Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2023, Vol. 17 Issue (6) : 964-979    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0978-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Numerically investigating the crushing of sandstone by a tooth hob
Dongning SUN1,2(), Baoning HONG1,2, Xin LIU1,3, Ke SHENG1,2, Guisen WANG1,2, Zhiwei SHAO1,2, Yunlong YAO1,2
1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
3. Institute of Tunnel and Underground Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
 Download: PDF(32206 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

To investigate the mechanical process that occurs between rocks and tooth hobs, the crushing of sandstone with a tooth hob was simulated using reconstructed multi-mineral mesoscopic numerical models of various grain-sized sandstone samples. When a piece of sandstone is crushed by the tooth of a hob rolling at a constant speed, the resultant reaction forces of the sandstone on the tooth first hinder and then contribute to the rolling of the hob. The absolute value of the longitudinal reaction force is significantly higher than that of the lateral reaction force. Because the tooth was subjected to reaction forces from the sandstone, forces and moments were applied to the hob in order to keep the hob rolling. The applied forces were equal in value and opposite in direction to the reaction forces of the sandstone on the tooth. Three typical curves of the work done by the applied forces and moment were obtained, and the contribution of the applied lateral force and moment to the total work done for crushing sandstones was variable; however, no work was done by the applied longitudinal force. Moreover, the applied longitudinal force and total work were positively correlated with the strength of sandstone samples. The total work, applied forces, and moment increased with the maximum penetration depth of the tooth in the sandstone.

Keywords sandstone      tooth hob      crushing process      reaction force      numerical simulation     
Corresponding Author(s): Dongning SUN   
About author:

* These authors contributed equally to this work.

Just Accepted Date: 01 March 2023   Online First Date: 27 July 2023    Issue Date: 30 August 2023
 Cite this article:   
Dongning SUN,Baoning HONG,Xin LIU, et al. Numerically investigating the crushing of sandstone by a tooth hob[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(6): 964-979.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-023-0978-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2023/V17/I6/964
classification of sandstonesampling depth (m)coloruniaxial compressive strength (MPa)
very coarse-grained40grayish-white100–120
coarse-grained65grayish-white110–140
medium-grained50grayish-white160–200
fine-grained45reddish-brown70–100
Tab.1  Basic information regarding the sandstone samples
Fig.1  Full images and detailed views of the (a) very coarse, (b) coarse-, (c) medium-, and (d) fine-grained sandstone samples.
Fig.2  (a) Histogram showing the grain-size distributions; (b) grain-size distribution curves of the samples (VC: very coarse-grained sandstone; C: coarse-grained sandstone; M: medium-grained sandstone; F: fine-grained sandstone).
Fig.3  Results of the mineral composition analysis test.
Fig.4  Stress?strain curves of the different grain-sized sandstone samples: (a) very coarse-grained sandstone samples; (b) coarse-grained sandstone samples; (c) medium-grained sandstone samples; and (d) fine-grained sandstone samples.
Fig.5  (a) Failure modes of sandstone samples; (b) locally zoomed images of cracks.
Fig.6  Results of the Brazilian splitting test.
Fig.7  Reconstruction of the numerical model: (a) initial model; (b) Voronoi cell (each color block is a Voronoi cell); (c) final model (disks of the same color are bonded into a mineral grain).
Fig.8  Numerical models of different grain-sized sandstone samples.
modelmineral typemeso parameter
emodkratiofricPb_emodPb_kratioPb_tenPb_cohPb_fa
VCquartz1.05E+101.002.02.25E+101.009.00E+071.76E+0810
feldspar8.40E+091.002.01.80E+101.007.20E+071.40E+0810
debris6.30E+091.002.01.35E+101.001.80E+073.51E+0710
Cquartz1.50E+102.101.52.80E+102.101.15E+082.24E+0815
feldspar1.20E+102.101.52.24E+102.109.20E+071.79E+0815
debris9.00E+092.101.51.68E+102.102.30E+074.49E+0715
Mquartz1.15E+102.401.53.80E+102.401.65E+083.22E+0878
feldspar9.20E+092.401.53.04E+102.401.32E+082.57E+0878
debris6.90E+092.401.52.28E+102.403.30E+076.44E+0778
Fquartz8.00E+091.452.02.05E+101.451.50E+082.93E+0879
feldspar6.40E+091.452.01.64E+101.451.20E+082.34E+0879
debris4.80E+091.452.01.23E+101.453.00E+075.85E+0779
Tab.2  Meso parameters of the contact between adjacent disks in the same grain
meso parametersvalue
emod0.4 × (x1 + x2)
kratio, fric, Pb_kratio, Pb_fa0.5 × (x1 + x2)
Pb_emod, Pb_ten, Pb_coh0.8 × min (x1, x2)
Tab.3  Calculation method for meso parameters of the contact between adjacent disks in two different grains
Fig.9  Comparison between the simulation results of the biaxial compression test and the experimental results of the triaxial compression tests: (a) very coarse-grained sandstone; (b) coarse-grained sandstone; (c) medium-grained sandstone; (d) fine-grained sandstone.
Fig.10  Simulation results of the Brazilian splitting tests.
Fig.11  Typical failure modes of the numerical models used in the (a) biaxial compression test and (b) Brazilian splitting test (each color block represents a fragment).
Fig.12  Illustration of the rock-crushing process: (a) dimensions of the tooth hob; (b) schematic diagram of the rock-crushing process by the tooth hob.
Fig.13  Numerical model of crushing sandstone using the tooth of a rolling hob.
Fig.14  Simulation results of the vertical penetration of hob in the coarse-grained sandstone model: rolling angle of the hob: (a) 0; (b) 0.5α; (c) 1.0α; (d) 1.5α; and (e) 2.0α (maximum penetration depth of the tooth into sandstone is 10 mm).
Fig.15  Force analysis of the hob in the rock-crushing process.
Fig.16  Lateral force varies with the variation in the rolling angle of the hob when the sandstone model and maximum penetration depth of the tooth in the sandstone are different: (a) maximum penetration depth of 3 mm; (b) maximum penetration depth of 5 mm; (c) maximum penetration depth of 10 mm; (d) maximum penetration depth of 15 mm.
Fig.17  Longitudinal force varies with variations in the rolling angle of the hob when the sandstone model and maximum penetration depth of the tooth in the sandstone are different: (a) maximum penetration depth of 3 mm; (b) maximum penetration depth of 5 mm; (c) maximum penetration depth of 10 mm; (d) maximum penetration depth of 15 mm.
Fig.18  Moment varies with the variation in the rolling angle of the hob when the sandstone model and maximum penetration depth of the tooth in the sandstone are different: (a) maximum penetration depth of 3 mm; (b) maximum penetration depth of 5 mm; (c) maximum penetration depth of 10 mm; (d) maximum penetration depth of 15 mm.
Fig.19  Work curves vary with variations in the rolling angle of the hob: (a) work curves when the medium-grained sandstone model is crushed by the hob (maximum penetration depth of 10 mm); (b) work curves when the coarse-grained sandstone model is crushed by the hob (maximum penetration depth of 3 mm); (c) work curves when the very coarse-grained sandstone model is crushed by the hob (maximum penetration depth of 5 mm) (work-FCx is the work done by lateral force, work-FCy is the work done by longitudinal force, work-MC is the work done by moment, and total work is the sum of all other works).
Fig.20  Work curves vary with the variations in the maximum penetration depth of the tooth into the sandstone.
1 K Thuro. Drillability prediction: Geological influences in hard rock drill and blast tunneling. Geologische Rundschau, 1997, 86(2): 426–438
https://doi.org/10.1007/s005310050151
2 S H Hoseinie, H Aghababaei, Y Pourrahimian. Development of a new classification system for assessing of rock mass drillability index (RDi). International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2008, 45(1): 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.04.001
3 M A Al-Dabbas, J A Al-Jassim, A I Qaradaghi. Diliciclastic deposit of the Nahr Umr formation, sedimentological and depositional environment studies, central and southern Iraq. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2013, 6(12): 4771–4783
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0747-7
4 M Yang, Y Meng, G Li, L Han, Y Li. Effect of grain size and grain content on the hardness and drillability of rocks. Sains Malaysiana, 2014, 43(1): 81–87
5 H Ma, Z Zhang, Y Fan, B Cao, Z Liu, G Feng. Directional fast drilling technology in Yanchang gas field with quartz sandstone geology. Applied Nanoscience, 2022, 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-021-02210-x
6 G Zhang, K Thuro, H Konietzky, F M Menschik, H Käsling, M Bayerl. In-situ investigation of drilling performance and bit wear on an electrical drill hammer. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 122: 104348
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104348
7 Y Han, X Li, Y Feng. A new approach to evaluate rock drillability of polycrystalline diamond compact bits using scratch test data. Energy Exploration & Exploitation., 2020, 38(4): 884–904
https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598719901091
8 G Wang, X Liu, B Hong, K Sheng, X Qian. Assessment of rock drillability by the method of analytic hierarchy process combined with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15(1): 1–14
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09270-x
9 Z Yue, S Chen, L Tham. Finite element modeling of geomaterials using digital image processing. Computers and Geotechnics, 2003, 30(5): 375–397
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(03)00015-6
10 Y Han, D Hu, L Matzar. Numerical computation of elastic properties for porous rocks based on CT-scanned images using direct mapping method. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2014, 122: 346–353
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.07.029
11 Y Lei. Reconstruction and analysis of tight sandstone digital rock combined with X-ray CT scanning and multiple-point geostatistics algorithm. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 2020: 9476060
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9476060
12 N You, Y Li, A Cheng. 3D carbonate digital rock reconstruction using progressive growing GAN. Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth, 2021, 126(5): 1–17
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB021687
13 J Yao, C Wang, Y Yang, R Hu, X Wang. The construction of carbonate digital rock with hybrid superposition method. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2013, 110: 263–267
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2013.10.005
14 D Cao, Z Hou, Q Liu, F Fu. Reconstruction of three-dimension digital rock guided by prior information with a combination of InfoGAN and style-based GAN. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2022, 208: 109590
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109590
15 N Saxena, J Dietderich, F O Alpak, A Hows, M Appel, J Freeman, R Hofmann, B Zhao. Estimating electrical cementation and saturation exponents using digital rock physics. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2021, 198: 108198
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108198
16 W Zhu, R Shan, A Nie, H R Peng. An efficiently dynamic stress strain simulation method on digital rock. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2017, 147: 10–15
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.10.008
17 L Che, X Gu, H Li. Numerical analysis and experimental research on hard rock fragmentation by high voltage pulse discharge. Minerals Engineering, 2021, 168: 106942
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106942
18 J Rojek, E Onate, C Labra, H Kargl. Discrete element simulation of rock cutting. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(6): 996–1010
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.06.003
19 M Xia, K Zhou. Particle simulation of the failure process of brittle rock under triaxial compression. International Journal of Minerals Metallurgy and Materials, 2010, 17(5): 507–513
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-010-0350-4
20 J A Vallejos, J M Salinas, A Delonca, D Mas Ivars. Calibration and verification of two bonded-particle models for simulation of intact rock behavior. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(4): 06016030
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000773
21 T Moon, J Oh. A study of optimal rock-cutting conditions for hard rock TBM using the discrete element method. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2011, 45(5): 837–849
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0180-3
22 R I Leine, A Schweizer, M Christen, J Glover, P Bartelt, W Gerber. Simulation of rockfall trajectories with consideration of rock shape. Multibody System Dynamics, 2014, 32(2): 241–271
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-013-9393-4
23 T Saksala, D Gomon, M Hokka, V T Kuokkala. Numerical and experimental study of percussive drilling with a triple-button bit on Kuru granite. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 72: 56–66
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.05.006
24 D J Kim, J Kim, B Lee, M S Shin, J Y Oh, J W Cho, C Song. Prediction model of drilling performance for percussive rock drilling tool. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 2020: 8865684
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8865684
25 C Zhang, Y Yang, Q Qi, H T Ren, J C Wang. Research on numerical drilling technology of mesh-like cutting PDC bit. Energy Reports, 2021, 7(5): 2068–2080
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.04.013
26 A Fakhimi, M Lanari. DEM–SPH simulation of rock blasting. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 55: 158–164
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.008
27 P L Menezes. Influence of cutter velocity, friction coefficient and rake angle on the formation of discontinuous rock fragments during rock cutting process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 90(9–12): 3811–3827
28 H Ren, X Zhuang, Y Cai, T Rabczuk. Dual-horizon peridynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016, 108(12): 1451–1476
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5257
29 H Ren, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. A higher order nonlocal operator method for solving partial differential equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 367: 113132
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112621
30 X Zhuang, H Ren, T Rabczuk. Nonlocal operator method for dynamic brittle fracture based on an explicit phase field model. European Journal of Mechanics. A, Solids, 2021, 90: 104380
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104380
31 J Zou, J Han, W Yang. Investigating the influences of indentation hardness and brittleness of rock-like material on its mechanical crushing behavior. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 2020(s2): 1–16
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4713532
32 D O Potyondy. A grain-based model for rock: Approaching the true microstructure. Proceedings of the Rock Mechanics in the Nordic Countries, 2010, 2010: 225–234
33 C Shi, W Yang, J Yang, X Chen. Calibration of micro-scaled mechanical parameters of granite based on a bonded-particle model with 2D particle flow code. Granular Matter, 2019, 21(2): 1–13
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-019-0889-3
[1] Wenchang SUN, Nan JIANG, Chuanbo ZHOU, Jinshan SUN, Tingyao WU. Safety assessment for buried drainage box culvert under influence of underground connected aisle blasting: A case study[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 191-204.
[2] Sahand KHALILZADEHTABRIZI, Hamed SADAGHIAN, Masood FARZAM. Uncertainty of concrete strength in shear and flexural behavior of beams using lattice modeling[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 306-325.
[3] Jiaxin HE, Shaohui HE, Xiabing LIU, Jinlei ZHENG. Structural design and mechanical responses of closely spaced super-span double tunnels in strongly weathered tuff strata[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 685-703.
[4] Huayang LEI, Yajie ZHANG, Yao HU, Yingnan LIU. Model test and discrete element method simulation of shield tunneling face stability in transparent clay[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 147-166.
[5] Qian-Qing ZHANG, Shan-Wei LIU, Ruo-Feng FENG, Jian-Gu QIAN, Chun-Yu CUI. Finite element prediction on the response of non-uniformly arranged pile groups considering progressive failure of pile-soil system[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 961-982.
[6] Yunlin LIU, Shitao ZHU. Finite element analysis on the seismic behavior of side joint of Prefabricated Cage System in prefabricated concrete frame[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1095-1104.
[7] Wentao WANG, Chongzhi TU, Rong LUO. Numerical simulation of compaction parameters for sand-filled embankment using large thickness sand filling technique in Jianghan Plain district[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 568-576.
[8] A. ARAB, Ma. R. BANAN, Mo. R. BANAN, S. FARHADI. Estimation of relations among hysteretic response measures and design parameters for RC rectangular shear walls[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 3-15.
[9] Abbas PARSAIE,Sadegh DEHDAR-BEHBAHANI,Amir Hamzeh HAGHIABI. Numerical modeling of cavitation on spillway’s flip bucket[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 438-444.
[10] Mostafa Shahrabi, Khosrow Bargi. Numerical simulation of multi-body floating piers to investigate pontoon stability[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2013, 7(3): 325-331.
[11] Jian WU, Guangqi CHEN, Lu ZHENG, Yingbin ZHANG. GIS-based numerical simulation of Amamioshima debris flow in Japan[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2013, 7(2): 206-214.
[12] Weixiao YANG, Jincheng XING, Jianxing LI, Jihong LING, Haixian HAO, Zhiqiang YAN. Impacts of opening baffle of city road tunnels on natural ventilation performance[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2013, 7(1): 55-61.
[13] Junjie ZHENG, Zongzhe LI, Dongan ZHAO, Qiang MA, Rongjun ZHANG, . Resistance of large caisson in floating transport considering the influence of air[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2010, 4(3): 331-338.
[14] Wenli CHEN, Hui LI, . Vortex-induced vibration of stay cable under profile velocity using CFD numerical simulation method[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2009, 3(4): 357-363.
[15] Xueyi YOU , Wei LIU , Houpeng XIAO , . Dynamics simulation of bottom high-sediment sea water movement under waves[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2009, 3(3): 312-315.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed