Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Engineering Management

ISSN 2095-7513

ISSN 2096-0255(Online)

CN 10-1205/N

Postal Subscription Code 80-905

Front. Eng    2019, Vol. 6 Issue (2) : 249-261    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0014-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Industry effect of job hopping: an agent-based simulation of Chinese construction workers
Jide SUN1, Mian ZHENG1(), Martin SKITMORE2, Bo XIA2, Xincheng WANG3
1. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200082, China
2. School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia
3. Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
 Download: PDF(819 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Job hopping affects the development of industries in terms of efficiency and quality of work. It is a problem for the Chinese construction industry, where excessive job hopping is detrimental to meeting the current daunting challenges involved in the industry’s transformation and efficiency improvement. To provide an exhaustive analysis of this effect, game theory is combined with social relationship networks to create an agent-based simulation model. Simulation results indicate that the frequent job moves of Chinese construction workers have a negative effect on their skill development, employment, and worker relationships, as well as results in sharp increase in employer labor costs. The findings point to the need to act for the benefit of workers and employers and maintain the development of the industry.

Keywords job hopping      agent-based simulation      construction industry      effect      China     
Corresponding Author(s): Mian ZHENG   
Online First Date: 18 February 2019    Issue Date: 17 May 2019
 Cite this article:   
Jide SUN,Mian ZHENG,Martin SKITMORE, et al. Industry effect of job hopping: an agent-based simulation of Chinese construction workers[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(2): 249-261.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.1007/s42524-019-0014-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2019/V6/I2/249
Fig.1  Labor interest game tree
Fig.2  Work guarantee game tree
Fig.3  Personal value-recognition game tree
Fig.4  Flowchart of the dynamic evolution simulation
Variable name Variable value
Number of workers, i 180
Number of employers, j 12
Run time, T 20
Initial monthly salary, Payment0 N (3,300, 150)
Scale of a workers’ initial social relationships 6
Scale of an employer’s initial social relationships 10
Strength of initial social relationships,RS0 N (0.6, 0.1)
Strength of workers’ new social interrelationships RSnw~N (0.25, 0.01)
Strength of workers’ new social interrelationships and relationships with employers RSnc~N (0.40, 0.02)
Rate of relationship strengthening 20%, RSt=1.2* RSt-1
Rate of relationship weakening 20%, RSt=0.8* RSt-1
Strength of relationship discontinuations 0.2
Limits of team scale, Wmax, Wmin 15, - 6
Employment movementcosts, MC 200
Salary increase, SI 350
Initial extent of the work guarantee system WorkGuarantee0~N (0.20, 0.01)
Baseline value of the extent of the work guarantee system 0.4
Increase in extent of the work guarantee system, WI 0.1
Personal value recognition variable, Personalvalue Personalvalue ~(0, 1)
Initial training costs, Traininggcost0 200
Tab.1  Variable configuration in the simulation experiment
Supply–demand situation Number of workers Average employment movement rate Maximum employment movement rate
Extremely short supply 60 0.10 0.15
Short supply 120 0.17 0.22
Balance 180 0.03 0.20
Excess supply 240 0.00 0.10
Tab.2  Number of workers and corresponding employment movement rates
Fig.5  Employment movement rates for four supply–demand situations
Fig.6  Average training costs for four supply–demand situations
Fig.7  Average payment in the four supply–demand situations
Fig.8  Extent of the work guarantee system in the four supply–demand situations
Fig.9  Social relationship strength
Fig.10  Social relationship scale and number of dead relationships under excess supply
Fig.11  Social relationship scale and number of dead relationships under short supply
1 RAxelrod (1997). The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton: Princeton University Press
2 RBachmann, T K Bauer, P Bechara (2010). Labor market entry conditions, wages and job mobility. Ssrn Electronic Journal, 1–37
3 NBai, J Li (2008). Liquidity employment of migrant workers. Management World, 151(7): 70–76
4 A PBartel, G J Borjas (1978). Wage growth and job turnover: An empirical analysis. Nber Working Papers, 65–90
5 YBian, S Ang (1997). Guanxi networks and job mobility in China and Singapore. Social Forces, 75(3): 981–1005
https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/75.3.981
6 EBonabeau (2002). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(3 Supplement 3): 7280–7287
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082080899
7 SBrown, G Garino, CMartin (2009). Firm performance and labour turnover: Evidence from the 2004 workplace employee relations survey. Economic Modelling, 26(3): 689–695
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2009.01.014
8 EDane, B J Brummel (2014). Examining workplace mindfulness and its relations to job performance and turnover intention. Human Relations, 67(1): 105–128
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713487753
9 PDe Grande, M Eguia (2006). Strategy space exploration of a multi-agent model for the labor market. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 17(03): 357–371
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183106008534
10 CForde, R Mackenzie (2004). Cementing skills: Training and labour use in UK construction. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(3): 74–88
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2004.tb00127.x
11 XFu (2008). The floating characteristics of Beijing construction migrant workers’ organization. Beijing Social Science, 2008(3): 74–78
12 J EGomar, C T Haas, D P Morton (2002). Assignment and allocation optimization of partially multiskilled workforce. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(2): 103–109
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:2(103)
13 PGottschalk (2001). Wage mobility within and between Jobs. AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies
14 C LGrand, M Tahlin (2002). Job mobility and earnings growth. European Sociological Review, 18(4): 381–400
https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/18.4.381
15 M SGranovetter (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380
https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
16 M SGranovetter (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481–510
https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
17 J IHancock, D G Allen, F A Bosco, K R Mcdaniel, C A Pierce (2011). Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance. Journal of Management, 39(3): 573–603
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311424943
18 HHe, H Q Pham, Y Baruch, WZhu (2014). Perceived organizational support and organizational identification: Joint moderating effects of employee exchange ideology and employee investment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(20): 2772–2795
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.908315
19 UKaiser, H C Kongsted, T Rønde (2015). Does the mobility of R&D labor increase innovation? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 110: 91–105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.012
20 GKambourov, I Manovskii (2009). Occupational mobility and wage inequality. Review of Economic Studies, 76(2): 731–759
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00535.x
21 ELalé (2012). Trends in occupational mobility in France: 1982–2009. Labour Economics, 19(3): 373–387
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.03.005
22 MLiu, C Smith (2016). China at work: A labour process perspective on the transformation of work and employment In China. London: Palgrave Macmillan
23 P JLoprest (1992). Gender differences in wage growth and job mobility. American Economic Review, 82(2): 526–532
24 C MMacal, M J North (2010). Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation, 4(3): 151–162
https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2010.3
25 RMacKenzie, C Forde, ARobinson, HCook, B Eriksson, PLarsson, ABergman (2010). Contingent work in the UK and Sweden: Evidence from the construction industry. Industrial Relations Journal, 41(6): 603–621
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2010.00588.x
26 DMarsden (2004). The ‘network economy’ and models of the employment contract. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(4): 659–684
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00335.x
27 CMaslach, M P Leiter (1997). The Truth About Burnout: How Organization Cause Personal Stress and What to Do About It. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc
28 A HMaslow (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4): 370–396
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
29 PMitropoulos, B Memarian (2012). Team processes and safety of workers: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral processes of construction crews. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(10): 1181–1191
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000527
30 National Bureau of Statistics of China (2016). National Report on Migrant Worker Monitoring and Survey 2015. China Population Today, 2016(4): 22–30 (in Chinese)
31 J I GPérez, Y RSanz (2005). Wage changes through job mobility in Europe: A multinomial endogenous switching approach. Labour Economics, 12(4): 531–555
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2005.05.005
32 BQi, K Li, HWang (2013). Research on talent outflow in construction projects based on evolutionary game theory. Project Management Technology, 11(7): 23–27
33 MRixen, J Weigand (2014). Agent-based simulation of policy induced diffusion of smart meters. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85(85): 153–167
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.011
34 J RSargent, K T Sullivan, A S Hanna (2003). Absenteeism and turnover impact on labor productivity for electrical contractors. Construction Research Congress, 1–8
35 JScott (2017). Social Network Analysis. California: Sage Publications
36 MStevens (2003). Earnings functions, specific human capital, and job matching: Tenure bias is negative. Journal of Labor Economics, 21(4): 783–805
https://doi.org/10.1086/376958
37 JSun, Q Nie, LShen (2015). Analysis on current situation and development trend of construction worker’s occupational mobility. Open Construction & Building Technology Journal, 9(1): 303–310
https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801509010303
38 JSun, X Wang, LShen (2017a). Chinese construction workers’ behaviour towards attending vocational skills trainings: Evolutionary game theory with government participation. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, 23(1–2): 468–485
39 JSun, X Wang, LShen (2017b). Analysis based on Shanghai data: What element causes the frequent occupational mobility of construction labor. Journal of Engineering Management, 31(2): 7–11
40 JSun, X Wang, LShen (2018). Research on the mobility behavior of Chinese construction workers based on evolutionary game theory. Economic Research-. Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 31(1): 1–14
https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1421992
41 I MTaplin, J Winterton (2007). The importance of management style in labour retention. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(1/2): 5–18
https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330710722724
42 LTesfatsion (2001). Structure, behavior, and market power in an evolutionary labor market with adaptive search. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 25(3–4): 419–457
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(00)00032-4
43 H RThomas, M J Horman, R E Jr Minchin, D Chen (2003). Improving labor flow reliability for better productivity as lean construction principle. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(3): 251–261
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:3(251)
44 MWatkins, A Mukherjee, NOnder, KMattila (2009). Using agent-based modeling to study construction labor productivity as an emergent property of individual and crew interactions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7): 657–667
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000022
45 BWellman, S D Berkowitz (1988). Social Structures: A Network Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
46 XWen, X Zhou (2007). Western labor process theory and Chinese experience: A critical review. Social Sciences in China, 30(3): 29–39
47 YWu (2011). Labor market segmentation, job mobility and the two track model of Chinese urban workers’ acquisition of economic status. Social Sciences in China, 2011(3): 119–137
48 XYuan (2000). The Dictionary of Modern Labor Relations. Beijing: China Labor and Social Security Press
49 XZhai (2003). Social mobility and relational trust: Strength of relations and job-hunting tactics of peasant workers. Sociolinguistic Studies, 103(1): 1–11
50 RZhao (2008). A brief talk on the current situation and development of labor in the construction industry. Technological Development of Enterprise, 27(7): 111–113
51 LZhou, J Huang (2012). The intension of changing job and re-mobility for migrant workers: A research based on survey data of Pearl River Delta. South China Population, 27(2): 66–73
[1] Qinghua HE, Junyan XU, Ting WANG, Albert P. C. CHAN. Identifying the driving factors of successful megaproject construction management: Findings from three Chinese cases[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 5-16.
[2] Chunfang LU, Junfei LIU, Yanhong LIU, Yuming LIU. Intelligent construction technology of railway engineering in China[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(4): 503-516.
[3] Guo LIU, Kunhui YE. Interactive effects of high-speed rail on nodal zones in a city: Exploratory study on China[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(3): 327-335.
[4] Sujesh F. SUJAN, Arto KIVINIEMI, Steve W. JONES, Jacqueline M. WHEATHCROFT, Eilif HJELSETH. Common biases in client involved decision-making in the AEC industry[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(2): 221-238.
[5] Xiaoliang YANG, Wolfgang HEIDUG, Douglas COOKE. An adaptive policy-based framework for China’s Carbon Capture and Storage development[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(1): 78-86.
[6] Lingxuan LIU, Zhongshun SHI, Leyuan SHI. Minimization of total energy consumption in an m-machine flow shop with an exponential time-dependent learning effect[J]. Front. Eng, 2018, 5(4): 487-498.
[7] Yi HU, Yun LE, Xinglin GAO, Yongkui LI, Mingqiang LIU. Grasping institutional complexity in infrastructure mega-projects through the multi-level governance system: A case study of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge construction[J]. Front. Eng, 2018, 5(1): 52-63.
[8] Chenhao ZHOU, Haobin LI, Wencheng WANG, Loo Hay LEE, Ek Peng CHEW. Connecting the Belt and Road through sea-rail collaboration[J]. Front. Eng, 2017, 4(3): 315-324.
[9] Zhi-gang Zhao,Hai-zhang Yang,Wu Tang,Shi-xiang Liu. Deepwater Hydrocarbon Exploration in China Seas: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow[J]. Front. Eng, 2016, 3(4): 390-395.
[10] Xue-mei Su,Jia Zhao. Connecting Information to Promote Public Health[J]. Front. Eng, 2016, 3(4): 384-389.
[11] Ke-qiang Wu,Jian-yong Xu,Bo Kang. Strategic Thinking on Shallow-water Oil and Gas Exploration in Offshore China[J]. Front. Eng, 2016, 3(4): 349-355.
[12] Fei Dai,Yoojung Yoon,Hota V. GangaRao. State of Practice of Construction Site Safety in the USA[J]. Front. Eng, 2016, 3(3): 275-282.
[13] Ru-jiang Zhao,Wung Hee Moh. Value Management Practices on Major Construction Projects and Green Building[J]. Front. Eng, 2016, 3(2): 147-157.
[14] Da-wei Zhang. The Fast Road of Shale Gas Development in China —Reflections on Building a Special Test Areas for National Shale Gas Development[J]. Front. Eng, 2015, 2(4): 364-372.
[15] Chuan-jun Zheng,Hu Cheng. Development of Engineering Management Education in China[J]. Front. Eng, 2015, 2(3): 304-310.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed