Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (2) : 399-409    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1934-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Pressure drop analysis on the positive half-cell of a cerium redox flow battery using computational fluid dynamics: mathematical and modelling aspects of porous media
Fernando F. Rivera1,2(), Berenice Miranda-Alcántara2, Germán Orozco2, Carlos Ponce de León3, Luis F. Arenas3()
1. National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT), Mexico City 03940, Mexico
2. Center of Research and Technological Development in Electrochemistry (CIDETEQ), Querétaro 76703, Mexico
3. Electrochemical Engineering Laboratory, Energy Technology Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
 Download: PDF(2167 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Description of electrolyte fluid dynamics in the electrode compartments by mathematical models can be a powerful tool in the development of redox flow batteries (RFBs) and other electrochemical reactors. In order to determine their predictive capability, turbulent Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and free flow plus porous media (Brinkman) models were applied to compute local fluid velocities taking place in a rectangular channel electrochemical flow cell used as the positive half-cell of a cerium-based RFB for laboratory studies. Two different platinized titanium electrodes were considered, a plate plus a turbulence promoter and an expanded metal mesh. Calculated pressure drop was validated against experimental data obtained with typical cerium electrolytes. It was found that the pressure drop values were better described by the RANS approach, whereas the validity of Brinkman equations was strongly dependent on porosity and permeability values of the porous media.

Keywords CFD simulation      porous media      porous electrode      pressure drop      redox flow battery     
Corresponding Author(s): Fernando F. Rivera,Luis F. Arenas   
Just Accepted Date: 21 April 2020   Online First Date: 30 June 2020    Issue Date: 10 March 2021
 Cite this article:   
Fernando F. Rivera,Berenice Miranda-Alcántara,Germán Orozco, et al. Pressure drop analysis on the positive half-cell of a cerium redox flow battery using computational fluid dynamics: mathematical and modelling aspects of porous media[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 399-409.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-020-1934-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2021/V15/I2/399
Fig.1  Electrodes and flow system for hydrodynamic studies. (a) Planar electrode+ TP, which comprises a stack of three pieces of polypropylene mesh. The circular insert depicts part of one TP next to the planar electrode. (b) Expanded metal mesh electrode consisting of a welded stack of three pieces of mesh. In these images, the general direction of fluid flow is from left to right. (c) A computer-assisted design (CAD) cut view of the 23 cm high flow cell employed for pressure drop measurements. (d) Experimental arrangement of the flow circuit used for the same studies.
Fig.2  3D CAD subdomains for the half-cell flow channels considered in the simulations. For the RANS approach: (a) Plate+ TP electrode and (c) mesh electrode. The geometry of the electrode structure interacts directly with the fluid flow. For the free flow-Brinkman approach: (b) Plate+ TP electrode and (d) mesh electrode. A uniform subdomain represents the macroscopic characteristics of the porous media. In this perspective, the proton exchange membrane and negative half-cell would be placed adjacent and on top of the visible electrode channel, while the current collector would be placed below it.
Property Value Ref.
Density, r/(kg·m−3) 1370 [15]
Kinematic viscosity, v/(m2·s−1) 0.039 [15]
Porosity of TP, ξ/dimensionless 0.78 [16]
Porosity of expanded mesh, ξ/dimensionless 0.71 [16]
Permeability of TP, K/m2 3.9 × 10−9 [16]
Permeability of expanded mesh, K/m2 7.1 × 10−9 [16]
Tab.1  Electrolyte and electrode structure properties used in the numerical simulation considering a 0.1 mol·dm3 Ce(IV) ions and 0.7 mol·dm3 Ce(III) ions solution at 25°C
Fig.3  Grid independence analysis showing mesh refinement at the corners. (a) 3D computational subdomains consisting of approximately 250000, 600000 and 1300000 elements (also called “coarse”, “normal” and “fine” mesh, respectively); (b) Plot of calculated velocity magnitude as a function of the number of grid elements at the exit manifold of the flow cell.
Fig.4  Electrolyte flow through the channel containing the plate+ TP electrode for a mean linear velocity of 0.1 m·s1: (a) Electrolyte velocity fields calculated using the RANS approach, (b) electrolyte velocity fields calculated using the Brinkman approach, (c) typical flow line diagram generated using the RANS approach (d) typical flow line diagram generated using the Brinkman approach. The colour scale is valid for the velocity fields and not for the line diagrams.
Fig.5  Electrolyte flow through the channel containing the expanded mesh electrode for a mean linear velocity of 0.08 m·s1: (a) Electrolyte velocity fields calculated using the RANS approach, (b) electrolyte velocity fields calculated using the Brinkman approach, (c) typical flow line diagram generated using the RANS approach, (d) typical flow line diagram generated using the Brinkman approach. The colour scale is valid for the velocity fields and not for the line diagrams.
Fig.6  Electrolyte velocity profiles as a function of x-coordinate (width) for the mesh electrode at different inlet velocities at its middle section, y-coordinate (length) = 0.03 m: (a) Calculated by RANS equations, where fluid flow interacts with the electrode structure, (b) calculated by Brinkman equations, where the electrode subdomain is considered to have a homogeneous porous behaviour. Values of x with no data corresponding to the void velocity subdomain where the mesh electrode is present.
Fig.7  Electrolyte velocity profiles as a function of x-coordinate (width) for the mesh electrode at different inlet velocities at its middle section, y-coordinate (length) = 0.03 m: (a) Calculated by RANS equations, where fluid flow interacts with the electrode structure, (b) calculated by Brinkman equations, where the electrode subdomain is considered to have a homogeneous porous behaviour. Values of x with no data corresponding to the void velocity subdomain where the mesh electrode is present.
Fig.8  RANS-simulated pressure drop contour plots across the flow channels containing the electrodes of interest for a mean linear velocity of 0.08 m·s1: (a) Plate+ TP electrode, (b) expanded mesh electrode.
Fig.9  Comparison between experimental and RANS-simulated pressure drop vs. electrolyte mean linear velocity inside the electrode channel for the plate+ TP and mesh electrodes in a rectangular channel flow cell comprising the positive half-cell of a laboratory RFB.
1 M Aneke, M Wang. Energy storage technologies and real-life applications—A state of the art review. Applied Energy, 2016, 179: 350–377
2 G L Soloveichik. Flow batteries: Current status and trends. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(20): 11533–11558
3 B R Chalamala, T Soundappan, G R Fisher, M R Anstey, V V Viswanathan, M L Perry. Redox flow batteries: An engineering perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2014, 102(6): 976–999
4 L F Arenas, C Ponce de León, F C Walsh. Engineering aspects of the design, construction and performance of modular redox flow batteries for energy storage. Journal of Energy Storage, 2017, 11: 119–153
5 J Noack, N Roznyatovskaya, T Herr, P Fischer. The chemistry of redox-flow batteries. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54: 9776–9809
6 L F Arenas, C Ponce de León, F C Walsh. Electrochemical redox processes involving soluble cerium species. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 205: 226–247
7 F C Walsh, C Ponce de León, L Berlouis, G Nikiforidis, L F Arenas-Martínez, D Hodgson, D Hall. The development of Zn-Ce hybrid redox flow batteries for energy storage and their continuing challenges. ChemPlusChem, 2015, 80: 288–311
8 L F Arenas, A Loh, D P Trudgeon, X Li, C Ponce de León, F C Walsh. The characteristics and performance of hybrid redox flow batteries with zinc negative electrodes for energy storage. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 90: 992–1016
9 H M H Dewage, B Wu, A Tsoi, V Yufit, G J Offer, N Brandon. A novel regenerative hydrogen cerium fuel cell for energy storage applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry Part A, 2015, 3: 9446–9450
10 M C Tucker, A Weiss, A Z Weber. Improvement and analysis of the hydrogen-cerium redox flow cell. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 327: 591–598
11 R Roussel, C Oloman, S Harrison. Redox mediated in-cell electrosynthesis of p-anisaldehyde. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2016, 163(14): E414–E420
12 P K Leung, C Ponce de León, C T J Low, A A Shah, F C Walsh. Characterization of a zinc-cerium flow battery. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(11): 5174–5185
13 Z Na, X Sun, L Wang. Surface-functionalized graphite felts: Enhanced performance in cerium-based redox flow batteries. Carbon, 2018, 138: 363–368
14 Z Na, X Wang, D Yin, L Wang. Graphite felts modified by vertical two-dimensional WO3 nanowall arrays: High-performance electrode materials for cerium-based redox flow batteries. Nanoscale, 2018, 10: 10705–10712
15 L F Arenas, C Ponce de León, F C Walsh. Mass transport and active area of porous Pt/Ti electrodes for the Zn-Ce redox flow battery determined from limiting current measurements. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 221: 154–166
16 L F Arenas, C Ponce de León, F C Walsh. Pressure drop through platinized titanium porous electrodes for cerium-based redox flow batteries. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2018, 64(3): 1135–1146
17 L F Arenas, C Ponce de León, R P Boardman, F C Walsh. Characterization of platinum electrodeposits on a titanium micromesh stack in a rectangular channel flow cell. Electrochimica Acta, 2017, 247: 994–1005
18 A Frías-Ferrer, I Tudela, O Louisnard, V Sáez, M D Esclapez, M I Díez-García, P Bonete, J González-García. Optimized design of an electrochemical filter-press reactor using CFD methods. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 69(1-3): 270–281
19 A N Colli, J M Bisang. Time-dependent mass-transfer behaviour under laminar and turbulent flow conditions in rotating electrodes: A CFD study with analytical and experimental validation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 137: 835–846
20 B K Korbahti. Finite element modeling of continuous flow tubular electrochemical reactor for industrial and domestic wastewater treatment. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2014, 161(8): E3225–E3234
21 A Rodríguez, F F Rivera, G Orozco, G Carreño, F Castañeda. Analysis of inlet and gap effect in hydrodynamics and mass transport performance of a multipurpose electrochemical reactor: CFD simulation and experimental validation. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 282: 520–532
22 R Cervantes-Alcalá, M Miranda-Hernández. Flow distribution and mass transport analysis in cell geometries for redox flow batteries through computational fluid dynamics. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2018, 48(11): 1243–1254
23 P S Bernard, J M Wallace. Turbulent Flow: Analysis, Measurement and Prediction. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 2002, 304–353
24 D A Nield, A Bejan. Convection in Porous Media. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 1999, 1–22
25 G Nikiforidis, X Yan, W A Daoud. Electrochemical behavior of carbon paper on cerium methanesulfonate electrolytes for zinc-cerium flow battery. Electrochimica Acta, 2015, 157: 274–281
26 A J Karabelas, M Kostoglou, C P Koutsou. Modeling of spiral wound membrane desalination modules and plants—review and research priorities. Desalination, 2015, 356: 165–186
27 S Ahmed, M T Seraji, J Jahedi, M A Hashib. CFD simulation of turbulence promoters in a tubular membrane channel. Desalination, 2011, 276: 191–198
28 H K Versteeg, W Malalasekera. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. London: Prentice Hall, 1995, 72–80
29 D C Wilcox. Turbulence Modelling for CFD. 3rd ed. California: DCW Industries, 2006, 128–131
30 E P Rivero, M R Cruz-Díaz, F J Almazán-Ruiz, I González. Modeling the effect of non-ideal flow pattern on tertiary current distribution in a filter-press-type electrochemical reactor for copper recovery. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2015, 100: 422–433
31 G Rodríguez, F Z Sierra-Espinosa, J Teloxa, A Álvarez, J A Hernández. Hydrodynamic design of electrochemical reactors based on computational fluid dynamics. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2016, 57(48-49): 22968–22979
32 V Nassehi, N S Hanspal, A N Waghode, W R Ruziwa, R J Wakeman. Finite-element modelling of combined free/porous flow regimes: Simulation of flow through pleated cartridge filters. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60: 995–1006
33 M Parvazinia, V Nassehi, R J Wakeman, M H R Ghoreishy. Finite element modelling of flow through a porous medium between two parallel plates using the Brinkman equation. Transport in Porous Media, 2006, 63: 71–90
34 G S Beavers, D D Joseph. Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1967, 30: 197–207
35 F F Rivera, L Castañeda, P E Hidalgo, G Orozco. Study of hydrodynamics at AsahiTM prototype electrochemical flow reactor, using computational fluid dynamics and experimental characterization techniques. Electrochimica Acta, 2017, 245: 107–117
36 J Su, H Y Lu, H Xu, J R Sun, J L Ha, H B Lin. Mass transfer enhancement for mesh electrode in a tubular electrochemical reactor using experimental and numerical simulation method. Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 2011, 47(11): 1293–1298
37 Y Zeng, F Li, F Lu, X Zhou, Y Yuan, X Cao, B Xiang. A hierarchical interdigitated flow field design for scale-up of high performance redox flow batteries. Applied Energy, 2019, 238: 435–441
38 K Boomsma, D Poulikakos. The effects of compression and pore size variations on the liquid flow characteristics in metal foams. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002, 124(1): 263–272
39 K Bromberger, J Kaunert, T Smolinka. A model for all vanadium redox flow batteries: Introducing electrode-compression effects on voltage losses and hydraulics. Energy Technology, 2014, 2: 64–76
40 L Li, G Nikiforidis, M K H Leung, W A Daoud. Vanadium microfluidic fuel cell with novel multi-layer flow-through porous electrodes: Model, simulations and experiments. Applied Energy, 2016, 177: 729–739
[1] Lin Yang, Wenpeng Li, Junheng Guo, Wei Li, Baoguo Wang, Minqing Zhang, Jinli Zhang. Effects of rotor and stator geometry on dissolution process and power consumption in jet-flow high shear mixers[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 384-398.
[2] Anan Wang,Helen H. Lou,Daniel Chen,Anfeng Yu,Wenyi Dang,Xianchang Li,Christopher Martin,Vijaya Damodara,Ajit Patki. Combustion mechanism development and CFD simulation for the prediction of soot emission during flaring[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 459-471.
[3] Minhua ZHANG,Fang MENG,Zhongfeng GENG. CFD simulation on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with small-angle helical baffles[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(2): 183-193.
[4] Ali SHAHMOHAMMADI,Arezou JAFARI. Application of different CFD multiphase models to investigate effects of baffles and nanoparticles on heat transfer enhancement[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2014, 8(3): 320-329.
[5] Chong PANG, Wei TAN, Endian SHA, Yuanqing TAO, Liyan LIU. Simulating multiphase flow in a two-stage pusher centrifuge using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(3): 329-338.
[6] Xiaobin JIANG, Baohong HOU, Yongli WANG, Jingkang WANG. Permeability analysis and seepage process study on crystal layer in melt crystallization with fractal and porous media theory[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(4): 435-441.
[7] Zhenhao XI, Weizhen SUN, Ling ZHAO, Zhaoyan LIU. Combined static mixers for high viscous fluids mixing[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2009, 3(1): 93-96.
[8] CHEN Yunhua, ZHU Xuedong, WU Yongqiang, ZHU Zibin. The investigation of pressure drop in moving-beds[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2007, 1(2): 184-189.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed