Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (7) : 86    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1494-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Mechanistic insight into the biofilm formation and process performance of a passive aeration ditch (PAD) for decentralized wastewater treatment
Jibin Li1, Jinxing Ma1,2, Li Sun1, Xin Liu3, Huaiyu Liao1, Di He1,2()
1. Key Laboratory for City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
2. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China
3. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
 Download: PDF(2304 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• A Passive Aeration Ditch was developed to treat decentralized wastewater.

• A model was developed to describe the process performance.

• A high C/N ratio facilitates microbial growth but nitrification deteriorates.

• A high salinity decreases both organic and nitrogen contaminants removal.

Decentralized wastewater containing elevated salinity is an emerging threat to the local environment and sanitation in remote coastal communities. Regarding the cost and treatment efficiencies, we propose a passive aeration ditch (PAD) using non-woven polyester fabric as a feasible bubbleless aerator and biofilm carrier for wastewater treatment. Consideration has been first given to PAD’s efficacy in treating saline decentralized wastewater, and then to the impact of chemical oxygen demand-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio and salinity on biofilm formation. A multispecies model incorporating the salinity effect has been developed to depict the system performance and predict the microbial community. Results showed that the PAD system had great capacity for pollutants removal. The biofilm thickness increased at a higher C/N ratio because of the boost of aerobic heterotrophs and denitrifying bacteria, which consequently improved the COD and total nitrogen removal. However, this led to the deterioration of ammonia removal. Moreover, while a higher salinity benefited the biofilm growth, the contaminant removal efficiencies decreased because the salinity inhibited the activity of aerobic heterotrophs and reduced the abundance of nitrifying bacteria inside the biofilm. Based on the model simulation, feed water with salinity below 2% and C/N ratio in a range of 1 to 3 forms a biofilm that can reach relatively high organic matter and ammonia removal. These findings not only show the feasibility of PAD in treatment of saline decentralized wastewater, but also offer a systematic strategy to predict and optimize the process performance.

Keywords Decentralized wastewater      Passive aeration ditch      Biofilm formation      C/N ratio      Salinity      Model simulation     
Corresponding Author(s): Di He   
Issue Date: 08 November 2021
 Cite this article:   
Jibin Li,Jinxing Ma,Li Sun, et al. Mechanistic insight into the biofilm formation and process performance of a passive aeration ditch (PAD) for decentralized wastewater treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 86.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-021-1494-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2022/V16/I7/86
Scenario Influent COD (mg/L) Influent NH4+-N (mg/L) Salinity (%)
T1 400 50 1
C1 100 50 0
C2 150 50 0
C3 200 50 0
C4 250 50 0
S1 200 50 0.2
S2 200 50 0.5
S3 200 50 1
S4 200 50 2
Tab.1  The designed scenarios with influents of different C/N ratios and salinities
Fig.1  A schematic representation of the PAD system.
Fig.2  The process performance of the PAD system removing COD and NH4+-N from the synthetic decentralized wastewater. Influent COD= 400 mg/L, NH4+-N= 50 mg/L and salinity= 1%.
Fig.3  The thickness of the biofilm formed under different conditions (a) C/N ratio: 2; (b) C/N ratio: 3; (c) C/N ratio: 4; (d) C/N ratio: 5; (e) salinity: 0.2%; (f) salinity: 0.5%; (g) salinity: 1%; (h) salinity: 2%. The annotation on the right of the image is the average biofilm thickness (µm).
Fig.4  The experimental and model results of contaminants removal in the PAD system under different C/N ratios: (a) COD; (b) NH4+-N; (c) TN.
Fig.5  The experimental and model results of contaminants removal in the PAD system under different salinities: (a) COD; (b) NH4+-N; (c) TN.
Fig.6  The bacterial community distribution of inoculation sludge on genus level.
Fig.7  Simulation results of the biomass fraction inside the biofilm under different conditions: (a) C/N ratio: 4; (b) C/N ratio: 5; (c) salinity: 0.2%; (d) salinity: 2%. The biofilm thickness corresponding to the end of each profile represents the final biofilm thickness, and 0 µm represents the biofilm base.
Fig.8  Model simulation results of (a) COD, (b) NH4+-N and (c) TN removal under varied C/N ratios and salinities. The white dot line in (a), (b) and (c) represents the COD removal of 80%, NH4+-N removal of 60% and TN removal of 60%, respectively.
1 S I Abou-Elela, M S Hellal, O H Aly, S A Abo-Elenin (2019). Decentralized wastewater treatment using passively aerated biological filter. Environmental Technology, 40(2): 250–260
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1385648 pmid: 29025371
2 G Boeije, R Corstanje, A Rottiers, D Schowanek (1999). Adaptation of the CAS test system and synthetic sewage for biological nutrient removal. Chemosphere, 38(4): 699–709
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00311-7 pmid: 10903104
3 L Lijklema (1988). Water Pollution Research and Control Brighton. Brighton: Pergamon
4 H Chen, A Li, D Cui, C Cui, F Ma (2019). Evolution of microbial community and key genera in the formation and stability of aerobic granular sludge under a high organic loading rate. Bioresource Technology Reports, 7: 100280
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100280
5 A Dinçer, F Kargi (1999). Salt inhibition of nitrification and denitrification in saline wastewater. Environmental Technology, 20(11): 1147–1153
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332008616912
6 X Ding, D Wei, W Guo, B Wang, Z Meng, R Feng, B Du, Q Wei (2019). Biological denitrification in an anoxic sequencing batch biofilm reactor: Performance evaluation, nitrous oxide emission and microbial community. Bioresource Technology, 285: 121359
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121359 pmid: 31015181
7 Z Gong, F Yang, S Liu, H Bao, S Hu, K Furukawa (2007). Feasibility of a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor to achieve single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal based on Anammox. Chemosphere, 69(5): 776–784
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.05.023 pmid: 17590408
8 X Guo, Z Liu, M Chen, J Liu, M Yang (2014). Decentralized wastewater treatment technologies and management in Chinese villages. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 8(6): 929–936
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0623-z
9 H Huang, Q Yu, H Ren, J Geng, K Xu, Y Zhang, L Ding (2018). Towards physicochemical and biological effects on detachment and activity recovery of aging biofilm by enzyme and surfactant treatments. Bioresource Technology, 247: 319–326
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.082 pmid: 28950141
10 F Kargi, A R Dincer (1996). Effect of salt concentration on biological treatment of saline wastewater by fed-batch operation. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 19(7): 529–537
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(96)00070-1
11 O Lefebvre, R Moletta (2006). Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: a literature review. Water Research, 40(20): 3671–3682
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.027 pmid: 17070895
12 J Lin, P Zhang, G Li, J Yin, J Li, X Zhao (2016). Effect of COD/N ratio on nitrogen removal in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 113: 74–79
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.01.009
13 C Liu, L Huang, M Liu, S Hao, H Zhai, X Shao, Y Du (2019a). Effects of seawater irrigation on fruit quality of grapevine, soil properties and microbial diversity. Scientia Horticulturae, 253: 80–86
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.022
14 X Liu, J Dai, T L Ng, G Chen (2019b). Evaluation of potential environmental benefits from seawater toilet flushing. Water Research, 162: 505–515
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.07.016 pmid: 31310889
15 D Lu, H Bai, F Kong, S N Liss, B Liao (2020). Recent advances in membrane aerated biofilm reactors. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 51(7): 1–55
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1734432
16 J Ma, Z Wang, Y Yang, X Mei, Z Wu (2013a). Correlating microbial community structure and composition with aeration intensity in submerged membrane bioreactors by 454 high-throughput pyrosequencing. Water Research, 47(2): 859–869
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.013 pmid: 23200801
17 J Ma, Z Wang, X Zou, J Feng, Z Wu (2013b). Microbial communities in an anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment: Comparison of bulk sludge and cake layer. Process Biochemistry, 48(3): 510–516
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2013.02.003
18 M A Massoud, A Tarhini, J A Nasr (2009). Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1): 652–659
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.001 pmid: 18701206
19 S Matsumoto, A Terada, S Tsuneda (2007). Modeling of membrane-aerated biofilm: Effects of C/N ratio, biofilm thickness and surface loading of oxygen on feasibility of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 37(1): 98–107
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.03.013
20 L Metcalf, H P Eddy, G Tchobanoglous (1979). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse. New York: McGraw-Hill
21 R Nogueira, L F Melo, U Purkhold, S Wuertz, M Wagner (2002). Nitrifying and heterotrophic population dynamics in biofilm reactors: effects of hydraulic retention time and the presence of organic carbon. Water Research, 36(2): 469–481
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00229-9 pmid: 11827353
22 L Nurse, A Cashman, J Mwansa (2012). Confronting the challenges of sewerage management in the caribbean: a case study from the island of barbados. Environment, 54(2): 30–43
https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2012.657910
23 S Phanwilai, N Kangwannarakul, P Noophan, T Kasahara, A Terada, J Munakata-Marr, L A Figueroa (2020). Nitrogen removal efficiencies and microbial communities in full-scale IFAS and MBBR municipal wastewater treatment plants at high COD:N ratio. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(6): 115
24 P Reichert (1998). AQUASIM 2.0-user manual, Computer program for the identification and simulation of aquatic systems. Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG), 219: 4
25 J Schindelin, I Arganda-Carreras, E Frise, V Kaynig, M Longair, T Pietzsch, S Preibisch, C Rueden, S Saalfeld, B Schmid, J Y Tinevez, D J White, V Hartenstein, K Eliceiri, P Tomancak, A Cardona (2012). Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods, 9(7): 676–682
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019 pmid: 22743772
26 J W Shanahan, M J Semmens (2004). Multipopulation model of membrane-aerated biofilms. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(11): 3176–3183
https://doi.org/10.1021/es034809y pmid: 15224752
27 N K Singh, A A Kazmi, M Starkl (2015). A review on full-scale decentralized wastewater treatment systems: techno-economical approach. Water Science and Technology, 71(4): 468–478
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.413 pmid: 25746636
28 J Sipma, M B Osuna, M A E Emanuelsson, P M L Castro (2010). Biotreatment of industrial wastewaters under transient-state conditions: process stability with fluctuations of organic load, substrates, toxicants, and environmental parameters. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 40(2): 147–197
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380802039329
29 D Spirandelli, T Dean, R Babcock Jr, E Braich (2019). Policy gap analysis of decentralized wastewater management on a developed pacific island. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(14): 2506–2528
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1565817
30 E Syron, E Casey (2008). Membrane-aerated biofilms for high rate biotreatment: Performance appraisal, engineering principles, scale-up, and development requirements. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(3): 459–467
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0719428 pmid: 18409602
31 H Tian, M Hui, P Pan, J Huang, L Chen, J Zhao (2019). Performance and microbial ecology of biofilms adhering on aerated membrane with distinctive conditions for the treatment of domestic sewage. Environmental Technology, 42(3): 459–467
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1631890 pmid: 31204896
32 H Tian, J Liu, T Feng, H Li, X Wu, B Li (2017). Assessing the performance and microbial structure of biofilms adhering on aerated membranes for domestic saline sewage treatment. RSC Advances, 7(44): 27198–27205
https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA03755D
33 Y Xu, Z Lu, W Sun, X Zhang (2021). Influence of pore structure on biologically activated carbon performance and biofilm microbial characteristics. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(6): 131
34 C Yang, W Zhang, R Liu, Q Li, B Li, S Wang, C Song, C Qiao, A Mulchandani (2011). Phylogenetic diversity and metabolic potential of activated sludge microbial communities in full-scale wastewater treatment plants. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(17): 7408–7415
https://doi.org/10.1021/es2010545 pmid: 21780771
35 C Yuan, Y Peng, B Wang, X Li, Q Zhang (2020). Facilitating sludge granulation and favoring glycogen accumulating organisms by increased salinity in an anaerobic/micro-aerobic simultaneous partial nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal (SPNDPR) process. Bioresource Technology, 313: 123698
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123698 pmid: 32585454
36 D Zeng, K Liang, F Guo, Y Wu, G Wu (2020). Denitrification performance and microbial community under salinity and MIT stresses for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment. Separation and Purification Technology, 242(1): 116799
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116799
37 H Zhang, Y Lin, Z Men, M Ihara, W Li, K He (2020). Evaluation of pharmaceutical activities of G-protein coupled receptor targeted pharmaceuticals in Chinese wastewater effluent. Chinese Chemical Letters, 31(10): 2859–2863
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.08.040
[1] FSE-21090-OF-LJB_suppl_1 Download
[1] Zhuqiu Sun, Jinying Xi, Chunping Yang, Wenjie Cong. Quorum sensing regulation methods and their effects on biofilm in biological waste treatment systems: A review[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 87-.
[2] Quanli Man, Peilian Zhang, Weiqi Huang, Qing Zhu, Xiaoling He, Dongsheng Wei. A heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification bacterium Halomonas venusta TJPU05 suitable for nitrogen removal from high-salinity wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 69-.
[3] Yukun Zhang, Shuying Wang, Shengbo Gu, Liang Zhang, Yijun Dong, Lei Jiang, Wei Fan, Yongzhen Peng. The combined effects of biomass and temperature on maximum specific ammonia oxidation rate in domestic wastewater treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 123-.
[4] Haoran Feng, Min Liu, Wei Zeng, Ying Chen. Optimization of the O3/H2O2 process with response surface methodology for pretreatment of mother liquor of gas field wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 78-.
[5] Xiao Quan, Kai Huang, Mei Li, Meichao Lan, Baoan Li. Nitrogen removal performance of municipal reverse osmosis concentrate with low C/N ratio by membrane-aerated biofilm reactor[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(6): 5-.
[6] Xuejiao Wang, Xiang Feng, Jing Shang. Efficient photoelectrochemical oxidation of rhodamine B on metal electrodes without photocatalyst or supporting electrolyte[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(6): 11-.
[7] Weihua Zhao, Meixiang Wang, Jianwei Li, Yu Huang, Baikun Li, Cong Pan, Xiyao Li, Yongzhen Peng. Optimization of denitrifying phosphorus removal in a pre-denitrification anaerobic/anoxic/post-aeration+ nitrification sequence batch reactor (pre-A2NSBR) system: Nitrate recycling, carbon/nitrogen ratio and carbon source type[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(5): 8-.
[8] Shou ZHAO,Dongxin WANG,Chenghong FENG,Ying WANG,Zhenyao SHEN. Sequence of the main geochemical controls on the Cu and Zn fractions in the Yangtze River estuarine sediments[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(1): 19-27.
[9] Yanqing YU, Xiaoliang LI, Xiaolan ZOU, Xiaobin ZHU. Effect of seawater salinity on the synthesis of zeolite from coal fly ash[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2014, 8(1): 54-61.
[10] Guanglei QIU, Yonghui SONG, Peng YUAN, Liancheng XIANG, Jianfeng PENG, Ping ZENG, . Comparison and modeling of two biofilm processes applied to decentralized wastewater treatment[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2009, 3(4): 412-420.
[11] Chaoxiang LIU, Kaiqin XU, Ryuhei INAMORI, Yuhei INAMORI, Yoshitaka EBIE, Jie LIAO, . Pilot-scale studies of domestic wastewater treatment by typical constructed wetlands and their greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2009, 3(4): 477-482.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed