doi:10.1007/s11705-017-1621-7

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

2017, Vol. 11

Issue (1): 107-116 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-017-1621-7

本期目录

Construction, characterization and application of a genome-wide promoter library in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Ting Yuan¹,Yakun Guo¹,Junkai Dong¹,Tianyi Li¹,Tong Zhou¹,Kaiwen Sun¹,Mei Zhang²,Qingyu Wu¹,Zhen Xie³,Yizhi Cai⁴,Limin Cao²,Junbiao Dai¹(

)

¹. MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
². College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
³. MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics Division, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, TNLIST/Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
⁴. School of Biological Sciences, The King’s Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, UK

全文: PDF(451 KB) HTML

文章导读

摘要:

关键词 ：

Abstract：

Promoters are critical elements to control gene expression but could behave differently under various growth conditions. Here we report the construction of a genome-wide promoter library, in which each native promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was cloned upstream of a yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) reporter gene. Nine libraries were arbitrarily defined and assembled in bacteria. The resulting pools of promoters could be prepared and transformed into a yeast strain either as centromeric plasmids or integrated into a genomic locus upon enzymatic treatment. Using fluorescence activated cell sorting, we classified the yeast strains based on YFP fluorescence intensity and arbitrarily divided the entire library into 12 bins, representing weak to strong promoters. Several strong promoters were identified from the most active bins and their activities were assayed under different growth conditions. Finally, these promoters were applied to drive the expression of genes in xylose utilization to improve fermentation efficiency. Together, this library could provide a quick solution to identify and utilize desired promoters under user-defined growth conditions.

Key words： synthetic biology yeast promoter activity metabolic engineering xylose utilization

收稿日期: 2016-08-18 出版日期: 2017-03-17

PACS:

基金资助:

Corresponding Author(s): Junbiao Dai

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 107-116.
Ting Yuan, Yakun Guo, Junkai Dong, Tianyi Li, Tong Zhou, Kaiwen Sun, Mei Zhang, Qingyu Wu, Zhen Xie, Yizhi Cai, Limin Cao, Junbiao Dai. Construction, characterization and application of a genome-wide promoter library in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 107-116.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/10.1007/s11705-017-1621-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/Y2017/V11/I1/107

Tab.1

Fig.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.3

Fig.4

1	Lee M E, Aswani A, Han A S, Tomlin C J, Dueber J E. Expression-level optimization of a multi-enzyme pathway in the absence of a high-throughput assay. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 41(22): 10668–10678 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt809
2	Paddon C J, Westfall P J, Pitera D J, Benjamin K, Fisher K, McPhee D, Leavell M D, Tai A, Main A, Eng D, High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature, 2013, 496(7446): 528–532 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12051
3	Smanski M J, Bhatia S, Zhao D, Park Y, Woodruff L B A, Giannoukos G, Ciulla D, Busby M, Calderon J, Nicol R, Functional optimization of gene clusters by combinatorial design and assembly. Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32(12): 1241–1249 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3063
4	Gibson D G, Young L, Chuang R Y, Venter J C, Hutchison C A III, Smith H O. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nature Methods, 2009, 6(5): 343–345 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1318
5	Engler C, Kandzia R, Marillonnet S. A one pot, one step, precision cloning method with high throughput capability. PLoS One, 2008, 3(11): e3647 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003647
6	Casini A, MacDonald J T, De Jonghe J, Christodoulou G, Freemont P S, Baldwin G S, Ellis T. One-pot DNA construction for synthetic biology: The modular overlap-directed assembly with linkers (MODAL) strategy. Nucleic Acids Research, 2014, 42(1): e7 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt915
7	Guo Y, Dong J, Zhou T, Auxillos J, Li T, Zhang W, Wang L, Shen Y, Luo Y, Zheng Y, YeastFab: the design and construction of standard biological parts for metabolic engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, 43(13): e88 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv464
8	Lam F H, Ghaderi A, Fink G R, Stephanopoulos G. Biofuels. Engineering alcohol tolerance in yeast. Science, 2014, 346(6205): 71–75 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257859
9	Diao L, Liu Y, Qian F, Yang J, Jiang Y, Yang S. Construction of fast xylose-fermenting yeast based on industrial ethanol-producing diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae by rational design and adaptive evolution. BMC Biotechnology, 2013, 13(1): 110–118 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-13-110
10	Caspeta L, Castillo T, Nielsen J. Modifying yeast tolerance to inhibitory conditions of ethanol production processes. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2015, 3: 184–198 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00184
11	Demeke M M, Dietz H, Li Y, Foulquie-Moreno M R, Mutturi S, Deprez S, Den Abt T, Bonini B M, Liden G, Dumortier F, Development of a D-xylose fermenting and inhibitor tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with high performance in lignocellulose hydrolysates using metabolic and evolutionary engineering. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2013, 6(1): 89–112 https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-89
12	Zhang M M, Zhao X Q, Cheng C, Bai F W. Improved growth and ethanol fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid by overexpression of SET5 and PPR1. Biotechnology Journal, 2015, 10(12): 1903–1911 https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500508
13	Cao L, Tang X, Zhang X, Zhang J, Tian X, Wang J, Xiong M, Xiao W. Two-stage transcriptional reprogramming in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for optimizing ethanol production from xylose. Metabolic Engineering, 2014, 24: 150–159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2014.05.001
14	Smolke C D. Building outside of the box: iGEM and the biobricks foundation. Nature Biotechnology, 2009, 27(12): 1099–1102 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1209-1099
15	Zucca S, Pasotti L, Politi N, Cusella De Angelis M G, Magni P. A standard vector for the chromosomal integration and characterization of biobrick parts in Escherichia coli. Journal of Biological Engineering, 2013, 7(1): 12–24 https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-7-12
16	Sharon E, Kalma Y, Sharp A, Raveh-Sadka T, Levo M, Zeevi D, Keren L, Yakhini Z, Weinberger A, Segal E. Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters. Nature Biotechnology, 2012, 30(6): 521–530 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2205
17	Solis-Escalante D, Kuijpers N G, van der Linden F H, Pronk J T, Daran J M, Daran-Lapujade P. Efficient simultaneous excision of multiple selectable marker cassettes using I-SceI-induced double-strand DNA breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Research, 2014, 14(5): 741–754 https://doi.org/10.1111/1567-1364.12162
18	Plessis A, Perrin A, Haber J E, Dujon B. Site-specific recombination determined by I-SceI, a mitochondrial group I intron-encoded endonuclease expressed in the yeast nucleus. Genetics, 1992, 130(3): 451–460
19	Alper H, Fischer C, Nevoigt E, Stephanopoulos G. Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(36): 12678–12683 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504604102
20	Keren L, Zackay O, Lotan-Pompan M, Barenholz U, Dekel E, Sasson V, Aidelberg G, Bren A, Zeevi D, Weinberger A, Promoters maintain their relative activity levels under different growth conditions. Molecular Systems Biology, 2013, 9(1): 701–717 https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2013.59
21	Ho N W, Chen Z, Brainard A P, Sedlak M. Successful design and development of genetically engineered saccharomyces yeasts for effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose from cellulosic biomass to fuel ethanol. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, 1999, 65: 163–192 https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49194-5_7
22	Ha S J, Galazka J M, Kim S R, Choi J H, Yang X, Seo J H, Glass N L, Cate J H, Jin Y S. Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of simultaneous cellobiose and xylose fermentation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(2): 504–509 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010456108
23	Wei N, Oh E J, Million G, Cate J H, Jin Y S. Simultaneous utilization of cellobiose, xylose, and Acetic acid from lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production by an engineered yeast platform. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2015, 4(6): 707–713 https://doi.org/10.1021/sb500364q
24	Alper H, Fischer C, Nevoigt E, Stephanopoulos G. Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(36): 12678–12683 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504604102
25	Curran K A, Crook N C, Karim A S, Gupta A, Wagman A M, Alper H S. Design of synthetic yeast promoters via tuning of nucleosome architecture. Nature Communications, 2014, 5: 4002–4021 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5002
26	Redden H, Alper H S. The development and characterization of synthetic minimal yeast promoters. Nature Communications, 2015, 6: 7810–7818 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8810
27	Rajkumar A S, Liu G, Bergenholm D, Arsovska D, Kristensen M, Nielsen J, Jensen M K, Keasling J D. Engineering of synthetic, stress-responsive yeast promoters. Nucleic Acids Research, 2016, 44(17): e136 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw553
28	Kuyper M, Hartog M M, Toirkens M J, Almering M J, Winkler A A, van Dijken J P, Pronk J T. Metabolic engineering of a xylose-isomerase-expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for rapid anaerobic xylose fermentation. FEMS Yeast Research, 2005, 5(4-5): 399–409 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.09.010
29	van Maris A J, Winkler A A, Kuyper M, de Laat W T, van Dijken J P, Pronk J T. Development of efficient xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Xylose isomerase as a key component. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, 2007, 108: 179–204 https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2007_057
30	Zhou H, Cheng J S, Wang B L, Fink G R, Stephanopoulos G. Xylose isomerase overexpression along with engineering of the pentose phosphate pathway and evolutionary engineering enable rapid xylose utilization and ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metabolic Engineering, 2012, 14(6): 611–622 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.07.011

[1]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 139-142.
[2]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 133-138.
[3]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 89-99.
[4]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 15-26.
[5]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 542-551.
[6]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 480-489.
[7]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 441-458.
[8]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 396-404.
[9]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 432-439.
[10]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 425-431.
[11]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 417-424.
[12]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 405-416.
[13]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 348-359.
[14]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 301-347.
[15]	. [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(1): 16-38.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed