The past, present and future of bovine pluripotent stem cells: a brief overview

doi:10.15302/J-FASE-2018247

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.

2019, Vol. 6

Issue (1) : 3-7 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2018247

REVIEW

The past, present and future of bovine pluripotent stem cells: a brief overview

Xiuchun TIAN(

)

Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticut/UCONN Stem Cell Institute, Storrs, CT 06268-4163, USA

Download: PDF(139 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

Although the pursuit of bovine embryonic stem cells started more than 26 years ago for the purpose of gene-targeting, true pluripotent stem cells in this economically important species are still elusive. With the rapid advances in genome-editing and cloning using homologously recombined somatic cells, the need for pluripotent stem cells for precise genetic modification in any species became questionable. With the pig being the better model for human regenerative biology, the identification of the commonalities and uniqueness of the pluripotency circuitry across mammalian species may be the main objective for studying pluripotent stem cells in the bovine.

Keywords bovine embryonic induced pluripotent stem cells

Corresponding Author(s): Xiuchun TIAN

Just Accepted Date: 19 December 2018 Online First Date: 10 January 2019 Issue Date: 25 February 2019

Cite this article:

Xiuchun TIAN. The past, present and future of bovine pluripotent stem cells: a brief overview[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(1): 3-7.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2018247
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2019/V6/I1/3

1	SSaito, N Strelchenko, HNiemann. Bovine embryonic stem cell-like cell lines cultured over several passages. Roux’s Archives of Developmental Biology, 1992, 201(3): 134–141 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188711 pmid: 28305579
2	PLi, C Tong, RMehrian-Shai, LJia, N Wu, YYan, R EMaxson, E NSchulze, HSong, C L Hsieh, M F Pera, Q L Ying. Germline competent embryonic stem cells derived from rat blastocysts. Cell, 2008, 135(7): 1299–1310 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.006 pmid: 19109898
3	F DWest, E W Uhl, Y Liu, HStowe, YLu, P Yu, AGallegos-Cardenas, S LPratt, S LStice. Brief report: chimeric pigs produced from induced pluripotent stem cells demonstrate germline transmission and no evidence of tumor formation in young pigs. Stem Cells, 2011, 29(10): 1640–1643 https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.713 pmid: 22039609
4	ABradley, M Evans, M HKaufman, ERobertson. Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines. Nature, 1984, 309(5965): 255–256 https://doi.org/10.1038/309255a0 pmid: 6717601
5	J AThomson, J Itskovitz-Eldor, S SShapiro, M AWaknitz, J JSwiergiel, V SMarshall, J MJones. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science, 1998, 282(5391): 1145–1147 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5391.1145 pmid: 9804556
6	JNichols, A Smith. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell, 2009, 4(6): 487–492
7	I GBrons, L E Smithers, M W Trotter, P Rugg-Gunn, BSun, S MChuva de Sousa Lopes, S KHowlett, AClarkson, LAhrlund-Richter, R APedersen, LVallier. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature, 2007, 448(7150): 191–195 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05950 pmid: 17597762
8	P JTesar, J G Chenoweth, F A Brook, T J Davies, E P Evans, D L Mack, R L Gardner, R D McKay. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature, 2007, 448(7150): 196–199 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05972 pmid: 17597760
9	DJames, A J Levine, D Besser, AHemmati-Brivanlou. TGFβ/activin/nodal signaling is necessary for the maintenance of pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Development, 2005, 132(6): 1273–1282 https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01706 pmid: 15703277
10	KTakahashi, S Yamanaka. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 2006, 126(4): 663–676 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 pmid: 16904174
11	JYu, M A Vodyanik, K Smuga-Otto, JAntosiewicz-Bourget, J LFrane, STian, J Nie, G AJonsdottir, VRuotti, RStewart, I ISlukvin, J AThomson. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science, 2007, 318(5858): 1917–1920 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151526 pmid: 18029452
12	CBuecker, H H Chen, J M Polo, L Daheron, LBu, T SBarakat, POkwieka, APorter, JGribnau, KHochedlinger, NGeijsen. A murine ESC-like state facilitates transgenesis and homologous recombination in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2010, 6(6): 535–546 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.05.003 pmid: 20569691
13	JHanna, A W Cheng, K Saha, JKim, C JLengner, FSoldner, J PCassady, JMuffat, B WCarey, RJaenisch. Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(20): 9222–9227 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004584107 pmid: 20442331
14	OGafni, L Weinberger, A AMansour, Y SManor, EChomsky, DBen-Yosef, YKalma, SViukov, IMaza, A Zviran, YRais, ZShipony, ZMukamel, VKrupalnik, MZerbib, SGeula, ICaspi, DSchneir, TShwartz, SGilad, DAmann-Zalcenstein, SBenjamin, IAmit, A Tanay, RMassarwa, NNovershtern, J HHanna. Derivation of novel human ground state naive pluripotent stem cells. Nature, 2013, 504(7479): 282–286 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12745 pmid: 24172903
15	JWu, A Platero-Luengo, MSakurai, ASugawara, M AGil, TYamauchi, KSuzuki, Y SBogliotti, CCuello, MMorales Valencia, DOkumura, JLuo, M Vilariño, IParrilla, D ASoto, C AMartinez, THishida, SSánchez-Bautista, M LMartinez-Martinez, HWang, A Nohalez, EAizawa, PMartinez-Redondo, AOcampo, PReddy, JRoca, E A Maga, C R Esteban, W T Berggren, E Nuñez Delicado, JLajara, IGuillen, PGuillen, J MCampistol, E AMartinez, P JRoss, J CIzpisua Belmonte. Interspecies chimerism with mammalian pluripotent stem cells. Cell, 2017, 168(3): 473–486 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.036 pmid: 28129541
16	YYang, B Liu, JXu, JWang, J Wu, CShi, YXu, J Dong, CWang, WLai, J Zhu, LXiong, DZhu, X Li, WYang, TYamauchi, ASugawara, ZLi, F Sun, XLi, CLi, A He, YDu, TWang, C Zhao, HLi, XChi, H Zhang, YLiu, CLi, S Duo, MYin, HShen, J C I Belmonte, H Deng. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells with in vivo embryonic and extraembryonic potency. Cell, 2017, 169(2): 243–257 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.005 pmid: 28388409
17	XWu, M Song, XYang, XLiu, K Liu, CJiao, JWang, C Bai, GSu, XLiu, G Li. Establishment of bovine embryonic stem cells after knockdown of CDX2. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 28343 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28343 pmid: 27320776
18	J BCibelli, S L Stice, P J Golueke, J J Kane, J Jerry, CBlackwell, F A Pde León, J MRobl. Transgenic bovine chimeric offspring produced from somatic cell-derived stem-like cells. Nature Biotechnology, 1998, 16(7): 642–646 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0798-642 pmid: 9661197
19	Y SBogliotti, JWu, M Vilarino, DOkamura, D ASoto, CZhong, MSakurai, R VSampaio, KSuzuki, J CIzpisua Belmonte, P JRoss. Efficient derivation of stable primed pluripotent embryonic stem cells from bovine blastocysts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(9): 2090–2095 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716161115 pmid: 29440377
20	HSumer, J Liu, L FMalaver-Ortega, M LLim, KKhodadadi, P JVerma. NANOG is a key factor for induction of pluripotency in bovine adult fibroblasts. Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 89(9): 2708–2716 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3666 pmid: 21478453
21	XHan, J Han, FDing, SCao, S S Lim, Y Dai, RZhang, YZhang, BLim, N Li. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from bovine embryonic fibroblast cells. Cell Research, 2011, 21(10): 1509–1512 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.125 pmid: 21826109
22	HCao, P Yang, YPu, XSun, H Yin, YZhang, YZhang, YLi, Y Liu, FFang, ZZhang, YTao, X Zhang. Characterization of bovine induced pluripotent stem cells by lentiviral transduction of reprogramming factor fusion proteins. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 2012, 8(4): 498–511 https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.3723 pmid: 22457605
23	T RTalluri, D Kumar, SGlage, WGarrels, ZIvics, KDebowski, RBehr, H Niemann, W AKues. Derivation and characterization of bovine induced pluripotent stem cells by transposon-mediated reprogramming. Cellular Reprogramming, 2015, 17(2): 131–140 https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2014.0080 pmid: 25826726
24	L FMalaver-Ortega, HSumer, JLiu, P J Verma. Inhibition of JAK-STAT ERK/MAPK and glycogen synthase kinase-3 induces a change in gene expression profile of bovine induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells International, 2016, 2016: 5127984 https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5127984 pmid: 26880968
25	S WWang, S S Wang, D C Wu, Y C Lin, C C Ku, C C Wu, C Y Chai, J N Lee, E M Tsai, C L Lin, R C Yang, Y C Ko, H S Yu, C Huo, C PChuu, YMurayama, YNakamura, SHashimoto, KMatsushima, CJin, R Eckner, C SLin, SSaito, K KYokoyama. Androgen receptor-mediated apoptosis in bovine testicular induced pluripotent stem cells in response to phthalate esters. Cell Death & Disease, 2013, 4(11): e907 https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2013.420 pmid: 24201806
26	Y CLin, K K Kuo, K Wuputra, S HLin, C CKu, Y HYang, S WWang, S WWang, D CWu, C CWu, C YChai, C LLin, C SLin, MKajitani, HMiyoshi, YNakamura, SHashimoto, KMatsushima, CJin, S K Huang, S Saito, K KYokoyama. Bovine induced pluripotent stem cells are more resistant to apoptosis than testicular cells in response to mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2014, 15(3): 5011–5031 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15035011 pmid: 24658443
27	Y THeo, X Quan, Y NXu, SBaek, H Choi, N HKim, JKim. CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease-mediated gene knock-in in bovine-induced pluripotent cells. Stem Cells and Development, 2015, 24(3): 393–402 https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2014.0278 pmid: 25209165
28	TKawaguchi, T Tsukiyama, KKimura, SMatsuyama, NMinami, MYamada, HImai. Generation of naïve bovine induced pluripotent stem cells using piggyBac transposition of doxycycline-inducible transcription factors. PLoS One, 2015, 10(8): e0135403 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135403 pmid: 26287611
29	TKawaguchi, D Cho, MHayashi, TTsukiyama, KKimura, SMatsuyama, NMinami, MYamada, HImai. Derivation of induced trophoblast cell lines in cattle by doxycycline-inducible piggyBac vectors. PLoS One, 2016, 11(12): e0167550 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167550 pmid: 27907214
30	N CTalbot, W O Sparks, C E Phillips, A D Ealy, A M Powell, T J Caperna, W M Garrett, D M Donovan, L A Blomberg. Bovine trophectoderm cells induced from bovine fibroblasts with induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming factors. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2017, 84(6): 468–485 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22797 pmid: 28332752
31	TEzashi, H Matsuyama, B PTelugu, R MRoberts. Generation of colonies of induced trophoblast cells during standard reprogramming of porcine fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Biology of Reproduction, 2011, 85(4): 779–787 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.111.092809 pmid: 21734265
32	T JWilliams, R K Munro, J N Shelton. Production of interspecies chimeric calves by aggregation of Bos indicus and Bos taurus demi-embryos. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 1990, 2(4): 385–394 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9900385 pmid: 2217895
33	ABoediono, T Suzuki, L YLi, R AGodke. Offspring born from chimeras reconstructed from parthenogenetic and in vitro fertilized bovine embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 1999, 53(2): 159–170 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199906)53:2<159::AID-MRD5>3.0.CO;2-X pmid: 10331454
34	M IHiriart, R J Bevacqua, N G Canel, R Fernández-Martín, D FSalamone. Production of chimeric embryos by aggregation of bovine egfp eight-cell stage blastomeres with two-cell fused and asynchronic embryos. Theriogenology, 2013, 80(4): 357–364 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.04.023 pmid: 23735715
35	KSimmet, M Reichenbach, H DReichenbach, EWolf. Phytohemagglutinin facilitates the aggregation of blastomere pairs from Day 5 donor embryos with Day 4 host embryos for chimeric bovine embryo multiplication. Theriogenology, 2015, 84(9): 1603–1610 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.08.012 pmid: 26409823
36	E MRazza, R A Satrapa, I P Emanuelli, C M Barros, M F Nogueira. Screening of biotechnical parameters for production of bovine inter-subspecies embryonic chimeras by the aggregation of tetraploid Bos indicus and diploid crossbred Bos taurus embryos. Reproductive Biology, 2016, 16(1): 34–40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2015.11.003 pmid: 26952751
37	SSaito, K Sawai, HUgai, SMoriyasu, AMinamihashi, YYamamoto, HHirayama, SKageyama, JPan, T Murata, YKobayashi, YObata, K KYokoyama. Generation of cloned calves and transgenic chimeric embryos from bovine embryonic stem-like cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2003, 309(1): 104–113 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01536-5 pmid: 12943670
38	SIwasaki, K H Campbell, C Galli, KAkiyama, SIwasaki. Production of live calves derived from embryonic stem-like cells aggregated with tetraploid embryos. Biology of Reproduction, 2000, 62(2): 470–475 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.2.470 pmid: 10642589
39	TFurusawa, K Ohkoshi, KKimura, SMatsuyama, SAkagi, MKaneda, MIkeda, MHosoe, KKizaki, TTokunaga. Characteristics of bovine inner cell mass-derived cell lines and their fate in chimeric conceptuses. Biology of Reproduction, 2013, 89(2): 28 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.112.106641 pmid: 23782837
40	MCasal, M Haskins. Large animal models and gene therapy. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2006, 14(3): 266–272 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201535 pmid: 16333317
41	P AHarper, P J Healy, J A Dennis. Animal model of human disease. Citrullinemia (argininosuccinate synthetase deficiency). American Journal of Pathology, 1989, 135(6): 1213–1215 pmid: 2596577

[1]	Yanna DANG, Kun ZHANG. Factors affecting early embryonic development in cattle: relevance for bovine cloning[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(1): 33-41.
[2]	Jianyong HAN, Yi-Liang MIAO, Jinlian HUA, Yan LI, Xue ZHANG, Jilong ZHOU, Na LI, Ying ZHANG, Jinying ZHANG, Zhonghua LIU. Porcine pluripotent stem cells: progress, challenges and prospects[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(1): 8-27.
[3]	Qijing LEI, Qin PAN, Shuai YU, Na LI, Shulin CHEN, Kuldip SIDHU, Jinlian HUA. Reprogramming of the pig primordial germ cells into pluripotent stem cells: a brief review[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(1): 28-32.
[4]	Min ZHANG,Xueqian CHENG,Dan CHU,Jingwen LIANG,Yi SUN,Li MA,Beilei XU,Min ZHENG,Meili WANG,Liming REN,Xiaoxiang HU,Qingyong MENG,Ran ZHANG,Ying GUO,Yunping DAI,Robert AITKEN,Ning LI,Yaofeng ZHAO. Depletion of conventional mature B cells and compromised specific antibody response in bovine immunoglobulin μ heavy-chain transgenic mice[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2014, 1(2): 158-173.
[5]	Hanning WANG,Yangli PEI,Ning LI,Jianyong HAN. Progress, problems and prospects of porcine pluripotent stem cells[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2014, 1(1): 6-15.
[6]	Guanghua SU,Lei CHENG,Yu GAO,Kun LIU,Zhuying WEI,Chunling BAI,Fengxia YIN,Li GAO,Guangpeng LI,Shorgan BOU. In vivo and in vitro development of Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii) interspecific cloned embryos[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2014, 1(1): 28-36.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed