Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

Postal Subscription Code 80-972

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front. Energy    2019, Vol. 13 Issue (4) : 757-763    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-017-0455-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Large-scale geo-energy development: sustainability impacts
Li JIANG1(), Liandong ZHU2, Erkki HILTUNEN2
1. Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Vaasa Energy Institute, FI-65101 Vaasa, Finland
2. Vaasa Energy Institute, FI-65101 Vaasa, Finland
 Download: PDF(224 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Geothermal energy is a renewable and alternative energy with the potential to replace fossil fuels and help mitigate global warming. However, the development of geothermal energy has environmental, economic and social-cultural consequences, which needs to be predicted beforehand and then mitigated. To guarantee a sustainable development, it is, therefore, essential to consider the relative potential impacts. From a sustainability point of view, in the present study, a comprehensive analysis of consequences of geothermal energy development is conducted, including environmental, economic and societal & cultural dimensions. The geothermal energy industry will prosper only if sustainable aspects can be integrally considered.

Keywords geothermal energy      sustainability      impact      development     
Corresponding Author(s): Li JIANG   
Online First Date: 16 February 2017    Issue Date: 26 December 2019
 Cite this article:   
Li JIANG,Liandong ZHU,Erkki HILTUNEN. Large-scale geo-energy development: sustainability impacts[J]. Front. Energy, 2019, 13(4): 757-763.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-017-0455-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2019/V13/I4/757
Country Capacity in 2007/MW [8] Capacity in 2010/MW [9] Capacity in 2013/MW [7]
US 2687 3086 3389
Philippines 1970 1904 1884
Indonesia 992 1197 1333
Mexico 953 958 980
Italy 811 843 901
New Zealand 472 628 895
Iceland 421 575 664
Japan 535 536 537
Tab.1  Established geothermal market installed capacity in Megawatts
Fig.1  A framework for sustainability impact analysis of large-scale geothermal energy development
Environmental dimension Economic dimension Social & cultural dimension
– Cause soil erosion, geothermal hazards and direct or indirect land use changes;
– Damage groundwater, interrupt hydrologic cycles, and affect the water quality;
–Dust pollution and gaseous emissions from the discharge of non-condensable gases;
– Detrimental effects on local ecosystems, affecting the habitats
– Start-up phase is expensive, requiring overwhelming investments;
– The expense of storage and management of geothermal energy is also very high;
– Supporting facilities might be needed, creating additional costs
– Local people might suffer from the noise in the drilling and well-testing phase, the construction phase, and the plant operation phase;
– Landscape aesthetics might be damaged;
– It requires time for people to adapt and accept geo-energy
Tab.2  Potential sustainability impacts related to geothermal energy development
1 B M S Giambastiani, F Tinti, D Mendrinos, M Mastrocicco. Energy performance strategies for the large scale introduction of geothermal energy in residential and industrial buildings: The GEO. POWER project. Energy Policy, 2014, 65: 315–322
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.008
2 IEA. Policies for renewable heat: an integrated approach (IEAInsights series). 2012,
3 S J Self, B V Reddy, M A Rosen. Geothermal heat pump systems: status review and comparison with other heating options. Applied Energy, 2013, 101: 341–348
4 S Yoon, S R Lee, G H Go, S Park. An experimental and numerical approach to derive ground thermal conductivity in spiral coil type ground heat exchanger. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2015, 88(3): 229–240
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2014.10.002
5 A Bahadori , S Zendehboudi , G Zahedi . A review of geothermal energy resources in Australia: current status and prospects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21: 29–34
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.020
6 T Abbas, A Ahmed Bazmi, A Waheed Bhutto, G Zahedi. Greener energy: issues and challenges for Pakistan-geothermal energy prospective. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 31: 258–269
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.043
7 US Geothermal Energy Association. Geothermal power: international market overview. 2013–09,
8 R Bertani. Worldgeothermal generation in 2007. Geo-Heat Centre Quarterly Bulletin, 2007, 28(3): 8–19
9 A Holm, L Blodgett, D Jennejohn, K Gawell. Geothermal energy: international market update, Geothermal Energy Association. 2010–05-24,
10 R Bertani. Geothermal power generation in the world 2005–2010 update report. Geothermics, 2012, 41: 1–29
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2011.10.001
11 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 9
12 D Yang, V Sarhosis, Y Sheng. Thermal–mechanical modelling around the cavities of underground coal gasification. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2014, 87(4): 321–329
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2014.03.029
13 R Shortall, B Davidsdottir, G Axelsson. Geothermal energy for sustainable development: a review of sustainability impacts and assessment frameworks. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 44: 391–406
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.020
14 J Phillips. Evaluating the level and nature of sustainable development for a geothermal power plant. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(8): 2414–2425
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.05.009
15 A Akpınar, M İ Kömürcü, M Kankal, İ H Özölçer, K Kaygusuz. Energy situation and renewables in Turkey and environmental effects of energy use. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12(8): 2013–2039
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.04.011
16 L Zhu, T Ketola. Microalgae production as a biofuel feedstock: risks and challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2012, 19(3): 268–274
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.636083
17 K Kim, M H Koo, S H Moon, B W Yum, K S Lee. Hydrochemistry of groundwaters in a spa area of Korea: an implication for water quality degradation by intensive pumping. Hydrological Processes, 2005, 19(2): 493–505
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5551
18 W Gabriel. Assessment of geothermal wastewater disposal effects, case studies: Nesjavellir (Iceland) and Olkaria (Kenya) fields. Reykjavik, Iceland: UNU-GTP, University of Iceland, 2004
19 P Bayer, L Rybach, P Blum, R Brauchler. Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 26: 446–463
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.039
20 I B Fridleifsson. Geothermal energy for the benefit of the people. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2001, 5(3): 299–312
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00002-8
21 H Kristmannsdóttir, H Armannsson. Environmental aspects of geothermal energy utilization. Geothermics, 2003, 32(4-6): 451–461
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6505(03)00052-X
22 S M van Manen, R Reeves. An Assessment of changes in Kunzeaericoides var. microflora and other hydrothermal vegetation at the Wairakei–Tauhara geothermal field, New Zealand. Environmental Management, 2012, 50(4): 766–786
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9899-1
23 S Loppi, L Paoli, C Gaggi. Diversity of epiphytic lichens and Hg contents of Xanthoriaparietina Thalli as monitors of geothermal air pollution in the Mt. Amiata Area (Central Italy). Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2006, 53(2): 93–105
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-006-6648-y
24 J Chen, F Jiang. Designing multi-well layout for enhanced geothermal system to better exploit hot dry rock geothermal energy. Renewable Energy, 2015, 74: 37–48
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.056
25 K Baris, S Kucukali. Availibility of renewable energy sources in Turkey: current situation, potential, government policies and the EU perspective. Energy Policy, 2012, 42: 377–391
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.002
26 L Zhu, S Huo, L Qin. A microalgae-based biodiesel refinery: sustainability concerns and challenges. International Journal of Green Energy, 2015, 12(6): 595–602
https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2013.867406
27 Y Tanoto, M E Wijaya. Economic and environmental emissions analysis in Indonesian electricity expansion planning: low-rank coal and geothermal energy utilization scenarios. In: 2011 IEEE 1st Conference on Clean Energy and Technology (CET). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2011, 177–181
28 A Kagel, D Bates, K Gawell. A guide to geothermal energy and the environment. Geothermal Energy Association, 2007, 42–58
29 R Dipippo. Geothermal Power Plants: Principles, Applications, Case Studies and Environmental Impact. Oxford: Butterworth–Heinemann, 2012
30 K A Barrick. Geyser decline and extinction in New Zealand — energy development impacts and implications for environmental management. Environmental Management, 2007, 39(6): 783–805
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0195-1
31 G Bloomquist, J Lund, M Gehringer. Geothermal energy. In: Crawley G M. The World Scientific Handbook of Energy. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2013, 245–273
32 Eurobarometer. Public Awareness and acceptance of CO2 (specialEurobarometer364). 2011–05,
33 CSIRO. The Australian public’s preferences for energy sources and related technologies. 2012,
[1] Philip Kofi ADOM, Michael Owusu APPIAH, Mawunyo Prosper AGRADI. Does financial development lower energy intensity?[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(3): 620-634.
[2] Rabah BOUDINA, Jie WANG, Mohamed BENBOUZID, Farid KHOUCHA, Mohamed BOUDOUR. Impact evaluation of large scale integration of electric vehicles on power grid[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(2): 337-346.
[3] Xiaoqian SONG, Yong GENG, Ke LI, Xi ZHANG, Fei WU, Hengyu PAN, Yiqing ZHANG. Does environmental infrastructure investment contribute to emissions reduction? A case of China[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(1): 57-70.
[4] Weiliang WANG, Zheng LI, Junfu LYU, Hai ZHANG, Guangxi YUE, Weidou NI. An overview of the development history and technical progress of China’s coal-fired power industry[J]. Front. Energy, 2019, 13(3): 417-426.
[5] Junfu LYU, Hairui YANG, Wen LING, Li NIE, Guangxi YUE, Ruixin LI, Ying CHEN, Shilong WANG. Development of a supercritical and an ultra-supercritical circulating fluidized bed boiler[J]. Front. Energy, 2019, 13(1): 114-119.
[6] Suraj TALELE, Caleb TRAYLOR, Laura ARPAN, Cali CURLEY, Chien-Fei CHEN, Julia DAY, Richard FEIOCK, Mirsad HADZIKADIC, William J. TOLONE, Stan INGMAN, Dale YEATTS, Omer T. KARAGUZEL, Khee Poh LAM, Carol MENASSA, Svetlana PEVNITSKAYA, Thomas SPIEGELHALTER, Wei YAN, Yimin ZHU, Yong X. TAO. Energy modeling and data structure framework for Sustainable Human-Building Ecosystems (SHBE) — a review[J]. Front. Energy, 2018, 12(2): 314-332.
[7] Yujie DING,Jing LIU. Water film coated composite liquid metal marble and its fluidic impact dynamics phenomenon[J]. Front. Energy, 2016, 10(1): 29-36.
[8] Deepak SANGROYA,Jogendra NAYAK. Effectiveness of state incentives for promoting wind energy: A panel data examination[J]. Front. Energy, 2015, 9(3): 247-258.
[9] Zhihua CAI, Xunmin OU, Xu ZHANG, Xiliang ZHANG, Jiankun HE, Yangang XING. Comparative study of energy consumption and CO2 emissions between Beijing and London[J]. Front Energ, 2013, 7(1): 1-5.
[10] Lisa C. DIRKS, Gary W. DIRKS, Jianguo WU. Evolving perspectives on biofuels in the United States[J]. Front Energ, 2012, 6(4): 379-393.
[11] Jiangping CHEN, Yu ZHAO, Zhaogang QI. New developments in mobile air conditioning systems in China[J]. Front Energ, 2011, 5(1): 53-58.
[12] Xudong YANG, Yi JIANG, Ming YANG, Ming SHAN, . Energy and environment in Chinese rural housing: Current status and future perspective[J]. Front. Energy, 2010, 4(1): 35-46.
[13] Jiaping LIU, Rongrong HU, Liu YANG, Dalong LIU, Runshan WANG, . Energy efficiency of rural residential buildings: a sustainable case study in Daping Village, Sichuan Province[J]. Front. Energy, 2010, 4(1): 117-121.
[14] Zhimin HUANG , Jiansheng ZHANG , Guangxi YUE , . Status of domestic gasification technology in China[J]. Front. Energy, 2009, 3(3): 330-336.
[15] Xinggang LI, Qingzhi YAN, Rong MA, Haoqiang WANG, Changchun GE. Feasibility analysis of modified AL-6XN steel for structure component application in supercritical water-cooled reactor[J]. Front Energ Power Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 193-197.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed