Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (10) : 129    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1889-z
Socioeconomic drivers of the human microbiome footprint in global sewage
Minglei Ren1,2, Shaojuan Du3, Jianjun Wang1,2()
1. Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
3. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China
 Download: PDF(8840 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● We built a read-mapping framework to profile human microbes from sewages (HSM).

● There were 95.03% human microbial species successfully recaptured from sewages.

● The HSM composition showed a distance-decay pattern at a global scale.

● The HSM communities from developed regions were separated from developing regions.

● Economy was the key socioeconomic factors driving the HSM diversity.

The human microbiome leaves a legacy in sewage ecosystems, also referred to as the human sewage microbiomes (HSM), and could cause potential risk to human health and ecosystem service. However, these host-associated communities remain understudied, especially at a global scale, regarding microbial diversity, community composition and the underlying drivers. Here, we built a metagenomic read mapping-based framework to estimate HSM abundance in 243 sewage samples from 60 countries across seven continents. Our approach revealed that 95.03% of human microbiome species were identified from global sewage, demonstrating the potential of sewage as a lens to explore these human-associated microbes while bypassing the limitations of human privacy concerns. We identified significant biogeographic patterns for the HSM community, with species richness increasing toward high latitudes and composition showing a distance-decay relationship at a global scale. Interestingly, the HSM communities were mainly clustered by continent, with those from Europe and North America being separated from Asia and Africa. Furthermore, global HSM diversity was shown to be shaped by both climate and socioeconomic variables. Specifically, the average annual temperature was identified as the most important factor for species richness (33.18%), whereas economic variables such as country export in goods and services contributed the most to the variation in community composition (27.53%). Economic and other socioeconomic variables, such as education, were demonstrated to have direct effects on the HSM, as indicated by structural equation modeling. Our study provides the global biogeography of human sewage microbiomes and highlights the economy as an important socioeconomic factor driving host-associated community composition.

Keywords Human sewage microbiome      Biogeography      Socioeconomic factors      Climate factors     
Corresponding Author(s): Jianjun Wang   
Issue Date: 02 August 2024
 Cite this article:   
Minglei Ren,Shaojuan Du,Jianjun Wang. Socioeconomic drivers of the human microbiome footprint in global sewage[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(10): 129.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-024-1889-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2024/V18/I10/129
Fig.1  The overview of the framework for exploring HSM. The framework includes three steps highlighted in panels with distinct colors: (a) The taxonomic profiling of the human-related microbiome in sewage (HSM), (b) The collection of the relevant variables from the curated databases, (c) Statistical analyses.
Fig.2  Global distribution and diversity of the HMS. (a) Latitudinal distribution of the HMS diversity. The points represent the HMS species richness. (b) Distance-decay relationships based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of the HMS. (c) NMDS ordinations showing the distribution patterns of HMS communities across global continents.
Fig.3  The correlation network of the HMS and variables. The network represents the relationships between species abundance and both two types of variables (a). The distributions of average linking numbers and degrees across different types of variables were shown in panels (b, c).
Fig.4  The relative importance of the variables to HMS diversity. The relative contributions of the variables to HMS species richness and community composition based on the random forest model results (a, b). The effects of the significant variables on the HMS were shown based on redundancy analysis (c).
Fig.5  The drivers of the HMS diversity revealed through SEMs. The SEMs showed the relationships among the variables and HMS species richness and community composition (a, b). The width of the arrows represents the strength of influence between variables, with numbers denoting the standardized path coefficients.
1 J Ahn, R B Hayes. (2021). Environmental influences on the human microbiome and implications for noncommunicable disease. Annual Review of Public Health, 42(1): 277–292
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105020
2 A I Amaruddin, F Hamid, J P R Koopman, M Muhammad, E A T Brienen, Lieshout L van, A R Geelen, S Wahyuni, E J Kuijper, E Sartono. et al.. (2020). The bacterial gut microbiota of schoolchildren from high and low socioeconomic status: a study in an urban area of Makassar, Indonesia. Microorganisms, 8(6): 961
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060961
3 S (2010) Andrews. FastQC: a Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Cambridge: Babraham Institute
4 S Bastian, M M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1): 361–362
https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
5 Belstrøm D, Holmstrup P, Nielsen C H, Kirkby N, Twetman S, Heitmann B L, Klepac-Ceraj V, Paster B J, Fiehn N E (2014). Bacterial profiles of saliva in relation to diet, lifestyle factors, and socioeconomic status. Journal of Oral Microbiology, 6(1): 09
6 K Bibby, E Viau, J Peccia. (2010). Pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to reveal bacterial pathogen diversity in biosolids. Water Research, 44(14): 4252–4260
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.039
7 A M Bolger, M Lohse, B Usadel. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 30(15): 2114–2120
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
8 R C Bowyer, M A Jackon, C I Le Roy, M N Lochlainn, T D Spector, J B Dowd, C J Steves. (2019). . , 7(1):
9 R H Bradley, R F Corwyn. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1): 371–399
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
10 L Cai, F Ju, T Zhang. (2014). Tracking human sewage microbiome in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(7): 3317–3326
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5402-z
11 F Catania, J Baedke, A Fábregas-Tejeda, Delgado A Nieves, V Vitali, L A N Long. (2021). Global climate change, diet, and the complex relationship between human host and microbiome: towards an integrated picture. BioEssays, 43(6): 2100049
https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100049
12 X Chen, X Chen, Y Zhao, H Zhou, X Xiong, C Wu. (2020). Effects of microplastic biofilms on nutrient cycling in simulated freshwater systems. Science of the Total Environment, 719: 137276
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137276
13 A Crits-Christoph, R S Kantor, M R Olm, O N Whitney, B Al-Shayeb, Y C Lou, A Flamholz, L C Kennedy, H Greenwald, A J Hinkle. (2020). . ,
14 M Deschasaux, K E Bouter, A Prodan, E Levin, A K Groen, H Herrema, V Tremaroli, G J Bakker, I Attaye, S J Pinto-Sietsma. et al.. (2018). Depicting the composition of gut microbiota in a population with varied ethnic origins but shared geography. Nature Medicine, 24(10): 1526–1531
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0160-1
15 P (2003) Dixon. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14: 927-930
16 J B Dowd, A Renson. (2018). “Under the skin” and into the gut: social epidemiology of the microbiome. Current Epidemiology Reports, 5(4): 432–441
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-018-0167-7
17 A M Eren, M L Sogin, H G Morrison, J H Vineis, J C Fisher, R J Newton, S L McLellan. (2015). A single genus in the gut microbiome reflects host preference and specificity. ISME Journal, 9(1): 90–100
https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.97
18 C García-Aljaro, A R Blanch, C Campos, J Jofre, F Lucena. (2019). Pathogens, faecal indicators and human-specific microbial source-tracking markers in sewage. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 126(3): 701–717
https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14112
19 F O Gudda, M G Waigi, E S Odinga, B Yang, L Carter, Y Gao. (2020). Antibiotic-contaminated wastewater irrigated vegetables pose resistance selection risks to the gut microbiome. Environmental Pollution, 264: 114752
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114752
20 W B Gunawan, M N P Abadi, F S Fadhillah, F Nurkolis, A Pramono. (2023). The interlink between climate changes, gut microbiota, and aging processes. Human Nutrition & Metabolism, 32: 200193
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hnm.2023.200193
21 R S Hendriksen, P Munk, P Njage, Bunnik B van, L McNally, O Lukjancenko, T Röder, D Nieuwenhuijse, S K Pedersen, J Kjeldgaard. et al.. (2019). Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage. Nature Communications, 10(1): 1124
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08853-3
22 J Hijmans, S E R, J L Cameron, P G Parra, A Jones. (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25: 1965–1978
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
23 J Hu, H A, B Wang, G Sun, J Niu, C Si, X Wang, X Yeh, J Zhu. et al.. (2020). Mountain biodiversity and ecosystem functions: interplay between geology and contemporary environments. ISME Journal, 14: 1–14
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0574-x
24 M Ji, Z Liu, K Sun, Z Li, X Fan, Q Li. (2021). Bacteriophages in water pollution control: advantages and limitations. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 84
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1378-y
25 E R Jones, M T H van Vliet, M Qadir, M F P Bierkens. (2021). Country-level and gridded estimates of wastewater production, collection, treatment and reuse. Earth System Science Data, 13(2): 237–254
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-237-2021
26 E L LaMartina, A A Mohaimani, R J Newton. (2021). Urban wastewater bacterial communities assemble into seasonal steady states. Microbiome, 9(1): 116
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01038-5
27 B Langmead, S L Salzberg. (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods, 9(4): 357–359
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
28 B Li, F Ju, L Cai, T Zhang. (2015). Profile and fate of bacterial pathogens in sewage treatment plants revealed by high-throughput metagenomic approach. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(17): 10492–10502
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02345
29 H Li, B Handsaker, A Wysoker, T Fennell, J Ruan, N Homer, G Marth, G Abecasis, R Durbin. (2009). The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25(16): 2078–2079
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
30 M Li, G Song, R Liu, X Huang, H Liu. (2022). Inactivation and risk control of pathogenic microorganisms in municipal sludge treatment: a review. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(6): 70
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1504-5
31 I Martínez, J C Stegen, M X Maldonado-Gómez, A M Eren, P M Siba, A R Greenhill, J Walter. (2015). The gut microbiota of rural Papua New Guineans: composition, diversity patterns, and ecological processes. Cell Reports, 11(4): 527–538
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.049
32 Mateo-Sagasta J, Raschid-sally L, Thebo A (2015). Global wastewater and sludge production, treatment and use. In: Drechsel P, Qadir M, Wichelns D, eds. Wastewater. Dordrecht: Springer
33 M Matus, C Duvallet, M K Soule, S M Kearney, N Endo, N Ghaeli, I Brito, C Ratti, E B Kujawinski, E J Alm. (2019). . ,
34 G E Miller, P A Engen, P M Gillevet, M Shaikh, M Sikaroodi, C B Forsyth, E Mutlu, A Keshavarzian. (2016). Lower neighborhood socioeconomic status associated with reduced diversity of the colonic microbiota in healthy adults. PLoS One, 11(2): e0148952
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148952
35 M L Nadimpalli, S J Marks, M C Montealegre, R H Gilman, M J Pajuelo, M Saito, P Tsukayama, S M Njenga, J Kiiru, J Swarthout. et al.. (2020). Urban informal settlements as hotspots of antimicrobial resistance and the need to curb environmental transmission. Nature Microbiology, 5(6): 787–795
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0722-0
36 R J Newton, S Mclellan, D K Dila, J H Vineis, H G Morrison, A M Eren, M L Sogin. (2015). Sewage reflects the microbiomes of human populations. mBio, 6(2): e02574
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02574-14
37 P Nowak, M Troseid, E Avershina, B Barqasho, U Neogi, K Holm, J R Hov, K Noyan, J Vesterbacka, J Svärd. et al.. (2015). Gut microbiota diversity predicts immune status in HIV-1 infection. AIDS, 29(18): 2409–2418
https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000869
38 M Nowrotek, Ł Jałowiecki, M Harnisz, G A Płaza. (2019). Culturomics and metagenomics: in understanding of environmental resistome. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13: 40
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1121-8
39 M Parizadeh, M C Arrieta. (2023). The global human gut microbiome: genes, lifestyles, and diet. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 29(10): 789–801
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2023.07.002
40 E Pasolli, F Asnicar, S Manara, M Zolfo, N Karcher, F Armanini, F Beghini, P Manghi, A Tett, P Ghensi. et al.. (2019). Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell, 176(3): 649–662.e20
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.001
41 O A Pipek, A Medgyes-Horváth, L Dobos, J Stéger, J Szalai-Gindl, D Visontai, R S Kaas, M Koopmans, R S Hendriksen, F M Aarestrup. et al.. (2019). Worldwide human mitochondrial haplogroup distribution from urban sewage. Scientific Reports, 9(1): 11624
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48093-5
42 J Qin, R Li, J Raes, M Arumugam, K S Burgdorf, C Manichanh, T Nielsen, N Pons, F Levenez, T J Yamada. et al.. (2010). A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature, 464(7285): 59–65
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08821
43 P H H Schneeberger, S Fuhrimann, S L Becker, J F Pothier, B Duffy, C Beuret, J E Frey, J Utzinger. (2019). Qualitative microbiome profiling along a wastewater system in Kampala, Uganda. Scientific Reports, 9(1): 17334
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53569-5
44 J P S Sidhu, L Hodgers, W Ahmed, M N Chong, S Toze. (2012). Prevalence of human pathogens and indicators in stormwater runoff in Brisbane, Australia. Water Research, 46(20): 6652–6660
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.012
45 C Staley, K H Reckhow, J Lukasik, V J Harwood. (2012). Assessment of sources of human pathogens and fecal contamination in a Florida freshwater lake. Water Research, 46(17): 5799–5812
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.012
46 M Tisza, C S Javornik, V Avadhanula, P Zhang, T Ayvaz, K Feliz, K L Hoffman, J R Clark, A Terwilliger, M C Ross. et al.. (2023). Wastewater sequencing reveals community and variant dynamics of the collective human virome. Nature Communications, 14(1): 6878
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42064-1
47 A Tiwari, A Krolicka, T T Tran, K Räisänen, Á M Ásmundsdóttir, O G Wikmark, R Lood, T Pitkänen. (2024). Antibiotic resistance monitoring in wastewater in the Nordic countries: a systematic review. Environmental Research, 246: 118052
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.118052
48 L Wu, D Ning, B Zhang, Y Li, P Zhang, X Shan, Q Zhang, M R Brown, Z Li, Nostrand J D Van. et al.. (2019). Global diversity and biogeography of bacterial communities in wastewater treatment plants. Nature Microbiology, 4(7): 1183–1195
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0426-5
49 T Yatsunenko, F E Rey, M J Manary, I Trehan, M G Dominguez-Bello, M Contreras, M Magris, G Hidalgo, R N Baldassano, A P Anokhin. (2012). Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature, 486(7402): 222–227
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11053
50 J Zhao, B Li, P Lv, J Hou, Y Qiu, X Huang. (2022). Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes and their association with bacteria and viruses in decentralized sewage treatment facilities. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(3): 35
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1469-4
[1] FSE-24075-OF-RML_suppl_1 Download
[1] Malan Yi, Yao Fang, Guoping Hu, Shufeng Liu, Jinren Ni, Tang Liu. Distinct community assembly processes underlie significant spatiotemporal dynamics of abundant and rare bacterioplankton in the Yangtze River[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 79-.
[2] Wenwen Xie, Yanpeng Li, Wenyan Bai, Junli Hou, Tianfeng Ma, Xuelin Zeng, Liyuan Zhang, Taicheng An. The source and transport of bioaerosols in the air: A review[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 44-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed