.08.006 pmid: 17014941
20 Y Li, J M Lin, Y Y Huang, Y Yao, X Wang, C Liu, Y Liang, K Liu, F Yu (2020 b). Bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation of manganese and cadmium co-contaminated soil by Polygonaceae plants (Polygonum hydropiper L. and Polygonum lapathifolium L.) and Enterobacter sp. FM-1. Plant and Soil, 448(1-2): 439–453
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04447-x
21 D Liu, E Islam, T Li, X Yang, X Jin, Q Mahmood (2008). Comparison of synthetic chelators and low molecular weight organic acids in enhancing phytoextraction of heavy metals by two ecotypes of Sedum alfredii Hance. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 153(1-2): 114–122
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.08.026 pmid: 17904736
22 J Liu, W Shang, X Zhang, Y Zhu, K Yu (2014). Mn accumulation and tolerance in Celosia argentea Linn.: A new Mn-hyperaccumulating plant species. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 267(1): 136–141
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.051 pmid: 24444455
23 K Liu, L Fan, Y Li, Z Zhou, C Chen, B Chen, F Yu (2018). Concentrations and health risks of heavy metals in soils and crops around the Pingle manganese (Mn) mine area in Guangxi Province, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(30): 30180–30190
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2997-8 pmid: 30151790
24 K Liu, F Yu, M Chen, Z Zhou, C Chen, M S Li, J Zhu (2016). A newly found manganese hyperaccumulator—Polygonum lapathifolium Linn. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 18(4): 348–353
https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2015.1109589 pmid: 26514228
25 N Liu, G Zhong, J Zhou, Y Liu, Y Pang, H Cai, Z Wu (2019). Separate and combined effects of glyphosate and copper on growth and antioxidative enzymes in Salvinia natans (L.) All. Science of the Total Environment, 655: 1448–1456
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.213 pmid: 30577136
26 Y Luo, X Wu, H Sun, Y Wu (2020). Root-induced changes in aggregation characteristics and potentially toxic elements (PTEs) speciation in a revegetated artificial zinc smelting waste slag site. Chemosphere, 243: 125414
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125414 pmid: 31783184
27 S Mishra, S Srivastava, R D Tripathi, R Govindarajan, S V Kuriakose, M N V Prasad (2006). Phytochelatin synthesis and response of antioxidants during cadmium stress in Bacopa monnieri L. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 44(1): 25–37
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.01.007 pmid: 16545573
28 M M Montiel-Rozas, E Madejón, P Madejón (2016). Effect of heavy metals and organic matter on root exudates (low molecular weight organic acids) of herbaceous species: An assessment in sand and soil conditions under different levels of contamination. Environmental Pollution, 216: 273–281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.080 pmid: 27267743
29 F Nsanganwimana, B Pourrut, M Mench, F Douay (2014). Suitability of Miscanthus species for managing inorganic and organic contaminated land and restoring ecosystem services: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 143: 123–134
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.027 pmid: 24905642
30 T Pardo, M P Bernal, R Clemente (2017). Phytostabilisation of severely contaminated mine tailings using halophytes and field addition of organic and inorganic amendments. Chemosphere, 178: 556–564
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.079 pmid: 28351014
31 A C S Rocha, C M R Almeida, M C P Basto, M T S D Vasconcelos (2016). Marsh plant response to metals: Exudation of aliphatic low molecular weight organic acids (ALMWOAs). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 171: 77–84
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.01.027
32 P Römkens, L Bouwman, J Japenga, C Draaisma (2002). Potentials and drawbacks of chelate-enhanced phytoremediation of soils. Environmental Pollution 116 (1), 0–121
33 E Saifullah, Meers, M Qadir, P de Caritat, F M G Tack, G Du Laing, M H Zia (2009). EDTA-assisted Pb phytoextraction. Chemosphere, 74(10): 1279–1291
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.007 pmid: 19121533
34 H Shahandeh, L R Hossner (2002). Enhancement of uranium phytoremediation from contaminated soils. Soil Science, 167(4): 269–280
https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-200204000-00004
35 F L Wang, W Ouyang, F H Hao, C Y Lin, N N Song (2014). In situ remediation of cadmium-polluted soil reusing four byproducts individually and in combination. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14(3): 451–461
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0827-7
36 A Wiszniewska, E Hanus-Fajerska, E Muszyńska, K Ciarkowska (2016). Natural organic amendments for improved phytoremediation of polluted soils: A review of recent progress. Pedosphere, 26(1): 1–12
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60017-0
37 R A Wuana, F E Okieimen, J A Imborvungu (2010). Removal of heavy metals from a contaminated soil using organic chelating acids. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 7(3): 485–496
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326158
38 K K Yadav, N Gupta, A Kumar, L M Reece, N Singh, S Rezania, S A Khan (2018). Mechanistic understanding and holistic approach of phytoremediation: A review on application and future prospects. Ecological Engineering, 120: 274–298
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.05.039
39 S K Yadav (2010). Heavy metals toxicity in plants: An overview on the role of glutathione and phytochelatins in heavy metal stress tolerance of plants. South African Journal of Botany, 76(2): 167–179
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2009.10.007
40 X J Yang, D M Deng, K H Liu, F M Yu (2016). Response of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense systems of Polygonum hydropiper to Mn stress. Journal of Central South University, 23(4): 793–797
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3125-x
41 F Yu, Y Li, F Li, C Li, K Liu (2019a). The effects of EDTA on plant growth and manganese (Mn) accumulation in Polygonum pubescens Blume cultured in unexplored soil, mining soil and tailing soil from the Pingle Mn mine, China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 173: 235–242
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.086 pmid: 30772713
42 F Yu, Y Li, F Li, Z Zhou, C Chen, X Liang, C Li, K Liu (2019b). Nitrogen fertilizers promote plant growth and assist in manganese (Mn) accumulation by Polygonum pubescens Blume cultured in Mn tailings soil. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(12): 1225–1233
https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2019.1619161 pmid: 31140289
43 F Yu, K Liu, M Li, Z Zhou, H Deng, B Chen (2013). Effects of cadmium on enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidative defences of rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Phytoremediation, 15(6): 513–521
https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2012.702807 pmid: 23819293
44 J Zhang, T Zhang, Q Lu, S Cai, W Chu, H Qiu, T Xu, F Li, Q Xu (2015). Oxidative effects, nutrients and metabolic changes in aquatic macrophyte, Elodea nuttallii, following exposure to lanthanum. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 115: 159–165
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.02.013 pmid: 25700094
45 X Zhou, S Wang, Y Liu, G Huang, S Yao, H Hu (2020). Coupling phytoremediation efficiency and detoxification to assess the role of P in the Cu tolerant Ricinus communis L. Chemosphere, 247: 125965
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125965 pmid: 32069730
[1] Weichuan Qiao, Rong Li, Tianhao Tang, Achuo Anitta Zuh. Removal, distribution and plant uptake of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in a simulated constructed wetland system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 20-.
[2] Ling Huang, Syed Bilal Shah, Haiyang Hu, Ping Xu, Hongzhi Tang. Pollution and biodegradation of hexabromocyclododecanes: A review[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 11-.
[3] Mei Lei, Ziping Dong, Ying Jiang, Philip Longhurst, Xiaoming Wan, Guangdong Zhou. Reaction mechanism of arsenic capture by a calcium-based sorbent during the combustion of arsenic-contaminated biomass: A pilot-scale experience[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 24-.
[4] Jianbing WANG,Guoqing WANG,Chunli YANG,Shaoxia YANG,Qing HUANG. Catalytic ozonation of organic compounds in water over the catalyst of RuO2/ZrO2-CeO2[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(4): 615-624.
[5] Yi ZHONG, Jian WANG, Yizhi SONG, Yuting LIANG, Guanghe LI. Microbial community and functional genes in the rhizosphere of alfalfa in crude oil-contaminated soil[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(6): 797-805.
[6] LIU Zhengqian, MA Jun, ZHAO Lei. Effect of preparation parameters on catalytic properties of Pt/graphite[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(4): 482-487.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed