Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Computer Science

ISSN 2095-2228

ISSN 2095-2236(Online)

CN 10-1014/TP

Postal Subscription Code 80-970

2018 Impact Factor: 1.129

Front. Comput. Sci.    2018, Vol. 12 Issue (6) : 1060-1075    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-018-6342-7
REVIEW ARTICLE
A survey of data-driven approach on multimedia QoE evaluation
Ruochen HUANG1, Xin WEI1,2, Liang ZHOU1,2(), Chaoping LV1, Hao MENG1, Jiefeng JIN1
1. School of Telecommunication and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
2. National Engineering Research Center of Communications and Networking, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
 Download: PDF(604 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

With the development of mobile communication technology and the growth of mobile device, the requirements for user quality of experience (QoE) become higher and higher. Network operators and content providers are interested in QoE evaluation for improving users’ QoE. However, multimedia QoE evaluation faces severe challenges due to the subjective properties of the QoE. In this paper, we provide a survey of the state of the art about applying data-driven approach on QoE evaluation. Firstly, we describe the way to choose factors influencing QoE. Then we investigate and discuss the strengths and shortcomings of existing machine learning algorithms for modeling and predicting users’ QoE. Finally, we describe our research work on how to evaluate QoE in imbalanced dataset.

Keywords quality of experience      data-driven      machine learning      imbalanced dataset     
Corresponding Author(s): Liang ZHOU   
Just Accepted Date: 28 May 2018   Online First Date: 04 September 2018    Issue Date: 04 December 2018
 Cite this article:   
Ruochen HUANG,Xin WEI,Liang ZHOU, et al. A survey of data-driven approach on multimedia QoE evaluation[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2018, 12(6): 1060-1075.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/EN/10.1007/s11704-018-6342-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/EN/Y2018/V12/I6/1060
1 Cisco V N I. Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2015–2020, White Paper, Document ID, 2016, 958959758
2 Index C U N. Cisco visual networking index: global mobile data traffic forecast2014–2019. Technical Report, 2015
3 ITU-T Recommendation P.10/G.100, Vocabulary for performance and quality of service. Amendment 2: New definitions for inclusion in Recommendation ITU-T P.10/G.100, Int. Telecomm. Union, Geneva 2008.
4 ETSI Technical Report 102 643 V1.0.2, Human Factors (HF); Quality of Experience (QoE) requirements for real-time communication services, 2010
5 Yamagishi K, Hayashi T. Parametric packet-layer model for monitoring video quality of IPTV services. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications. 2008, 110–114
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2008.29
6 Belmudez B, Möller S. Extension of the G.1070 video quality function for the MPEG2 video codec. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience. 2010, 7–10
https://doi.org/10.1109/QOMEX.2010.5518225
7 You F H, Zhang W, Xiao J. Packet loss pattern and parametric video quality model for IPTV. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science. 2009, 824–828
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIS.2009.24
8 Wang Z, Li L, Wang W, Wan Z, Fang Y, Cai C. A study on QoS/QoE correlation model in wireless-network. In: Proceedings of Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference. 2014, 1–6
https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPA.2014.7041760
9 Kim H J, Lee D H, Lee J M, Lee K H, Lyu W, Choi S G. The QoE evaluation method through the QoS-QoE correlation model. In: Proceedings of Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management. 2008, 719–725
https://doi.org/10.1109/NCM.2008.202
10 Paudyal P, Battisti F, Carli M. Impact of video content and transmission impairments on quality of experience. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2016, 75(23): 16461–16485
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3214-0
11 Kim J, Um T W, Ryu W, Lee B S, Hahn M. IPTV systems, standards and architectures: part ii-heterogeneous networks and terminalaware QoS/QoE-guaranteed mobile IPTV service. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2008, 46(5): 110–117
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2008.4557052
12 Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, Simoncelli E P. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600–612
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861
13 Khorsandroo S, Md Noor R, Khorsandroo S. A generic quantitative relationship to assess interdependency of QoE and QoS. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 2013, 7(2): 327–346
https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2013.02.009
14 Reichl P, Egger S, Schatz R, D'alconzo A. The logarithmic nature of QoE and the role of the weber-fechner law in QoE assessment. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications. 2010, 1–5
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2010.5501894
15 Reichl P, Tuffin B, Schatz R. Logarithmic laws in service quality perception: where microeconomics meets psychophysics and quality of experience. Telecommunication Systems, 2013, 52(2): 587–600
16 Hannuksela M M. Does context matter in quality evaluation of mobile television? In: Proceedings of International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 2008, 63–72
17 Kaikkonen A, Kekäläinen A, Cankar M, Kallio T, Kankainen A. Usability testing of mobile applications: a comparison between laboratory and field testing. Journal of Usability Studies, 2005, 1(1): 4–16
18 Kjeldskov J, Stage J. New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2004, 60(5–6): 599–620
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.11.001
19 Machajdik J, Hanbury A, Garz A, Sablatnig R. Affective computing for wearable diary and lifelogging systems: an overview. In: Proceedings of the Workshop of the Austrian Association for Pattern Recognition. 2011, 2447–2456
20 Hamm J, Stone B, Belkin M, Dennis S. Automatic annotation of daily activity from smartphone-based multisensory streams. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services. 2012, 328–342
21 Jalal A, Uddin M Z, Kim T S. Depth video-based human activity recognition system using translation and scaling invariant features for life logging at smart home. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2012, 58(3): 863–871
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2012.6311329
22 Kamal S, Jalal A. A hybrid feature extraction approach for human detection, tracking and activity recognition using depth sensors. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2016, 41(3): 1043–1051
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1955-8
23 Jalal A, Kamal S, Kim D. A depth video sensor-based life-logging human activity recognition system for elderly care in smart indoor environments. Sensors, 2014, 14(7): 11735–11759
https://doi.org/10.3390/s140711735
24 Jalal A, Sarif N, Kim J T, Kim T S. Human activity recognition via recognized body parts of human depth silhouettes for residents monitoring services at smart home. Indoor and Built Environment, 2013, 22(1): 271–279
https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X12469714
25 Farooq A, Jalal A, Kamal S. Dense RGB-D map-based human tracking and activity recognition using skin joints features and self-organizing map. Ksii Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 2015, 9(5): 1856–1869
26 Jalal A, Kim Y, Kim D. Ridge body parts features for human pose estimation and recognition from RGB-D video data. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies. 2014, 1–6
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2014.6963015
27 Jalal A, Kim J T, Kim T S. Development of a life logging system via depth imaging-based human activity recognition for smart homes. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sustainable Healthy Buildings. 2012, 91–104
28 Jalal A, Lee S, Kim J T, Kim T S. Human activity recognition via the features of labeled depth body parts. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics. 2012, 246–249
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30779-9_36
29 Barakovi′c S, Skorin-Kapov L. Survey and challenges of QoE management issues in wireless networks. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 2013: 1–28
30 He Z, Mao S, Jiang T. A survey of QoE-driven video streaming over cognitive radio networks. IEEE Network, 2015, 29(6): 20–25
https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2015.7340420
31 Tang W, Nguyen T D, Huh E N. A survey study on QoE perspective of mobile cloud computing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Applications. 2014, 1–4
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISA.2014.6847345
32 Mitra K, Zaslavsky A, hlund C. QoE modelling, measurement and prediction: a review. 2014, arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.6952
33 Seufert M, Egger S, Slanina M, Zinner T, Hossfeld T, Tran-Gia P. A survey on quality of experience of http adaptive streaming. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 2015, 17(1): 469–492
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2014.2360940
34 Alreshoodi M, Woods J. Survey on QoE\QoS correlation models for multimedia services. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 2013, 4(3): 53–72
https://doi.org/10.5121/ijdps.2013.4305
35 Yun L, Peng Z. An automatic hand gesture recognition system based on viola-jones method and SVMS. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering. 2009, 72–76
https://doi.org/10.1109/WCSE.2009.769
36 Kamal S, Jalal A, Kim D. Depth images-based human detection, tracking and activity recognition using spatiotemporal features and modified HMM. Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, 2016, 11(3): 1921–1926
https://doi.org/10.5370/JEET.2016.11.6.1857
37 Yamauchi K, Chen W, Wei D. 3D mobile phone applications in telemedicine-a survey. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. 2005, 956–960
38 Jalal A, Uddin I. Security architecture for third generation (3g) using gmhs cellular network. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Emerging Technologies. 2007, 74–79
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET.2007.4516319
39 Jalal A, Zeb M A. Security and QoS optimization for distributed real time environment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. 2007, 369–374
https://doi.org/10.1109/CIT.2007.124
40 Jalal A, Rasheed Y A. Collaboration achievement along with performance maintenance in video streaming. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Interactive Computer Aided Learning. 2007, 1–8
41 Jalal A, Zeb M A. Security enhancement for e-learning portal. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 2008, 8(3): 41–45
42 Jalal A, Kim S, Yun B. Assembled algorithm in the real-time H. 263 codec for advanced performance. In: Proceedings of the 7th InternationalWorkshop on Enterprise Networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry. 2005, 295–298
43 Jalal A, Kim S. Advanced performance achievement using multialgorithmic approach of video transcoder for low bit rate wireless communication. International Journal on Graphics, Vision and Image Processing, 2005, 5(9): 27–32
44 Jalal A, Sarif N, Kim J T, Kim T S. Human activity recognition via recognized body parts of human depth silhouettes for residents monitoring services at smart home. Indoor and Built Environment, 2013, 22(1): 271–279
https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X12469714
45 Jalal A, Kim S. A complexity removal in the floating point and rate control phenomenon. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Korea Multimedia Society. 2005, 48–51
46 Jalal A, Kim S. Global security using human face understanding under vision ubiquitous architecture system. Enformatika, 2011, 13: 7–11
47 Jalal A, Kim S. Algorithmic implementation and efficiency maintenance of real-time environment using low-bitrate wireless communication. In: Proceedings of IEEEWorkshop on Software Technologies for Future Embedded and Ubiquitous Systems, and the 2nd International Workshop on Collaborative Computing, Integration, and Assurance. 2006, 81–88
48 Zhou L. QoE-driven delay announcement for cloud mobile media. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2017, 27(1): 84–94
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2016.2539698
49 Zhou L. On data-driven delay estimation for media cloud. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2016, 18(5): 905–915
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2016.2537782
50 Chen Y, Wu K, Zhang Q. From QoS to QoE: a tutorial on video quality assessment. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 2015, 17(2): 1126–1165
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2014.2363139
51 Barakovi′c S, Barakovi′c J, Bajri′c H. QoE dimensions and QoE measurement of NGN services. In: Proceedings of the 18th Telecommunications Forum. 2010, 15–18
52 Skorin-Kapov L, Varela M. A multi-dimensional view of QoE: the arcu model. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Convention. 2012, 662–666
53 Gill P, Arlitt M, Li Z, Mahanti A. Youtube traffic characterization: a view from the edge. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement. 2007, 15–28
https://doi.org/10.1145/1298306.1298310
54 Brunnström K, Beker S A, De Moor K, Dooms A, Egger S, Garcia M N, Hossfeld T, Jumisko-Pyykkö S, Keimel C, Larabi M C. Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience. In: Proceedings of Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience Output from the 5th Qualinet Meeting. 2013
55 Piyathilaka L, Kodagoda S. Gaussian mixture based hmm for human daily activity recognition using 3D skeleton features. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. 2013, 567–572
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2013.6566433
56 Jalal A, Kamal S, Kim D. Depth map-based human activity tracking and recognition using body joints features and self-organized map. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies. 2014, 1–6
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2014.6963013
57 Jalal A, Kim Y. Dense depth maps-based human pose tracking and recognition in dynamic scenes using ridge data. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance. 2014, 119–124
https://doi.org/10.1109/AVSS.2014.6918654
58 Jalal A, Kim J T, Kim T S. Human activity recognition using the labeled depth body parts information of depth silhouettes. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Sustainable Healthy Buildings. 2012, 1–8
59 Arlot S, Celisse A. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys, 2010, 4: 40–79
https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS054
60 Kim J H. Estimating classification error rate: repeated crossvalidation, repeated hold-out and bootstrap. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 2009, 53(11): 3735–3745
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.04.009
61 Dobrian F, Awan A, Zhan J, Zhang H. Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement. ACM SIGCOMMComputer Communication Review, 2011, 41(4): 362–373
https://doi.org/10.1145/2043164.2018478
62 Balachandran A, Sekar V, Akella A, Seshan S, Stoica I, Zhang H. Developing a predictive model of quality of experience for internet video. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2013, 43(4): 339–350
https://doi.org/10.1145/2534169.2486025
63 Zhang Y, Yue T, Wang H, Wei A. Predicting the quality of experience for internet video with fuzzy decision tree. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. 2014, 1181–1187
https://doi.org/10.1109/CSE.2014.230
64 Menkovski V, Exarchakos G, Liotta A. Online QoE prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience. 2010, 118–123
https://doi.org/10.1109/QOMEX.2010.5517692
65 Menkovski V, Exarchakos G, Liotta A. Online learning for quality of experience management. In: Proceedings of the Annual Machine Learning Conference of Belgium and The Netherlands. 2010
66 Zheng K, Zhang X, Zheng Q, Xiang W. Quality-of-experience assessment and its application to video services in LTE networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2015, 22(1): 70–78
https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2015.7054721
67 Paudel I, Pokhrel J, Wehbi B, Cavalli A, Jouaber B. Estimation of video QoE from mac parameters in wireless network: a random neural network approach. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies. 2015, 51–55
68 Kapa M, Happe L, Jakab F. Prediction of quality of user experience for video streaming over IP networks. Cyber Journals, 2012: 22–35
69 Mushtaq M S, Augustin B, Mellouk A. Empirical study based on machine learning approach to assess the QoS/QoE correlation. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Networks and Optical Communications. 2012, 1–7
https://doi.org/10.1109/NOC.2012.6249939
70 Chen H, Yu X, Xie L. End-to-end quality adaptation scheme based on QoE prediction for video streaming service in lte networks. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks. 2013, 627–633
71 Qian L, Chen H, Xie L. SVM-based QoE estimation model for video streaming service over wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing. 2015, 1–6
https://doi.org/10.1109/WCSP.2015.7341066
72 Kang Y, Chen H, Xie L. An artificial-neural-network-based QoE estimation model for video streaming over wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications in China. 2013, 264–269
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCChina.2013.6671126
73 De Pessemier T, De Moor K, Joseph W, De Marez L, Martens L. Quantifying the influence of rebuffering interruptions on the user’s quality of experience during mobile video watching. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 2013, 59(1): 47–61
https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2012.2220231
74 Aguiar E, Riker A, Cerqueira E, Abelém A, Mu M, Braun T, Curado M, Zeadally S. A real-time video quality estimator for emerging wireless multimedia systems. Wireless Networks, 2014, 20(7): 1759–1776
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0709-y
75 Chen Y, Chen Q, Zhang F, Zhang Q, Wu K, Huang R, Zhou L. Understanding viewer engagement of video service in wi-fi network. Computer Networks, 2015, 91: 101–116
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.08.006
76 Krishnan S S, Sitaraman R K. Video stream quality impacts viewer behavior: inferring causality using quasi-experimental designs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2013, 21(6): 2001–2014
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2013.2281542
77 Hsu C W, Lin C J. A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2002, 13(2): 415–425
https://doi.org/10.1109/72.991427
78 Wang B, Zou D, Ding R. Support vector regression based video quality prediction. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Multimedia. 2011, 476–481
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM.2011.84
79 Andrews R, Diederich J, Tickle A B. Survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks. Knowledge-based Systems, 1995, 8(6): 373–389
https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(96)81920-4
80 Marchette D J. Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Technometrics, 2008, 45(2): 178–179
https://doi.org/10.1198/tech.2003.s141
81 Mitra K, Zaslavsky A, Hlund C. Dynamic bayesian networks for sequential quality of experience modelling and measurement. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Smart Spaces and Next Generation Wired/wireless Networking. 2011, 135–146
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22875-9_12
82 Mian A U, Hu Z, Tian H. Estimation of in-service quality of experience for peer-to-peer live video streaming systems using a usercentric and context-aware approach based on bayesian networks. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 2013, 24(3): 280–287
https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.2641
83 Rabiner L R. A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Readings in Speech Recognition, 1990, 77(2): 267–296
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-051584-7.50027-9
84 Jalal A, Kim Y, Kamal S, Farooq A, Kim D. Human daily activity recognition with joints plus body features representation using kinect sensor. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics, Electronics and Vision. 2015, 1–6
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEV.2015.7334030
85 Jala l A, Kamal S, Kim D. Human depth sensors-based activity recognition using spatiotemporal features and hidden markov model for smart environments. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 2016: 1–11
86 Jalal A, Kamal S, Kim D. Individual detection-tracking-recognition using depth activity images. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence. 2015, 450–455
https://doi.org/10.1109/URAI.2015.7358903
87 Jalal A, Kamal S. Real-time life logging via a depth silhouette-based human activity recognition system for smart home services. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance. 2014, 74–80
https://doi.org/10.1109/AVSS.2014.6918647
88 Jalal A, Kim Y H, Kim Y J, Kamal S, Kim D. Robust human activity recognition from depth video using spatiotemporal multi-fused features. Pattern Recognition, 2016, 61: 295–308
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2016.08.003
89 Jalal A, Kamal S, Kim D. Shape and motion features approach for activity tracking and recognition from kinect video camera. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information networking and Applications Workshops. 2015, 445–450
https://doi.org/10.1109/WAINA.2015.38
90 Min C, Hao Y, Mao S, Di W, Yuan Z. User intent-oriented video QoE with emotion detection networking. In: Proceedings of Global Communications Conference. 2017, 1–6
91 Sun Y, Yin X, Wang N, Jiang J, Sekar V, Jin Y, Sinopoli B. Analyzing TCP throughput stability and predictability with implications for adaptive video streaming. 2015, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1506.05541
92 Mitra K, Hlund C, Zaslavsky A. QoE estimation and prediction using hidden markov models in heterogeneous access networks. In: Proceedings of Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference. 2012, 1–5
https://doi.org/10.1109/ATNAC.2012.6398083
93 Hoßfeld T, Biedermann S, Schatz R, Platzer A, Egger S, Fiedler M. The memory effect and its implications on web QoE modeling. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Teletraffic Congress. 2011, 103–110
94 Tasaka S. A bayesian hierarchical model of QoE in interactive audiovisual communications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications. 2015, 6983–6989
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2015.7249439
95 Charonyktakis P, Plakia M, Tsamardinos I, Papadopouli M. On usercentric modular QoE prediction for voip based on machine-learning algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2016, 15(6): 1443–1456
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2015.2461216
96 Venkataraman M, Chatterjee M, Chattopadhyay S. Evaluating quality of experience for streaming video in real time. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. 2009, 1–6
https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2009.5425806
97 Zhou Z H. When semi-supervised learning meets ensemble learning. Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China, 2011, 6(1): 6–16
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-011-0126-2
98 He H, Garcia E A. Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2009, 21(9): 1263–1284
https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008.239
99 Kubat M, Holte R C, Matwin S. Machine learning for the detection of oil spills in satellite radar images. Machine Learning, 1998, 30(2-3): 195–215
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007452223027
100 He H, Shen X. A ranked subspace learning method for gene expression data classification. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2007, 358–364
101 Chawla N V, Bowyer K W, Hall L O, Kegelmeyer W P. Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2002, 16: 321–357
https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953
102 López V, Fernández A, García S, Palade V, Herrera F. An insight into classification with imbalanced data: empirical results and current trends on using data intrinsic characteristics. Information Sciences, 2013, 250: 113–141
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.007
103 Ramyachitra D, Manikandan P. Imbalanced dataset classification and solutions: a review. International Journal of Computing and Business Research, 2014, 5(4): 1–29
104 Wang L, Jin J, Huang R, Wei X, Chen J. Unbiased decision tree model for user’s QoE in imbalanced dataset. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Computing Research and Innovations. 2016, 114–119
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCRI.2016.25
105 Huang R, Wei X, Lv C, L i X, Zhang S. Prediction model for user’s QoE in imbalanced dataset. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Intelligence Theory, Systems and Applications. 2015, 41–45
https://doi.org/10.1109/CCITSA.2015.33
106 Liu R, Huang R, Qian Y, Wei X, Lu P. Improving user’s quality of experience in imbalanced dataset. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference. 2016, 644–649
https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2016.7577132
[1] Xia-an BI, Yiming XIE, Hao WU, Luyun XU. Identification of differential brain regions in MCI progression via clustering-evolutionary weighted SVM ensemble algorithm[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2021, 15(6): 156903-.
[2] Yan-Ping SUN, Min-Ling ZHANG. Compositional metric learning for multi-label classification[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2021, 15(5): 155320-.
[3] Jian SUN, Pu-Feng DU. Predicting protein subchloroplast locations: the 10th anniversary[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2021, 15(2): 152901-.
[4] Syed Farooq ALI, Muhammad Aamir KHAN, Ahmed Sohail ASLAM. Fingerprint matching, spoof and liveness detection: classification and literature review[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2021, 15(1): 151310-.
[5] Xu-Ying LIU, Sheng-Tao WANG, Min-Ling ZHANG. Transfer synthetic over-sampling for class-imbalance learning with limited minority class data[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2019, 13(5): 996-1009.
[6] Yu-Feng LI, De-Ming LIANG. Safe semi-supervised learning: a brief introduction[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2019, 13(4): 669-676.
[7] Wenhao ZHENG, Hongyu ZHOU, Ming LI, Jianxin WU. CodeAttention: translating source code to comments by exploiting the code constructs[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2019, 13(3): 565-578.
[8] Hao SHAO. Query by diverse committee in transfer active learning[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2019, 13(2): 280-291.
[9] Qingying SUN, Zhongqing WANG, Shoushan LI, Qiaoming ZHU, Guodong ZHOU. Stance detection via sentiment information and neural network model[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2019, 13(1): 127-138.
[10] Qiang LV, Yixin CHEN, Zhaorong LI, Zhicheng CUI, Ling CHEN, Xing ZHANG, Haihua SHEN. Achieving data-driven actionability by combining learning and planning[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2018, 12(5): 939-949.
[11] Ashish Kumar DWIVEDI, Anand TIRKEY, Santanu Kumar RATH. Software design pattern mining using classification-based techniques[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2018, 12(5): 908-922.
[12] Bo SUN, Haiyan CHEN, Jiandong WANG, Hua XIE. Evolutionary under-sampling based bagging ensemble method for imbalanced data classification[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2018, 12(2): 331-350.
[13] Min-Ling ZHANG, Yu-Kun LI, Xu-Ying LIU, Xin GENG. Binary relevance for multi-label learning: an overview[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2018, 12(2): 191-202.
[14] Zhongqing WANG, Shoushan LI, Guodong ZHOU. Personal summarization from profile networks[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2017, 11(6): 1085-1097.
[15] Qiang LU,Zhicheng CUI,Yixin CHEN,Xiaoping CHEN. Extracting optimal actionable plans from additive tree models[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2017, 11(1): 160-173.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed