Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front Earth Sci    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (3) : 323-329    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-011-0182-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A comparative study of Beijing and three global cities: A perspective on urban livability
Jiao WANG, Meirong SU(), Bin CHEN, Shaoqing CHEN, Chen LIANG
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
 Download: PDF(253 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A so-called global city that plays an important role in regional and global economic, political and cultural development should perform well in terms of its livability. The livability level of Beijing was compared with those of three acknowledged global cities, i.e., New York City, Greater London, and Tokyo-to to clarify whether Beijing has great potential to grow into a global city. From the aspects of social development, living standard and environmental quality, the livable level integrated index (LLII) was established in this paper to evaluate the urban livability, while the linear weighted sum was applied as the assessment model. After analyzing the situations of the four cities during 2000–2009, it was indicated that the LLIIs of Beijing, New York City, Greater London, and Tokyo-to were respectively 38.76, 52.93, 50.95, and 40.65 in 2000. By comparison, the LLIIs in 2009 were 38.96, 59.23, 69.24 and 52.15, respectively. Further analysis showed that a big gap exists between the environmental quality of Beijing and those of three global cities and the performance of social development for Beijing declined in the last decade. To accelerate the transformation of Beijing to a global city, much more attention should be paid to improve the environmental quality, especially the atmospheric quality and water quality.

Keywords global city      urban livable level      Beijing      New York City      Greater London      Tokyo-to     
Corresponding Author(s): SU Meirong,Email:sumr@bnu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 September 2011
 Cite this article:   
Jiao WANG,Meirong SU,Bin CHEN, et al. A comparative study of Beijing and three global cities: A perspective on urban livability[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2011, 5(3): 323-329.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-011-0182-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2011/V5/I3/323
Objective layerCriteria layerFactor layerIndicator layerWeights
Livable level integrated indictex (LLII)Social progressEconomic developmentPer capita GDP/USD0.0625
Proportion of tertiary industry in GDP/ %0.0125
Social securityPopulation density/(km2·capita-1)0.0236
Registered unemployment rate in urban area/%0.1433
Deaths per 10000 vehicles from motor vehicle accidents0.0581
Health conditionInfant mortality/‰0.0327
Life expectancy0.0163
Living levelQuality of lifePer capita disposable income/USD0.0763
Per capita usable space of houses in urban areas/m20.0156
Time taken to travel to work/min0.0410
Engel coefficient of urban households/%0.0290
Basic servicesNew enrollments per 1000 population in colleges & universities0.0173
Certified physicians per 1000 population0.0639
Number of libraries0.0078
Environmental qualityWater qualityCOD discharge volume per 10000 USD of GDP/kg0.1286
Rate of waste water disposed/%0.0428
Air qualityDaily mean of sulfur dioxide/(mg·L-1)0.0280
Daily mean of nitrogen oxides/(mg·L-1)0.0509
Annual mean of PM10/(mg·L-1)0.0925
Resource and usageConsumed water per 10000 USD of GDP/m30.0476
Per capita park green areas/m20.0095
Tab.1  Indicator system for urban livability
Fig.1  Values of for four cities during 2000-2009
Fig.2  Relative values of during 2000-2009 (based on the situation of Beijing)
Fig.3  Values of social progress for four cities
Fig.4  Values of living level for four cities
Fig.5  Values of environmental quality for four cities
Fig.6  Changing trend of criteria layers for four cities
1 Beaverstock J V (1994). Re-thinking skilled international labour migration: World cities and banking organisations. Geoforum , 25(3): 323–338
doi: 10.1016/0016-7185(94)90034-5 pmid:12320415
2 Beaverstock J V (2002). Transnational elites in global cities: British expatriates in Singapore’s financial district. Geoforum , 33(4): 525–538
doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00036-2
3 Beaverstock J V, Taylor P J (1999). A roster of world cities. Cities , 16(6): 445–458
doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00042-6
4 Chu W (2010). How far away from Beijing to global cities. Data , (4): 62–64 (in Chinese)
5 Friedmann J (1986). The world city hypothesis. Dev Change , 17(1): 69–83
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1986.tb00231.x
6 Friedmann J, Wolff G (1982). World city formation and agenda for research and action. Int J Urban Reg Res , 6(3): 309–344
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1982.tb00384.x
7 Geddes P (1915). Cities in Evolution. London: Williams & Norgate
8 Huo X J, Pan Y Z, Zhang L W, Qu S H (2006). The city’s ecological appraisement of sustainable development–a case study in Baotou Inner Mongolia. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment , 20(1): 140–145 (in Chinese)
9 Kang P, Xu L Y (2010). Development of ecological environment in Beijing from perspective of global city, 2010. Annual Meeting of Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences . Shanghai: 524–527 (in Chinese)
10 Li G P, Lu M H (2002). The preliminary research on the mode and policy tendency of Beijing constructed into a world city. Scientia Geographica Sinica , 22(3): 263–269 (in Chinese)
11 Li X R (2007). Compare and application of principal component analysis, factor analysis and clustering analysis. Journal of Shangdong Education Institute , 22(6): 23–26 (in Chinese)
12 Mai X (2010). Constructing global city based on livable city. Beijing Planning Review , (4): 178–179 (in Chinese)
13 Nagel C (2005). Skilled migration in global cities from ‘Other’ perspectives: British Arabs, indentity politics, and local embededdness. Geoforum , 36(2): 197–210
doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.06.003
14 Ng M K, Hills P (2003). World cities or great cities? A comparative study of five Asian metropolises. Cities , 20(3): 151–165
doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(03)00003-9
15 Research Group in Institution of Capital Socioeconomic Development (2010). A Comparative study on livable level of Beijing and global cities. The Frontline , (10): 49–51 (in Chinese)
16 Sassen S (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press
17 Short J R, Kim Y, Kuus M, Wells H (1996). The dirty little secret of world cities research: Data problems in comparative analysis. Int J Urban Reg Res , 20(4): 697–717
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1996.tb00343.x
18 Vogel R K, Savitch H V, Xu J, Yeh A G O, Wu W P, Sancton A, Kantor P, Newman P, Tsukamoto T, Cheung P T Y, Shen J F, Wu F L, Zhang F Z (2010). Governing global city regions in China and the West. Prog Plann , 73(1): 1–75
doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2009.12.001
19 Wan J (2010). Building a world city and cultivating Beijing’s soft power. Municipal Administration and Technology , 12(2): 36–37 (in Chinese)
20 Wang Q H, Xiang R M, Yang Z L (2003). Comparison of some conventional comprehensive evaluation methods. Statistics & Information Tribune , 18(2): 30–33 (in Chinese)
21 Yang X H, Liu R M, Zeng Y (2008). Environmental Statistical Analysis. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press (in Chinese)
22 Zhang X D, Zheng Z G (2007). Study on the environmental indicator systems of environment-friendly city. Environmental Science and Management , 32(9): 53–56 (in Chinese)
23 Zhao H X, Xu S B Jin S (1986). Analytical Hierarchy Process. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)
24 Zhou J L (2007). Countermeasure study of Beijing constructed into a world city. Studies on the Socialism with Chinese Characteristics , (3): 106–110 (in Chinese)
[1] Liangxia ZHANG, Wei CAO, Jiangwen FAN. Soil organic carbon dynamics in Xilingol grassland of northern China induced by the Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Control Program[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(2): 407-415.
[2] Mengyao HAN,Shan GUO,Hui CHEN,Xi JI,Jiashuo LI. Local-scale systems input-output analysis of embodied water for the Beijing economy in 2007[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(3): 414-426.
[3] Yan ZHANG,Hong LIU,Bin CHEN,Hongmei ZHENG,Yating LI. Analysis of urban metabolic processes based on input–output method: model development and a case study for Beijing[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(2): 190-201.
[4] Chen CHEN, Meirong SU, Zhifeng YANG, Gengyuan LIU. Evaluation of the environmental impact of the urban energy lifecycle based on lifecycle assessment[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2014, 8(1): 123-130.
[5] Weiwei LU, Chen CHEN, Meirong SU, Bin CHEN, Yanpeng CAI, Tao XING. Urban energy consumption and related carbon emission estimation: a study at the sector scale[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2013, 7(4): 480-486.
[6] Chen CHEN, Meirong SU, Gengyuan LIU, Zhifeng YANG. Evaluation of economic loss from energy-related environmental pollution: a case study of Beijing[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2013, 7(3): 320-330.
[7] Hualin XIE, Chih-Chun KUNG, Yuluan ZHAO. Spatial disparities of regional forest land change based on ESDA and GIS at the county level in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2012, 6(4): 445-452.
[8] Shouke WEI, Albrecht GNAUCK, Alin LEI. Simulation analysis of domestic water demand and its future uncertainty in water scarce areas[J]. Front Earth Sci Chin, 2009, 3(3): 349-360.
[9] Guifang YANG, Zhiliang GE, Qing DAI, Jie CHENG, Gongming YIN, Lihong ZAN, Jingwei LIU. A grain-size record from Beijing region in Northern China: Late Quaternary paleoclimate oscillation in response to global change[J]. Front Earth Sci Chin, 2009, 3(2): 164-170.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed