Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front Arch Civil Eng Chin    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (2) : 121-150    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0104-z
REVIEW
Unified description of sand behavior
Feng ZHANG1(), Bin YE2, Guanlin YE3
1. Department of Civil Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Gokiso-cho, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
 Download: PDF(1141 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In this paper, the mechanical behavior of sand, was systematically described and modeled with a elastoplastic model proposed by Zhang et al. [1]. Without losing the generality of the sand, a specific sand called as Toyoura sand, a typical clean sand found in Japan, has been discussed in detail. In the model, the results of conventional triaxial tests of the sand under different loading and drainage conditions were simulated with a fixed set of material parameters. The model only employs eight parameters among which five parameters are the same as those used in Cam-clay model. Once the parameters are determined with the conventional drained triaxial compression tests and undrained triaxial cyclic loading tests, then they are fixed to uniquely describe the overall mechanical behaviors of the Toyoura sand, without changing the values of the eight parameters irrespective of what kind of the loadings or the drainage conditions may be. The capability of the model is discussed in a theoretical way.

Keywords constitutive model      sand      stress-induced anisotropy      density      structure     
Corresponding Author(s): ZHANG Feng,Email:cho.ho@nitech.ac.jp   
Issue Date: 05 June 2011
 Cite this article:   
Feng ZHANG,Bin YE,Guanlin YE. Unified description of sand behavior[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2011, 5(2): 121-150.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-011-0104-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2011/V5/I2/121
Fig.1  Subloading, normal and superloading yield surfaces in plane adopted in the present model
Fig.2  Changes in the subloading yielding surfaces at different anisotropy . (a) Modified cam-clay model; (b) SYS Cam-clay model; (c) proposed model
Fig.3  Changes in the subloading yielding surface in the cyclic mobility stage
Fig.4  Changes in , and in or away from the cyclic mobility region
amplitude of shear stress ratio, q/(2p0)initial void ratio, e0initial mean effective stress, p/kPacyclic loading frequency, f/Hz
0.150.748 (Dr = 0.62)980.01
0.200.753 (Dr = 0.61)980.01
0.250.770 (Dr = 0.56)980.01
Tab.1  Test conditions of Toyoura Sand samples
Fig.5  Test results of undrained triaxial cyclic loading test with different shearing ratios. (a) Effective stress paths; (b) stress-strain relations
Fig.6  Theoretical simulation of undrained triaxial cyclic loading test with different cyclic loading ratios. (a) Effective stress paths; (b) stress-strain relations
compression index, λswelling index, κcritical state parameter, Mvoid ratio, N (p=98 kPa on N.C.L.)poisson’s ratio, νdegradation parameter of overconsolidation state, mdegradation parameter of structure, aevolution parameter of anisotropy, br
0.0500.00641.300.870.300.010.501.50
Tab.2  Material parameters of Toyoura Sand
amplitude of shear stress ratio, q/(2p0)initial void ratio, e0initial mean effective stress, p/kPainitial degree of structure, R0*initial degree of overconsolidation, OCR (1/R0)initial anisotropy, ζ0
0.150.81980.75700
0.200.81980.75700
0.250.81980.75700
Tab.3  State variables of Toyoura Sand samples in Fig. 6
e0e0R0*OCR (1/R0)ζ0
loose sand0.81196.00.902.00
dense sand0.67196.00.9045.00
Tab.4  State variables of Toyoura Sand samples in Fig. 7
Fig.7  Experimental and theoretical results of triaxial compression tests. (a) Loose sand; (b) dense sand
Fig.8  Set of sands with different densities prepared from loose sand by vibration compaction and isotropic compression
e0P/kPaR0*OCR (1/R0)ζ0
1.1910.00.101.00
Tab.5  State variables of Toyoura Sand sample before compaction
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
e01.071.000.940.900.810.760.700.68
p/kPa196.0196.0196.0196.0196.0196.0196.0196.0
R0*0.1010.1120.1240.1310.1470.1580.170.177
OCR (1/R0)1.225.2923.8756.15350.36969.933527.836928.
ζ05.11E-026.58E-027.24E-027.07E-027.70E-027.45E-027.09E-027.14E-02
Tab.6  State variables of Toyoura Sand samples after compaction
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
e00.9160.8600.8010.7750.7310.7070.6710.646
p/kPa196.0196.0196.0196.0196.0196.0196.0196.0
R0*0.1040.1140.1250.1330.1490.1600.1720.179
OCR (1/R0)1.495.0317.530.173.4118.255.426.
ζ01.44E-051.47E-051.97E-053.42E-055.95E-043.73E-032.18E-023.79E-02
Tab.7  State variables of Toyoura Sand samples after isotropic consolidation
Fig.9  
Fig.10  Stress paths, stress-strain relations of the sand specimens with different densities subjected to cyclic triaxial test under undrained condition
Fig.11  Effective stress paths and relation of the loose sand specimen [] subjected to cyclic triaxial loading under drained condition. (a) Effective stress path; (b) relation
Fig.12  Simulation of undrained triaxial compression tests. (a) Effective stress paths; (b) stress-strain relation; (c) -ln relation
Fig.13  Simulation of drained triaxial compression tests. (a) Dilatancy; (b) stress-strain relation; (c) e- relation
p/MPae0OCR (1/R0)R0*ζ0
[i]0.100.891.50.500.00
[ii]1.00.881.10.050.00
[iii]2.00.891.00.020.00
[iv]0.100.7185.00.500.00
[V]1.00.728.00.300.00
[vi]2.00.715.00.240.00
[vii]3.00.723.50.180.00
[viii]0.100.65280.00.500.00
[ix]1.00.6630.00.300.00
[x]2.00.6620.00.200.00
[xi]3.00.6612.00.200.00
Tab.8  State variables of Toyoura Sand samples in Fig. 14
Fig.14  Test results of stress paths and stress-strain relations of Toyoura Sand with the same void ratio but different confining stress in undrained triaxial compression test []. (a) stress-strain relations; (b) effective stress paths
Fig.15  Simulation of the test results in Fig. 13. (a) stress-strain relations; (b) effective stress paths
e0p/kPaR0*OCR (1/R0)ζ0
0.661960.9953.60
Tab.9  State variables of Toyoura Sand sample in Fig. 16
Fig.16  Test results of dense sand in drained cyclic loading tests []. (a) loading; (b) volumetric strain-stress ratio relation; (c) stress-strain relation
Fig.17  Simulation of the test results in Fig. 15. (a) loading; (b) volumetric strain-stress ratio relation; (c) stress-strain relation; (d) change of anisotropy; (e) change of with stress ratio; (f) change of with volumetric strain
Fig.18  Prescribed loading path under drained condition
Fig.19  Influence of initial anisotropic condition. (a) Effective stress paths under undrained condition; (b) stress-strain relations under undrained condition
e0p/kPaR0*OCR (1/R0)ζ0
[r]0.731960.15675.80.221
[s]0.731960.15675.8-0.221
Tab.10  State variables of Toyoura Sand samples in Fig. 18
e0p/kPaR0*OCR(1/R0)ζ0br
[i]0.671960.7806001.5
[j]0.671960.706002.5
[k]0.671960.706005.0
Tab.11  State variables and changed material parameter of samples in Fig. 19
Fig.20  Influence of the evolution rate of anisotropy. (a) Effective stress paths; (b) stress-strain relations
e0p/kPaR0*OCR(1/R0)ζ0
[2]0.860196[a]: 0.114[e]: 1.05.01.47E-05
[4]0.775196[b]: 0.133[f]: 1.030.13.42E-05
[7]0.671196[c]: 0.172[g]: 1.0255.02.18E-02
[8]0.646196[d]: 0.179[h]: 1.0426.03.79E-02
Tab.12  State variables of Toyoura Sand sample in Fig. 20
Fig.21  
Fig.22  Influence of the structure. (a) Considering the structure effect; (b) without the structure effect
Fig.23  Difference between clay and sand. (a) Effective stress paths; (b) stress-strain relations
iteme0p/kPaR0*OCR(1/R0)ζ0ma
[l]0.691960.803500.010.50
[m]0.691960.803500.020.30
[n]0.691960.803500.050.10
[o]0.691960.803500.030.05
Tab.13  State variables and changed material parameters of samples in Fig. 21
1 Zhang F, Ye B, Noda T, Explanation of cyclic mobility of soils: approach by stress-induced anisotropy. Soisl and Foundations , 2007, 47(4): 635–648
doi: 10.3208/sandf.47.635
2 Asaoka A, Nakano M, Noda T. Super loading yield surface concept for the saturated structured soils. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering-NUMGE98. Udine , 1998, 232–242
3 Castro G. Liquefaction of sand. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Cambridge: Harvard Soil Mech Series, 1969, No 81
4 Castro G. Liquefaction and cyclic mobility of saturated sands. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1975, 101(GT6): 551–569
5 Castro G, Poulos S. Factors affecting liquefaction and cyclic mobility. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1977, 103(GT6): 501–516
6 Tatsuoka F, Muramatsu M, Sasaki T. Cyclic undrained stress-strain behavior of dense sand by torsional simple shear test. Soils and Foundations , 1982, 22(2): 55–70
7 Asaoka A. Consolidation of clay and compaction of sand. In: Proceedings of the 12th Asian Regional Conference of International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Singapore , 2003, 2
8 Finn W D, Pickering D J. Effect of strain history on liquefaction of sand. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division , 1970, SM6: 1917–1934
9 Ishihara K, Okada S. Effects of stress history on cyclic behavior of sand. Soisl and Foundations , 1978, 18(4): 31–45
10 Ishihara K, Okada S. Effects of large preshearing on cyclic behavior of sand. Soisl and Foundations , 1982, 22(3): 109–125
11 Oda M, Kawamoto K, Suzuki K, Microstructural interpretation on reliquefaction of saturated granular soils under cyclic loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering , 2001, 127(5): 416–423
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(416)
12 Kato S, Ishihara K, Towhata I. Undrained shear characteristics of saturated sand under anisotropic consolidation. Soisl and Foundations , 2001, 41(1): 1–11
13 Hyodo M, Tanimizu H, Yasufuku N, Undrained cyclic and monotonic triaxial behavior of saturated loose sand. Soisl and Foundations , 1994, 34(1): 19–32
14 Meneses J, Ishihara K, Towhata I. Effects of superimposing cyclic shear stress on the undrained behavior of saturated sand under monotonic loading. Soisl and Foundations , 1998, 38(42): 115–127
15 Verdugo R, Ishihara K. The steady state of sandy soils. Soils and Foundations , 1996, 36(2): 81–91
16 Hinokio M. Deformation characteristic of sand subjected to monotonic and cyclic loadings and its application to bearing capacity problem. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Nagoya: Nagoya Institute of Technology, 2000, 141–144 (in Japanese)
17 Nakai T, Mihara Y. A new mechanical quantity for soils and its application to elastoplastic constitutive models. Soisl and Foundations , 1984, 24(2): 82–94
18 Nakai T, Matsuoka H. A generalized elastoplastic constitutive model for clay in a three-dimensional stresses. Soisl and Foundations , 1986, 26(3): 81–89
19 Nakai T. An isotropic hardening elastoplastic model for sand considering the stress path dependency in three-dimensional stresses. Soisl and Foundations , 1989, 29(1): 119–137
20 Nakai T, Hinokio M. A simple elastoplastic model for normally and over consolidated soils with unified material parameters, 2004, 44(2): 53–70
21 Yamada S, Takamori T, Sato K. Effect on reliquefaction resistance produced by changes in anisotropy during liquefaction. Soisl and Foundations , 2010, 50(1): 9–25
doi: 10.3208/sandf.50.9
22 Oka F, Ohno Y. Cyclic plasticity models for sand and clay. In: Proceedings of 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering . Tokyo , 1988, III: 273–278
23 Oka F, Yashima A, Kato M, A constitutive model for sand based on the non-linear kinematic hardening rule and its application. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering. Madrid , 1992, 2529–2534
24 Yashima A, Oka F, Shibata T, Liquefaction analysis by LIQCA. In: Proceedings of JGS Conference on Liquefaction of Ground and its Counter measure , 1991. 165–174 (in Japanese)
25 Hashiguchi K, Ueno M. Elastoplastic constitutive laws of granular material, Constitutive Equations of Soils. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Spec Ses 9 , Tokyo, JSSMFE, 1977, 73–82
26 Hashiguchi K. Plastic constitutive equations of granular materials. In: Proceedings of US-Japan Seminar on Continuum Mechanics and Statistical Approaches in the Mechanics of Granular-Materials . Sendai, JSSMFE, 1978, 321–329
27 Hashiguchi K. Subloading surface model in unconventional plasticity. International Journal of Solids and Structures , 1989, 25(8): 917–945
doi: 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90038-3
28 Asaoka A, Nakano M, Noda T. Superloading yield surface concept for highly structured soil behavior. Soils and Foundations , 2000, 2(40): 99–110
29 Asaoka A, Nakano M, Noda T, Delayed compression/consolidation of naturally clay due to degradation of soil structure. Soisl and Foundations , 2000, 3(40): 75–85
30 Roscoe K H, Schofield A N, Thurairajah A. Yielding of clays in states wetter than critical. Géotechnique , 1963, 13(3): 250–255
doi: 10.1680/geot.1963.13.3.211
31 Roscoe K H, Burland J B. On the generalized stress-strain behavior of “wet clay”. In: Heyman J, Leckie F A, eds. Engineering Plasticity. London: Cambridge University Press, 1968, 535–609
32 Sekiguchi H. Rheological characteristics of clays. In: Proceedings of the International conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Tokyo , 1977, 1: 289–292
33 Hashiguchi K, Chen Z P. Elasto-plastic constitutive equations of soils with the subloading surface and the rotational hardening. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics , 1998, 22(3): 197–227
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199803)22:3<197::AID-NAG914>3.0.CO;2-T
34 Asaoka A, Noda T, Yamada E, An elasto-plastic description of two distinct volume change mechanisms of soils. Soisl and Foundations , 2002, 42(5): 47–57
35 Yao Y P, Sun D A, Matsuoka H. A unified constitutive model for both clay and sand with hardening parameter independent on stress path. Computers and Geotechnics , 2008, 35(2): 210–222
doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.04.003
36 Wan Z, Yao Y P, Wang N D, 3-D Zhang's model based on the TS method. Soils and Foundations , 2011 (In press)
37 Hashiguchi K. Fundamental requirements and formulation of elasto-plastic constitutive equations with tangential plasticity. International Journal of Plasticity , 1993, 9(5): 525–549
doi: 10.1016/0749-6419(93)90018-L
38 Zienkiewicz O C, Taylor R L. The Finite Element Method. 4th ed. London: McGraw-Hill, 1991, Vol. 2
39 Ye B. Experiment and Numerical Simulation of Repeated Liquefaction-Consolidation of Sand. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Gifu: Gifu University, 2007
40 Ye B, Ye G, Zhang F, Experiment and numerical simulation of repeated liquefaction-consolidation of sand. Soils and Foundations , 2007, 47(3): 547–558
doi: 10.3208/sandf.47.547
41 Ishihara K. Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquake. Géotechnique , 1993, 43(3): 351–451
doi: 10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351
42 Nakai K. An elasto-plastic constitutive modeling of soils based on the evolution laws describing collapse of soil skeleton structure, loss of overconsolidation and development of anisotropy. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Nagoya: Nagoya University, 2005 (in Japanese)
43 Ye B, Ye G L, Zhang F.Numerical modeling of changes in anisotropy during liquefaction. Soils and Foundations , 2011 (In press)
[1] Fulin Qu, Wengui Li, Xiaohui Zeng, Zhiyu Luo, Kejin Wang, Daichao Sheng. Effect of microlimestone on properties of self-consolidating concrete with manufactured sand and mineral admixture[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1545-1560.
[2] Yurong ZHANG, Shengxuan XU, Yanhong GAO, Jie GUO, Yinghui CAO, Junzhi ZHANG. Correlation of chloride diffusion coefficient and microstructure parameters in concrete: A comparative analysis using NMR, MIP, and X-CT[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1509-1519.
[3] Sang I. PARK, Sang-Ho LEE. Heuristic solution using decision tree model for enhanced XML schema matching of bridge structural calculation documents[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1403-1417.
[4] El Houcine MOURID, Said MAMOURI, Adnan IBRAHIMBEGOVIC. Progressive collapse of 2D reinforced concrete structures under sudden column removal[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1387-1402.
[5] Bin LI, Xiaoying ZHUANG. Multiscale computation on feedforward neural network and recurrent neural network[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1285-1298.
[6] Beibei SUN, Hao WU, Weimin SONG, Zhe LI, Jia YU. Hydration, microstructure and autogenous shrinkage behaviors of cement mortars by addition of superabsorbent polymers[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1274-1284.
[7] Nader KARBALLAEEZADEH, Hosein GHASEMZADEH TEHRANI, Danial MOHAMMADZADEH SHADMEHRI, Shahaboddin SHAMSHIRBAND. Estimation of flexible pavement structural capacity using machine learning techniques[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1083-1096.
[8] Jie LI. A PDEM-based perspective to engineering reliability: From structures to lifeline networks[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1056-1065.
[9] Chunfeng ZHAO, Xin YE, Avinash GAUTAM, Xin LU, Y. L. MO. Simplified theoretical analysis and numerical study on the dynamic behavior of FCP under blast loads[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 983-997.
[10] Sanku KONAI, Aniruddha SENGUPTA, Kousik DEB. Seismic behavior of cantilever wall embedded in dry and saturated sand[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 690-705.
[11] Lingyun YOU, Kezhen YAN, Jianhong MAN, Nengyuan LIU. Anisotropy of multi-layered structure with sliding and bonded interlayer conditions[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 632-645.
[12] Yu-Fei WU, Ying-Wu ZHOU, Biao HU, Xiaoxu HUANG, Scott SMITH. Fused structures for safer and more economical constructions[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 1-9.
[13] Nishant SHARMA, Kaustubh DASGUPTA, Arindam DEY. Optimum lateral extent of soil domain for dynamic SSI analysis of RC framed buildings on pile foundations[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 62-81.
[14] Yonghui WANG, Ximei ZHAI. Development of dimensionless P-I diagram for curved SCS sandwich shell subjected to uniformly distributed blast pressure[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 1432-1445.
[15] Tugrul TALASLIOGLU. Optimal dome design considering member-related design constraints[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1150-1170.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed