Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (1) : 198-207    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1968-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Development of barium@alginate adsorbents for sulfate removal in lithium refining
Lisa Xu, Kaifei Chen, George Q. Chen, Sandra E. Kentish, Gang (Kevin) Li()
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
 Download: PDF(1698 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The demand for lithium has been steadily growing in recent years due to the boom of electric cars. High purity lithium is commonly used in the manufacture of battery grade lithium electrolyte. Sulfate residuals originating from acid leaching of lithium ores must be limited to below 20 mg·L1 during refining. There are methods to remove sulfate such as membrane processing and chemical precipitation using barium salts. However, membrane separation is unable to achieve the required purity while chemical precipitation often causes secondary contamination with barium and requires extra filtration processes that lead to increased processing costs. In this study, we developed a polymeric matrix entrapped with barium ions as a novel adsorbent to selectively adsorb sulfate in aqueous solutions. The adsorbent was prepared by dropwise injection method where alginate droplets were crosslinked with barium to form hydrogel microcapsules. In a typical scenario, the microcapsules had a diameter of 3 mm and contained 5 wt-% alginate. The microcapsules could successfully reduce sulfate concentration in a solution from 100 to 16 mg·L1, exceeding the removal target. However, the microcapsules were mechanically unstable in the presence of an excess amount of sulfate. Hence, calcium ions were added as a secondary crosslinking agent to improve the integrity of the microcapsules. The two-step Ca/Ba@alginate microcapsules showed an exceptional adsorption performance, reducing the sulfate concentration to as low as 0.02 mg·L1. Since the sulfate selective microcapsules can be easily removed from the aqueous system and do not result in secondary barium contamination, these Ca/Ba@alginate adsorbents will find applications in ultra-refining of lithium in industry.

Keywords barium@alginate      microcapsules      dropwise injection      sulfate removal      lithium     
Corresponding Author(s): Gang (Kevin) Li   
Just Accepted Date: 25 August 2020   Online First Date: 29 October 2020    Issue Date: 12 January 2021
 Cite this article:   
Lisa Xu,Kaifei Chen,George Q. Chen, et al. Development of barium@alginate adsorbents for sulfate removal in lithium refining[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 198-207.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-020-1968-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2021/V15/I1/198
Fig.1  Methods for preparing Ba@alginate microcapsules: (a) Method 1, pure barium hydroxide Ba@alginate microcapsules; (b) Method 2, two-step Ca/Ba@alginate microcapsules, where the polymerisation reaction first took place by using calcium as the firming agent, followed by barium; (c) Method 3, one step dual-ion Ca-Ba@alginate microcapsules, where both calcium and barium ions were used for the polymerisation reaction at the same time.
Fig.2  Scheme 1 Barium ion crosslinks with carboxyl functional groups.
Fig.3  Optical images of Ba@alginate microcapsules prepared using three methods at different alginate concentrations: (a-e) Ba@alginate microcapsules produced from 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 wt-% alginate, respectively; (f) Ca/Ba@alginate from 5 wt-% alginate; (g) Ca-Ba@alginate from 5 wt-% alginate. Illustrations of the alginate solution dropwise injection process (h) under the desirable range of viscosity and (i) under high viscosity.
Fig.4  (a) The relationship between the integrity and the concentration of alginate in an 800 mg·L1 lithium sulfate solution (red line: a line of best fit; inset: optical image of Ba@alginate flakes, scale: mm); (b) the physical strength of calcium@alginate microcapsules under 0.1 and 0.05 mol·L–1 Ca2+ and 60, 3000, 1200 s crosslink time.
Fig.5  SEM/EDS of pure barium hydroxide Ba@alginate microcapsules (a–b) before and (c–d) after sulfate adsorption in 100 mg·L1 lithium sulfate solution. The distance on the x-axis corresponds to the chord line shown in the microscopy image.
Fig.6  (a) Sulfate removal efficiency of Ba@alginate microcapsules in a 100 mg·L1 lithium sulfate solution; (b) concentration of sulfate solution after adsorption in a 100 mg·L1 lithium sulfate solution.
Fig.7  The sulfate removed per gram of Ba@alginate microcapsules in 100 mg·L1 lithium sulfate solution versus time fitted by (a) the pseudo second order, (b) pseudo first order, and (c) Elovich adsorption kinetic models.
Parameters Secondorder pseudo Firstorder pseudo Elovich
Qe/(mg·g1) k2× 103/(g·mg1·s1) R2 Qe
/(mg·g1)
k1× 103/s1 R2 α/s1 β R2
Ca/Ba@alginate 2.76 1.71 0.991 2.64 2.68 0.988 2.08 4.19 0.952
Ca-Ba@alginate 2.18 1.32 0.984 2.04 1.91 0.953 8.25 × 103 3.80 0.971
Ba@alginate 2.10 1.56 0.990 2.01 1.83 0.990 1.07 × 102 2.02 0.955
Tab.1  Kinetic parameters of second order pseudo, first order pseudo, and Elovich for Ba@alginate microcapsules in 100 mg·L1 lithium sulfate solution
1 J Hykawy, T. Chudnovsky Industry report//Lithium. Stormcrow technical report. 2015
2 C Grosjean, P H Miranda, M Perrin, P Poggi. Assessment of world lithium resources and consequences of their geographic distribution on the expected development of the electric vehicle industry. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(3): 1735–1744
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.023
3 S E Kesler, P W Gruber, P A Medina, G A Keoleian, M P Everson, T J Wallington. Global lithium resources: relative importance of pegmatite, brine and other deposits. Ore Geology Reviews, 2012, 48: 55–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.05.006
4 Y Chen, Q Tian, B Chen, X Shi, T Liao. Preparation of lithium carbonate from spodumene by a sodium carbonate autoclave process. Hydrometallurgy, 2011, 109(2): 43–46
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.05.006
5 L T Peiró, G V Méndez, R U Ayres. Lithium: sources, production, uses, and recovery outlook. JOM, 2013, 65(8): 986–996
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0666-4
6 D Buckley, J D Genders. Method of making high purity lithium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid. US Patent, 20110044882A1, 2011-02-24
7 Livent. Lithium hydroxide monohydrate, battery grade. Datasheet. 2018
8 L K Wang, D A Vaccari, Y Li, N K Shammas. Physicochemical Treatment Processes. In: Handbook of Environmental Engineering. New Delhi: Humana Press, 2005, 3: 141–197
9 S Sarkar, A K Sengupta, P Prakash. The Donnan membrane principle: opportunities for sustainable engineered processes and materials. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(4): 1161–1166
https://doi.org/10.1021/es9024029
10 C Y Tang, Z Yang. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Membrane Characterization, 2017, 145–159
11 S Lin. Water and wastewater calculations manual 3rd edition, 2014
12 G G Chen, G S Luo, J H Xu, J D Wang. Membrane dispersion precipitation method to prepare nanoparticles—A Review. Powder Technology, 2004, 139(2): 180–185
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2003.12.003
13 D C Y Wong, Z Jaworski, A W Nienow. Effect of ion excess on particle size and morphology during barium sulfate precipitation: an experimental study. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(3): 727–734
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00282-7
14 K Y Lee, D J Mooney. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Progress in Polymer Science, 2012, 37(1): 106–126
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003
15 D R Lu, C M Xiao, S J Xu. Starch-based completely biodegradable polymer materials. Express Polymer Letters, 2009, 3(6): 366–375
https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.46
16 Z Li, H R Ramay, K D Hach, D Xiao, M Zhang. Chitosan-alginate hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(18): 3919–3928
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.062
17 N Fiol, C Escudero, J Poch, I Villaescus. Preliminary studies on Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution using grape stalk wastes encapsulated in calcium alginate beads in a packed bed up-flow column. Reactive & Functional Polymers, 2006, 66(8): 795–807
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2005.11.006
18 B B Lee, P Ravindra, E S Chan. Size and shape of calcium alginate beads produced by extrusion dripping. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2013, 36(10): 1627–1642
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201300230
19 E S Chan, B B Lee, P Ravindra, D Poncelet. Prediction models for shape and size of ca-alginate macrobeads produced through extrusion-dripping method. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2009, 338(1): 63–72
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2009.05.027
20 S K Papageorgiou, E P Kouvelos, F K Katsaros. Calcium alginate beads from Laminaria digitata for the removal of Cu2+ and Cd2+ from dilute aqueous metal solutions. Desalination, 2008, 224(1-3): 293–306
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.06.011
21 B E Larsen, J Bjørnstad, E O Pettersen, H H Tønnesen, J E Melvik. Rheological characterization of an injectable alginate gel system. BMC Biotechnology, 2015, 15(1): 29
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-015-0147-7
22 H S Fogler. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2016, chapter 14: 1–10
23 W Cai, R Chen, Y Yang, M Yi, L Xiang. Removal of SO42− from Li2CO3 by recrystallization in Na2CO3 solution. Crystals, 2018, 8(1): 19–26
https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8010019
24 Ý A Mørch, I Donati, B L Strand, G Skjåk-Bræk. Effect of Ca2+, Ba2+, and Sr2+ on alginate microbeads. Biomacromolecules, 2006, 7(5): 1471–1480
https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060010d
25 M Fathy, T A Moghny, A E Awadallah, A Au El-Bellihi. Study the adsorption of sulfates by high cross-linked polystyrene divinylbenzene anion-exchange resin. Applied Water Science, 2017, 7(1): 309–313
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0246-y
26 L Largitte, R Pasquier. A review of the kinetics adsorption models and their application to the adsorption of lead by an activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2016, 109: 495–504
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.02.006
[1] Lifeng Zhang, Yifei Song, Weiping Wu, Robert Bradley, Yue Hu, Yi Liu, Shouwu Guo. Fe2Mo3O8 nanoparticles self-assembling 3D mesoporous hollow spheres toward superior lithium storage properties[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 156-163.
[2] Shilei Ding, Zelong Jiang, Jing Gu, Hongliang Zhang, Jiajia Cai, Dongdong Wang. Carbon-coated lithium titanate: effect of carbon precursor addition processes on the electrochemical performance[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 148-155.
[3] Wenming Li, Weijian Tang, Maoqin Qiu, Qiuge Zhang, Muhammad Irfan, Zeheng Yang, Weixin Zhang. Effects of gradient concentration on the microstructure and electrochemical performance of LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 cathode materials[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 988-996.
[4] Krishnaveni Kalaiappan, Subadevi Rengapillai, Sivakumar Marimuthu, Raja Murugan, Premkumar Thiru. Kombucha SCOBY-based carbon and graphene oxide wrapped sulfur/polyacrylonitrile as a high-capacity cathode in lithium-sulfur batteries[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 976-987.
[5] Chunlong Zhao, Mingming He, Hongbin Cao, Xiaohong Zheng, Wenfang Gao, Yong Sun, He Zhao, Dalong Liu, Yanling Zhang, Zhi Sun. Investigation of solution chemistry to enable efficient lithium recovery from low-concentration lithium-containing wastewater[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 639-650.
[6] Tong Zhang, Elie Paillard. Recent advances toward high voltage, EC-free electrolytes for graphite-based Li-ion battery[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 577-591.
[7] Linghui Yu, Jiansong Miao, Yi Jin, Jerry Y.S. Lin. A comparative study on polypropylene separators coated with different inorganic materials for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(3): 346-352.
[8] Chang WANG,Yanlong ZHAI,Xi WANG,Ming ZENG. Preparation and characterization of lithium λ-MnO2 ion-sieves[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2014, 8(4): 471-477.
[9] P. V. Korake, A. G. Gaikwad. Capture of carbon dioxide over porous solid adsorbents lithium silicate, lithium aluminate and magnesium aluminate at pre-combustion temperatures[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(2): 215-226.
[10] Yuzhu SUN, Xingfu SONG, Jin WANG, Yan LUO, Jianguo YU. Primary nucleation of lithium carbonate[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2009, 3(1): 73-77.
[11] Lu WANG, Changgong MENG, Wei MA. Preparation of lithium ion-sieve and utilizing in recovery of lithium from seawater[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2009, 3(1): 65-67.
[12] XU Yunlong, TAO Lili, MA Hongyan, HUANG Huaqing. LiFePO/C cathode materials synthesized by co-precipitation and microwave heating [J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2008, 2(4): 422-427.
[13] ZHANG Mei, CUI Zhenyu, ZHU Baoku, HAN Gaige, XU Youyi, ZHANG Aiqing. Preparation and properties of gel membrane containing porous PVDF-HFP matrix and cross-linked PEG for lithium ion conduction[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2008, 2(1): 89-94.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed