Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front Arch Civil Eng Chin    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (2) : 225-238    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0108-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Experimental study of two saturated natural soils and their saturated remoulded soils under three consolidated undrained stress paths
Mingjing JIANG1(), Haijun HU1, Jianbing PENG2, Serge LEROUEIL3
1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. School of Geological Engineering and Surveying, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China; 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Laval University, Quebec G1K 7P4, Canada
 Download: PDF(1258 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In this paper, an experimental investigation is conducted to study the mechanical behavior of saturated natural loess, saturated natural filling in ground fissure and their corresponding saturated remoulded soils under three consolidated undrained triaxial stress tests, namely, conventional triaxial compression test (CTC), triaxial compression test (TC) and reduced triaxial compression test (RTC). The test results show that stress-strain relation, i.e. strain-softening or strain-hardening, is remarkably influenced by the structure, void ratio, stress path and confining pressure. Natural structure, high void ratio, TC stress path, RTC stress path and low confining pressures are favorable factors leading to strain-softening. Excess pore pressure during shearing is significantly affected by stress path. The tested soils are different from loose sand on character of strain-softening and are different from common clay on excess pore water pressure behavior. The critical states in p′– q space in CTC, TC and RTC tests almost lie on one line, which indicates that the critical state is independent of the above stress paths. As for remoulded loess or remoulded filling, the critical state line (CSL) and isotropic consolidation line (ICL) in e-log p′ space are almost straight, while for natural loess or natural filling, in e-log p′ space there is a turning point on the CSL, which is similar to the ICL.

Keywords stress paths      static liquefaction      natural soil      remoulded soil      loess      structure      total strength indices      excess pore pressure     
Corresponding Author(s): JIANG Mingjing,Email:mingjing.jiang@tongji.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 June 2011
 Cite this article:   
Mingjing JIANG,Haijun HU,Jianbing PENG, et al. Experimental study of two saturated natural soils and their saturated remoulded soils under three consolidated undrained stress paths[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2011, 5(2): 225-238.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-011-0108-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2011/V5/I2/225
Fig.1  Sample location, geological profile and distribution of fissures
Fig.2  Collected samples. (a) Loess; (b) filling
propertyloessfilling
natural moisture content, %16.915.0
natural density, g/cm31.521.73
void ratio1.070.80
grain size distribution
sand>0.05mm, %12.19.5
silt 0.05~0.005mm, %83.184.1
clay<0.005mm, %4.86.4
atterberge limits
wl, %3331.3
wp, %18.914.6
Ip14.116.7
Tab.1  Physical properties of loess and filling
Fig.3  Plasticity properties of loess and filling as compared with loess types defined by []
Fig.4  Grain size distribution curves of loess and filling as compared with loess types defined by []
Fig.5  SEM photos of loess and filling on vertical plane of sample. (a) Natural loess; (b) natural filling; (c) remoulded loess; (d) remoulded filling
Fig.6  Schematic diagram of GDS triaxial apparatus
samplesload grades/kPa
saturated natural loess15, 30, 50, 65, 80, 95, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1600,3200
saturated natural filling15, 30, 50, 65, 80, 95, 110, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200
saturated remoulded loess15, 30, 50, 65, 80, 100, 130, 150, 180, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1600, 3200
saturated remoulded filling15, 30, 50, 65, 80, 95, 110, 150, 200, 400, 600, 1600, 2400, 3200
Tab.2  Program of oedometer tests
test typessaturated natural loesssaturated natural fillingsaturated remoulded loesssaturated remoulded filling
conventional triaxial compression testCTC50kPaCTC100kPaCTC50kPaCTC100kPa
CTC200kPaCTC200kPaCTC200kPaCTC200kPa
CTC400kPa
CTC600kPaCTC600kPaCTC600kPaCTC600kPa
triaxial compression testTC50kPaTC100kPaTC50kPaTC100kPa
TC200kPaTC200kPaTC200kPaTC200kPa
TC600kPaTC600kPaTC600kPaTC600kPa
reduced triaxial compression testRTC50kPaRTC100kPaRTC50kPaRTC100kPa
RTC200kPaRTC200kPaRTC200kPaRTC200kPa
RTC600kPaRTC600kPaRTC600kPaRTC600kPa
Tab.3  Program of triaxial stress path tests
Fig.7  Three stress paths in triaxial tests
samplesconsolidation yield stress/kPa
saturated natural loess79
saturated natural filling315
saturated remoulded loess29
saturated remoulded filling53
Tab.4  Consolidation yield stress of samples
soil typessaturated natural loesssaturated natural fillingsaturated remoulded loesssaturated remoulded filling
compression coefficient α1-2/MPa-11.110.170.820.55
compression index cc0.340.250.280.17
gradient of K0 compression line λ0.1520.1130.1250.073
gradient of isotropic consolidation line λ*0.1990.0880.1320.072
Tab.5  Compressibility of natural soils and remoulded soils
Fig.8  Compression curves in oedometer test and consolidation point in triaxial test
Fig.9  -log curves in oedometer test
Fig.10  Distribution of major axis of particles of a region observed on vertical plane of sample. (a) Natural loess; (b) remoulded loess; (c) natural filling; (d) remoulded filling
Fig.11  Test results of saturated natural loess. (a) Effective stress paths and critical state line in ′- space; (b) (T-) stress path in - space; (c) deviatoric stress versus axial strain curves; (d) excess pore pressure versus axial strain
Fig.12  Test results of saturated remoulded loess. (a) Effective stress paths and critical state line in ′-′ space; (b) (T-) stress path in - space; (c) deviatoric stress versus axial strain curves; (d) pore pressure versus axial strain
Fig.13  Test results of saturated natural filling. (a) Effective stress paths and critical state line in ′- space; (b) (T-) stress path in - space; (c) deviatoric stress versus axial strain curves; (d) pore pressure versus axial strain
Fig.14  Test results of saturated remoulded filling. (a) Effective stress paths and critical state line in ′- space; (b) (T-) stress path in - coordination space; (c) deviatoric stress versus axial strain curves; (d) pore pressure versus axial strain
samplesstrain-hardeningstrain-softening
saturated natural loessCTC600kPaCTC50kPa, CTC200kPa,
TC400ka, TC50kPa, TC200kPa, TC600ka,
RTC50kPa, RTC200kPa, RTC600ka
saturated natural fillingCTC50kPa, CTC200kPa, CTC600ka, TC50kPa,TC200kPa, TC600ka,
RTC50kPa, RTC200kPa, RTC600ka
saturated remoulded loessCTC600kPaCTC100kPa, CTC200kPa
TC100kPa, TC200kPa, TC600ka,
RTC100kPa, RTC200kPa, RTC600ka
saturated remoulded fillingCTC100kPa, CTC200kPa, CTC600ka,
TC100kPa, TC200kPa, TC600ka,
RTC100kPa, RTC200kPa, RTC600ka
Tab.6  Failure types of tested soils
Fig.15  Comparison of shear behavior between saturated remoulded loess and saturated natural loess. (a) Deviatoric stress versus axial strain curves; (b) excess pore pressure versus axial strain curves
consolidated stress/kPasaturated natural loesssaturated natural fillingsaturated remoulded loess
CTCTCRTCCTCTCRTCCTCTCRTC
5027.8420.5440.7221.138.1215.0422.09
20013.2518.9021.1013.3720.4222.605.5511.15
60020.157.157.3711.472.3814.88
Tab.7  Softening coefficient of tested soils (%)
samplesc'/kPa?'/(°)
saturated natural loess6.430.8
saturated remoulded loess1.434.3
saturated natural filling3.134.2
saturated remoulded filling2.633.5
Tab.8  Effective strength indexes of tested soils
samplesc/kPa?/(°)
CTC8.714.9
TC5.116.8
RTC6.626.8
Tab.9  Total strength indexes of saturated remoulded filling
test typesaAf
CTC100kPa0.770.26
CTC200kPa1.320.44
CTC600kPa1.390.46
TC100kPa1.340.45
TC200kPa1.540.51
TC600kPa1.640.55
RTC100kPa1.640.55
RTC200kPa1.540.51
RTC600kPa1.790.60
Tab.10  and in test for saturated remoulded filling
samples?cu/(°)
TC18.9
RTC34.8
Tab.11  Predicted total strength indexes of saturated remoulded loess
Fig.16  ICL and CSL of saturated natural soils in -log ′ space
Fig.17  ICL and CSL of saturated remoulded soils in -log ′ space isotropic consolidated lines
1 Castro G. Liquefaction of sands. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Cambridge: Harvard University, 1969
2 Poulos S J. The steady state of deformation. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1981, 107(5): 553–562
3 Poulos S J, Castro G, France J W. Liquefaction evaluation procedure. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1985, 111(6): 772–792
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:6(772)
4 Ishihara K. Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes: thirty-third rankine lecture. Geotechnique , 1993, 43(3): 351–415
doi: 10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351
5 Yamamuro J A, Lade P V. Steady state concepts and static liquefaction of silty sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering , 1998, 124(9): 868–877
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:9(868)
6 Chang Y S, Wang X D, Zai J M, Xu J L. Stress path tests of cohesive soil. Journal of Nanjing University of technology , 2005, 27(5): 36–44 (in Chinese)
7 Zeng L L, Chen X P. Analysis of mechanical characteristics of soft soil under different stress paths. Rock and Soil Mechanics , 2009, 30(5): 1264–1270 (in Chinese)
8 Liu Z D, Xing Y C. A new method for determining the parameters of cap-model. Water Resources & Water Engineering , 1993, 4(4): 1–8 (in Chinese)
9 Yang P. Influence of stress path on deformation and strength characteristics of saturated intact loess. Dissertation for the Master Degree , Xi’an: Xi’an University of Technology, 2007 (in Chinese)
10 Yang Z M, Zhao C G, Wang L M, Rao W G. Liquefaction behaviros and steady state strength of saturated loess. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering , 2007, 35(12): 83–86 (in Chinese)
11 Zhang D X, Wang G H, Luo C Y, Chen J, Zhou Y X. A rapid loess flow slide triggered by irrigation in China. Landslides , 2009, 6(1): 55–60
doi: 10.1007/s10346-008-0135-2
12 Zhou Y X, Zhang D X, Zhou X D. Undrained consolidation triaxial test for flow sliding mechanism of loess landslides. Journal of Engineering Geology , 2010, 18(1): 72–77 (in Chinese)
13 Zhou Y X, Zhang D X, Luo C Y, Chen J.Experimental research on steady strength of saturated loess. Rock and Soil Mechanics , 2010, 31(5): 1486–1490,1496 (in Chinese)
14 Leroueil S, Vaughan P R. The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks. Geotechnique , 1990, 40(3): 467–488
doi: 10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.467
15 Diaz-Rodriguez J A, Leroueil S, Aleman J D. Yielding of mexico city clay and other natural clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1992, 118(7): 981–995
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:7(981)
16 Malandraki V, Toll D G. Triaxial tests on weakly bonded soil with changes in stress path. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering , 2001, 127(3): 282–291
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:3(282)
17 Yin J, Hong Z S, Gao Y F. Yielding characteristics of natural soft Lianyungang clay. Journal of Southeast University , 2009, 39(5): 1059–1064 (Natural Science Edition)
18 Liu M F, Yao Y P, Kong D Q. The experimental study of saturated structural K0 consolidated loess. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology , 2008, 40(2): 238–248 (Natural Science Edition)
19 Lamber T W. Stress path method. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations , 1967, 93(6): 309–331
20 Lamber T W, Marr W A. Stress path method: second edition. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1979, 105(6): 727–738
21 Ng C W W. Stress paths in relation to deep excavations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering , 1999, 125(5): 357–363
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:5(357)
22 Cai M. Influence of stress path on tunnel excavation response – Numerical tool selection and modeling strategy. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology , 2008, 23(6): 618–628
doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2007.11.005
23 Weng M C, Jeng F S, Hsieh Y M, Huang T H. A simple model for stress-induced anisotropic softening of weak sandstones. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences , 2008, 45(2): 155–166
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.04.004
24 Chen C N, Tseng C T. 2D tunneling chart from redistributed 3D principal stress path. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology , 2010, 25(4): 305–314
doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2010.01.003
25 Bilotta E, Stallebrass S E. Prediction of stresses and strains around model tunnels with adjacent embedded walls in overconsolidated clay. Computers and Geotechnics , 2009, 36(6): 1049–1057
doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.03.015
26 Dai F C, Lee C F, Wang S J, Feng Y Y. Stress–strain behavior of a loosely compacted volcanic-derived soil and its significance to rainfall-induced fill slope failures. Engineering Geology , 1999, 53(3-4): 359–370
doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00016-2
27 Zhou B C. Influence of stress path on effective shear strength parameters of reshaped clay. Journal of Huazhong University of Science & Technology , 2007, 35(12): 83–86 (Nature Science Edition)
28 Gibbs H J, Holland W Y. Petrographic and engineering properties of loess. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation. Engineering Monograph , 1960, 28: 1–37
29 Bishop A W, Wesley L. A hydraulic triaxial apparatus for controlled stress path testing. Geotechnique , 1975, 25(4): 657–670
doi: 10.1680/geot.1975.25.4.657
30 Menzies B K. A computer controlled hydraulic triaxial testing system. In: Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock, ASTM STP 977 Philadelphia , 1988, 82–94
31 Casagrande A. Determination of the pre-consolidation load and its practical significance. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation . Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1936, 60–64
32 Chandler R J. Clay sediments in depositional Basins: the geotechnical cycle. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology , 2000, 33(1): 7–39
doi: 10.1144/qjegh.33.1.7
33 Jiang M J, Yu H S, Leroueil S. A simple and efficient approach to capturing bonding effect in natural sands by discrete element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , 2007, 69(6): 1158–1193
doi: 10.1002/nme.1804
34 Roscoe K H, Schofield A N, Thurairajah A. Yield of clays in states wetter than critical. Geotechnique , 1963, 13(3): 211–240
doi: 10.1680/geot.1963.13.3.211
35 Bishop A W. Progressive failure-with special reference to the mechanism causing it. In: Proceedings of the Geotechnical Conference, Norway , 1967, 142–150
36 Pan X Q, Pan L, Luo S H. Influence of stress path on ?cu of normally-consolidated saturated clay. Dam Observation and Geotechnical Tests , 1997, 21(4): 25–30 (in Chinese)
[1] Yurong ZHANG, Shengxuan XU, Yanhong GAO, Jie GUO, Yinghui CAO, Junzhi ZHANG. Correlation of chloride diffusion coefficient and microstructure parameters in concrete: A comparative analysis using NMR, MIP, and X-CT[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1509-1519.
[2] Sang I. PARK, Sang-Ho LEE. Heuristic solution using decision tree model for enhanced XML schema matching of bridge structural calculation documents[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1403-1417.
[3] El Houcine MOURID, Said MAMOURI, Adnan IBRAHIMBEGOVIC. Progressive collapse of 2D reinforced concrete structures under sudden column removal[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1387-1402.
[4] Beibei SUN, Hao WU, Weimin SONG, Zhe LI, Jia YU. Hydration, microstructure and autogenous shrinkage behaviors of cement mortars by addition of superabsorbent polymers[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1274-1284.
[5] Nader KARBALLAEEZADEH, Hosein GHASEMZADEH TEHRANI, Danial MOHAMMADZADEH SHADMEHRI, Shahaboddin SHAMSHIRBAND. Estimation of flexible pavement structural capacity using machine learning techniques[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1083-1096.
[6] Jie LI. A PDEM-based perspective to engineering reliability: From structures to lifeline networks[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1056-1065.
[7] Chunfeng ZHAO, Xin YE, Avinash GAUTAM, Xin LU, Y. L. MO. Simplified theoretical analysis and numerical study on the dynamic behavior of FCP under blast loads[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 983-997.
[8] Lingyun YOU, Kezhen YAN, Jianhong MAN, Nengyuan LIU. Anisotropy of multi-layered structure with sliding and bonded interlayer conditions[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 632-645.
[9] Yu-Fei WU, Ying-Wu ZHOU, Biao HU, Xiaoxu HUANG, Scott SMITH. Fused structures for safer and more economical constructions[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 1-9.
[10] Nishant SHARMA, Kaustubh DASGUPTA, Arindam DEY. Optimum lateral extent of soil domain for dynamic SSI analysis of RC framed buildings on pile foundations[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 62-81.
[11] Tugrul TALASLIOGLU. Optimal dome design considering member-related design constraints[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1150-1170.
[12] Mingjie ZHANG, Fuyou XU. Variational mode decomposition based modal parameter identification in civil engineering[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1082-1094.
[13] Reza KHADEMI-ZAHEDI, Pouyan ALIMOURI. Finite element model updating of a large structure using multi-setup stochastic subspace identification method and bees optimization algorithm[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 965-980.
[14] Zhenyuan LUO, Weiming YAN, Weibing XU, Qinfei ZHENG, Baoshun WANG. Experimental research on the multilayer compartmental particle damper and its application methods on long-period bridge structures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 751-766.
[15] Maryam ZANDIYEHVAKILI, Isa HOJAT, Mehdi MAHMUDI. The role of geometrical features in the architectural- structural interaction: Some case studies of the Iranian ancient architecture[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 716-724.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed