Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

Postal Subscription Code 80-972

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front. Energy    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (1) : 222-234    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-017-0480-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Numerical study of thermal characteristics of double skin facade system with middle shade
Shaoning LIU, Xiangfei KONG(), Hua YANG, Minchao FAN, Xin ZHAN
School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
 Download: PDF(7842 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Architectural shade is an effective method for improving building energy efficiency. A new shade combined with the double skin façade (DSF) system, called middle shade (MS), was introduced and developed for buildings. In this paper, a 3D dynamic simulation was conducted to analyze the influence of MS combined with DSF on the indoor thermal characteristics. The research on MS for DSF involves the temperature, the ventilation rate, the velocity distribution of the air flow duct, and the indoor temperature. The results show that the angle and position of the shade in the three seasons are different, and different conditions effectively enhance the indoor thermal characteristics. In summer, the appearance of MS in DSF makes the indoor temperature significantly lower. The indoor temperature is obviously lower than that of the air flow duct, and the temperature of the air flow duct is less affected by MS. The influence of the position of blinds on indoor temperature and ventilation rate is greater than the influence of the angle of blinds. According to the climate characteristics of winter and transition season, in winter, early spring, and late autumn, the indoor temperature decreases with the increase of the position of blinds at daytime, but the opposite is true at night. The results found in this paper can provide reference for the design and use of MS combined with DSF in hot summer and cold winter zone.

Keywords middle shade      position      thermal characteristics      double skin facade     
Corresponding Author(s): Xiangfei KONG   
Just Accepted Date: 13 June 2017   Online First Date: 12 July 2017    Issue Date: 19 March 2021
 Cite this article:   
Shaoning LIU,Xiangfei KONG,Hua YANG, et al. Numerical study of thermal characteristics of double skin facade system with middle shade[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(1): 222-234.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-017-0480-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2021/V15/I1/222
Fig.1  Geometric model of DSF
MembersRoom/m3
(length×width×height)
Vents/m2
(length×width)
Airflow duct/m2
(width×depth)
Blinds/m2
(width×height)
Thickness of blinds/m
Geometry size6×4×2.84.0× 0.50.8×3.70.9×2.00.05
Tab.1  Basic geometry size of physical model
InstrumentsModelAccuracyApplication
ThermocouplesType±0.1oCTemperatures
Aglient34970A0.0041%Data recorded
Automatic meteorological stationTRM-ZS2±0.4 for temperature and≤5% for radiationSolar radiation intensity and meteorological parameters
Tab.2  Basic parameters of main instruments
Fig.2  Comparison of temperature measured by using instruments and calculated by using formula
Fig.3  ]Variation of solar radiation
ComponentsThickness/mmTransmission coefficientAbsorption coefficientThermal conductivity/ (W·m?1·K?1)U-value/(W·m?2·K?1)Area/m2
Single-type coated glass(ECW)60.710.220.756.1511.20
Layer glass(ICW)120.660.230.3752.709.25
Blinds20.100.205
The inner opaque wall3700.591.471.95
Tab.3  Physical parameters of components
Fig.4  Sketch of blinds
Fig.5  Schematics of model room for validation
Fig.6  Comparison of indoor temperature between experiment and simulation results
Fig.7  Comparison of temperature in airflow duct at different angles
Fig.8  Comparison of indoor temperature at different angles
Fig.9  Comparison of temperature at different blind positions in the air flow duct
Fig.10  Comparison of indoor temperature at different blind positions
Relative position of blindsAngle of blindsNo blinds
0o30 o45 o60 o90 o
0.1 m307.45307.42307.40307.39307.21307.24
0.2 m307.34307.35307.35307.31307.22307.24
0.4 m307.34307.33307.17307.33307.24307.24
Tab.4  Airflow duct temperature in different conditions Unit: K
Relative position of blindsAngle of blindsNo blinds
0o30 o45 o60 o90 o
0.1 m302.09301.92302.14302.05301.64304.25
0.2 m301.98301.97301.91301.96301.42304.25
0.4 m301.64301.51301.41301.52300.91304.25
Tab.5  Indoor temperature in different conditions Unit: K
Fig.11  Effect of MS on indoor thermal environment
Conditions
No blindsRelative position of L=0.1mRelative position of L=0.1m
Maximum temperature/K288.55282.44282.09
Minimum temperature/K277.15279.71279.82
Tab.6  Maximum and minimum indoor temperatures Unit: K
Fig.12  Comparison of temperature in air flow duct and room
Fig.13  Velocity vector diagram of air flow duct at different blind angles
Fig.14  Hourly air velocity vector at L=0.1m and a blind of angle of 60o
Fig.15  Distribution of ventilation rate at different blind angles
Fig.16  Distribution of ventilation rate at different blind positions
Relative position of blindsAngle of blindsNo sunshade
30°45°60°90°
L=0.1 m1.56031.59181.60881.62221.68581.7592
L=0.2 m1.38701.43071.47351.53191.69231.7592
L=0.4 m1.32171.32661.34391.39461.69021.7592
Tab.7  Statistics of ventilation rate
1 H Poirazis. Blomsterberg Åke, M Wall. Energy simulations for glazed office buildings in Sweden. Energy & Buildings,  2008,  40(7):1161–1170
2 S M Zhang, M A Da-Lei, C Y Ran, L Bai. The influence analysis of the building outside window on the building energy-saving. Journal of Jilin Institute of Architectural & Civil Engineering, 2008, 25(4):49–52
3 Z Y Wang. Research on energy saving for the case analysis of building energy conservation in Xichang city. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 886: 478–483
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.886.478
4 L Q Wan, X Y Peng. Comparison of evaluation methods for energy saving effect of building sunshade outside the window. Building Energy & Environment, 2013, 32(2):46–48
5 Y Q Xiao, T Ren. The layout and form design research on BIPV external sun-shading skin in hot-humid areas. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 374–377: 220–229
6 M Kim, S B Leigh, T Kim, S Cho. A study on external shading devices for reducing cooling loads and improving daylighting in office buildings. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 2015, 14(3): 687–694
https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.687
7 Q R Zheng, Y F Ding, W U Teng-Fei. Analysis of the energy saving potential of horizontal external shading in Guangzhou buildings. Journal of Guangzhou University, 2008, 7(6):69–72
8 Y Q Cui, N Sun, Y L Peng, Y Wang. Simulation analysis on sun-shading design case of buildings in cold regions. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2014, 638–640: 1656–1659
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.638-640.1656
9 X D Zeng, F A Huang. A study of the optimization of building external shading methods in Chongqing area. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 368–373: 3753–3756
10 L P Sun. The sun-shading technologies of the existing traditional dwellings in China. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 689: 163–166
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.689.163
11 Y D He, N P Li, W B Liu, D X Zheng. Building sun-shading in Changsha area. Building Energy Efficiency, 2014, 42(3):60–62
12 Y Ye, P Xu, J Mao, Y Ji. Experimental study on the effectiveness of internal shading devices. Energy and Building, 2016, 111: 154–163
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.040
13 A Kirimtat, B K Koyunbaba, I Chatzikonstantinou, S Sariyildiz. Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 53: 23–49
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.020
14 M V Nielsen, S Svendsen, L B Jensen. Quantifying the potential of automated dynamic solar shading in office buildings through integrated simulations of energy and daylight. Solar Energy, 2011, 85(5): 757–768
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.01.010
15 M David, M Donn, F Garde, A Lenoir. Assessment of the thermal and visual efficiency of solar shades. Building and Environment, 2011, 46(7): 1489–1496
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.01.022
16 A A Y Freewan. Impact of external shading devices on thermal and daylighting performance of offices in hot climate regions. Solar Energy, 2014, 102(4): 14–30
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.01.009
17 L Karlsen, P Heiselberg, I Bryn, H JohraSolar shading control strategy for office buildings in cold climate. Energy and Buildings, 2016, 118:316–328
18 H Manz. Total solar energy transmittance of glass double facades with free convection. Energy and Building, 2004, 36(2): 127–136
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.10.003
19 E Gratia, A De Herde. The most efficient position of shading devices in a double-skin facade. Energy and Building, 2007, 39(3): 364–373
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.09.001
20 C S Park, G Augenbroe, T Messadi, M Thitisawat, N Sadegh. Calibration of a lumped simulation model for double-skin façade systems. Energy and Buildings, 2004, 36(11):1117–1130
21 C S Park, G Augenbroe, N Sadegh, M Thitisawat, T Messadi. Real-time optimization of a double-skin façade based on lumped modeling and occupant preference. Building and Environment, 2004, 39(8): 939–948
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.01.018
22 X L Xu, Z Yang. Natural ventilation in the double skin façade with venetian blind. Energy and Building, 2008, 40(8): 1498–1504
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.02.012
23 D Saelens, W Parys, J Roofthooft, A T de la Torre. Reprint of “Assessment of approaches for modeling louver shading devices in building energy simulation programs”. Energy & Buildings, 2014, 68(Part C): 799–810
24 V Gavan, M Woloszyn, F Kuznik, J J Roux. Experimental study of a mechanically ventilated double-skin facade with Venetian sun-shading device: a full-scale investigation in controlled environment. Solar Energy, 2010, 84(2): 183–195
25 J Lee, M Alshayeb, J D Chang. A study of shading device configuration on the natural ventilation efficiency and energy performance of a double skin façade. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 118: 310–317
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.432
26 X Kong, S Liu, H Yang, Y Zhong, C Qi. An experimental study of all-season operation strategy for a respiration-type double-layer glass curtain wall system in cold zone of China. Building & Environment, 2015, 97:166–176
[1] Zhuo LIU, Jianbo LI, Mingming ZHU, Xiaofeng LU, Zhezi ZHANG, Dongke ZHANG. Effect of oil shale semi-coke on deposit mineralogy and morphology in the flue path of a CFB burning Zhundong lignite[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(1): 26-37.
[2] Neil Stephen LOPEZ, Anthony S.F. CHIU, Jose Bienvenido Manuel BIONA. Decomposing drivers of transportation energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions for the Philippines: the case of developing countries[J]. Front. Energy, 2018, 12(3): 389-399.
[3] Heba ALI, N. ISMAIL, M. S. AMIN, Mohamed MEKEWI. Decoration of vertically aligned TiO2 nanotube arrays with WO3 particles for hydrogen fuel production[J]. Front. Energy, 2018, 12(2): 249-258.
[4] Yanlin CHEN,Sihua ZHONG,Miao TAN,Wenzhong SHEN. SiO2 passivation layer grown by liquid phase deposition for silicon solar cell application[J]. Front. Energy, 2017, 11(1): 52-59.
[5] Solomon GIWA,Oludaisi ADEKOMAYA,Collins NWAOKOCHA. Potential hybrid feedstock for biodiesel production in the tropics[J]. Front. Energy, 2016, 10(3): 329-336.
[6] Weiwei ZHANG, Huisheng ZHANG, Ming SU. Fault simulation of boiler heating surface ash deposition in a power plant system[J]. Front Energ, 2011, 5(4): 435-443.
[7] Xiangsong HOU, Shi YANG, Junfu LU, Hai ZHANG, Guangxi YUE. Effect of circulating ash from CFB boilers on NO and N2O emission[J]. Front Energ Power Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 241-246.
[8] Xilai ZHANG, Shiping JIN, Suyi HUANG, Guoqing TIAN. Experimental and CFD analysis of nozzle position of subsonic ejector[J]. Front Energ Power Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 167-174.
[9] HUANG Dongping, DING Guoliang, QUACK Hans. Lagrangian simulation of deposition of CO gas-solid sudden expansion flow[J]. Front. Energy, 2008, 2(2): 216-221.
[10] YAN Jianhua, CHEN Tong, LU Shengyong, LI Xiaodong, GU Yueling, CEN Kefa. Experimental study on low temperature thermal treatment of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) in fly ash[J]. Front. Energy, 2007, 1(3): 280-284.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed