Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Law in China

ISSN 1673-3428

ISSN 1673-3541(Online)

CN 11-5742/D

Postal Subscription Code 80-981

Front. Law China    2021, Vol. 16 Issue (1) : 35-57    https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-010-021-0003-6
FOCUS
Digital Inclusion for Persons with Disabilities in China Under COVID-19: How Far Has China Come?
HE Biao1(), Rune Halvorsen2()
1. M.A. in International Social Welfare and Health Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway; Research Assistant, Department of Social Work, Child Welfare and Social Policy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo 0130, Norway.
2. Ph.D. in Sociology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Professor, Department of Social Work, Child Welfare and Social Policy, and Co-director of CEDIC— Center for the Study of Digitalization of Public Services and Citizenship, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo 0130, Norway.
 Download: PDF(361 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This article reviews social regulatory and redistributive policies in China that aim at fostering digital inclusion of persons with disabilities. We examine the emerging Chinese policies and how China has responded to the impacts of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on digital inclusion in terms of redistribution, market regulation, involvement of persons with disabilities and disabled people’s organizations (DPOs), and awareness-raising campaigns. The policy review demonstrates that the Chinese policy framework contains a few redistributive initiatives, for example, cash transfer programs, and free distribution of information and communications technology (ICT). These have the potential to increase the uptake of ICT among persons with disabilities. The Chinese policy framework also includes provisions to ensure consultation with individual persons with disabilities and DPOs in the deliberation and implementation of ICT accessibility policies. While China has initiated awareness-raising campaigns among market actors about the importance of digital inclusion, so far, the Chinese government has adopted little legal regulation of the market to foster accessibility to ICT. The article thus argues that some of the limitations may be due to the way state–market relations have developed since the economy opened up in 1978. Apart from the growing benefits of several cash transfer programs, we have not seen major changes or adjustments to the current policy framework during the efforts to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on digital inclusion.

Keywords disability policy      digital inclusion      accessibility      social regulation      China      information and communication technology (ICT)     
Issue Date: 25 April 2021
 Cite this article:   
HE Biao,Rune Halvorsen. Digital Inclusion for Persons with Disabilities in China Under COVID-19: How Far Has China Come?[J]. Front. Law China, 2021, 16(1): 35-57.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.3868/s050-010-021-0003-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2021/V16/I1/35
[1] DAI Ruikai. Information Accessibility for Public Health Emergencies-A Case Study of Information Accessibility during the New Coronavirus Outbreak[J]. Front. Law China, 2021, 16(1): 58-78.
[2] ZHANG Lin, AN Jingjing. The Legal Infrastructure for Creativity in China: A Perspective of Venture Capital[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(4): 452-480.
[3] HAI Dan. Institutional Reform and Social Changes in Northeast China During the Late Qing: A Case Study of Appeal Trials[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(1): 38-58.
[4] NA Heya. Between Tradition and Modernity: The Re-trial System of the Beiyang Period in the Early Republic of China (1912-1928)[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(1): 59-83.
[5] LU Haina. Adding a Gender Perspective to China’s Belt and Road Initiative as an International Human Rights Obligation[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(4): 445-477.
[6] Yuko Nishitani. Coordination of Legal Systems by the Recognition of Foreign Judgments — Rethinking Reciprocity in Sino-Japanese Relationships[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(2): 193-230.
[7] HOU Peng. Using Shields as Weapons: Third-Party Funding Assisting China-Related Arbitration under Belt and Road Investment[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(2): 274-303.
[8] ZHANG Wenxian. Forty Themes on the Innovation and Development of Chinese Legal Research in the Reform and Opening Up Era[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(1): 2-38.
[9] Yasuhiro OKUDA. UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF RECIPROCITY REQUIREMENT FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN JAPAN[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(2): 159-170.
[10] ZHANG Wenliang. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN NON-MONETARY JUDGMENTS IN CHINA[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(2): 218-240.
[11] Bruno da Silva. EVOLUTION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT: MORE THAN HALF OF CENTURY OF UNCERTAINTY AND WHAT HISTORY CAN TELL US[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(4): 501-523.
[12] Philip Ebow Bondzi-Simpson, Felix Awuah. A REVIEW OF THE CHINA–GHANA BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATY, 1989[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(3): 372-383.
[13] JIANG Dong. DOES CHINA NEED AN ANTI-FOREIGN BRIBERY STATUTE? SOME LESSONS FROM THE FCPA OF US[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(3): 355-371.
[14] JIN Meirong. ANTI-MONOPOLY PERSPECTIVES OF CHINESE PUBLIC AIR TRANSPORT MARKET[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 138-156.
[15] ZHANG Lei, Arthur P. J. Mol, YANG Shuai. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE IN CHINA: IN THE ERA OF INFORMATIZATION AND BIG DATA[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 57-75.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed