|
|
Fluoride removal from secondary effluent of the graphite industry using electrodialysis: Optimization with response surface methodology |
Xiaomeng Wang1, Ning Li1, Jianye Li2, Junjun Feng1, Zhun Ma1(), Yuting Xu1, Yongchao Sun1,3, Dongmei Xu1, Jian Wang4, Xueli Gao3(), Jun Gao1 |
1. College of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China 2. School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Weifang University of Science & Technology, Shouguang 262700, China 3. Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology (Ministry of Education); College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China 4. The Institute of Seawater Desalination and Multipurpose Utilization, SOA, Tianjin 300192, China |
|
|
Abstract RSM was utilized to optimize and model influential parameters on fluoride removal. Regression models involving independent variables and main response were developed. Interactive effects and optimum of process factors were illuminated and determined. Fluoride removal efficiency of 99.69% was observed in optimal process conditions. Response surface methodology was utilized to model and optimize the operational variables for defluoridation using an electrodialysis process as the treatment of secondary effluent of the graphite industry. Experiments were conducted using a Box-Behnken surface statistical design in order to evaluate the effects and the interaction of the influential variables including the operational voltage, initial fluoride concentration and flow rate. The regression models for defluoridation and energy consumption responses were statistically validated using analysis of variance (ANOVA); high coefficient of determination values (R2 = 0.9772 and R2 = 0.9814; respectively) were obtained. The quadratic model exhibited high reproducibility and a good fit of the experimental data. The optimum values of the initial fluoride concentration, voltage and flow rate were found to be 13.9 mg/L, 13.4 V, 102.5 L/h, respectively. A fluoride removal efficiency of 99.69% was observed under optimum conditions for the treatment of the secondary effluent of the graphite industry.
|
Keywords
Response surface methodology
Fluoride removal
Electrodialysis
Box-Behnken design
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Zhun Ma,Xueli Gao
|
Issue Date: 10 May 2019
|
|
1 |
A VMuthusamy Subramanian, M D GNachimuthu, VCinnasamy (2017). Assessment of cutting force and surface roughness in LM6/SiC p using response surface methodology. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 15(3): 283–296
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jart.2017.01.013
|
2 |
SAoudj, A Khelifa, NDrouiche, RBelkada, DMiroud (2015). Simultaneous removal of chromium(VI) and fluoride by electrocoagulation–electroflotation: Application of a hybrid Fe-Al anode. Chemical Engineering Journal, 267: 153–162
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.081
|
3 |
A ABalandin, S Ghosh, WBao, ICalizo, DTeweldebrhan, FMiao, C N Lau (2008). Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Letters, 8(3): 902–907
https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0731872
pmid: 18284217
|
4 |
M J KBashir, H AAziz, M SYusoff, M NAdlan (2010). Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of ammoniacal nitrogen removal from semi-aerobic landfill leachate using ion exchange resin. Desalination, 254(1–3): 154–161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.12.002
|
5 |
M TBashir, S B Ali, A Adris, RHaroon (2013). Health effects associated with fluoridated water sources-A Review of central Asia. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 10(3): 29–37
|
6 |
MBehbahani, M R A Moghaddam, M Arami (2011). Techno-economical evaluation of fluoride removal by electrocoagulation process: Optimization through response surface methodology. Desalination, 271(1–3): 209–218
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.033
|
7 |
ABhatnagar, E Kumar, MSillanpää (2011). Fluoride removal from water by adsorption: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 171(3): 811–840
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.028
|
8 |
SChakrabortty, M Roy, PPal (2013). Removal of fluoride from contaminated groundwater by cross flow nanofiltration: Transport modeling and economic evaluation. Desalination, 313: 115–124
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.12.021
|
9 |
M FChang, J C Liu (2007). Precipitation removal of fluoride from semiconductor wastewater. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 133(4): 419–425
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2007)133:4(419)
|
10 |
ZDahaghin, H Z Mousavi, S M Sajjadi (2017). A novel magnetic ion imprinted polymer as a selective magnetic solid phase for separation of trace lead(II) ions from agricultural products, and optimization using a Box-Behnken design. Food Chemistry, 237: 275–281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.118
pmid: 28763996
|
11 |
M HDehghani, M Faraji, AMohammadi, HKamani (2017). Optimization of fluoride adsorption onto natural and modified pumice using response surface methodology: Isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 34(2): 454–462
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0274-4
|
12 |
XDu, G Liu, FQu, KLi, S Shao, GLi, HLiang (2017). Removal of iron, manganese and ammonia from groundwater using a PAC-MBR system: The anti-pollution ability, microbial population and membrane fouling. Desalination, 403: 97–106
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.03.002
|
13 |
AFakhri (2014). Application of response surface methodology to optimize the process variables for fluoride ion removal using maghemite nanoparticles. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 18(4): 340–347
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2013.10.010
|
14 |
C VGherasim, J Křivčík, PMikulášek (2014). Investigation of batch electrodialysis process for removal of lead ions from aqueous solutions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 256: 324–334
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.094
|
15 |
FGhorbani, H Younesi, S MGhasempouri, A AZinatizadeh, MAmini, ADaneshi (2008). Application of response surface methodology for optimization of cadmium biosorption in an aqueous solution by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chemical Engineering Journal, 145(2): 267–275
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.04.028
|
16 |
QGuo, J Tian (2013). Removal of fluoride and arsenate from aqueous solution by hydrocalumite via precipitation and anion exchange. Chemical Engineering Journal, 231: 121–131
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.025
|
17 |
JHe, K Chen, XCai, YLi, C Wang, KZhang, ZJin, F Meng, XWang, LKong, J Liu (2017). A biocompatible and novelly-defined Al-HAP adsorption membrane for highly effective removal of fluoride from drinking water. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 490: 97–107
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.009
pmid: 27870965
|
18 |
J SHo, Z Ma, JQin, S HSim, C SToh (2015). Inline coagulation–ultrafiltration as the pretreatment for reverse osmosis brine treatment and recovery. Desalination, 365: 242–249
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.018
|
19 |
M LJiménez-Núñez, MSolache-Ríos, JChávez-Garduño, M TOlguín-Gutiérrez (2012). Effect of grain size and interfering anion species on the removal of fluoride by hydrotalcite-like compounds. Chemical Engineering Journal, 181–182: 371–375
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.11.097
|
20 |
ZLi, Z Ma, YXu, XWang, Y Sun, RWang, JWang, X Gao, JGao (2018). Developing homogeneous ion exchange membranes derived from sulfonated polyethersulfone/N-phthaloyl-chitosan for improved hydrophilic and controllable porosity. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 35: 1716-1725
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-018-0064-2
|
21 |
WLiang, S J Couperthwaite, G Kaur, CYan, D WJohnstone, G JMillar (2014). Effect of strong acids on red mud structural and fluoride adsorption properties. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 423: 158–165
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.02.019
pmid: 24703681
|
22 |
YLiu, Q Fan, SWang, YLiu, A Zhou, LFan (2016). Adsorptive removal of fluoride from aqueous solutions using Al-humic acid-La aerogel composites. Chemical Engineering Journal, 306: 174–185
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.036
|
23 |
ZMa, T Lei, XJi, XGao, C Gao (2015). Submerged membrane bioreactor for vegetable oil wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 38(1): 101–109
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201400184
|
24 |
PMiretzky, A F Cirelli (2011). Fluoride removal from water by chitosan derivatives and composites: A review. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 132(4): 231–240
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2011.02.001
|
25 |
MMohapatra, S Anand, B KMishra, D EGiles, PSingh (2009). Review of fluoride removal from drinking water. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1): 67–77
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.015
pmid: 19775804
|
26 |
RMondal, S Pal, D VBhalani, VBhadja, UChatterjee, S KJewrajka (2018). Preparation of polyvinylidene fluoride blend anion exchange membranes via non-solvent induced phase inversion for desalination and fluoride removal. Desalination, 445: 85–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.032
|
27 |
MMourabet, A El Rhilassi, HEl Boujaady, MBennani-Ziatni, REl Hamri, ATaitai (2012). Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by adsorption on Apatitic tricalcium phosphate using Box–Behnken design and desirability function. Applied Surface Science, 258(10): 4402–4410
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.12.125
|
28 |
MMourabet, A El Rhilassi, HEl Boujaady, MBennani-Ziatni, ATaitai (2017). Use of response surface methodology for optimization of fluoride adsorption in an aqueous solution by Brushite. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 10: S3292–S3302
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.12.028
|
29 |
IOwusu-Agyeman, A Jeihanipour, TLuxbacher, A ISchäfer (2017). Implications of humic acid, inorganic carbon and speciation on fluoride retention mechanisms in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 528: 82–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.043
|
30 |
JPhiri, P Gane, T CMaloney (2017). General overview of graphene: Production, properties and application in polymer composites. Materials Science and Engineering B, 215: 9–28
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2016.10.004
|
31 |
JShen, A Schäfer (2014). Removal of fluoride and uranium by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: A review. Chemosphere, 117: 679–691
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.090
pmid: 25461935
|
32 |
JSingh, P Singh, ASingh (2016). Fluoride ions vs removal technologies: A study. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 9(6): 815–824
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.06.005
|
33 |
NSong, X Gao, ZMa, XWang, Y Wei, CGao (2018). A review of graphene-based separation membrane: Materials, characteristics, preparation and applications. Desalination, 437: 59–72
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.02.024
|
34 |
CSu, W Li, XLiu, XHuang, XYu (2016). Fe-Mn-sepiolite as an effective heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst for the decolorization of reactive brilliant blue. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 10(1): 37–45
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0729-y
|
35 |
CSu, W Li, YWang (2013). Adsorption property of direct fast black onto acid-thermal modified sepiolite and optimization of adsorption conditions using Box-Behnken response surface methodology. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 7(4): 503–511
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0477-9
|
36 |
L SThakur, P Mondal (2017). Simultaneous arsenic and fluoride removal from synthetic and real groundwater by electrocoagulation process: Parametric and cost evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 190: 102–112
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.053
pmid: 28040586
|
37 |
PTripathi, V C Srivastava, A Kumar (2009). Optimization of an azo dye batch adsorption parameters using Box–Behnken design. Desalination, 249(3): 1273–1279
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.03.010
|
38 |
GVijayalakshmi, B Shobha, VVanajakshi, SDivakar, BManohar (2001). Response surface methodology for optimization of growth parameters for the production of carotenoids by a mutant strain of Rhodotorula gracilis. European Food Research and Technology, 213(3): 234–239
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170100356
|
39 |
CWang, A Wei, HWu, FQu, W Chen, HLiang, GLi (2016). Application of response surface methodology to the chemical cleaning process of ultrafiltration membrane. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 24(5): 651–657
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2016.01.002
|
40 |
QWang, X Gao, ZMa, JWang, X Wang, YYang, CGao (2018). Combined water flux enhancement of PES-based TFC membranes in ultrasonic-assisted forward osmosis processes. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 64: 266–275
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.03.024
|
41 |
YWei, Y Zhang, XGao, ZMa, X Wang, CGao (2018). Multilayered graphene oxide membrane for water treatment: A review. Carbon, 139: 964–981
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.040
|
42 |
LXu, X Gao, ZLi, CGao (2015). Removal of fluoride by nature diatomite from high-fluorine water: An appropriate pretreatment for nanofiltration process. Desalination, 369: 97–104
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.04.033
|
43 |
MYadav, P Tripathi, AChoudhary, UBrighu, SMathur (2016). Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution by Bio-F sorbent: a fixed-bed column study. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(14): 6624–6631
https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1011708
|
44 |
JZhang, Y Wei, HLi, E YZeng, JYou (2017). Application of Box-Behnken design to optimize multi-sorbent solid phase extraction for trace neonicotinoids in water containing high level of matrix substances. Talanta, 170: 392–398
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.04.031
pmid: 28501186
|
45 |
KZhang, S Wu, XWang, JHe, B Sun, YJia, TLuo, F Meng, ZJin, DLin, W Shen, LKong, JLiu (2015). Wide pH range for fluoride removal from water by MHS-MgO/MgCO3 adsorbent: kinetic, thermodynamic and mechanism studies. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 446: 194–202
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.049
pmid: 25668780
|
46 |
B HZhao, J Chen, H QYu, Z HHu, Z BYue, JLi (2017). Optimization of microwave pretreatment of lignocellulosic waste for enhancing methane production: Hyacinth as an example. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(6): 17
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0965-z
|
47 |
YZhu, S Murali, WCai, XLi, J W Suk, J R Potts, R S Ruoff (2010). Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Advanced materials, 22(35): 3906–3924
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201001068
pmid: 20706983
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|