Cyclic behavior of prefabricated reinforced concrete frame with infill slit shear walls

doi:10.1007/s11709-015-0294-x

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.

2016, Vol. 10

Issue (1) : 63-71 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-015-0294-x

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Cyclic behavior of prefabricated reinforced concrete frame with infill slit shear walls

Kui XIAO(

),Qilin ZHANG,Bin JIA

Department of Building Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Download: PDF(3049 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

A composite structural system consisting of prefabricated reinforced concrete frame with infill slit shear walls (PRCFW), with good ductility, is a new type of earthquake resistant structure. Pseudo-static tests were performed to evaluate the seismic behavior of the PRCFW system. Two one-bay, two-story PRCFW specimens were both built at one-half scale. Additional computational research is also conducted to enhance the nonlinear analytical capabilities for this system. Combined with the concrete damaged plastic (CDP) model provided by finite element program ABAQUS and the constitutive model of concrete proposed by Chinese code, the damage process of the PRCFW structure under cyclic load is simulated. The simulated results show a good agreement with the test data, the dynamic behavior of the PRCFW system can be simulated sufficiently accurate and efficient to provide useful design information. The experimental and numerical study show that this system has the potential to offer good ductility and energy absorption capacity to dissipate input energy, and stiffness adequate for controlling drift for buildings located in earthquake-prone regions.

Keywords slit shear wall constitutive model cyclic seismic damage

Corresponding Author(s): Kui XIAO

Online First Date: 23 June 2015 Issue Date: 19 January 2016

Cite this article:

Kui XIAO,Qilin ZHANG,Bin JIA. Cyclic behavior of prefabricated reinforced concrete frame with infill slit shear walls[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(1): 63-71.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-015-0294-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2016/V10/I1/63

Tab.1 Material properties

Fig.1 Specimen dimension and test up

Fig.2 Shear connectors detail. (a) M1; (b) M2; (c) M3

Fig.3 Experimental hysterical curves of PRCFW specimens

Fig.4 Final failure and damage patterns of PRCFW specimens. (a) PRCFW-1; (b) PRCFW-2

Fig.5 Performance of local members. (a) Bottom beam end of PRCFW-1; (b) top beam end of PRCFW-2; (c) column foot of PRCFW-1; (d) middle joint of PRCFW-2

Fig.6 Experimental skeleton curve of PRCFW-1 and idealized model

Fig.7 Finite element model of PRCFW system

Fig.8 Yield surfaces in the deviatoric plane due to different values of K_c

Fig.9 Concrete material model under cyclic loading

Fig.10 Comparison between numerical and experimental resilience curves. (a) Hysteretic cycles; (b) skeleton curve

Fig.11 Damage process of the PRCFW system under cyclic loading. (a) 0.43%; (b) −0.43%; (c) 1.71%; (d) −1.71%; (e) 2.14%; (f) −2.14%

1	Oesterle R G, Aristizabal-Ochoa J D, Shiu K N, Corley W G. Web crushing of reinforced concrete structural walls. ACI Journal Proceedings, 1984, 81: 231–242
2	Pilakoutas K, Elnashai A. Cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete cantilever walls, part I–experimental results. ACI Structural Journal, 1995, 92: 271–281
3	Muto K, Ohmori N, Itoh T. Composite Building Structure and Walls therefore. USA Patent 3736712, 1973
4	Muto K. Structural dynamic design. Translated by Teng Jialu. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1984: 87–90
5	Liou Y W, Sheu S M. Prediction of lateral stiffness for fully slitted RC shear wall. J. of the Chinese Inst. of Eng., 1998, 21(2): 221–232
6	Tam V W Y, Tam C M, Zeng S X, Ng W C Y. Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(10): 3642–3654
7	(JGJ 99–1998) Technical specification for steel structure of tall buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1998 (in Chinese)
8	Tong X D, Hajjar J F, Schultz A E, Shield C K. Cyclic behavior of steel frame structures with composite reinforced concrete infill walls and partially-restrained connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2005, 61(1): 531–552
9	(JGJ 101–1996) Specification of testing methods for earthquake resistant building. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1997 (in Chinese)
10	Lee J, Fenves G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1998, 124(8): 892–900
11	(GB 50010–2010) Code for design of concrete structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010 (in Chinese)
12	Peng X, Gu Q, Lin C. Non-linear finite element simulation and strength analysis of composite steel frame reinforced concrete infill wall structure. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2009, 41(5): 631–636 (in Chinese)

[1]	Mohammad Reza AZADI KAKAVAND, Ertugrul TACIROGLU. An enhanced damage plasticity model for predicting the cyclic behavior of plain concrete under multiaxial loading conditions[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1531-1544.
[2]	Suman HAZARI, Sima GHOSH, Richi Prasad SHARMA. New pseudo-dynamic analysis of two-layered cohesive-friction soil slope and its numerical validation[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1492-1508.
[3]	Mahmood AHMAD, Xiao-Wei TANG, Jiang-Nan QIU, Feezan AHMAD, Wen-Jing GU. A step forward towards a comprehensive framework for assessing liquefaction land damage vulnerability: Exploration from historical data[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1476-1491.
[4]	Sadegh ETEDALI. Ranking of design scenarios of TMD for seismically excited structures using TOPSIS[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1372-1386.
[5]	Roham RAFIEE, Hossein RASHEDI, Shiva REZAEE. Theoretical study of failure in composite pressure vessels subjected to low-velocity impact and internal pressure[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1349-1358.
[6]	Bin LI, Xiaoying ZHUANG. Multiscale computation on feedforward neural network and recurrent neural network[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1285-1298.
[7]	Peng DENG, Boyi YANG, Xiulong CHEN, Yan LIU. Experimental and numerical investigations of the compressive behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer-strengthened tubular steel T-joints[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1215-1231.
[8]	Wei XIONG, Shan-Jun ZHANG, Li-Zhong JIANG, Yao-Zhuang LI. Parametric study on the Multangular-Pyramid Concave Friction System (MPCFS) for seismic isolation[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1152-1165.
[9]	Hamed FATHNEJAT, Behrouz AHMADI-NEDUSHAN. An efficient two-stage approach for structural damage detection using meta-heuristic algorithms and group method of data handling surrogate model[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 907-929.
[10]	Alireza ARABHA NAJAFABADI, Farhad DANESHJOO, Hamid Reza AHMADI. Multiple damage detection in complex bridges based on strain energy extracted from single point measurement[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 722-730.
[11]	Sanku KONAI, Aniruddha SENGUPTA, Kousik DEB. Seismic behavior of cantilever wall embedded in dry and saturated sand[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 690-705.
[12]	Tiago Miguel FERREIRA, João ESTÊVÃO, Rui MAIO, Romeu VICENTE. The use of Artificial Neural Networks to estimate seismic damage and derive vulnerability functions for traditional masonry[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 609-622.
[13]	Mahrad FAHIMINIA, Aydin SHISHEGARAN. Evaluation of a developed bypass viscous damper performance[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 773-791.
[14]	Yasmin MURAD, Wassel AL BODOUR, Ahmed ASHTEYAT. Seismic retrofitting of severely damaged RC connections made with recycled concrete using CFRP sheets[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 554-568.
[15]	Mohammad Abubakar NAVEED, Zulfiqar ALI, Abdul QADIR, Umar Naveed LATIF, Saad HAMID, Umar SARWAR. Geotechnical forensic investigation of a slope failure on silty clay soil—A case study[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 501-517.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed