Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front Earth Sci Chin    0, Vol. Issue () : 438-448    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-010-0127-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Threatened wetlands and ecologically sensitive ecosystems management in Bangladesh
Shafi Noor ISLAM()
Department of Ecosystems and Environmental Informatics, Brandenburg University of Technology at Cottbus, Cottbus 101344, Germany
 Download: PDF(725 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Wetlands constitute a part of human heritage. It has played a significant role in the development of human culture and society. More over it contains very rich components of biodiversity of local, national, and regional significance. They also provide habitat for a variety of resident and migratory waterfowl, a significant number of endangered species, and a large number of commercially important species. Mangrove wetlands are unique environments of floral-faunal assemblages, providing a complex detritus-based food-web for a number of marine and brackish water organisms. Wetlands in Bangladesh have great importance for the country’s economic, industrial, ecological, socioeconomic, and cultural aspects. There are five types of wetlands available in Bangladesh, such as saltwater wetlands, freshwater wetlands, palustrine wetlands, lacustrine wetlands, and manmade wetlands. There are 43 designated wetlands, and some are under threat from indiscriminate utilization, encroachments and reclamation, urbanization and drawbacks from agricultural development, and flood control. Almost 50% of the country’s people are directly dependent on wetlands resources. The vast majority of the poor people in the wetlands areas are dependent on wetlands resources for their nourishment. Wetlands have potential and have been recognized as a driving force for biodiversity conservation and rural socioeconomic improvement. Smart-use of wetlands can solve the ecosystems problems in the floodplain areas. A comprehensive analysis of the various issues leading to wetlands degradation is made in this study. The country needs an adequate interdisciplinary policy and political will to implement it for sustainable management and protection of wetlands and ecologically sensitive ecosystems in Bangladesh. Therefore, a reliable data bank is provided in this study to enhance the conservation measures initiated by the Government.

Keywords Bangladesh      wetlands      sensitive ecosystem      policy      conservation      resource management     
Corresponding Author(s): ISLAM Shafi Noor,Email:Shafinoor@yahoo.com   
Issue Date: 05 December 2010
 Cite this article:   
Shafi Noor ISLAM. Threatened wetlands and ecologically sensitive ecosystems management in Bangladesh[J]. Front Earth Sci Chin, 0, (): 438-448.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-010-0127-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y0/V/I/438
Fig.1  Designated wetlands areas and its location in Bangladesh
Fig.2  Wetlands and ecologically sensitive sites in Bangladesh
Wetland typesArea coverage/km2Percentage of area/%
Rivers, canals and estuaries10300.0013.77
Natural depressions1141.691.52
Ponds1619.432.16
Ox-bow lakes544.880.73
Reservoirs688.000.92
Seasonal flood lands28000.0037.42
Brackish water farms873.001.17
Mangrove wetlands6100.008.15
Beel and haor5000.006.68
Peat land155.000.21
Swamp forest20400.0027.27
Total74 822.00100.00
Tab.1  Wetlands of Bangladesh ()
Fig.3  Freshwater and saline wetlands. (a) Freshwater wetlands in Karcher haor; (b) saline mangrove wetlands in Sundarbans
Wetlands valueWetlands ecosystem service
EnvironmentalHydrological cycle maintenance, water storage and discharge, flood control and regulation, transport of sediments, reduce salinity intrusion, purification of water, reduce of erosion, soil formation, food chain and habitat maintaining, biodiversity protection, protect ecosystems, pollution control, maintenance of landscapes and balance of ecology, etc.
Economic
Direct valuesAgricultural production, forestry, hunting, fishing, production of wild food, grazing field for livestock, supply of fuel, fodder, honey, fruits and wood (mangrove), supply of raw materials, and field for primary economic activities.
Indirect valuesBenefits from improvement of water quality, flood prevention, pollution control, provision for medicinal plants, land for industrial location, primary economic activities, etc.
Option valuesBenefits from ensuring the option for a future use
Existence valuesBenefits from conserving or willingness to forgo a part of ones income in order to conserve a resource especially natural amenities or species.
Bequest valuesBenefits from ensuring that certain goods will be preserved for future generations.
SocialNavigation and transportation, provision of settlement places for the indigenous community, extension of urbanization, inspiration place for education and research, employment opportunity for the poor, empowerment of the destitute groups.
CulturalTourism and recreation, tangible and intangible cultural heritage, cultural values, natural heritage, aesthetic values, religion values, spiritual values, ethical values, scenic values sense of place, cultural landscapes, etc.
Tab.2  Wetlands value and wetland ecosystem services
Fig.4  Relationship between wetlands and aquatic terrestrial ecosystems ()
Fig.5  Wetland ecosystems functions and socioeconomic benefits ()
Fig.6  Destruction of the Chokoria Sundarbans mangrove wetlands in Cox’s Bazar
1 Ahmed I, Deaton B J, Sarker R, Virani T (2008). Wetland ownership and management in a common property resource setting: A case study of Hakaluki Haor in Bangladesh. Ecol Econ , 68(1–2): 429–436
2 Akonda A W (1989). Bangladesh. In: Scott D A, ed. A directory of Asian wetlands. Switzerland: IUCN, 541–581
3 Alam S M, Chowdhury H M (2003). Wetland, Banglapedia: national encyclopedia of Bangladesh. Dhaka: Asiatic Civil Military Press, 1–5
4 Bari M, Marchand M, Wolfert H P (2004). The use of an ecotope classification for identifying environmental flows: Case studies from Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of 7th INTECOL International Conference on Wetlands 2004, Utrecht . The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht Press, 195
5 Blasco F, Aizpuru M (1997). Classification and evalution of the mangroves of India. Trop Ecol , 38(2): 357–374
6 Department of Forest (1976). National report for Bangladesh. In: Smart M, eds. Proceedings International Conference on Conservation of Wetlands and Waterfowl 1976, Heiligenhafen, Federal Republic of Germany . Slimbridge: IWRB, 74–80
7 Food and Agricultural Organization (1988). Agro-ecological regions of Bangladesh. Rome: FAO, 5–24
8 Gnauck A, Islam S N (2004). The Threatened Mangrove wetlands ecosystems in Bangladesh: A case study on the Sundarbans. In: Proceedings of 7th INTECOL International Conference on Wetlands 2004, Utrecht . The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht Press, 109
9 Government of Bangladesh (1999). National Water Policy. Dhaka: Genesis (PVT) Ltd, 1–26
10 Gopal B, Wetzel R G (1995). Limnology in Developing Countries V. 1. New Delhi: International Association for Limnology , 1–230
11 Gopal B (1999). Natural and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: potentials and problems. Water Sci Technol , 40(3): 27–35
doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00468-0
12 Hasan S, Mulamoottil G (1994). Environmental problems of Dhaka city: A study of mismanagement. Cities , 11(3): 195–200
doi: 10.1016/0264-2751(94)90059-0
13 Hughes R, Adnan S, Clayton B D (1994). Floodplains or Flood Plans? A Review of Approaches to Water Management in Bangladesh . London: IIED, 1–12
14 Hossain M S, Lin C K, Hussain M Z (2001). Goodbye Chakaria Sundarbans: the oldest mangrove forest. Society of Wetland Scientists Bulletin , 18(3): 19–22
doi: 10.1672/0732-9393(2001)018[0019:GCSTOM]2.0.CO;2
15 Islam S N (2007). Water salinity and thresholds for the protection of mangrove wetland ecosystems in the Sundarbans Region. In: Ganuck A, ed. Modellierung und Simulation von ?kosystemen (Modelling and Simulation of Ecosystems Journal) . Aachen: Shaker Verlag, 187–201
16 Islam S N, Gnauck A (2007a). Effects of salinity intrusion in mangrove wetlands ecosystems in the Sundarbans: an alternative approach for sustainable management. In: Okruszko T, Jerecka M, Kosinski K, eds. Wetlands: Monitoring Modelling and Management . Leiden: Taylor & Francis/Balkema, 315–322
17 Islam S N, Gnauck A (2007b). Salinity intrusion due to freshwater scarcity in the Ganges catchment: a challenege for urban drinking water and mangrove wetland ecosystems in the Sundarbans region, Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of 6th World Wide Workshop for Young Environmental Scientists 2007 , Paris. Paris: CEREVE Enpc, 20–30
18 Islam S N, Gnauck A (2007c). Increased salinity in the Ganges delta and Impacts on Coastal Environment in Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference Logistics and Economics of Resource and Energy- Saving in Industries (ISPC “LEREI-2-2007”) 2007 , Saratov. Saratov: Saratov State Technical University Press, 244–248
19 Islam S N, Gnauck A (2008). Mangrove wetland ecosystems in Ganges-Brahmaputra delta in Bangladesh. Front Earth Sci China , 2(4): 439–448
doi: 10.1007/s11707-008-0049-2
20 Islam S N (2008). Cultural landscapes changing due to anthropogenic influences on surface water and threats to mangrove wetlands ecosystems: a case study on the Sundarbans, Bangladesh. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Cottbus: Brandenburg University of Technology, 1–179
21 Islam S N, Gnauck A (2009a). Threats to the Sundarbans mangrove wetland ecosystems from transboundary water allocation in the Ganges basin: a preliminary problem analysis. International Journal of Ecological Economics & Statistics , 13(W09): 64–78
22 Khan A A (1993). Fresh water wetlands in Bangladesh: opportunities and options. In: Nishat A, Hussain Z, Roy M K, Karim A, eds. Freshwater Wetlands in Bangladesh — Issues and Approaches for Management . Dhaka: IUCN, 1–7
23 Khan S M, Haq E, Huq S, Rahman A A, Rashid S M A, Ahmed H (1994). Wetlands of Bangladesh. Dhaka: Holiday Printers Limited, 1–88
24 Kundzewicz Z W (2003). Ecohydrology for sustainable wetlands under global change — data, models, management. In: Igner S, Nowakowski P, Okruszko, eds. Measurement techniques and data assessment in wetlands hydrology . Warsaw: Warsaw Agricultural University Press, 25–35
25 Mioduszewski W, Querner E, Slesicka A (2004). Modelling of hydrological system of the Biebrza Velley. In: Kubrak J, Okruszko T, Ignar S, eds. Model Application for Wetlands Hydrology and Hydraulics . Warsaw: Warsaw Agricultural University Press, 9–19
26 Mitsch W I, Gosselink I G (1986). Wetlands. New York: Van Nostand Reinhold, 1–220
27 Nair K S (2004). Wetlands management to meet the food and water crisis - example from a tropical region. In: Proceedings of 7th INTECOL International Conference on Wetlands 2004 , Utrecht. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht Press, 217
28 Nishat A (1993). Fresh water wetlands in Bangladesh: Status and issues. In: Nishat A, Hossain B, Roy M K, Karim A, eds. Freshwater Wetlands in Bangladesh — Issues and Approaches for Management. Dhaka: IUCN, 9–22
29 Rahman A A (1995). Policy Livelihood Relationship in South Asia. Role of NGOs in Advocacy: Lessons Learnt from South Asian Countries . Dhaka: Holiday Printers Limited, 1–27
30 Rahman S, Ahmed K K (2002). Performance of fisheries sector planning in Bangladesh. Outlook Agric , 31(4): 243–251
doi: 10.5367/000000002101294137
31 Sarkar S U (1993). Faunal diversity and their conservation in freshwater wetlands. In: Nishat A, Hossain Z, Roy M K, Karim A, eds. Freshwater Wetlands in Bangladesh: Issues and Approaches for management . Gland: IUCN, 1–364
32 Sultana P, Thompson P M (2007). Community based fisheries management and fishers lifelihoods: Bangladesh case studies. Hum Ecol , 35(5): 527–546
doi: 10.1007/s10745-006-9092-3
33 TalukdarB, NakagoshiN , RashidM S (2008). State and management of wetlands in Bangladesh. Landscape Ecology Engineering , 5(1): 81–90
34 Thompson P M, SultanaP, IslamN (2003). Lessons from community based management of floodplain fisheries in Bangladesh. J Environ Manage , 69(3): 307–321
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.014
[1] Bowen LI, Zhifeng YANG, Yanpeng CAI, Bo LI. The frontier evolution and emerging trends of hydrological connectivity in river systems: a scientometric review[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(1): 81-93.
[2] Md. Yousuf GAZI, Farhad HOSSAIN, Sumiya SADEAK, Md. Mahin UDDIN. Spatiotemporal variability of channel and bar morphodynamics in the Gorai-Madhumati River, Bangladesh using remote sensing and GIS techniques[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(4): 828-841.
[3] Xuezhu CUI, Shaoying LI, Xuetong WANG, Xiaolong XUE. Driving factors of urban land growth in Guangzhou and its implications for sustainable development[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 464-477.
[4] Jianguo LI, Wenhui YANG, Qiang LI, Lijie PU, Yan XU, Zhongqi ZHANG, Lili LIU. Effect of reclamation on soil organic carbon pools in coastal areas of eastern China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(2): 339-348.
[5] Duanyang XU, Alin SONG, Xiao SONG. Assessing the effect of desertification controlling projects and policies in northern Shaanxi Province, China by integrating remote sensing and farmer investigation data[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(4): 689-701.
[6] Changhai WANG. Driving forces behind the construction of an eco-compensation mechanism for wetlands in China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(3): 487-497.
[7] Yanyun ZHAO, Xiangming HU, Jingtao LIU, Zhaohua LU, Jiangbao XIA, Jiayi TIAN, Junsheng MA. Vegetation pattern in Shell Ridge Island in China’s Yellow River Delta[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(3): 567-577.
[8] Changjian WANG,Xiaolei ZHANG,Fei WANG,Jun LEI,Li ZHANG. Decomposition of energy-related carbon emissions in Xinjiang and relative mitigation policy recommendations[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(1): 65-76.
[9] Qi ZHONG, Qing ZHONG, Ziniu XIAO. Improving energetics in an ideal baroclinic instability case with a Physical Conserving Fidelity model[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2013, 7(3): 341-350.
[10] Stephen J. MORREALE, Kristi L. SULLIVAN, . Community-level enhancements of biodiversity and ecosystem services[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2010, 4(1): 14-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed