Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2017, Vol. 6 Issue (2) : 123-136    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.02.002
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Externally-induced meditative states: an exploratory fMRI study of architects’ responses to contemplative architecture
Julio Bermudez1(), David Krizaj2, David L. Lipschitz3, Charles Elliott Bueler4, Jadwiga Rogowska4, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd4, Yoshio Nakamura3
1. School of Architecture and Planning, The Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Ave. NE, Washington, DC 20064, USA
2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 65 Mario Capecchi Dr.,Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
3. Utah Center for Exploring Mind-Body Interactions, Pain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, 615 Arapeen Drive, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
4. Cognitive Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Drive, Room 323, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
 Download: PDF(1159 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Built environments can induce contemplative states, but direct evidence for their impact on the brain is lacking. This exploratory work investigated brain correlates of internal states elicited by architecture designed for contemplative experience. Functional MRI and self-reports of 12 architects were assessed to study their responses to photographs of ordinary and contemplative architectures. Images of contemplative buildings: (1) induced attentive, receptive, and absorbing experiences and diminished internal dialogue; (2) involved decreased engagement of prefrontal cortex; and (3) activated the occipital lobe, precentral gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule. They suggest that viewing buildings designed for contemplation may evoke experiential and brain signatures that consistently differ from those induced by buildings that serve everyday functions. The depth of such externally induced states was inversely correlated with the engagement of the Default Mode Network. Our study points toward a novel avenue fo rinvestigating how contemplation can be cultivated in the human brain/mind.

Keywords Contemplation      Meditation      Architecture      Embodiment      Phenomenology      Neuroscience     
Corresponding Author(s): Julio Bermudez   
Issue Date: 06 July 2017
 Cite this article:   
Julio Bermudez,David Krizaj,David L. Lipschitz, et al. Externally-induced meditative states: an exploratory fMRI study of architects’ responses to contemplative architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(2): 123-136.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2017.02.002
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2017/V6/I2/123
[1] Luis Alfonso de la Fuente Suaárez. Subjective experience and visual attention to a historic building: A real-world eyetracking study[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 774-804.
[2] Ana Torres, Juan Serra, Jorge Llopis, Anna Delcampo. Color preference cool versus warm in nursing homes depends on the expected activity for interior spaces[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 739-750.
[3] Ran Xu, Haishan Xia, Mei Tian. Wayfinding design in transportation architecture e are saliency models or designer visual attention a good predictor of passenger visual attention?[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 726-738.
[4] Xiaoxin Zhao. Game of capitals: Production of influential online architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 670-680.
[5] Sanyam Bahga, Gaurav Raheja. Complexities of practicing architectural regionalism in India: An interview study[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 568-578.
[6] Cong Sun, Charlie Q.L. Xue. Shennan Road and the modernization of Shenzhen architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 437-449.
[7] Agnieszka Faustyna Szuta, Jakub Szczepański. Striking elements – A lifebelt or a fad? Searching for an effective way of adapting abandoned churches[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 277-286.
[8] Vinicius Mizobuti, Luiz C.M. Vieira Junior. Bioinspired architectural design based on structural topology optimization[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 264-276.
[9] Tulay Karakas, Dilek Yildiz. Exploring the influence of the built environment on human experience through a neuroscience approach: A systematic review[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 236-247.
[10] Maurice Mitchell, Amara Roca Iglesias. Urban agriculture in Kathmandu as a catalyst for the civic inclusion of migrants and the making of a greener city[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 169-190.
[11] Andréa de Paiva, Richard Jedon. Short- and long-term effects of architecture on the brain: Toward theoretical formalization[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 564-571.
[12] Anh Tuan Nguyen, Nguyen Song Ha Truong, David Rockwood, Anh Dung Tran Le. Studies on sustainable features of vernacular architecture in different regions across the world: A comprehensive synthesis and evaluation[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 535-548.
[13] Roy Kozlovsky. Forking path: De-scripting interchange architecture at the Ayalon Crosstown Expressway[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(3): 332-347.
[14] Fangqing Lyu. Architecture as spatial storytelling: Mediating human knowledge of the world, humans and architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(3): 275-283.
[15] Camille de Gaulmyn, Karine Dupre. Teaching sustainable design in architecture education: Critical review of Easy Approach for Sustainable and Environmental Design (EASED)[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(2): 238-260.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed