Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front Earth Sci    0, Vol. Issue () : 306-313    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-012-0328-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Debris flow and landslide hazard mapping and risk analysis in China
Xilin LIU1(), Chengjun YU1, Peijun SHI2, Weihua FANG2
1. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
 Download: PDF(4522 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This paper assesses the hazardousness, vulnerability and risk of debris flow and landslide in China and compiles maps with a scale of 1∶6000000, based on Geographical Information System (GIS) technology, hazard regionalization map, socioeconomic data from 2000. Integrated hazardousness of debris flow and landslide is equivalent to the sum of debris flow hazardousness and landslide hazardousness. Vulnerability is assessed by employing a simplified assessment model. Risk is calculated by the following formula: Risk= Hazardousness × Vulnerability. The analysis results of assessment of hazardousness, vulnerability and risk show that there are extremely high risk regions of 104 km2, high risk regions of 283008 km2, moderate risk regions of 3161815 km2, low risk regions of 3299604 km2, and extremely low risk regions of 2681709 km2. Exploitation activities should be prohibited in extremely high risk and high risk regions and restricted in moderate risk regions. The present study on risk analysis of debris flow and landslide not only sheds new light on the future work in this direction but also provides a scientific basis for disaster prevention and mitigation policy making.

Keywords debris flow and landslide hazards      hazardousness      vulnerability      risk assessment and analysis      GIS mapping     
Corresponding Author(s): LIU Xilin,Email:liuxilin@mail.sysu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 September 2012
 Cite this article:   
Xilin LIU,Chengjun YU,Peijun SHI, et al. Debris flow and landslide hazard mapping and risk analysis in China[J]. Front Earth Sci, 0, (): 306-313.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-012-0328-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y0/V/I/306
Fig.1  Integrated hazardousness map of debris flow and landslide in China
Fig.2  Vulnerability map of debris flow and landslide in China
Fig.3  Risk map of debris flow and landslide hazards in China
Fig.4  Hazardousness analysis of debris flow and landslide in China
?CityVulnerability range??CityVulnerability range?CityVulnerability range
Beijing0.2–0.8?Fuzhou0.4–0.8?Chengdu0.4–0.8
Shijiazhuang0.4–0.8?Nanchang0.2–0.8?Chongqing0.2–0.8
Taiyuan0.4–0.8?Jinan0.4–0.8?Guiyang0.4–0.8
Hohhot0.2–0.8?Zhengzhou0.4–0.8?Kunming0.4–0.6
Shenyang0.2–0.8?Wuhan0.2–0.8?Lhasa0.2–0.8
Changchun0.2–0.8?Changsha0.2–0.8?Xi’an0.4–0.8
Harbin0.2–0.8?Guangzhou0.4–0.8?Lanzhou0.2–0.8
Nanjing0.4–0.8?Hong Kong0.4–0.8?Xining0.4–0.8
Hangzhou0.4–0.8?Nanning0.4–0.8?Yinchuan0.2–0.6
Hefei0.4–0.8?Haikou0.2–0.8?Urumqi0.2–0.6
Tab.1  Vulnerability analysis of debris flow and landslide of 30 main cities in China
Administrative units Risk grades
Extremely lowLowModerateHighExtremely high
Beijing\\\
Hebei\
Shanxi
Inner Mongolia\
Liaoning\\
Jilin\\
Heilongjiang\\
Jiangsu\
Zhejiang\
Shandong\\
Anhui\
Henan\
Jiangxi\
Hubei\
Hunan\
Fujian\
Guangdong\\
Hong Kong\\\
Hainan\\
Sichuan
Chongqing\
Guangxi\
Guizhou
Yunnan
Tibet\
Shaanxi
Gansu\
Ningxia
Qinghai\
Xinjiang\\
Tab.2  Risk grades of debris flow and landslide of 30 provincial administrative units in China
1 Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999). Landslide hazard assessment: summary, review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ , 58(1): 21–44
doi: 10.1007/s100640050066
2 Amendola A, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Okada N, Shi P J (2008). Towards integrated disaster risk management: case studies and trends from Asia. Nat Hazards , 44(2): 163–168
doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9152-z
3 Brabb E E (1984). Innovative approaches to landslide hazard and risk mapping. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Landslides. Canadian Geotechnical Society, Toronto , 1, 307–324
4 Cancelli A, Crosta G (1994). Hazard and risk assessment in rockfall prone areas. In: Skipp B O, ed. Risk and Reliability in Ground Engineering . Springfield: Thomas Telford, 177–190
5 Carrara A, Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999). Use of GIS technology in the prediction and monitoring of landslide hazard. Nat Hazards , 20(2–3): 117–135
doi: 10.1023/A:1008097111310
6 Chau K T, Sze Y L, Fung M K, Wong W Y, Fong E L, Chan L C P (2004). Landslide hazard analysis for Hong Kong using and slide inventory and GIS. Comput Geosci , 30(4): 429–443
doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2003.08.013
7 Chengdu Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Conservation (1991a). Zonation Map of Debris Flow Distribution and Debris Flow Hazardousness in China, 1∶6000000. Chengdu: Chengdu Map Press (in Chinese)
8 Chengdu Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Conservation (1991b). Zonation Map of Landslide Distribution in China, 1∶6000000. Chengdu: Chengdu Map Press (in Chinese)
9 Chung C J, Fabbri A G (2008). Predicting landslides for risk analysis — Spatial models tested by a cross-validation technique. Geomorphology , 94(3–4): 438–452
doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.036
10 EM-DAT (2005). The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database. Université Catholique de Louvain-Brussels, Belgium , http://www.em-dat.net
11 Fall M, Azzam R, Noubactep C (2006). A multi-method approach to study the stability of natural slopes and landslide susceptibility mapping. Eng Geol , 82(4): 241–263
doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.007
12 Gritzner M L, Marcus W A, Aspinall R, Custer S G (2001). Assessing landslide potential using GIS, soil wetness modeling and topographic attributes, Payette River, Idaho. Geomorphology , 37(1–2): 149–165
doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00068-4
13 Kouli M, Loupasakis C, Soupios P, Vallianatos F (2010). Landslide hazard zonation in high risk areas of Rethymno Prefecture, Crete Island, Greece. Nat Hazards , 52(3): 599–621
doi: 10.1007/s11069-009-9403-2
14 Li Y, Gu J, Zhou L (2005). English-Chinese Glossary of Basic Terms Related to Disaster Management. Beijing: China Standard Press (in Chinese)
15 Liu X L (2000). Regional risk assessment on debris flow. Journal of Natural Disasters , 9(1): 54–61 (in Chinese)
16 Liu X L, Mo D W (2002). Site-specific debris flow vulnerability assessment. Geographical Research , 21(5): 569–577 (in Chinese)
17 Liu X L, Mo D W (2003). Risk Assessment on Debris Flow. Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press (in Chinese)
18 Remondo J, Bonachea J, Cendrero A (2008). Quantitative landslide risk assessment and mapping on the basis of recent occurrences. Geomorphology , 94(3–4): 496–507
doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.041
19 Shi P J (2002). Theory on disaster science and disaster dynamics. Journal of Natural Disasters , 11(3): 1–9 (in Chinese)
20 Shou K, Chen Y (2005). Spatial risk analysis of Li-shan landslide in Taiwan. Eng Geol , 80(3–4): 199–213
doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.05.002
21 Simpson D M, Human R J (2008). Large-scale vulnerability assessments for natural hazards. Nat Hazards , 47(2): 143–155
doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9202-6
22 United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (1992). Internationally Agreed Glossary of Basic Terms Related to Disaster Management, DNA/93/36, Geneva
23 Wang J A, Shi P J, Yi X, Jia H, Zhu L (2008). The regionalization of urban natural disasters in China. Nat Hazards , 44(2): 169–179
doi: 10.1007/s11069-006-9102-1
[1] Jing ZHU, Yi LU, Fumin REN, John L McBRIDE, Longbin YE. Typhoon disaster risk zoning for China’s coastal area[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(2): 291-303.
[2] Xue YU, Yue LI, Min XI, Fanlong KONG, Mingyue PANG, Zhengda YU. Ecological vulnerability analysis of Beidagang National Park, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(2): 385-397.
[3] Ştefan BILAŞCO, Corina GOVOR, Sanda ROŞCA, Iuliu VESCAN, Sorin FILIP, Ioan FODOREAN. GIS model for identifying urban areas vulnerable to noise pollution: case study[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(2): 214-228.
[4] Qing GU, Jun LI, Jinsong DENG, Yi LIN, Ligang MA, Chaofan WU, Ke WANG, Yang HONG. Eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for large drinking water resource: a case study of Qiandao Lake Area,China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(3): 578-589.
[5] Yuexia ZHANG, Jing GUO, Zhumei CHE. Discussion on evaluating the vulnerability of storm surge hazard bearing bodies in the coastal areas of Wenzhou[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(2): 300-307.
[6] Chao GAO, Jun LEI, Fengjun JIN. The classification and assessment of vulnerability of man-land system of oasis city in arid area[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2013, 7(4): 406-416.
[7] Michael M?derl, Wolfgang Rauch. Spatial risk assessment for critical network infrastructure using sensitivity analysis[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2011, 5(4): 414-420.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed